[00:00] <duffydack> Strange no one else has had this problem.
[00:01] <duffydack> Ive not done anything special.. Just using U1 on lucid, and setup Maverick dualboot and tried to use it there, thats all.
[00:01] <joshuahoover> duffydack: right, the problem on maverick is likely due to the way we're not handling someone having no keyring password setup...i'm trying to test that now
[00:02] <duffydack> I`m in the minority there?  oh.ok
[00:03] <joshuahoover> duffydack: it's hard to say...there are those that elect to have no password (login or keyring) but, like i said before, it's generally not recommended...but it's allowed and u1 should handle it
[00:15] <kirillofic> ïðèâåò
[00:15] <kirillofic> hello
[00:15] <kirillofic> i need help
[00:16] <popey> hello kirillofic
[00:17] <kirillofic> i`m installed Ubantu
[00:17] <popey> Great!
[00:17] <popey> Having a problem?
[00:19] <kirillofic> I established system and in an installation time casually haven't set login and the password for an input
[00:20] <popey> ok, and you would like to set a password now?
[00:20] <kirillofic> And now I can't enter into system because neither it doesn't accept login nor the password - I haven't set it
[00:21] <kirillofic> yes, you right
[00:21] <popey> http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/linux/reset-your-forgotten-ubuntu-password-in-2-minutes-or-less/
[00:22] <popey> that page may help you
[00:22] <kirillofic> oh! thank you! a am from Moscow)))
[00:22] <popey> Greetings from London :)
[00:22] <duffydack> from russia with love
[00:23]  * popey hides his walther ppk
[00:23] <kirillofic> from Moscow with love)))))
[00:24] <kirillofic> London - a remarkable city
[00:26] <kirillofic> This page - not absolutely what approaches me as I don't have login - as to me to enter?
[00:29] <duanedesign> kirillofic: can you get to the GRUB screen?
[00:45] <cullan> Hi everyone. Is there a backup stored on my computer of the files that were synced with U1? I somehow have an old version of a cpp file and my git repo is missing all the commits after that point also.
[00:48] <cullan> I had the folder in ~/Ubuntu One/. I have since moved it elsewhere after discovering the data loss.
[00:51] <popey> cullan: can you see the files at http://one.ubuntu.com/files/ ?
[00:52] <cullan> I downloaded the file from there but it is also the old one. I had been working on the file on my laptop and got it ready to turn in. It appears to have been overritten with the old version from my desktop computer.
[00:52] <popey> thats unfortunate
[00:53] <popey> i dont know if there's something that can be done. I dont believe that U1 holds revisions of files
[00:54] <cullan> Damn. Well, thanks anyway
[00:55] <popey> however..
[00:55] <popey> i dont work on u1, so to get the official answer you should ask someone who does
[00:55] <popey> I'm just some guy who uses it
[00:55] <popey> I would file a bug against it
[00:55] <popey> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntuone/+filebug
[00:56] <popey> there
[00:56] <cullan> I'll keep this channel open but my main concern now has to be starting over and attempting to finish it again by midnight. Thanks again
[05:14] <kklimonda> heh, so I've tried using couchdb-glib with reduced views and all hell broke loose ;)
[11:57] <duanedesign> good morning
[11:59] <mkarnicki> morning all :)
[14:51] <snap-l> Noting that my bookmarks aren't syncing for Ubuntu One
[14:51] <snap-l> Is there something special I need to do outside of installing bindwood on the machines?
[14:55] <snap-l> Ah, n/m, I didn't see the status that it's still borked.
[14:55] <snap-l> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuOne/Status#Bookmarks
[14:55] <snap-l> Thanks!
[15:06] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, hi!  I'm puzzling over a line in ubuntuone-android-contacts.
[15:06] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: hi! how can I help?
[15:07] <CardinalFang> src/com/ubuntuone/android/contacts/funambol/activities/settings/AndroidAccountView.java
[15:07]  * mkarnicki looks it up
[15:07] <CardinalFang> saveCredential, about line 257 or so.
[15:07] <mkarnicki> got it
[15:07] <mkarnicki> ok
[15:08] <mkarnicki> public void saveCredential(SaveSettingsCallback callback) {
[15:08] <CardinalFang> if(hasChanges() || !validCredential) { ...
