[03:21] <cr3> hi folks, might someone be available to rename a couple empty projects in launchpad?
[03:23] <nigelb> cr3: ideally, you can just open a question against LP
[03:23] <cr3> nigelb: will do
[03:28] <cr3> nigelb: done: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/124694
[03:29] <cr3> ^^^ if someone could have a look at this, I would very much appreciate. sleep time, cheerio!
[06:52] <XRayNuke|L-G> howdy. i'm stuck importing an external SVN repo. project: https://launchpad.net/gpt-surgeon ; ext repo: http://bat-country.us/svn/GPTools/trunk/ ; nothing happening. Is manual intervention involved or required?
[08:52] <poolie> that's kinda nice that you at least get a warning
[08:52] <poolie> is that new?
[08:54] <spm> poolie: ? in launchpad itself? if Y, no, that's been there since I started.
[08:55] <poolie> ah
[08:55] <poolie> perhaps it's just the warning is too short for me to normally notice
[08:55] <spm> :-)
[08:55] <spiv> Yes, I think that's probably the case unfortunately.
[08:58] <bilalakhtar> Launchpad is going down!
[08:59] <wgrant> The warning's not been there forever.
[08:59] <wgrant> But a couple of years or so.
[09:01] <spm> wgrant: thank you for that vote of confidence in me not being around forever; but just over 2 years. ;-)
[09:03] <wgrant> Hah.
[09:05] <vish> hmm , maybe we can name those 'maintenance' unplugging as  "Forced Typing Breaks!" ;p
[09:09] <bilalakhtar> vish: took a break?
[09:09] <bilalakhtar> Hopefully this break will get some devs to have time and endorse my app :D
[09:09] <bilalakhtar> they seem to be very busy
[09:14] <vish> gah! i cant even read bugs!..
[09:14] <vish> this is new level of maintenance? :(
[09:15] <vish> i mean higher priority..
[09:22] <lifeless> vish: we're upgrading several machines to lucid, which are key non load balanced machines
[09:24] <vish> lifeless: ah.. cool.. this is the first time i noticed lp going totally down :)
[09:24] <lifeless> we do try to avoid it.
[09:26] <bilalakhtar> vish: Take a break!
[09:38] <bilalakhtar> Hello there, hyperair !
[09:38] <bilalakhtar> hyperair: go and check on LP how good the new theme is!
[09:38]  * hyperair runs away
[09:45] <lucidfox> So, Launchpad is offline and the only way for me to get information on why and for how long is from a dreaded microblogging service
[09:45] <lucidfox> thank you very much :/
[09:46] <lifeless> lucidfox: we try to minimise these events as much as possible
[09:46] <lucidfox> Minimize?
[09:47] <lucidfox> It's not that Launchpad is offline
[09:49] <lucidfox> it's that the only information on its status is available via an identi.ca link
[09:49] <StevenK> lucidfox: And blog.launchpad.net ?
[09:50] <G> silly question maybe and kind of in light of lucidfox's comments as well, but whats the best mailing list to get advanced warning of these events?
[09:50] <lifeless> lucidfox: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/launchpad-announce/2010-September/000074.html
[09:50] <lifeless> launchpad-announce
[09:50] <lifeless> G: ^
[09:50] <G> lifeless: thanks
[09:50] <lifeless> lucidfox: http://blog.launchpad.net/notifications/launchpad-unavailable-9th-september-2010-08-00-utc
[09:50] <lucidfox> The "Launchpad is offline" page doesn't point to blog.launchpad.net or the mailing list archive, only to identi.ca
[09:50] <lifeless> lucidfox: the offline page is static, it serves for both planned and unplanned outages.
[09:50] <lifeless> this one is planned.
[09:51] <G> yeah, the maintenance page or something should encourage subscribing to the announce-list for "advanced notification of planned outages"
[09:51] <lucidfox> Still, why can't it link to these?
[09:51] <lucidfox> as it stands I didn't even know they existed
[09:51] <lifeless> we can add that in.
[09:51] <G> neither
[09:51] <lucidfox> presumably quite a few other people don't
[09:52] <lifeless> I don't know why they aren't there, so I won't promise to get it added, but I will file a bug with this discussion and see what comes of that.
[09:52] <lucidfox> thanks
[09:52] <G> lifeless: thanks, btw I noticed you are from Canterbury, hope you didn't get too shook up
[09:53] <lifeless> G: no damage to my house, family are ok. We're in rangiora, which was one of the least affected places around the fault.
