[00:11] <chrisccoulson> [reed] - ok, i'm testing a much smaller patch using MOZ_APP_LAUNCHER, but unfortunately, make has decided it's going to rebuild the whole tree :(
[00:11] <chrisccoulson> so it might take a little while for me to tell you how well it works ;)
[00:40] <[reed]> chrisccoulson: oke
[02:26] <jdstrand> fta: I just uploaded 0.6+svn20100904r58574+58998-0ubuntu0.2~ucd1 to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa/+packages with your patch, to see what would happen
[02:26] <jdstrand> fta: it hasn't shown up yet, but should soon
[02:26]  * jdstrand wanders off
[02:27] <jdstrand> fta: actually, there it is -> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa/+build/1954812
[03:45] <era> my faith in mozilla has been restored.
[03:47] <era> http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/09/hardware-acceleration/
[03:47] <era> until i read that, i was almost positive that 4.0 would treat linux like a second-class citizen.
[03:48] <era> this also made me happy: http://brasstacks.mozilla.com/resultserv/data/results/bc854382-c9cd-409e-b083-14a53a13f22d
[13:06] <fta> jdstrand, hi, if you have time, could you please test build this on arm: https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa/+files/chromium-codecs-ffmpeg_0.6%2Bsvn20100904r58574%2B58998-0ubuntu1~ucd2.dsc   (thanks)
[14:10] <jdstrand> fta: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa/+build/1955299
[14:37] <fta> jdstrand, i will prepare the chromium minor update asap, which path should i follow? bug + lucid-proposed?
[14:38] <fta> grrr, lp keeps saying "Start in 1 minute", even after 30min
[14:38] <jdstrand> yes
[14:39] <jdstrand> not sure why that is
[14:39] <jdstrand> it has a high build score...
[14:40] <jdstrand> fta: I think we should build it in ubuntu-security-proposed like we have been, and I'll copy it to -proposed and we can update the bug accordingly
[14:40] <jdstrand> fta: with luck, we can get it and the chromium-browser update to users before the 7 days
[14:40] <fta> jdstrand, it has no security fixes but it's fine for me.
[14:41] <jdstrand> fta: yes, but I think the chromium update is being held up on this
[14:42] <jdstrand> even it it wasn't, a regression introduced by -security should be fixed in -security
[14:42] <fta> jdstrand, i'm talking about ch 6.0.472.55~r58392 (you have 6.0.472.53~r57914 still waiting)
[14:42] <fta> ok
[14:43] <jdstrand> https://launchpad.net/builders/ shows what armel is busy with
[14:43] <jdstrand> a few of those shouldn't take too much longer (hopefully)
[14:45] <fta> i see there are 2 armel ppa builders, so maybe there's hope
[14:51] <fta> well, all the packages currently building on arm takes hours, and the q is ~18h :(
[14:51] <fta> -s
[15:15] <fta> i wonder how it's possible for a package to be in LOUISVILLE, KY, US at 5:15am, and in PARIS, FR at 7:07am the same day..
[15:25] <jdstrand> fta: we're building natively so we have 7 builders. It started a few minutes ago
[17:58] <fta> jdstrand, the arm build is fine. i'll release the new ch and those codecs at the same time later today, then push to maverick and hand over the lucid-security debs to you
[17:59] <fta> jdstrand, also, would be nice to test those builds on arm, not something i can do :(
[19:10] <jdstrand> fta: sounds good, though I don't have arm hardware myself :(
[19:46] <fta> jdstrand, bug 635949
[19:46] <ubot2> fta: Bug 635949 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/635949 is private
[19:46] <fta> eh?? no it's not
[19:47] <fta> bug 635949
[19:47] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 635949 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "6.0.472.53~r57914 -> 6.0.472.55~r58392 upgrade (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/635949
[20:43] <fta> jdstrand, all done. http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/6.0.472.55~r58392-0ubuntu0.10.04.1/
[22:11] <jdstrand> fta: I think I misunderstood what you were doing. I thought we were just getting the codecs into proposed to fix arm
[22:12] <jdstrand> fta: i can get the codecs into -proposed and then we can get the previous chromium out the door, and then SRU the chromium you just gave me
[22:12] <jdstrand> fta: that will hopefully get the security fixes out on monday without people having to wait longer for the security fixes
[22:13] <jdstrand> that was a weird sentence...
[22:13] <jdstrand> but you get the idea
 but you get the idea
 jdstrand, the codecs are worth uploading both for ch .53 and .55
[22:20] <fta> * Disconnected ().
[22:20] <fta> did i miss anything?
[22:20] <fta> jdstrand, ^^, which part don't you like/want?
[22:20] <jdstrand> 16:11 < jdstrand> fta: I think I misunderstood what you were doing. I thought  we were just getting the codecs into proposed to fix arm
[22:20] <jdstrand> 16:12 < jdstrand> fta: i can get the codecs into -proposed and then we can get  the previous chromium out the door, and then SRU the chromium  you just gave me
[22:20] <jdstrand> 16:12 < jdstrand> fta: that will hopefully get the security fixes out on monday  without people having to wait longer for the security fixes
[22:21] <jdstrand> 16:13 < jdstrand> that was a weird sentence...
[22:21] <fta> got that
[22:21] <jdstrand> fta: it isn't that I don't like it-- I just know the SRU process isn't going to like .55 without a wait
[22:21] <jdstrand> fta: so I want codecs in -proposed now with .53. we release asap (ie monday), then get .55 into -proposed
[22:22] <jdstrand> since .53 is tested and the only thing holding it back is codecs
[22:22] <fta> jdstrand, well, nothing i can do for that, right? ;)   my job is to provide the bits in a timely manner, if the process makes than unwanted, too bad
[22:22] <fta> -than+that
[22:23] <jdstrand> fta: you don't need to do anything. I've uploaded codecs to security-proposed and will get them over to -proposed when they build
[22:23] <fta> ok
[22:23] <jdstrand> fta: thanks for your work on it. I'll get chromium-browser building after, so I can get it into -proposed quickly
[22:23] <jdstrand> (after we publish .53 that is)
[22:23] <jdstrand> fta: thanks for your work on this :)
[22:24] <fta> jdstrand, sure, thanks for your work too
[22:24] <jdstrand> sure, np
[22:25] <fta> i've also updated all the ppas to have them all in sync and built with PIE: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/chromium-daily.html
[22:26] <jdstrand> fta: nice! that is fantastic :)
[22:26] <jdstrand> kees: ^
[22:27] <fta> ~50 commits in a dozen branches :P
[22:28] <jdstrand> wow
[22:28] <fta> with merges in all directions, should be fun to graph that ;)
[22:28] <jdstrand> heh