/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/09/13/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

chrisccoulsonmicahg - oh, that makes sense00:05
chrisccoulsondebian has a different name for the flash alternative00:05
micahgchrisccoulson: k, I'll look at the packaging later00:06
chrisccoulsonthanks00:06
micahgchrisccoulson: quality is decent though00:06
chrisccoulsonexcellent00:06
micahgand you can have it full screen and work on the second one without it leaving full screen00:07
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
BUGabundogrrrrrr00:38
BUGabundoI can repetidly crash gmail00:38
BUGabundowhile replying to an email with bullets00:38
BUGabundoand nothing shows in GDB :((((00:38
ftaBUGabundo, -g --temp-profile --single-process01:01
ftaand if you have the ubuntu fonts, that's know. there's already a bug about that01:02
BUGabundoyeah it crashes (snap) also on temp profile01:02
BUGabundono idea on the fonts01:03
BUGabundoI have what ever MM gives me on that departement01:03
ftaok, i'm done writing the readme of my new project :)01:05
ftaFlappy01:05
BUGabundobe afraid. be very afraid01:06
BUGabundonite dear01:06
ftaasac, hey, fyi, i had to disable neon in the arm builds of the ffmpeg codecs as no one offered any help08:22
asacfta: yeah08:30
asacfta: when did we enable that?08:30
asacin ubuntu we cant enable neon without ensuring that it falls back to non-neon08:31
asacif neon is not on board08:31
ftaasac, never, but upstream has it by default now08:31
ftait doesn't seem to be a problem to build chromium but ffmpeg 0.6 ftbfs08:31
asacfta: building works because the builders have coincidentilaly NEON co processort08:34
asacfta: i thought we disabled it explicitly thouh08:34
asacfta: do you have a bug for the ftbfs?08:34
ftaasac, no, and no one complained. maybe no one is using ch on arm08:34
asacfta: the amount of users of folks with boards that dont have neon is close to zero :)08:35
asacbeagle etc. have neon08:35
ftabug 628924 has the details08:35
ubot2Launchpad bug 628924 in libvpx (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 11 other projects) "chromium update: 5.0.375.127 -> 6.0.472.53 (affects: 4) (dups: 1) (heat: 278)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/62892408:35
ftaasac, let me know if you want me to fix that08:44
asacfta: ok seems its not a toolchain regression09:02
asacbut rather upstream neon code bustage09:02
asacnothing we can really do there. just keep it disabled for ffmpeg for now09:03
asacthanks!!09:03
ftaasac, well, if i understand neon correctly, it's pretty bad to not use it for decoding media stuff if your hw supports it09:04
asacfta: ack09:04
asacthats true09:04
asacfta: we will get a guy who could fix it soon09:05
asacbut we dont have him yet ;)09:05
ftaasac, ok, thanks09:05
asacfta: do you know if this is a  general ffmpeg upstrema issue?09:08
ftaasac, it comes from the upstream tree so maybe siretart knows something about it, i don't09:09
micahggood morning chrisccoulson10:39
chrisccoulsonhi micahg10:39
chrisccoulsonhmmmm, thunderbird 3.0.8 and 3.1.4 already10:42
micahgchrisccoulson: yep, they're quick :)10:42
micahgchrisccoulson: I think we should push 3.1.4 to security PPA10:43
chrisccoulsonbut that's not for mozilla bug 594699?10:43
ubot2Mozilla bug 594699 in DOM: Core & HTML "startup crash [@ nsWindowWatcher::OpenWindowJSInternal(nsIDOMWindow*, char const*, char const*, char const*, int, nsIArray*, int, nsIDOMWindow**)] at safe to run script check" [Blocker,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59469910:43
chrisccoulsonso there might be another respin anyway10:43
chrisccoulsonyeah, security PPA makes sense10:43
micahgchrisccoulson: yeah, for all 5 products10:44
micahgchrisccoulson: so, Debian is apparantly using flash-mozilla.so for the alternative, where we have 6 all something-flashplugin10:53
micahggnash ^^10:53
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, that's what i mentioned last night10:54
chrisccoulsonthat's not something we can change this close to release though :)10:54
micahgchrisccoulson: yeah, I can change the alternative though so it's installable, I'll look at what flashplugin-installer does10:55
