[00:32] Riddell, ScottK, ping [00:32] plasma-mobile worked fine with the backported patches [00:32] http://paste.ubuntu.com/491882/ [00:37] ScottK: are you doing libbluedevil ? [02:56] ftbfs fixed [03:04] http://kde-look.org/poll/index.php :) === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening [05:59] any reason amarok-dbg symbols do not seem to exist for 2.3.1.90? [06:08] hmmm, I see them [06:09] in Synaptic, right this minute [06:10] !amarok-dbg [06:10] Sorry, I don't know anything about amarok-dbg [06:10] hmmm [06:35] amarok-dbg is wrong version [06:36] 2.3.1 not 2.3.1.90 is missing [06:49] rgreening: I see 2.3.1.90 [06:49] hmm.. strange [06:50] apt-cache policy amarok-dbg [06:50] amarok-dbg: [06:50] Installed: (none) [06:50] Candidate: 2:2.3.1-1ubuntu7 [06:50] Version table: [06:50] 2:2.3.1-1ubuntu7 0 [06:50] 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Packages [06:52] http://imagebin.ca/view/SA5LnFH.html [06:52] try synaptic [06:52] um.. same db? [06:52] dunno [06:53] I have the best luck with synaptic [06:53] synaptic uses same db [06:53] easy searching [06:53] etc. [06:53] well, a picture is worth 1000 words [06:54] nevermind. figured it out, [06:54] my bad [06:59] what was it? [07:00] didn't have the repo enabled. lol [07:00] I was kidding about synaptic [07:00] people should use the tools they like [09:09] \o/ [09:10] hello guys ... how is it going [09:11] well, looking at our ToDo I guess it is not bad [09:11] Can I be of any help... I am getting bored.... I have nothing to do [09:12] well, I think it is too late for some thing from our todo [09:12] will 10.10 have choqok 1.0 beta 3? [09:12] they were postponed for 10.10+1 [09:13] mfraz74: don't think so but I think it will land in Kubuntu PPA [09:13] Quintasan: ok [09:23] lex79: I am not (yet). I was hoping someone else would, but can if I need to. [11:43] ScottK: libbluedevil https://launchpad.net/~alessandro-ghersi/+archive/ppa/+packages [11:44] not tested, I don't have a laptop [11:44] and I can't upload it, it's not in the set of the packages for kubuntu-dev [12:06] apachelogger: oh does it now? its still a WIP ... [12:37] any idea how i delete a branch from my gitorious clone? [12:38] git branch -d ? [12:39] yofel: thats only for my local branch IIRC [12:39] how do i delete it from gitorious [12:39] good question.. [12:40] #git ? [12:40] sure [12:46] yofel: git push remote :branch [12:48] ah [12:51] is there a place where i can get a choqok that works with twitter? [12:51] and that's kinda trustworthy [12:51] shadeslayer: ^ [12:52] Nightrose: maverick? [12:52] or lucid? [12:52] shadeslayer: nope lucid [12:52] ok lemme check if the versioning is right in my lucid package [12:52] thx [12:53] Nightrose: ppa:rohangarg/kde-extra [12:53] from https://edge.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/kde-extra?field.series_filter=lucid [12:53] shadeslayer: any other nasty stuff in there? ;-) [12:54] well.. theres rekonq 0.4.90 [12:54] don't use that so no prob [12:54] and kraft [12:54] neither but actualy i can just download the package and install [12:55] Nightrose: and i hope your using kde 4.5.1 .. because apparently there also kdenetwork :P [12:55] oh download qoauth as well [12:55] hmm i don't on this one yet [12:55] ah downloading is the best option then [12:55] had too many problems on the netbook so waiting on the desktop to upgrade [12:55] ok [12:55] thx [12:56] no problemo [12:56] im waiting for mtux to workaround some stuff then ill ask for a SRU to lucid [12:56] cool [12:57] Nightrose: I have a choqok package for lucid in my ppa [12:57] hmmmmmmm [12:58] which is better now? :D [12:58] also qoauth 1.0.1 wich is needed for the new choqok version [12:58] :) [12:58] fight! [12:58] :P [12:58] ah qoauth 1.0.1 is better any day :P [12:58] neversfelde wins :D [12:58] haha [12:58] ok [12:58] yes, mtux told