[09:54] <lifeless> G: we got the all clear to drink the water again today.
[09:54] <G> lifeless: yeah saw that on the news tonight
[10:26] <gnomefreak> hey is anyone esle getting a "unable to connect to ppa.launchpad.net:http:" im getting it on all of my PPAs
[10:26] <gnomefreak> oh LP is down
[10:27] <noodles775> :)
[10:27] <gnomefreak> shouldnt that be added to topic
[10:27] <noodles775> erm, it is?
[10:28] <gmb> gnomefreak, Have you looked at the topic?
[10:28] <gnomefreak> yes i think
[10:28] <gnomefreak> gmb: its not there
[10:28] <gnomefreak> oh nevermid
[10:29] <gmb> :)
[10:29] <gnomefreak> iots way too early thanks
[10:45] <gnomefreak> it seems web pages and PPAs are bacvk up
[10:56] <bilalakhtar> MTecknology: The read-only thing won't happen?
[10:57] <bilalakhtar> MTecknology: tab-fail
[10:57] <bilalakhtar> mthaddon: LP won't be read-only?
[10:57] <wgrant> It seems to be fully upgraded already.
[10:57] <mthaddon> bilalakhtar: nope, we skipped straight to bringing everything back up
[10:57] <bilalakhtar> mthaddon: good, but the code rollout?
[10:57] <mthaddon> yep
[11:15] <noodles775> >
[11:36] <persia> Wow!  Nice work on the upgrade: much less time than was announced.
[12:18] <vish> ah.. back with new fonts too! :)
[12:19] <vish> hehe.. i caught y'all trying to test the new fonts on lp for a 5min period[not edge]  a couple of weeks ago though ;p
[12:21] <vish> any chance we could get Bug #414401 fixed any time soon?  such a PITA when we comment and later realize the person we reply to isnt subscribed to the bug :(
[12:21] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 414401 in Launchpad Bugs "Automatically subscribe users to bug mail when they post a comment (affected: 4, heat: 10)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/414401
[12:23] <G> vish: the font has changed?
[12:24] <vish> G: yeah.. only the bug descriptions and the rest on the side.. but comments are using monospace fonts..
[12:25] <vish>  it seems lp in general is using ubuntu font.. only the comments are HUGE! ;p
[12:25] <G> vish: hmmm it does look a little different yeah
[12:31] <persia> vish, I'm not convinced that bug can be "fixed" in any easy way.  What is the issue with folks commenting and not subscribing again?  Bugs aren't a good place for random conversation, but rather for detailed investigation of issues, so identities oughtn't matter, and there are bundles of folk who find subscription not to be a useful way of tracking a bug.
[12:33] <vish> persia: sure its not for conversation.. but when we ask info, they aernt subscribed .. so either i have to comment again or  hope they look at it when i subscribe them..
[12:34] <persia> Yeah, but of whom are you asking information?  Folks who are actively working on a bug are likely subscribed or otherwise following the bug.  Reporters are always subscribed.
[12:34] <persia> If random people post random issues in a bug and don't follow it, it may be better that they file a new bug.
[12:34] <vish> persia: bugzilla does this pretty well.. it usually has the mail id in the box , we can uncheck it if we dont want to subscribe
[12:35] <vish> so the unsubscribe is intentional.. and easier..
[12:35] <persia> I think the default should be the other way (as it was in LP), but more interestingly, how does one implement that with the new ajaxy implementation?  I think it's non-trivial from a human interaction perspective.
[12:35] <vish> persia: but we cant even tell them "this is not your bug, file a new one" :)
[12:36] <persia> You can leave a comment like that.  If they aren't following, it wouldn't have mattered.  If they are following (by any of several means), they may do that.
[12:36] <vish> ;)
[12:36] <persia> Better, you can use something like contact-this-user, as that sort of thing doesn't add to the bug triage, really.
[12:36] <vish> thats an extra PITA :)
[12:38] <vish> it seems people just expect to be subscribed once they comment, hence they dont see the need for an extra action.
[12:39] <persia> I guess.  I tend to comment and subscribe for unrelated reasons, and it's not frequent that I really want to do both.
[12:40] <persia> Perhaps it depends on personal workflows.