[15:08] <mkarnicki> ok, gimme sec
[15:08] <CardinalFang> "!validCredential"?  What is that checking?
[15:09] <CardinalFang> Maybe I'm just reading it wrong.
[15:10] <mkarnicki> that flag is set to false if checkFailes, let me look at that
[15:10] <mkarnicki> *checkCredential fails
[15:11] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: hmm.. be aware that we use a custom settings screen, with no user/pass fields, just a single button
[15:11] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: and it's possible that some methods do not apply to us (that is, affect the UI)
[15:11] <mkarnicki> gimme 1", I'm on it
[15:12]  * mkarnicki resets his password and checks behaviour
[15:14] <mkarnicki> ah, got it
[15:14] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, Yes, I see.  The configuration code hates that, which is what I'm aiming to fix right now.
[15:14] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: if hasChanges() is true (which is true, when user/pass fields where editted [we don't use them])
[15:14] <mkarnicki> or the checkCredentials has failed, and validCredentials is then == false
[15:15] <mkarnicki> it tries to save (possibly new) credentials from the form and check them again
[15:15] <mkarnicki> iirc, after 2nd try funambol reports as invalid credentials
[15:16] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, okay.  Thank you.
[15:16] <mkarnicki> I don't really get that second, empty run() { } thread body.. funambol likes to "think big"
[15:16] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: you are welcome. I don't feel I helped enough. What can I do else?
[15:16] <CardinalFang> Yeah, if the user answered "no" to the question in arg 0, then don't do anything.  Meh!
[15:16]  * mkarnicki jumps into the code again
[15:17] <mkarnicki> oh o_O heh..
[15:18] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, I'm just learning about the code, in trying to see how the pieces fit together.  There's a bug I'm trying to fix that is leading me around it.
[15:18] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: is it a problem with invalid token? was it reported on lp ?
[15:21] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: oh crap, for the first time in U1-contacts I saw a toast "Generic error" after "Setting up your account" dialog
[15:22] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: Funambol client is pretty huge, when I tried to grasp that codebase helping out sil, it indeed proved to be a challenge
[15:22] <mkarnicki> oh crap, 'Generic error' -- I can't re-authenticate. I assume that's the bug?
[15:23] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, er, nope, not the one I'm after.  :(
[15:23] <mkarnicki> o-oh
[15:23] <mkarnicki> I'll reinstall and try that steps again. CardinalFang -- which bug are you after, if I may ask?
[15:32] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-android-contacts/+bug/629544
[15:32] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 629544 in ubuntuone-android-contacts "saving configs requires nonOAuth username/password (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Critical,Confirmed]
[15:32] <mkarnicki> oh :/
[15:32] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, may be related to  https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-android-contacts/+bug/633536
[15:32] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 633536 in ubuntuone-android-contacts "If app data cleared, no U1 auth triggered. Instead, "Please enter username..." (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Low,Confirmed]
[15:33]  * mkarnicki has a look
[15:33] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, if you wish to work on one, take the latter, #633536 .
[15:36] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: app behaves badly if Phone pass reset during operation in the webUI. I'll have to look at that later, too.
[15:37] <mkarnicki> aquarius: where do we save the oauth token in u1-contacts?
[15:39]  * mkarnicki doesn't remember that detail
[15:40] <aquarius> mkarnicki, we don't save the oauth token
[15:41] <aquarius> we get a special mobile username/password and save that in AccountManager
[15:41] <mkarnicki> oh.. we save the credentials? oh right!
[15:41] <mkarnicki> so yes, I can take care of bug 633536
[15:41] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 633536 in ubuntuone-android-contacts "If app data cleared, no U1 auth triggered. Instead, "Please enter username..." (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/633536
[15:42] <mkarnicki> aquarius: looks like I really wanted to forget the funambol nightmare hahahhah
[15:42] <mkarnicki> it's been so recently, and I forgot about the AccountManager used by u1-contacts meh
[15:44]  * mkarnicki just installed maverick on his pendrive
[15:52] <aquarius> nice!
[15:52]  * mkarnicki installs u1-contacts on emulator
[16:15] <kklimonda> oh, joys of wrapping couchdb in C.. /me goes for a walk..