me, that it is necessary for it [12:58] neversfelde: can we have that in maverick ? [12:58] qoauth [12:59] shadeslayer: we should, but I guess it will not be easy to get it in [12:59] neversfelde: isnt it a bug fix release ? [13:00] if its just a bug fix, shouldnt be a problem [13:00] shadeslayer: not sure [13:01] it's not, it needs ffe [13:01] http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php/QOAuth?content=107420 [13:01] Nightrose: https://edge.launchpad.net/~neversfelde/+archive/experimental [13:02] * new API [13:02] neversfelde: jep thx - got it already - installing [13:02] nothing else in this ppa, so should be no problem to use it atm [13:02] lex79: :( [13:02] great [13:02] lex79: i say put it in backport ppa [13:03] shadeslayer: write a ffe for it if we need for choqok [13:03] lex79: um.. choqok is already up for a FFe, are you talking about qoauth ? [13:03] choqok 0.9.90 builds fine with 1.0.0 [13:03] yes, qoauth [13:04] do we need qoauth 1.0.1 for choqok or something else? [13:04] nope, choqok 0.9.90 builds fine with qoauth 1.0.0 [13:05] * lex79 is confused [13:06] lex79: mtux recommended qoauth 1.0.1, he didnt say it was necessary [13:06] ah ok [13:06] but since qoauth has only one rdepend (choqok) we should try to have it in maverick [13:07] shadeslayer: he told me that it is necessary [13:07] lex79: feel free to FFe, im coding this weekend ;) [13:07] neversfelde: really? but 0.9.90 has no such build dep [13:07] more like, CMake doesnt say a thing [13:07] maybe it needs on runtime [13:08] it works with 1.0 as well... [13:08] mtux is the developer of choqok? [13:09] yes [13:09] well if upstream says it's necessary, means it's necessary [13:10] lex79: neversfelde http://imgur.com/tw5Lf.png [13:11] shadeslayer: neversfelde: do i have to set up the accounts again? cause it's still not working atm [13:11] Nightrose: aye [13:11] :( [13:11] damn [13:11] ok [13:11] theres a new Auth mechanism [13:11] yes i know [13:11] i was hoping there is some migration... [13:11] nope :( [13:11] Nightrose: I do not use twitter, but I had to setup identi.ca after the upgrade [13:11] talk again with upstream please to ensure we are fine wit the old version of qoauth [13:11] identi.ca seem to be working fine [13:12] neversfelde: likewise for twitter [13:12] Nightrose: yeah, identi.ca supports both mechanisms for now [13:12] k [13:12] btw dont count on choqok working forever [13:12] * Nightrose goes and sets up 8 accounts again [13:12] *grumble* [13:13] because choqok includes the consumer key, and twitter is blocking all clients which include the user key [13:13] s/user/consumer [13:13] \o/ [13:13] i know :P [13:14] shadeslayer: btw, some people told me that qoauth probably has a missing dependency [13:14] libqca2-plugin-ossl [13:14] crissi: rebuilding kdevplatform, tell me if your issue stil exsists [13:14] orly? [13:14] neversfelde: its a sync from debian [13:15] shadeslayer: yes, I know [13:15] i dont think debian messes stuff up :{ [13:15] s/:{/:( [13:15] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595712 [13:15] Debian bug 595712 in libqoauth1 "libqoauth1: Missing dependency on libqca2-plugin-ossl see http://github.com/ayoy/qoauth/" [Important,Open] [13:15] oic [13:16] i shall fix0r that in a moment [13:16] I have no internet access this week, so I cannot have a look at it [13:16] we should move the choqok and qoauth package over to beta backports, if it is working [13:32] [muon] gmartres * 1174169 * trunk/extragear/sysadmin/muon/ (5 files in 3 dirs) Regression fixes: - PackageWidget: set correct stretch factor - UpdaterWidget: initially mark packages for dist-upgrade - Updater/ReviewWidget: hide the DetailsWidget when a package state changes [14:01] apachelogger: around much? [14:02] Riddell, ScottK, ping [14:04] lex79: can you upload qoauth with my fix? [14:06] yes [14:07] one sec.. [14:07] :O [14:07] will take a few mins [14:08] ok [14:12] lex79: http://paste.ubuntu.com/492138/ << debdiff [14:12] it builds locally in pbuilder here [14:13] it's more simple if you upload it in a ppa, then I can grab and upload [14:14] lex79: sure i can upload to my ppa [14:14] thanks [14:22] lex79: https://edge.