[12:45] <G> vish: persia: surely the best way is: Above the comment box, add a checkbox that says "Subscribe me for follow up e-mails regarding this bug"
[12:46] <persia> I suppose, but that means having two controls that do the same thing on the page.  Plus it's messy to use checkboxes for ajax calls.
[12:46] <G> for advanced users that can be defaulted off
[12:47] <persia> I'm not sure "advanced" is at all a good word to describe the sort of folk who want one behaviour over the other.
[12:47] <G> persia: I meant advanced users of Launchpad
[12:47] <persia> In general, I'm opposed to a set of "advanced" configuration that only some people use.  Things should do the right thing, and when they can't, there should be friendly, inviting means for users to express preferences.
[12:47] <G> developers/triagers/people that use LP daily
[12:47] <vish> persia: we could have two buttons "Comment and Subscribe"  "Post Comment Only"
[12:48] <persia> vish, I like that.  Easy enough to implement.  Not terribly confusing.  Doesn't require more pixels.  Please tell the bug :)
[12:48] <vish> \o/
[12:48] <persia> Extra points for writing a patch :)
[12:48]  * vish adds comment..
[12:50] <wgrant> vish, persia: This reminds me of the old pre-AJAX commenting UI, which had a checkbox to do that.
[12:50] <vish> wgrant: yeah , that was nice :)
[12:50] <persia> wgrant, Indeed.  The original description for the bug asks for the pre-ajax UI to be put back.
[12:51] <wgrant> Ah, i didn't actually look at the bug.
[13:21] <objorn> Hi, is this the place to start my open source career? :)
[13:21] <objorn> I want to gain some experience by contributing small work to projects
[13:21] <objorn> I'm a beginner, and I need beginner tasks. Is there a way to sort through beginner tasks on launchpad?
[13:29] <jcsackett> objorn: you could try to find a project that interests you, and then see if they have a tag like "trivial"
[13:30] <jcsackett> bugs marked with that tag should be somewhat easier to get involved with.
[13:42] <mdz> hmm: bzr: ERROR: Server sent an unexpected error: ('error', '<Fault -1: "Unexpected Zope exception: CannotHaveLinkedBranch: <Distribution \'Ubuntu\' (ubuntu)> cannot have linked branches.">')
[13:42] <mdz> launchpad, bzr or ubuntu bug?
[13:43] <mdz> (from bzr branch lp:ubuntu/apport)
[13:46] <wgrant> Launchpad.
[14:06] <deryck> mdz, this is from bzr cli, or from the bug page? Or somewhere else?
[14:09] <deryck> oh, or from just running bzr branch you meant.
[14:10] <wgrant> It's at least only broken for branches that don't exist.
[14:10] <wgrant> So it's just the error message that sucks.
[14:10] <deryck> right.  So it's a bad error.
[14:10] <deryck> right
[14:10] <deryck> the branch just doesn't exist.
[14:11] <wgrant> And the new code to automatically create them goes a bit wrong in the source package case.
[14:11] <deryck> hi wgrant, btw. :-)  How you been?
[14:11] <wgrant> deryck: Hi deryck!
[14:11] <wgrant> Uni keeping me more busy than usual, sadly.
[14:12] <deryck> I thought I had been seeing a tiny bit less of you.
[14:12] <wgrant> Heh.
[14:19] <chrisccoulson> does anyone have any idea why bug 410407 didn't autoclose with the upload i just did?
[14:19] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 410407 in flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) "Adobe Flash Player does not respond to mouse clicks [READ DESCRIPTION] (affected: 990, heat: 4341)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/410407
[14:21] <chrisccoulson> didrocks also sees the same behaviour since the rollout (eg, bug 526552)
[14:21] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 526552 in rhythmbox (Ubuntu Maverick) "Ensure rhythmbox is compliant with the sound menu specifications (affected: 26, heat: 143)" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/526552
[14:27] <bigjools> chrisccoulson: I'll investigate
[14:27] <chrisccoulson> bigjools, thanks
[14:28] <bigjools> wow, a few dupes on that first bug
[14:30] <bigjools> chrisccoulson: which package did you upload, flashplugin-nonfree?
[14:35] <bigjools> chrisccoulson: try using Launchpad-bugs-fixed (note letter casing)
[14:39] <chrisccoulson> bigjools, sorry, i just went to get some lunch
[14:39] <chrisccoulson> i uploaded nspluginwrapper
[14:40] <chrisccoulson> from looking on maverick-changes, it seems that none of the recent uploads have autoclosed bugs
[14:42] <bigjools> do you have something that auto generates the Launchpad-closes-bug header?