[16:20] <mkarnicki> aquarius: I noticed that initial sync (just after oauth login) isn't reflected in the GUI (no spinner, no animation on the textured bar, Sync all button still sensitive). Have you seen such bug reported?
[16:21] <mkarnicki> tapping Sync all pops 'Sync operation is in progress' though Contacts bar says 'Not synchronized' with no animation (and no spinner in the title bar)
[16:21] <aquarius> mkarnicki, I haven't
[16:21] <aquarius> doesn't seem to happen to me
[16:21] <mkarnicki> I see
[16:21] <mkarnicki> aquarius: so after initial login, you see it animate stuff and do initial-sync?
[16:27] <aquarius> no. It doesn't sync until I tell it to
[16:33] <mkarnicki> aquarius: each time i OAuth, and click the OK button ("Setting up your account"), and then click "Sync all" I always get the 'Sync operation in progress' toast, and no animations. that seems to be a new bug then..
[16:35] <aquarius> weird!
[16:35] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: I'm sorry, but I can't replicate bug 633536 - neither on HTC Hero, neither on the emulator
[16:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 633536 in ubuntuone-android-contacts "If app data cleared, no U1 auth triggered. Instead, "Please enter username..." (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/633536
[16:36] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, Huh!
[16:36] <mkarnicki> aquarius: indeed.. it looks like it starts the sync right away. it'd be nice to have someone with 2.1 test that
[16:36] <mkarnicki> aquarius: should I file a bug report?
[16:36] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: my Hero is 2.1, the emulator is 2.2 (good guess aquarius ? the default emulator from the readme)
[16:52] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: pardon me, the emulator is 2.0. so I couldn't replicate that under 2.0 and 2.1
[16:52] <mkarnicki> CardinalFang: perhaps it's the case on 2.2
[16:52] <CardinalFang> Hrm.
[17:25] <CardinalFang> mkarnicki, I lost my battle with Eclipse, so now I will compare 2.0 and 2.2 very soon.
[18:02] <andyrogers> hi all, would someone be able to possibly help me with a minor issue iam having with ubuntuone latest version's since my upgrade to maverick...
[18:03] <andyrogers> basically everytime i log into ubuntu i need to issue the command u1sdtool -c for my computer to connect to the U1 servers for it to start sync any of my files
[18:04] <popey> honk!
[18:05] <andyrogers> honk
[18:05] <rye_> andyrogers, popey, hi
[18:05] <popey> :)
[18:05] <andyrogers> hi rye, popey
[18:05] <rye_> andyrogers, the issue in question is bug #631822
[18:06] <popey> andyrogers: rye_ is an expert here
[18:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 631822 in ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "[maverick] ubuntuone-launch is not compatible with SSO tokens (affects: 3) (dups: 1) (heat: 20)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/631822
[18:06] <rye_> Chipaca, when is the next planned release for ubuntuone-client with the fix for ^ ?
[18:07] <Chipaca> rye_: tuesday
[18:08] <andyrogers> thanks rye_ i looked about a week ago and could not find anything similar.  I had been having this issue for approx 3-4 weeks since my upgrade but been waiting on the nighligities to see if had improved the situation
[18:08] <Chipaca> rye_: you might be able to goad dobey to build a package before that if you need it :)
[18:08] <Chipaca> ah! should be in the nightlies already
[18:08]  * Chipaca checks
[18:09] <andyrogers> it is is i have already upgraded to the latest version about 1 hour and still experience the same issues
[18:09] <Chipaca> andyrogers: that on login you aren't connected?
[18:09] <andyrogers> ive got no prolems with the SSO client any more, and getting sync erros since the server side of things were fixed earlier this week
[18:10] <andyrogers> yup, basically when I log into ubuntu ubuntuone does it local rescan etc and then just sits with this message in the log : State: 'READY'  (queues IDLE  connection 'Not User With Network')>; queues: metadata: 0; content: 0; hash: 0, fsm-cache: hit=9274 miss=26038) ----
[18:11] <andyrogers> until I issue u1sdtool -c to force a server connection
[18:11] <Chipaca> andyrogers: do you have Ubuntu One enabled in startup applications?