chrisccoulsonthanks10:55
micahgchrisccoulson: where's the lightning FFe bug?10:55
chrisccoulsonmicahg - bug 53186710:55
ubot2Launchpad bug 531867 in iceowl (Debian) (and 1 other project) "[FFe] [needs-packaging] Lightning 1.0 Beta for Thunderbird 3 (affects: 93) (dups: 5) (heat: 351)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53186710:55
chrisccoulsonhmmm, somebody added a debian task10:56
micahgah10:56
micahgchrisccoulson: are you trying for 3 or 3.1?10:56
chrisccoulsonmicahg - 3.110:57
micahgchrisccoulson: k10:57
micahgchrisccoulson: are we reusing the source?10:58
micahg*package10:58
chrisccoulsonmicahg - the packaging is basically a re-write (although it's significantly simpler to what we had before)10:59
chrisccoulsoni'll push it somewhere in a minute10:59
micahgchrisccoulson: k, I just was wondering about the na,me10:59
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i kept the same name for now11:00
micahgchrisccoulson: k11:00
* micahg should've just uploaded empty packages to lucid then rather than remove :(11:01
chrisccoulsonmicahg - it also uses the thunderbird SDK, which means it builds in about 2 minutes :)11:01
micahgchrisccoulson: that rocks :)11:02
micahgchrisccoulson: I'll work on the gnash update on my ride in to $WORK later today11:03
micahgmediatomb can wait another day or 211:04
chrisccoulsonmicahg - cool, thanks11:04
* micahg might try another UDD merge11:05
chrisccoulsonhuh, "/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.9/xulrunner-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libsqlite3.so.0: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32"11:06
chrisccoulsonon bug 63680611:06
ubot2Launchpad bug 636806 in xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu) "package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.9 build1 nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680611:06
chrisccoulsonpeople really do like breaking their systems11:07
micahgheh11:07
chrisccoulsonlightning is taking ages to upload on my connection :/11:16
chrisccoulsonthe source is currently the whole of comm-1.9.2, just like thunderbird, which isn't too good11:16
chrisccoulsoni'm not sure whether we can clean out the bits we don't need before we pack the tarballs11:16
micahgchrisccoulson: well, did you remove the mozilla-1.9.2 part of the checkout?11:21
chrisccoulsonmicahg - not yet. i suppose i could do that now it's using thunderbird to build11:21
micahgthen it'll take 2 minutes to upload too :)11:23
chrisccoulsonmicahg - oh, it seems like the lightning build still needs some parts of the embedded mozilla-1.9.2 tree12:06
chrisccoulsonlike the text preprocessor12:07
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i put the lightning packaging on http://people.canonical.com/~chrisccoulson/12:18
chrisccoulsonhi mdeslaur, can i have a USN for thunderbird 3.0.8 please :)13:07
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: sure, hold on13:07
chrisccoulsonthanks13:07
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: 986-113:08
chrisccoulsonmdeslaur, thanks13:08
mdeslaurnp13:08
ftaasac, kees, jdstrand_ : new stable chromium ftbfs on armel/karmic.. most probably related to the hardening thing: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/55522699/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-armel.chromium-browser_6.0.472.55~r58392-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz13:56
ftait's a minor upgrade (.53 -> .55), and the pie hardening was (almost) the only packaging change13:57
jdstrand_fta: re webm v flash> webm-- I didn't have flash installed14:07
ftajdstrand_, ok, good14:08
ftajdstrand_, once again, nothing i can do to solve the above issue, except blindly disabling the hardening on arm and pray for the best14:32
jdstrand_fta: can you wait for kees' input?14:33
ftajdstrand_, sure14:33
keesfta: hmmm. it looks like they're calling ld directly instead of using CXX; that can sometimes confuse things.15:56
ftamaybe, they often switch between ld and ld gold15:58
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
ftakees, ^^, this comes from gyp. the magic is somewhere in there: http://code.google.com/p/gyp/source/browse/trunk/pylib/gyp/generator/make.py16:08