[14:42] <wgrant> dpkg does it.
[14:42] <wgrant> From the changelog.
[14:42] <bigjools> sigh
[14:42] <wgrant> (in Debian too, IIRC)
[14:42] <wgrant> Soyuz and its tests are buggy.
[14:42] <bigjools> yes
[14:43] <chrisccoulson> yeah, the header is there in my changes file
[14:43] <chrisccoulson> Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 410407
[16:08] <davidbarth> hi, are there some known issues with the ppa builders atm?
[16:10] <cody-somerville> davidbarth, why do you ask?
[16:17] <davidbarth> having build issues on a package since after the restart
[16:17] <davidbarth> but if i'm the only one mentioning it, it must be my recipe
[16:18] <davidbarth> i'll try a few more things; i just wanted to know if that was worth investigating, or if the service was still getting back online
[16:18] <davidbarth> thanks
[16:23] <mdz> deryck, wgrant, should I be filing a bug?
[16:24] <deryck> mdz, I would think it would be more of a question against code to get the branch created.  But I'm not sure.  rockstar, can you help?
[16:24]  * rockstar looks up
[16:25] <deryck> rockstar, mdz tried branching lp:ubuntu/apport got weird error because branch doesn't exist.
[16:25] <rockstar> mdz, launchpad-code would be good.  I'm sure we can re-target if it's not our problem.
[16:25] <deryck> rockstar, is there a bug for the error?  And should he do something to get the branch created?
[16:29] <rockstar> deryck, unfortunately, I don't know much about source package branches, so I'll have to dig in the code a bit.
[16:29] <rockstar> mdz, yes, please file a bug.
[16:29] <deryck> ah, ok.
[16:52] <mdz> rockstar, bug 634149
[16:52] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 634149 in Launchpad Bazaar Integration "CannotHaveLinkedBranch: <Distribution \'Ubuntu\' (ubuntu)> cannot have linked branches."> (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/634149
[16:52] <rockstar> mdz, thank you sir.
[17:45] <El_Rico> hi there, i'm trying to change my user name on the edit page, but i run into an "not allowed here" page
[17:45] <El_Rico> is there anything i can do about that?
[18:10] <El_Rico> jelmer: you around?
[18:10] <jelmer> El_Rico: Hi
[18:11] <El_Rico> got problems changing my launchpad name
[18:11] <El_Rico> whenever i try to i run into a "you're not allowed here" page
[18:11] <jelmer> El_Rico: Somebody else was having a similar problem earlier today, it's probably a bug in Launchpad.
[18:11] <El_Rico> ah, ok
[18:42] <penguin42> I've started getting a bunch of apport retraces for things I reported weeks ago and they're failing, with a warning that the packages were old - well that's pretty obvious given there were 3 weeks old - is there something that's just changed?
[18:43] <vish> penguin42: the retracers were blocked by a bug earlier.. which just got fixed..
[18:43] <vish> so they are catching up...
[18:44] <penguin42> ah ok that explains it, it's probably not a great idea for them to complain about the version of the packages if they were valid packages - whether that's actually why they're failing is a different matter
[19:54] <vish> why do bug mails from members who have set the email ids to "public" sent as the "from addy" for bug mail?
[19:56] <vish> there was this user who has set mail filters to : " my spam rule. Message goes to spam if sender is not in address book."
[19:56] <vish> so it turned out that mail sent from a triager went into soam.
[19:56] <vish> spam*
[19:58] <vish> this sounds like a reasonable request :  <intrader> vish, there should be a way for contributors to send message on behalf of launchpad, and then I would only have to have launchpad in address book
[20:04] <bsaibes> question about Launchpad: Does Launchpad provide a query facility, where one can define a query, save it then run it at a later time?
[20:08] <cr3> hi folks, could a losa have a look at answer #124694? I'm about to push a branch and it would probably be simpler to rename the project without anythin linked to it, as is the current case
[20:09] <lifeless> cr3: speaking of branches
[20:09] <lifeless> cr3: storm, privacy policy on hardware cert...
[20:11] <cr3> lifeless: oh right! that's been approved to be open sourced, so I'll remove the privacy and eventually attempt to merge into trunk
[20:13] <cr3> lifeless: done
[20:13] <lifeless> cr3: you'v eremoved the privacy *policy* or just the privacy on *that branch*
[20:13] <lifeless> the former is what hurts me
[20:13] <lifeless> the latter needs to be done too
[20:16] <cr3> lifeless: just on the branches, isn't the policy on the team?