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/experimental/+files/qoauth_1.0-2ubuntu4.dsc [14:22] from https://edge.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/experimental/+packages [14:22] ( note, ignore the ~ppa1 package if you see it ) [14:23] ok [14:27] uploaded [14:29] thanks :D [14:29] ill bbiab [14:32] rbelem: I have your kdelibs patch compiled, still got testing to do [14:34] Riddell: can you retry this? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/1.14.1-0ubuntu7/+build/1951875 [14:34] it's weird, built fine here [14:35] rbelem: ooh it works [14:35] rbelem: I'll get it uploaded later [14:36] lex79: that mystified me, I e-mailed pitti about it but he's on holiday [14:36] I'll retry but I doubt it'll make a difference [14:37] ok [14:52] Riddell, cool :) [14:53] Riddell, will you upload qtwebkit and kdelibs patches? [14:54] Riddell, can we update plasma-mobile to latest revision? === mgraesslin_ is now known as mgraesslin_lapto [15:43] brb [16:04] [muon] gmartres * 1174225 * trunk/extragear/sysadmin/muon/libmuon/DownloadWidget.cpp DownloadWidget regression fix: scroll to the bottom of the view when a new item is added to the model [16:30] * shadeslayer cant ssh with his old ssh key :( [16:31] then use the new one :p [16:32] great, OOo Impress crashes while opening anything === yofel_ is now known as yofel [16:42] lex79: The docs for libbluedevil don't have to be stripped. They are fine, just a misunderstanding by the maintainer. [16:43] ScottK: ah, so "+dfsg" in the version should be removed? [16:44] Riddell: apport built ;) [16:57] bluedevil crashing receiving a file [16:57] :( [16:59] is there a CLI version of the USB creator? [17:03] daskreech: man dd [17:04] bulldog98: That's what I thought as well === emma_ is now known as emma === kubotu_ is now known as kubotu [18:01] smarter_: mind if I bug you with a few more regressions? :P [18:01] hey! [18:01] do tell :p [18:01] I'm surprised it's not crashing and burning more [18:01] now regular muon is suffering the same bug as the updater used to. Marking packages crashes [18:02] oh right, that's the one thing I didn't test :p [18:02] :P [18:02] I think it's re-adding the packages each time a package changes [18:02] (unmarking after clicking on the upgrade button works) [18:03] but yeah! less code duplication :p [18:03] now we share bugs! :p [18:03] hehe [18:04] The other thing I noticed is that the DetailsWidget seems to be taking up a lot more space than it used to: http://imgur.com/gwVNp [18:04] maybe due to kvbox -> qvboxlayout? [18:04] not that there was a choice, if we wanted to dynamically be able to insert the searchbar [18:05] have you svn up-ed recently? [18:05] that should be fixed [18:05] I added setStretchFactor(0, 4); [18:05] yep [18:06] what arguments does that function take? [18:06] index of the widget in the splitter, stretch factor [18:07] I see, I didn't notice it because it only happens when the size of the window is quiet small, and I'm on 1920x1200 [18:08] maybe the index is different in the updater vs the manager, since we have the searchbar in the manager? [18:08] no, the searchbar is part of the first widget in the splitter [18:08] mm, nope. -updater has the same behavior [18:09] ah, right [18:09] see setHeaderWidget [18:10] I guess we need a sizeHint [18:10] but it looks fine with a big resolution :p [18:11] :p [18:12] (without the stretch factor each widget took half the window size) [18:21] JontheEchidna: even with the appropriate SizePolicy, the detailswidget still takes a lot of space