[18:11] <andyrogers> it did use to do this all automatically before I upgraded
[18:11] <Chipaca> andyrogers: grep ready /usr/bin/ubuntuone-launch
[18:12] <Chipaca> ^ if that doesn't find stuff, it isn't in the nightlies yet
[18:12] <Chipaca> andyrogers: we had some issues with launchpad yesterday so maybe that merge got delayed
[18:13] <andyrogers> rout of message:
[18:13] <andyrogers>  * otherwise if syncdaemon is not already running it is started, and
[18:13] <andyrogers> def wait_for_ready(_, sync_daemon_tool):
[18:13] <andyrogers>                 d.addCallback(wait_for_ready, sync_daemon_tool)
[18:13] <andyrogers>             # SD is already running
[18:13] <andyrogers> rout=output
[18:16] <Chipaca> andyrogers: ok, so it should be working
[18:16] <Chipaca> andyrogers: is Ubuntu One enabled in startup applications?
[18:17] <Chipaca> andyrogers: if so, then what *should* happen is that, *30 seconds after you log in*, syncdaemon is started and connected after local rescan is done
[18:17] <Chipaca> andyrogers: there's a separate issue where syncdaemon is started early, so it should just connect at the 30 seconds mark
[18:17] <Chipaca> andyrogers: the 30 seconds is controlled by the .desktop file in startup apps
[18:17] <Chipaca> /etc/xdg/autostart/ubuntuone-launch.desktop
[18:18] <Chipaca> andyrogers: or ~/.config/autostart/ubuntuone-launch.desktop  if you've twiddled with it
[18:18] <andyrogers> chipaca: contents of my file:
[18:18] <andyrogers> [Desktop Entry]
[18:18] <andyrogers> Name=Ubuntu One
[18:18] <andyrogers> Exec=/bin/sh -c '[ -d "$HOME/Ubuntu One" ] && ubuntuone-launch'
[18:18] <andyrogers> Type=Application
[18:18] <andyrogers> X-GNOME-Autostart-Delay=30
[18:18] <andyrogers> Icon=ubuntuone
[18:18] <andyrogers> Comment= 
[18:18] <andyrogers> X-Ubuntu-Gettext-Domain=ubuntuone-client
[18:19] <andyrogers> chipaca: would you say I should increase this Delay then possibly?
[18:19] <andyrogers> chipaca: no file at ~/.config/autostart/ubuntuone-launch.desktop
[18:19] <Chipaca> andyrogers: I don't think that would help, no
[18:20] <Chipaca> andyrogers: unless your local rescan is taking really long
[18:20] <Chipaca> andyrogers: but that's not your case as per your description
[18:20] <Chipaca> andyrogers: so maybe you're just impatient? :)
[18:20] <andyrogers> i do have approx 8000 files
[18:20] <Chipaca> when you check syncdaemon and it is "READY", how long has passed since startup?
[18:21] <andyrogers> chipaca: i have left it between 5-10 mins, and also 60 mins and the same message just keeps appearing in my logs every 2 mins
[18:23] <andyrogers> it looks like 4 mins from the creation of the syncdaemon file to the actual "READY" message
[18:23] <rye_> andyrogers, could you please run find ~/.local/share/ubuntuone/syncdaemon/fsm -type d -empty  - just to find out how many unnecessary folders are there
[18:23] <rye_> andyrogers, wait
[18:23] <Chipaca> andyrogers: you want to try commenting out the X-GNOME-Autostart-Delay and seeing how that helps?
[18:23] <rye_> andyrogers,  find ~/.local/share/ubuntuone/syncdaemon/fsm -type d -empty | wc -l
[18:23] <Chipaca> andyrogers: either that, or change it to 240 or more :-/
[18:24] <Chipaca> andyrogers: this should be fixed when nautilus stops starting syncdaemon itself; then we'd just do the right thing
[18:24] <Chipaca> andyrogers: (will be fixed on trunk tue or wed next week, packages after that)
[18:25] <andyrogers> 460 reply I got from the find command
[18:25] <rye_> andyrogers, ok, thanks
[18:25] <andyrogers> so should I comment out that line, or be patient for a few more days?