[20:16] <lifeless> cr3: its on the project
[20:17] <lifeless> per-team
[20:17] <lifeless> cr3: its been the policy I've been nagging about all along
[20:18] <cr3> lifeless: I'm not sure how to do that then
[20:18] <lifeless> code.launchpad.net/storm
[20:18] <lifeless> there should be a clicky clicky there
[20:19] <lifeless> if you can't find it I'll snag a losa later and get them to do it, now that you've got the OK to not need it.
[20:20] <cr3> lifeless: I see the informational message:  New branches you create for Storm are private initially.
[20:20] <lifeless> right
[20:20] <lifeless> need to change that
[20:21] <lifeless> help.lp.net may give you the instructions you need
[20:32] <cr3> lifeless: I'm not finding a clikcly clicky nor finding documentation on help.lp.net. if I get the attention of a losa for my renaming, I'll make sure to ask about the privacy thing at the same time
[20:34] <dobey> can i get some help debugging some weird issues on LP?
[20:35] <lifeless> dobey: !ask :P
[20:36] <dobey> well, there seem to be several branches which aren't getting properly rescanned, and merge proposals for those branches, aren't getting the diff created, etc...
[20:37] <dobey> it doesn't seem like a speed/timing issue so much
[20:38] <ari-tczew> do I need to change my private key if I want use another emails adress?
[20:38] <dobey> one of them has been 'lp is rescanning your branch' for 7+ hours :(
[20:38] <dobey> ari-tczew: just add the e-mail address to your account
[20:39] <ari-tczew> dobey: I mean about using command debuild -S
[20:39] <dobey> add your e-mail to your key, using seahorse
[20:39] <dobey> and re-upload the key to the server
[20:40] <dobey> (to the key server, not launchpad)
[20:41] <dobey> lifeless: do you know anything about the code scanning, or how to figure out what broke?
[20:43] <lifeless> dobey: needs a losa
[20:43] <lifeless> losa ping
[20:46] <mbarnett> heya lifeless
[20:47] <dobey> hey mbarnett. launchpad's code scanner and diff generator seem to be having some issues on some branches. they don't seem to ever be getting completely rescanned
[20:50] <cr3> mbarnett: if you have a moment after answering dobey, please let me know when done because I'd have a question and a request for you
[20:51] <dobey> mbarnett: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rodrigo-moya/ubuntuone-client/fix-613219 for example, has been "Updating branch..." for about 8 hours now. :(
[20:55] <dobey> mbarnett: any idea how to figure out what's wrong there?
[20:56] <mbarnett> dobey: hmm, i see the branch scanner running and processing...
[20:56] <dobey> mbarnett: right. it's certainly scanned other branches that i've pushed
[20:57] <dobey> i even pulled one of these branches that isn't getting scanned, and pushed it as my own, and it still failed to scan
[20:57] <mbarnett> dobey: i don't see any errors.. is it possible that branch was pushed right before the rolllout, and somehow the diff was lost. I wonder if you pushed it again?
[20:57] <mbarnett> hmm
[20:57] <dobey> mbarnett: there are other branches from ~1hr ago, that exhibit the same issues
[20:57] <dobey> and i've pushed branches prior and since, that have been fine
[20:57] <mbarnett> dobey: so, the branch scanner is selectively updating diffs?
[20:58] <mbarnett> that sounds fun
[20:58] <dobey> i don't know wtf it's doing :)
[20:58] <dobey> aside from 'not working'
[20:58] <dobey> i wonder if maybe something is crashing, and it's not getting recorded or causing other stuff to break?
[20:59] <mbarnett> nothing obvious.
[20:59] <vish> oh! lp is acting weird..  previously if we select the our user name on the top right, it will take us to our lp page.. but now it takes us to our bug.lp page :s
[20:59] <dobey> this is very much not good :(
[21:00] <dobey> vish: it just doesn't remove context
[21:00] <dobey> vish: if you're viewing a branch, it takes you to your code page, if you're viewing a bug, bugs, etc...
[21:00] <vish> dobey: yeah.. that one is new.. only after todays's update..
[21:00] <dobey> vish: i've been seeing it for a few days now
[21:00] <vish> previously it takes to main profile page..
