[00:05] micahg - oh, that makes sense [00:05] debian has a different name for the flash alternative [00:06] chrisccoulson: k, I'll look at the packaging later [00:06] thanks [00:06] chrisccoulson: quality is decent though [00:06] excellent [00:07] and you can have it full screen and work on the second one without it leaving full screen === yofel_ is now known as yofel [00:38] grrrrrr [00:38] I can repetidly crash gmail [00:38] while replying to an email with bullets [00:38] and nothing shows in GDB :(((( [01:01] BUGabundo, -g --temp-profile --single-process [01:02] and if you have the ubuntu fonts, that's know. there's already a bug about that [01:02] yeah it crashes (snap) also on temp profile [01:03] no idea on the fonts [01:03] I have what ever MM gives me on that departement [01:05] ok, i'm done writing the readme of my new project :) [01:05] Flappy [01:06] be afraid. be very afraid [01:06] nite dear [08:22] asac, hey, fyi, i had to disable neon in the arm builds of the ffmpeg codecs as no one offered any help [08:30] fta: yeah [08:30] fta: when did we enable that? [08:31] in ubuntu we cant enable neon without ensuring that it falls back to non-neon [08:31] if neon is not on board [08:31] asac, never, but upstream has it by default now [08:31] it doesn't seem to be a problem to build chromium but ffmpeg 0.6 ftbfs [08:34] fta: building works because the builders have coincidentilaly NEON co processort [08:34] fta: i thought we disabled it explicitly thouh [08:34] fta: do you have a bug for the ftbfs? [08:34] asac, no, and no one complained. maybe no one is using ch on arm [08:35] fta: the amount of users of folks with boards that dont have neon is close to zero :) [08:35] beagle etc. have neon [08:35] bug 628924 has the details [08:35] Launchpad bug 628924 in libvpx (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 11 other projects) "chromium update: 5.0.375.127 -> 6.0.472.53 (affects: 4) (dups: 1) (heat: 278)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/628924 [08:44] asac, let me know if you want me to fix that [09:02] fta: ok seems its not a toolchain regression [09:02] but rather upstream neon code bustage [09:03] nothing we can really do there. just keep it disabled for ffmpeg for now [09:03] thanks!! [09:04] asac, well, if i understand neon correctly, it's pretty bad to not use it for decoding media stuff if your hw supports it [09:04] fta: ack [09:04] thats true [09:05] fta: we will get a guy who could fix it soon [09:05] but we dont have him yet ;) [09:05] asac, ok, thanks [09:08] fta: do you know if this is a general ffmpeg upstrema issue? [09:09] asac, it comes from the upstream tree so maybe siretart knows something about it, i don't [10:39] good morning chrisccoulson [10:39] hi micahg [10:42] hmmmm, thunderbird 3.0.8 and 3.1.4 already [10:42] chrisccoulson: yep, they're quick :) [10:43] chrisccoulson: I think we should push 3.1.4 to security PPA [10:43] but that's not for mozilla bug 594699? [10:43] Mozilla bug 594699 in DOM: Core & HTML "startup crash [@ nsWindowWatcher::OpenWindowJSInternal(nsIDOMWindow*, char const*, char const*, char const*, int, nsIArray*, int, nsIDOMWindow**)] at safe to run script check" [Blocker,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594699 [10:43] so there might be another respin anyway [10:43] yeah, security PPA makes sense [10:44] chrisccoulson: yeah, for all 5 products [10:53] chrisccoulson: so, Debian is apparantly using flash-mozilla.so for the alternative, where we have 6 all something-flashplugin [10:53] gnash ^^ [10:54] micahg - yeah, that's what i mentioned last night [10:54] that's not something we can change this close to release though :) [10:55] chrisccoulson: yeah, I can change the alternative though so it's installable, I'll look at what flashplugin-installer does [10:55] thanks [10:55] chrisccoulson: where's the lightning FFe bug? [10:55] micahg - bug 531867 [10:55] Launchpad bug 531867 in iceowl (Debian) (and 1 other project) "[FFe] [needs-packaging] Lightning 1.0 Beta for Thunderbird 3 (affects: 93) (dups: 5) (heat: 351)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/531867 [10:56] hmmm, somebody added a debian task [10:56] ah [10:56] chrisccoulson: are you trying for 3 or 3.1? [10:57] micahg - 3.1 [10:57] chrisccoulson: k [10:58] chrisccoulson: are we reusing the source? [10:58] *package [10:59] micahg - the packaging is basically a re-write (although it's significantly simpler to what we had before) [10:59] i'll push it somewhere in a minute [10:59] chrisccoulson: k, I just was wondering about the na,me [11:00] micahg - i kept the same name for now [11:00] chrisccoulson: k [11:01] * micahg should've just uploaded empty packages to lucid then rather than remove :( [11:01] micahg - it also uses the thunderbird SDK, which means it builds in about 2 minutes :) [11:02] chrisccoulson: that rocks :) [11:03] chrisccoulson: I'll work on the gnash update on my ride in to $WORK later today [11:04] mediatomb can wait another day or 2 [11:04] micahg - cool, thanks [11:05] * micahg might try another UDD merge [11:06] huh, "/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.9/xulrunner-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libsqlite3.so.0: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32" [11:06] on bug 636806 [11:06] Launchpad bug 636806 in xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu) "package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.9 build1 nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/636806 [11:07] people really do like breaking their systems [11:07] heh [11:16] lightning is taking ages to upload on my connection :/ [11:16] the source is currently the whole of comm-1.9.2, just like thunderbird, which isn't too good [11:16] i'm not sure whether we can clean out the bits we don't need before we pack the tarballs [11:21] chrisccoulson: well, did you remove the mozilla-1.9.2 part of the checkout? [11:21] micahg - not yet. i suppose i could do that now it's using thunderbird to build [11:23] then it'll take 2 minutes to upload too :) [12:06] micahg - oh, it seems like the lightning build still needs some parts of the embedded mozilla-1.9.2 tree [12:07] like the text preprocessor [12:18] micahg - i put the lightning packaging on http://people.canonical.com/~chrisccoulson/ [13:07] hi mdeslaur, can i have a USN for thunderbird 3.0.8 please :) [13:07] chrisccoulson: sure, hold on [13:07] thanks [13:08] chrisccoulson: 986-1 [13:08] mdeslaur, thanks [13:08] np [13:56] asac, kees, jdstrand_ : new stable chromium ftbfs on armel/karmic.. most probably related to the hardening thing: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/55522699/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-armel.chromium-browser_6.0.472.55~r58392-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [13:57] it's a minor upgrade (.53 -> .55), and the pie hardening was (almost) the only packaging change [14:07] fta: re webm v flash> webm-- I didn't have flash installed [14:08] jdstrand_, ok, good [14:32] jdstrand_, once again, nothing i can do to solve the above issue, except blindly disabling the hardening on arm and pray for the best [14:33] fta: can you wait for kees' input? [14:33] jdstrand_, sure [15:56] fta: hmmm. it looks like they're calling ld directly instead of using CXX; that can sometimes confuse things. [15:58] maybe, they often switch between ld and ld gold === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [16:08] kees, ^^, this comes from gyp. the magic is somewhere in there: http://code.google.com/p/gyp/source/browse/trunk/pylib/gyp/generator/make.py [16:10] kees, rebuilding in verbose mode would probably be helpful (VERBOSE=1 in my d/rules) but i don't have access to any arm builder [17:49] if i import contacts.csv will it over write the addresses i have already? [17:50] ^^^ for tb [18:47] fta: did only armel ftbfs for 6.0.472.55 ? [18:48] kees, yes: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/6.0.472.55~r58392-0ubuntu1 [18:49] fta: I will poke at it. arm-specific failure seems really odd in this case. [19:03] fta: since it takes 14 hours to build, let's do this for now: [19:03] # Don't build on armel because it's broken and we're already past beta [19:03] ifeq (,$(filter armel,$(DEB_BUILD_ARCH))) [19:03] etc [19:04] kees, yep, that was my plan if no one comes up with a solution [19:04] i.e. we're already past beta, and it's going to take a while for me to track this down. but since it works fine on i386/amd64, let's leave those as-is. [19:04] okay, cool [19:06] it also means i have to make yet another update in both maverick and lucid... [19:06] worth checking with upstream if they have another stable release in the pipe [19:11] fta: yeah, that was my concern -- this is creating a giant turn-around time due to the ARM compile times, so for now let's just ditch it on arm, and I'll continue trying to hunt it down. (I've started a build on an armel machine I have access to.) [19:12] kees, do it with VERBOSE=1 so it's easier for you to debug [19:13] oh yeah, good point [19:14] * kees restarts [19:20] (remember it's huge) [20:40] [reed] - you there? [20:59] micahg - have you seen http://blog.mozilla.com/mwu/2010/09/10/extensions-now-installed-packed/ ? [21:00] chrisccoulson: yes, I saw that, should speed up load time [21:00] i should start making a list of all the things we need to consider for next cycle [21:00] chrisccoulson: yeah, add them to the blueprint [21:00] we'll need to fix mozilla-devscripts for that one [21:00] yeah, i'll start adding a list later [21:01] chrisccoulson: k === BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_Expendables [21:37] how do I re-enable flash when it tells me 3rd party storage is disabled ?? [22:14] jdstrand, you got your ack for the ch 5->6 update [22:14] fta: yep. I already copied it :) [22:14] fta: I pestered people a bit for the ack ;) [22:14] jcastro, hi, could you do something about http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=51243 ? (last few comments) [22:14] well, more just ot look at the bug, not to convince them of the need to ack [22:15] jdstrand, good, thanks [22:15] *sigh* no time to work on my new project today :( [22:16] :( [22:19] i wonder if my project description makes sense: http://paste.ubuntu.com/492972/ [22:20] fta: ohhai, I was just looking for you [22:20] fta: did someone ever get you an answer wrt. daily build resources? [22:21] fta: ok so agl needs the font? [22:21] jcastro, nope, no one. build resources come and go, i suffer with the crowd [22:22] jcastro, yep, lots of people got this crash, all had the ubuntu font installed. but i don't have them, neither has upstream [22:22] oh, you don't either? ok one sec [22:23] do you know if agl has an lp account offhand? [22:23] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-typeface-interest [22:23] you this team please [22:23] jcastro, there's also a problem with ARM builds, i can't test build or debug anything, so i discover issues/regressions only when it's too late [22:24] jdstrand, not sure if agl has one, evan sure does. let me check [22:24] oops [22:24] jcastro, ^^ [22:24] ok [22:25] I'll add evan on the list too just in case [22:25] let me just find him in #chromium [22:26] (just asked him) [22:49] jdstrand, remember .55 ftbfs on arm. i will disable it (*) in the next upgrade (either ubuntu2, or if there's a new version shortly). (*) unless kees is able to find a fix [22:49] it = PIE === BUGa_Expendables is now known as BUGabundo