and grows faster than the view [18:24] JontheEchidna: oh wait, I was setting the horizontal policy instead of the vertical one ^^' [18:25] :P [18:34] smarter_: btw, as a heads-up I'll probably do another bugfix release for libqapt/muon tomorrow [18:35] okay, what's in it? [18:37] * JontheEchidna is waiting on websvn [18:37] oh, I did notice that during concurrent downloads, only one of the two packages gets progress updates. The second one only gets a progress update when a new package is added to the downloadmodel [18:37] (unrelated to bugfix release) [18:38] JontheEchidna: look like we didn't remove the break in the for loop :p [18:39] smarter_: for libqapt, we have a FindAptPkg.cmake file, your NotFound error for qapt-batch, my fix to make qaptworker not crash on malformed sources.list, and your button focus fix [18:40] oh that reminds me, the notfounderror thing has a dialog which says "Therefore, it cannot be installed." but the error can happens too(though that's unlikely) when removing a package [18:41] for muon we have a fix for the standalone purge button showing up when there is already a purge action in the remove submenu, and your fix for a few more non-readonly listview items [18:41] okay, great [18:44] [libqapt] gmartres * 1174256 * trunk/extragear/sysadmin/libqapt/src/worker/workeracquire.cpp Enable parallel downloads monitoring, wheeee [18:44] JontheEchidna: how did you get apt to perform parallel downloads by the way? [18:44] smarter_: oh, it does that automagically [18:44] but it doesn't seem to do it with me :p [18:44] even when fiddling with apt conf [18:46] it usually happens when downloading new chromium + a bunch of other smaller packages [18:48] I downloaded all the fps I could find and still nothing :p [18:48] (though I've got fps now, but no video card to play them :p) [18:52] JontheEchidna: do you know any other app which uses a {K,Q}TabWidget in a way similar to us? [18:52] * smarter_ is getting frustrated with QSizePolicy :p [18:52] hmm.... [18:52] perhaps shaman? [18:53] haha, they've got the same problem [18:53] smarter_: it does parallel downloads when downloading from different repos ... afaik [18:54] so if you have a PPA and the standard repo's it does parallel downloads [18:54] ah, that might explain it [18:54] I get chromium from the daily ppa [18:55] JontheEchidna: IIRC thats how it works [18:55] also does it for universe and main.. but only for small packages [19:09] JontheEchidna: I've seen the light [19:09] I know what to do with the detailsWidget-make-stuff-crash thing [19:10] the backend signal packageChanged needs an enum argument that specifies what changed exactly [19:10] so detailswidget now if it should clear() or just update its content [19:41] JontheEchidna: around ? [19:41] yep [19:41] [libqapt] jmthomas * 1174270 * trunk/extragear/sysadmin/libqapt/ (6 files in 3 dirs) (log message trimmed) [19:41] - Use DBus to invoke the Apt Xapian Index updater - Introduce a [19:41] xapianUpdateProgress signal to report on the percent progress of the updater The [19:42] hello, yofel send me to you, can you take a look at this bug ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/409039 [19:42] Launchpad bug 409039 in linux (Ubuntu) "laptop overheats and suddenly shuts down/off" [High,In progress] [19:43] nice bot failure o.O [19:44] * JontheEchidna was wtf'ing :P [19:44] jussi: ^ [19:45] well... irt to the report I don't really know what to say. I'm not an ubiquity expert, and I don't use mountmanager too terribly much, but just enough to know that it probably should be able to rename mount points [19:47] JontheEchidna: hmm, there is too kind of changes reported by packageChanged really: when a package state actually being changed (marked for install/removal/...) and when the backend caches is reloaded [19:48] I think it's worth handling them with separate