[21:00] <dobey> or a while even
[21:00] <vish> dobey: were you using edge? :)
[21:00] <dobey> yes
[21:01] <vish> yeah.. i'm talking about the main lp  :)
[21:01] <dobey> oh ok
[21:02] <vish> seems they might have had it in testing and now it been pushed to production :(
[21:02] <dobey> that's usually how it works, yes. :)
[21:02] <vish> yup.. but no one told me! ;p
[21:02] <dobey> use edge
[21:02] <vish> i mean about the context retaining...
[21:03] <dobey> yeah i don't like it either
[21:03] <dobey> and nobody told me about it however many weeks ago when it got to edge
[21:03] <vish> yeah , no one tells us anything! ;)
[21:03] <dobey> i just woke up one day and it had my username up there, instead of my real name
[21:03] <dobey> but anywya
[21:04] <dobey> back to my real problem :)
[21:05] <ari-tczew> dobey: gpg --send-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com my_id_key ?
[21:06] <dobey> ari-tczew: sounds right. i just use the ui in seahorse to do it
[21:06] <mbarnett> dobey: can you give me another branch that hasn't updated that was pushed after the rollout?
[21:07] <dobey> mbarnett: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~verterok/ubuntuone-client/fix-598189
[21:08] <dobey> mbarnett: and https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~nataliabidart/ubuntuone-client/fix-u1sync is in a weird halfway state. like it got some of the data, and a new revision was pushed, and it got stuck
[21:12] <mbarnett> dobey:  does the following show the proper diff for this pushed branch?  (i wonder if it is a display issue on that page, not a script issue in generating the diffs) -->http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~verterok/ubuntuone-client/fix-598189/revision/688
[21:15] <dobey> mbarnett: well, there's no diff getting attached to the merge proposal e-mails either
[21:15] <dobey> mbarnett: so i suspect it's not just a display issue
[21:16] <mbarnett> dobey: okay.  i think a bug needs to be filed then. The script is running with no errors.  I see nothing on the system that would indicate a problem.  It is possible there was a change in this latest release that is causing some branches not to be updated properly.
[21:17] <dobey> mbarnett: the bazaar.lp.net url has the right changes it seems
[21:17] <dobey> which i suppose should be expected
[21:20] <zyga-gone> hi
[21:20] <zyga-gone> I just responded to a merge proposal by email and I got a bounce from lp email system
[21:20] <zyga-gone> it said my signature could not be verified
[21:21] <zyga-gone> that is odd, I did not know that email signatures are checked (I assume the message was about PGP signatures)
[21:22] <jenkins> I have tried #ubuntu-packaging with no answer anyone any idea why i am getting this error for mavrick but my package will build in lucid http://paste.ubuntu.com/491143/
[21:23] <bcurtiswx_> jenkins, do you have the source file with the extension .orig.tar.gz ?
[21:24] <jenkins> bcurtiswx_: doing debuild -S gives http://paste.ubuntu.com/491208/ a very similar error
[21:24] <beuno> zyga-gone, they are, not sure if for regular comments, but one's with votes for sure
[21:25] <zyga-gone> beuno, it was for a merge request conversation thread
[21:25] <bcurtiswx_> jenkins, you need to have the source file .tar.gz renamed with .orig.tar.gz it's saying it can't find it
[21:25] <zyga-gone> beuno, it's odd because I keep posting to that merge request today and it's the first bounce!
[21:25] <beuno> zyga-gone, maybe you said something like +1 in it?  something that got interpreted as a vote
[21:26] <zyga-gone> hmm
[21:26] <zyga-gone> that would be fragile
[21:26] <zyga-gone> since it's not about voting here
[21:26]  * zyga-gone checks
[21:26] <bcurtiswx_> anyone, i upload to PPA after a git from source, then adding a debian directory and bzr-buildpackage with the source.changes file.. and it gets rejected with Source/binary (i.e. mixed) uploads are not allowed.  any ideas?
[21:26] <jenkins> bcurtiswx_:  i don't understnad why? launchpad also will not build it https://launchpadlibrarian.net/55298330/buildlog.txt.gz is a log
[21:26] <zyga-gone> beuno, nope
[21:26] <zyga-gone> beuno, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~zkrynicki/launch-control/stable.bundle-views/+merge/35005 last comment
[21:26] <zyga-gone> that's my full message
[21:27] <zyga-gone> I can send you the bounce if you want
[21:27] <bcurtiswx_> jenkins, where did you get your source file? and what is its file name?
