[04:45] <ScottK> slangasek: I'd appreciate it if you took another look at the Mesa FFe.  RAOF thinks he's answered all the questions and is waiting for approval/rejection.
[04:46] <slangasek> ScottK: "I'll test swrast on my nouveau system" -- he didn't report these results in the bug?
[04:46] <ScottK> slangasek: I'll ping him. Thanks.
[07:36] <wgrant> 9
[16:13] <ogasawara> apw: is bug 635379 similar to the i915 lockups you were seeing?
[16:13] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 635379 in linux (Ubuntu) "intel i945 GPU lockup, requires reboot to restore X (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/635379
[16:14] <apw> ogasawara, if i915 is reporting a GPU lockup then no its not, mine is something in the driver losing the dev_mutex
[16:15] <apw> bug #568138
[16:15] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 568138 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[arrandale] deadlock in i915_gem_madvise_ioctl (affects: 11) (dups: 1) (heat: 60)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/568138
[17:14] <ev> If anyone has spare cycles, I'd appreciate a review of bug 637410
[17:14] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 637410 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "UI free exception request for ubiquity 2.3.18 (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/637410
[17:20] <ScottK> slangasek: I'm uploaded mesa.  It will (unfortunately) hit binary New, so I'd appreciate it if you would keep and eye out for it and release it when it does.
[17:26] <slangasek> ScottK: ack
[17:26] <ScottK> Thanks.
[17:27] <slangasek> cjwatson: where does your lintian backport on cocoplum build from?  It seems there's been an apt upgrade
[17:28] <cjwatson> I'm honestly not sure.  We should probably rebuild it now that cocoplum runs lucid
[17:29] <cjwatson> I think it's still worth having a modern lintian there
[17:29] <slangasek> in that not rebuilding it results in it not running, yes :)
[17:29] <slangasek> oh, looks like current lintian has a lucid-backports, I can probably just unpack that maybe
[18:43] <nigelb> robbiew: now that's an awesome mail for final freeze :p
[18:43] <robbiew> heh
[18:44] <nigelb> exceptions requring confirmation bit is particularly amusing ;)
[18:46]  * robbiew didn't want to favor one religious deity over another ;)
[18:53] <robbiew> slangasek: cjwatson: so the more I look at example-content...the more I think it's contents need to be reassessed for value
[18:54] <cjwatson> that's usually the case, yes :)  maybe next cycle for a full reassessment though?
[18:55] <robbiew> aye