ftakees, rebuilding in verbose mode would probably be helpful (VERBOSE=1 in my d/rules) but i don't have access to any arm builder16:10
gnomefreakif i import contacts.csv will it over write the addresses i have already?17:49
gnomefreak^^^ for tb17:50
keesfta: did only armel ftbfs for 6.0.472.55 ?18:47
ftakees, yes: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/6.0.472.55~r58392-0ubuntu118:48
keesfta: I will poke at it. arm-specific failure seems really odd in this case.18:49
keesfta: since it takes 14 hours to build, let's do this for now:19:03
kees # Don't build on armel because it's broken and we're already past beta19:03
kees ifeq (,$(filter armel,$(DEB_BUILD_ARCH)))19:03
keesetc19:03
ftakees, yep, that was my plan if no one comes up with a solution19:04
keesi.e. we're already past beta, and it's going to take a while for me to track this down. but since it works fine on i386/amd64, let's leave those as-is.19:04
keesokay, cool19:04
ftait also means i have to make yet another update in both maverick and lucid...19:06
ftaworth checking with upstream if they have another stable release in the pipe19:06
keesfta: yeah, that was my concern -- this is creating a giant turn-around time due to the ARM compile times, so for now let's just ditch it on arm, and I'll continue trying to hunt it down. (I've started a build on an armel machine I have access to.)19:11
ftakees, do it with VERBOSE=1 so it's easier for you to debug19:12
keesoh yeah, good point19:13
* kees restarts19:14
fta(remember it's huge)19:20
chrisccoulson[reed] - you there?20:40
chrisccoulsonmicahg - have you seen http://blog.mozilla.com/mwu/2010/09/10/extensions-now-installed-packed/ ?20:59
micahgchrisccoulson: yes, I saw that, should speed up load time21:00
chrisccoulsoni should start making a list of all the things we need to consider for next cycle21:00
micahgchrisccoulson: yeah, add them to the blueprint21:00
chrisccoulsonwe'll need to fix mozilla-devscripts for that one21:00
chrisccoulsonyeah, i'll start adding a list later21:00
micahgchrisccoulson: k21:01
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_Expendables
kancermanhow do I re-enable flash when it tells me 3rd party storage is disabled ??21:37
ftajdstrand, you got your ack for the ch 5->6 update22:14
jdstrandfta: yep. I already copied it :)22:14
jdstrandfta: I pestered people a bit for the ack ;)22:14
ftajcastro, hi, could you do something about http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=51243 ? (last few comments)22:14
jdstrandwell, more just ot look at the bug, not to convince them of the need to ack22:14
ftajdstrand, good, thanks22:15
fta*sigh* no time to work on my new project today :(22:15
jdstrand:(22:16
ftai wonder if my project description makes sense: http://paste.ubuntu.com/492972/22:19
jcastrofta: ohhai, I was just looking for you22:20
jcastrofta: did someone ever get you an answer wrt. daily build resources?22:20
jcastrofta: ok so agl needs the font?22:21
ftajcastro, nope, no one. build resources come and go, i suffer with the crowd22:21
ftajcastro, yep, lots of people got this crash, all had the ubuntu font installed. but i don't have them, neither has upstream22:22
jcastrooh, you don't either? ok one sec22:22
jcastrodo you know if agl has an lp account offhand?22:23
jcastrohttps://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-typeface-interest22:23
jcastroyou this team please22:23
ftajcastro, there's also a problem with ARM builds, i can't test build or debug anything, so i discover issues/regressions only when it's too late22:23
ftajdstrand, not sure if agl has one, evan sure does. let me check22:24
ftaoops22:24
ftajcastro, ^^22:24
jcastrook22:24
jcastroI'll add evan on the list too just in case22:25
jcastrolet me just find him in #chromium22:25
fta(just asked him)22:26
ftajdstrand, remember .55 ftbfs on arm. i will disable it (*) in the next upgrade (either ubuntu2, or if there's a new version shortly). (*) unless kees is able to find a fix22:49
ftait = PIE22:49
=== BUGa_Expendables is now known as BUGabundo

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!