[18:26] <Chipaca> andyrogers: your call :)
[18:26] <rye_> hm, i tested ubuntuone-launch and it appeared to be quite working... /me needs moar files.
[18:26] <Chipaca> rye_: you've got the fixed nautilus, don't you?
[18:26] <Chipaca> rye_: the one with rodrigo's fix that almost but not quite worked? :)
[18:27] <rye_> Chipaca, well, yes, i tried using that and it does not look like it triggered syncdaemon on startup
[18:27] <Chipaca> rye_: right. So that's why your launcher works :)
[18:28] <andyrogers> right ill comment out that line, reboot & see what happens and report back in a few mins
[18:28] <Chipaca> andyrogers: you rock
[18:28] <andyrogers> cheers chipaca
[18:28] <andyrogers> brb
[18:33] <andyrogers> chipaca: bad news, that alteration did not work
[18:33] <Chipaca> bummer
[18:34] <rye_> andyrogers, wait, could you please run ubuntuone-launch now in the terminal ?
[18:34] <Chipaca> rye_: once syncdaemon is in READY you mean?
[18:34] <Chipaca> that's a few minutes more i figure :)
[18:34] <rye_> Chipaca, well, it should not be in READY for launch to work, right?
[18:34] <rye_> i am wondering whether it times-out somewhere where i failed to test
[18:36] <andyrogers> this is the message where I spotted it had not connected:2010-09-10 18:34:14,291 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.Main - NOTE - ---- MARK (state: <State: 'READY'  (queues IDLE  connection 'Not User With Network')>;
[18:36] <andyrogers> queues: metadata: 0; content: 0; hash: 0, fsm-cache: hit=9274 miss=26038) ----
[18:36] <andyrogers> i ran ubuntuone-launch and it connected ok then
[18:37] <Chipaca> rye_: local rescan pretty much blocks dbus messages from getting in
[18:38] <Chipaca> rye_: that is the core issue here
[18:38] <Chipaca> rye_: we work around that
[18:38] <rye_> Chipaca, local rescan does not have dbus server at all
[18:39] <rye_> Chipaca, it is initialized later on after local rescan is finished
[18:39] <Chipaca> rye_: haw haw, ok, hadn't realized that
[18:40] <Chipaca> rye_: so, we work around that :)
[18:40] <Chipaca> andyrogers: so, it should just work if you change the delay to something ridiculously huge
[18:40] <Chipaca> andyrogers: but we're working on not starting syncdaemon at all except via launch, so then that goes away too
[18:41] <Chipaca> andyrogers: I mean, that bug goes away, and launch at 30s works
[18:41] <andyrogers> thats good news then :) , will it make it into maverick final?
[18:42] <rye_> hm, my client stucks at SET_CAPABILITIES
[18:43] <andyrogers> chipaca, im just going to do another reboot and see how it goes.  will an increase time of 360 be ok?
[18:43] <Chipaca> andyrogers: yes, that'll be in final
[18:44] <Chipaca> andyrogers: depends on how long your syncdaemon takes to get to ready
[18:44] <Chipaca> andyrogers: 6 minutes is a long time, but some poor souls have to wait 45 :(
[18:50] <andyrogers> chipaca: right ive rebooted & its just done the same again, but it did not seem to delay the start either
[18:50] <Chipaca> andyrogers: you set it to 360?
[18:50] <Chipaca> andyrogers: and you've already been booted for 6 minutes?
[18:50] <andyrogers> no, its been less then this
[18:51] <andyrogers> so should it auto connect after 6 mins?
[18:51] <andyrogers> i thought it would delay the local rescan
[18:52] <andyrogers> im still learning the inns & outs of Ubuntuone still
[18:52] <andyrogers> chpiaca: but good news it that is has connected now
[18:52] <Chipaca> andyrogers: this would delay the connect
[18:52] <Chipaca> andyrogers: without the *other* bug, that nautilus starts syncdaemon, then it would start, do the local rescan, and connect, all starting after that delay
[18:53] <andyrogers> chipaca: so will this nautilus bug be fixed in the next few days then?
[18:54] <Chipaca> andyrogers: yes
[18:54] <andyrogers> chipaca: is there a bug report number you can point me to?
