chrisccoulson[reed] - ok, i'm testing a much smaller patch using MOZ_APP_LAUNCHER, but unfortunately, make has decided it's going to rebuild the whole tree :(00:11
chrisccoulsonso it might take a little while for me to tell you how well it works ;)00:11
[reed]chrisccoulson: oke00:40
=== TannerF is now known as Pilif12p
jdstrandfta: I just uploaded 0.6+svn20100904r58574+58998-0ubuntu0.2~ucd1 to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa/+packages with your patch, to see what would happen02:26
jdstrandfta: it hasn't shown up yet, but should soon02:26
* jdstrand wanders off02:26
jdstrandfta: actually, there it is -> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa/+build/195481202:27
=== Pilif12p is now known as NeverForget
eramy faith in mozilla has been restored.03:45
erauntil i read that, i was almost positive that 4.0 would treat linux like a second-class citizen.03:47
erathis also made me happy: http://brasstacks.mozilla.com/resultserv/data/results/bc854382-c9cd-409e-b083-14a53a13f22d03:48
ftajdstrand, hi, if you have time, could you please test build this on arm: https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa/+files/chromium-codecs-ffmpeg_0.6%2Bsvn20100904r58574%2B58998-0ubuntu1~ucd2.dsc   (thanks)13:06
jdstrandfta: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa/+build/195529914:10
ftajdstrand, i will prepare the chromium minor update asap, which path should i follow? bug + lucid-proposed?14:37
ftagrrr, lp keeps saying "Start in 1 minute", even after 30min14:38
jdstrandnot sure why that is14:39
jdstrandit has a high build score...14:39
jdstrandfta: I think we should build it in ubuntu-security-proposed like we have been, and I'll copy it to -proposed and we can update the bug accordingly14:40
jdstrandfta: with luck, we can get it and the chromium-browser update to users before the 7 days14:40
ftajdstrand, it has no security fixes but it's fine for me.14:40
jdstrandfta: yes, but I think the chromium update is being held up on this14:41
jdstrandeven it it wasn't, a regression introduced by -security should be fixed in -security14:42
ftajdstrand, i'm talking about ch 6.0.472.55~r58392 (you have 6.0.472.53~r57914 still waiting)14:42
jdstrandhttps://launchpad.net/builders/ shows what armel is busy with14:43
jdstranda few of those shouldn't take too much longer (hopefully)14:43
ftai see there are 2 armel ppa builders, so maybe there's hope14:45
ftawell, all the packages currently building on arm takes hours, and the q is ~18h :(14:51
ftai wonder how it's possible for a package to be in LOUISVILLE, KY, US at 5:15am, and in PARIS, FR at 7:07am the same day..15:15
jdstrandfta: we're building natively so we have 7 builders. It started a few minutes ago15:25
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
ftajdstrand, the arm build is fine. i'll release the new ch and those codecs at the same time later today, then push to maverick and hand over the lucid-security debs to you17:58
ftajdstrand, also, would be nice to test those builds on arm, not something i can do :(17:59
=== NeverForget is now known as Pilif12p
jdstrandfta: sounds good, though I don't have arm hardware myself :(19:10
ftajdstrand, bug 63594919:46
ubot2fta: Bug 635949 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/635949 is private19:46
ftaeh?? no it's not19:46
ftabug 63594919:47
ubot2Launchpad bug 635949 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "6.0.472.53~r57914 -> 6.0.472.55~r58392 upgrade (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/63594919:47
=== Pilif12p is now known as GoHawks
ftajdstrand, all done. http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/6.0.472.55~r58392-0ubuntu0.10.04.1/20:43
jdstrandfta: I think I misunderstood what you were doing. I thought we were just getting the codecs into proposed to fix arm22:11
jdstrandfta: i can get the codecs into -proposed and then we can get the previous chromium out the door, and then SRU the chromium you just gave me22:12
jdstrandfta: that will hopefully get the security fixes out on monday without people having to wait longer for the security fixes22:12
jdstrandthat was a weird sentence...22:13
jdstrandbut you get the idea22:13
fta<jdstrand> but you get the idea22:20
fta<fta> jdstrand, the codecs are worth uploading both for ch .53 and .5522:20
fta* Disconnected ().22:20
ftadid i miss anything?22:20
ftajdstrand, ^^, which part don't you like/want?22:20
jdstrand16:11 < jdstrand> fta: I think I misunderstood what you were doing. I thought  we were just getting the codecs into proposed to fix arm22:20
jdstrand16:12 < jdstrand> fta: i can get the codecs into -proposed and then we can get  the previous chromium out the door, and then SRU the chromium  you just gave me22:20
jdstrand16:12 < jdstrand> fta: that will hopefully get the security fixes out on monday  without people having to wait longer for the security fixes22:20
jdstrand16:13 < jdstrand> that was a weird sentence...22:21
ftagot that22:21
jdstrandfta: it isn't that I don't like it-- I just know the SRU process isn't going to like .55 without a wait22:21
jdstrandfta: so I want codecs in -proposed now with .53. we release asap (ie monday), then get .55 into -proposed22:21
jdstrandsince .53 is tested and the only thing holding it back is codecs22:22
ftajdstrand, well, nothing i can do for that, right? ;)   my job is to provide the bits in a timely manner, if the process makes than unwanted, too bad22:22
jdstrandfta: you don't need to do anything. I've uploaded codecs to security-proposed and will get them over to -proposed when they build22:23
jdstrandfta: thanks for your work on it. I'll get chromium-browser building after, so I can get it into -proposed quickly22:23
jdstrand(after we publish .53 that is)22:23
jdstrandfta: thanks for your work on this :)22:23
ftajdstrand, sure, thanks for your work too22:24
jdstrandsure, np22:24
ftai've also updated all the ppas to have them all in sync and built with PIE: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/chromium-daily.html22:25
jdstrandfta: nice! that is fantastic :)22:26
jdstrandkees: ^22:26
fta~50 commits in a dozen branches :P22:27
ftawith merges in all directions, should be fun to graph that ;)22:28
=== GoHawks is now known as HawksWin

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!