signals [19:48] and packageChanged could specify what package is changed and how [19:49] I don't think reloadCache() does any signal emission... [19:49] packageChange is emitted on individual package actions, as well as in the case of an upgrade being marked [19:50] JontheEchidna: thanks, i refer to reporter to retry with mountmanager [19:50] yes, the upgrade thing is different [19:50] and that's what makes handling detailswidget painful [19:51] a separate signal for that could be wise [19:51] *would [19:51] * JontheEchidna is about to do neat things in the statusbar with the new xapianUpdateProgress signal [19:51] cool [19:53] okay, and what about packageChanged giving a pointer to the QApt::Package and a MarkedType enum? [19:53] with InstallMarked, RemoveMarked, UnMarked, ... [19:54] It'd be impossible to track dependencies being marked for install, etc [19:54] since we don't do the actual marking [19:54] which means that reporting what changes would become way less useful [19:55] I see [19:56] I did have packagechanged emitting a package pointer at one point, but since it couldn't report all packages that changed it was only useful for knowing that some package changed state, so I removed the package pointer from the signal [19:57] but that means that even if we don't break the API we need to introduce a behaviour change since we _don't_ want the packageChanged() signal to be emitted when an upgrade is marked [19:58] I think at this point that would be OK since we're the upstream for all users of libqapt. [19:59] users in the "use libqapt" sense [19:59] okay :) [19:59] would that require a change in the shaman backend? [19:59] hmm [20:00] I don't think it's far enough along [20:00] it's upgrade button doesn't work yet, iirc [20:02] ok [20:03] I'll look into it tomorrow, but feel free to implement the changes before that if you're bored :p [20:04] k [20:04] 'night [20:04] 'night [20:05] (also, there's a packageChanged() in Backend::restoreCacheState) === jjesse-netbook_ is now known as ghost === ghost is now known as Guest8621 === Guest8621 is now known as jjesse-netbook [20:31] lex79: Yes and we should build and ship the docs in the -dev package (this will take doxygen and some magic in debian/rules. [20:34] I have to search an example before :) [20:42] ScottK: i agree on bug 635973 [20:42] Launchpad bug 635973 in rekonq (Ubuntu) "Ctrl +W doesn't close last tab" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/635973 [20:45] hrmm just updated netbook on maverick and choqok is crashing every time status is updated [20:45] known problem? [20:45] ScottK: ^ new upload of choqok? [20:46] seems to be the old one [20:46] * shadeslayer hopes it isnt qoauth 1.0.1 [20:47] * lex79 said talk with upstream if we need qoauth 1.0.1 on runtime [20:48] lex79: i sent him a dent, lets see what he says [20:48] great [20:48] :) [20:48] jjesse-netbook: shadeslayer has a proposed package for an choqok update. Can you test it? [20:49] lex79: if you can catch him at #choqok do ask as well [20:49] jjesse-netbook: https://edge.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/kde-extra << [20:49] I'm busy with other packages [20:49] oh ok [20:51] oh got a reply ..not from mtux tho [20:51] shadeslayer: ping [20:51] apparle_: pong.. [20:52] shadeslayer: I am getting this while building the qipmsg package by debuild -d "make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf', needed by `Makefile'. Stop." === apparle_ is now known as apparle [20:53] apparle: -d Do not run dpkg-checkbuilddeps to check build dependencies. << go figure [20:53] shadeslayer: what? [20:53] apparle: you did not install all build deps [20:53] shadeslayer: ahh... -S... by mistake I typed -d here [20:53] since your running with debuild -d [20:53] aye [20:54] shadeslayer: how do I install build-deps here... it doesn't have any source package here [20:54] erm whut? [20:54] shadeslayer: I mean I get that from apt-get source qipmsg [20:54] sudo apt-get install foo [20:55] shadeslayer: but what are the required build-deps where do I get that [20:55] apparle: from control file [20:55] shadeslayer: ahh... so dumb of me [20:55] LOL [20:56] shadeslayer: I already have al the build deps [20:57] apparle: run debuild then [20:59] do i just add that ppa to test choqok? [20:59] shadeslayer: http://paste.ubuntu.com/492331/ see make errors [20:59] sorry was talking to wife and son [20:59] jjesse-netbook: yes [21:00] apparle: ohhhh [21:00] apparle: see that command produces a foo.source [21:00] +file, you can upload that to a PPA [21:01] make that foo.source.changes [21:01] clear [21:01] typed here by mistake... was for konsole [21:01] :D [21:01] THEN launchpad builds that source package [21:02] also.. if you want local debs, use debuild without any parameters passed [21:02] cd qipmsg-1.0/;debuild [21:03] shadeslayer: but do I just ignore that make error? [21:03] yes [21:03] its not exactly a make error per se [21:04] shadeslayer: a cleaning error, but still, is it ok [21:04] were not telling debuild to actually build the package [21:04] yes, dh_clean takes care of that IIRC [21:04] shadeslayer: and the debian file only has version set as 0.9.6, so where do I change that [21:04] apparle: debian file? [21:04] shadeslayer: changelog [21:04] apparle: also fix : W: qipmsg source: diff-contains-editor-backup-file src/.serve_socket.cpp.swp [21:05] shadeslayer: I am sleepy right now [21:05] me too [21:05] apparle: lets do this tmmrw then [21:05] shadeslayer: no problem [21:05] shadeslayer: tomorrow... good night [21:06] night [21:07] ScottK: we will have to cherry pick a patch to fix a bug in choqok, which was fixed in svn, seems choqok displayed "to" as a clickable link [21:08] ( in the 0.9.90 release ) [21:08] will talk to mtux tommorrow about this [22:45] * Riddell oggles at http://kubuntuguide.org [22:52] rbelem: yes you can update plasma-mobile if you want [22:59] Riddell, cool! :-) [22:59] Riddell, so i will backport that patch too [23:00] rbelem: which patch? [23:01] Riddell, that revision that i pointed in the mail [23:01] ah the second kdelibs patch [23:03] Riddell, did you apply the patches? [23:04] s/apply/upload/ [23:04] rbelem: I uploaded qtwebkit with declarative package, kde4libs with kubuntu_71_backport_plasma_webview_changes.diff and plasma-mobile without kubuntu_02_no_qml_webkit.diff [23:05] Riddell, cool! :-) [23:07] Riddell, tomorrow i will work to finish the ksambashare and kdenetwork filesharing patches [23:07] rbelem: but we also want a newer plasma-mobile and kde revision 1157180 ? [23:07] http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/?rev=1157180&view=rev | svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/trunk -r 1157180 | support load by plugin from AbstractToolBox what stinks is the both support direct creation -and- plugin loading, but has to be BC could be the cas... [23:08] Riddell, yup [23:11] going to bed [23:11] night [23:11] g'night [23:17] rbelem: can you get the debdiff for kdelibs and the updated plasma-mobile package? [23:32] rbelem: if you do you'll need to get someone else to upload it, I'm away for the next three days [23:35] Riddell: While you're here, I'd appreciate it if you could conisder debfx's comments in Bug 634755 [23:35] Launchpad bug 634755 in qtwebkit-source (Ubuntu) "QtWebKit package is not installing the QML plugin" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/634755 [23:36] (if something needs uploading, let me know and I can do it later) [23:38] shadeslayer: using the choqok in the ppa w/ no crashes or problems, works great [23:40] Riddell, i'll do it tomorrow [23:41] ScottK, tomorrow I will send the debdiffs to you [23:41] OK. [23:42] :-) [23:45] * rbelem leaving... [23:46] bye