[18:54] <Chipaca> andyrogers: probably, give me a sec
[18:54] <andyrogers> chipaca: will i need to change this calue back once the bug has been fixed, or can I forget about it now
[18:54] <Chipaca> andyrogers: you'll probably want to change it back
[18:54] <andyrogers> calue=value
[18:54] <rye_> the merge proposal is here - https://code.launchpad.net/~rodrigo-moya/ubuntuone-client/fix-613219/+merge/34967
[19:00] <andyrogers> chipaca: thankyou very much for your help
[19:00] <Chipaca> andyrogers: thank you for using ubuntu one! :)
[19:06] <dobey> hey look
[19:06] <dobey> a diff!
[19:31] <roland> hello alll
[19:31] <roland> I have 2 UbuntuOne account, how can I remove one of them?!
[21:38] <Andre_Gondim> is it possible running ubuntu one in ubuntu server withou interface? like dropbox?
[21:52] <nessita> Andre_Gondim: yes, you can use the CLI tool names u1sdtool
[21:53] <nessita> Andre_Gondim: though the first time you'll need credentials.... I think you can get those by CLI as well, but rye is the guru on this
[21:54] <Andre_Gondim> nessita, may I get the credentials from other pc? cause in this I have one, but in the server I don't
[22:01] <rye> Andre_Gondim, i accomplished that by patching the source of ubuntuone-client so that it reads oauth tokens from the config file and does not have runtime dependency on gnome-keyring
[22:02] <verterok> rye: I think there is no more a dep on gnome-keyring, but I might be wrong...nessita would know
[22:06] <rye> nessita, i see that in syncdaemon/dbus_interface.py there is self.oauth_credentials but don't see the setter for that
[22:08] <rye> nessita, please ignore me i cannot read
[22:09] <rye> Andre_Gondim, i believe I will come up with a blog post describing ubuntuone usage on the server during this weekend
[22:09] <duffydack> how is https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634465 coming on,.
[22:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 634465 in ubuntu-sso-client (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Required argument 'password' (pos 2) not found (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Medium,Triaged]
[22:09] <Andre_Gondim> nice, I will waiting for this
[22:10] <rye> duffydack, question - are you able to reproduce this? I've switched many locales, changed vms but could not have reproduced that
[22:12] <duffydack> I`ll try it in a vm I guess.
[22:22] <duffydack> so.. I just tried something.
[22:22] <duffydack> in seahorse I made a new keyring called login
[22:22] <nessita> duffydack: the branch has just landed trunk
[22:22] <duffydack> gave it a password (not sure if no pass would work) and it works
[22:22] <nessita> duffydack: do you wanna try from the source?
[22:23] <rye> nessita, ah, so bug #634465 is due to keyring?
[22:23] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 634465 in ubuntu-sso-client (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Required argument 'password' (pos 2) not found (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/634465
[22:24] <nessita> rye: not really, is due to ussoc not passing all the params to gnomekerying.create_sync
[22:24] <duffydack> it was discussed that I had no 'login' keyring
[22:24] <duffydack> So I made one
[22:25] <duffydack> its doing sync now....
[22:25] <duffydack> there is a key called ubuntu one in there now
[22:26] <duffydack> Wether its down to me not using a password when first being asked by seahorse for it not making the key, I dunno.
[22:44] <rye> btw, why hasn't Ubuntu One entry in startup applications got any description?
[23:10] <duffydack> installing maverick beta to a vm, with autologin.
[23:13] <Andre_Gondim> where are the ubuntu one client icon in maverick?
[23:16] <duffydack> /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps
[23:17] <duffydack> or do you mean,  System>Prefs>
[23:20] <Andre_Gondim> since last update, I don't have ubuntu client in system>prefs..
[23:21] <duffydack> well to launch it, ubuntuone-preferences
[23:22] <duffydack> rye, or anyone else.. are you there
[23:23] <duffydack> the size of my added computers list since I got U1 working in maverick has grown, a LOT
[23:37] <duffydack> Right, fully updated clean install of maverick.. here goes.
[23:38] <duffydack> seahorse asked for my password for keyring (I didnt set one, so its auto set to login pass obviously) so I unlocked it and it works