[21:28] <beuno> zyga-gone, I don't see anything strage
[21:28] <beuno> strange
[21:29] <beuno> but you should talk to rockstar
[21:29] <jenkins> bcurtiswx_: I am building bzr branch lp:quickshot . What i don't understand is that for lucid it is not needed to add the orig bit in
[21:29] <zyga-gone> beuno, I'll check the email source for any oops id
[21:30] <zyga-gone> beuno, nope, there is only this text Signature couldn't be verified: (7, 8, u'Bad signature')
[21:33] <zyga-gone> rockstar, ping
[21:33] <zyga-gone> beuno, thanks for your help
[21:33] <jimlovell777> I can't get launchpad to accept a new bug, I've tried several times now. Any ideas? All I get is a screen saying Please Try Again, and that's after I've typed my whole report.
[21:34] <rockstar> zyga-gone, on the phone.  I'll ping you when I get off.
[21:34] <zyga-gone> thanks
[21:56] <lifeless> vish: please file a bug, I don't think that that change was intentional
[21:57] <vish> lifeless: which one ? the retains context one or the bug mail's "from addy" ? :)
[22:00] <lifeless> vish: both please
[22:01] <vish> lifeless: ok, sure.. filing them now :)
[22:01] <vish> thanks.
[22:02] <cr3> losa ping, can someone have a look at answer #124694? I'd really like to have something to show at the release meeting tomorrow
[22:12] <mbarnett> cr3: i am afraid that requires some sql tickling of the db, and I am in the midst of running down an issue right now.  It will certainly get done today though.
[22:13] <cr3> mbarnett: cool, looking forward to it. I'm still around for about a couple hours, so I'll cross my fingers that it gets done before I leave :)
[22:14] <mbarnett> :)
[23:00] <fta> 15h?? https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/1952454   please kill it, it's stuck
[23:01] <zyga-gone> rockstar, around?
[23:13] <jcsteele> when trying to change my nick on launchpad, i get the error "Not Allowed Here.  Sorry, you don't have permission to access this page. "
[23:14] <poolie> jcsteele: but it does show you as logged in?
[23:14] <wgrant> jcsteele: Before or after you submit the form?
[23:15] <jcsteele> it shows me logged in before and after
[23:16] <jcsteele> i am logged in (obviously) when I submit the request, then upon hitting save (and again after the warning about changing your nick) i goto the error page
[23:16] <jcsteele> still signed it afterwards though
[23:16] <wgrant> jcsteele: Can you change other fields on the form?
[23:16] <jcsteele> yes, i just submitted a real name change and it went through
[23:17] <wgrant> OK, let's see...
[23:17] <jcsteele> https://launchpad.net/~jcspsyc is the current page
[23:17] <jcsteele> trying to /s/jcspsyc/jcsteele
[23:17] <thumper> mwhudson: ping
[23:18] <mwhudson> thumper: otp
[23:21] <poolie> oh trying to change your lp username?
[23:22] <jcsteele> poolie, yes
[23:23]  * wgrant is trying it locally.
[23:31] <jcsteele> wgrant, things are a little weird now.  I changed my e-mail addy awhile ago (< 15 mins) and apparently it never took (though I did get a confirmation e-mail and confirmed it)
[23:32] <wgrant> jcsteele: Where did you change it?
[23:33] <wgrant> launchpad.net, login.launchpad.net, or login.ubuntu.com?
[23:35] <lifeless> account renaming is fubared
[23:35] <lifeless> see the bugs in registry overnight
[23:35] <jcsteele> wgrant, login.launchpad.net
[23:35] <wgrant> lifeless: Yeah, someone broke the permissions.
[23:36] <sinzui> We have a fix in landing. we are asking for a CP once it is merged
[23:36] <wgrant> jcsteele: Confusingly enough, that actually uses a separate list of email addresses to launchpad.net.
[23:37] <poolie> hello sinzui
[23:37] <poolie> hello wgrant, lifeless
[23:37] <sinzui> hi poolie
[23:37] <wgrant> Morning poolie.
[23:49] <mwhudson> thumper: no longer otp
[23:49] <thumper> mwhudson: nm, I've written my own plugin for it :)
[23:49] <thumper> mwhudson: I was going to ask about yours, but it was quicker to write one :)
[23:50] <mwhudson> thumper: most of my custom plugins are pretty trivial :)