[08:16] hi! [08:17] ScottL,what do you think about asking archive-admins to sync swh-lv2 from Debian NEW? [08:17] we should ask for a freeze-exception, of course [14:26] ciao quadrispro :) [14:26] ehy scott-work ! :) [14:26] we may a little late for maverick for swh-lv2 [14:26] working on new fluidsynth release right now with diwic [14:26] scott-work, yeah, I know [14:26] although i *think* i understand you concern about syncing from unstable [14:27] my guess is that natty will be in development before swh-lv2 is moved into stable, is that correct ? [14:28] scott-work, lol, no, I concern about: when natty becomes the ubuntu+1, lenny may not be released again! :D [14:28] s/lenny/squeeze/ [14:29] scott-work, please replace 'lenny' with 'squeeze' [14:30] so we would still need to ask for exception to sync from unstable then? (i'm still not completely fluent with debian release procedures) [14:31] scott-work, no, we would still need for a sync-from-debian-new :) [14:31] I hope it won't be so [14:31] doh, sorry, i read your statement that said debian-new and i erroneously have been saying unstable, my apologies [14:33] my hope is to hit the ground running for natty and make changes as soon as possible [14:33] anyone who is interested can look: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/ReleasePlanning [14:33] quadrispro: i suppose in a couple of months we will cross that bridge then [14:34] quadrispro: oh, i have forgotten...would you mind updating hydrogen-drumkits? i notice that debian is apparently outdated compared ubuntu [14:34] mm [14:34] don't have the time now, I'll take a look later [14:34] i should note also that the release planning page is open to anyone to add to it [14:35] scott-work, I see the same revision -> http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hydrogen-drumkits.html [14:35] quadrispro: no rush on the hydrogen-drumkits, i just wanted to add it to the seeds for natty [14:36] weird, this shows ubuntu at 0.9.4 : http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#outdatedinA [14:37] lol, it is [14:37] hmm, quadrispro, very strange, but launchpad appears to have the same version as debian :/ [14:38] scott-work, take a look -> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Debian+Multimedia :) [14:38] scott-work, no, take a look at this -> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Debian+Multimedia&set=yes&bugs=1&version=1&ubuntu=1&excuses=1&bin=1&buildd=1&problems=1&popc=1&watch=1§ion=1&ordering=0&uploads=1&packages=&uploader=&mirror=http%3A%2F%2Fftp.debian.org%2Fdebian [14:38] 'ubuntu' colums should be shown now [14:38] column * [14:39] ubuntu has -3 while debian has -1, but that doesn't explain 0.9.4 though [14:40] eh, -3 is in testing/unstable [14:40] as well [14:41] gah, quadrispro, i'm an idiot :/ [14:42] scott-work, no, I know a lot of idiots and you don't seem one of them :) [14:42] i've been comparing hydrogen, not hydrogen-drumkits which isn't in the qa.ubuntuwire.com link i sent [14:42] quadrispro: lol, thanks [14:42] ah! hydrogen [14:42] please give me some minutes [14:42] the whole purpose of my research was to get -drumkits into ubuntu studio, which means it isn't going to be on the qu.ubuntuwire.com link *foreheadslap* [20:52] scott-work: is pyqt ok for ubuntustudio ? [20:53] afaik, ubuntustudio already has some Qt apps (mixxx, qsynth, hydrogen, etc) [20:55] falktx: i would probably defer that question to TheMuso or persia [20:55] but i would imagine it should be okay since qjackctl uses it also [20:55] well, i assume it uses it [20:56] yes [20:56] but not pyqt, just 'qt' [20:56] maybe i should start making c++... [20:59] scott-work: i'll use pyqt then, c++ is way too much for me [20:59] scott-work: let me know if persia and TheMuso are ok with it [20:59] scott-work: oh, and send me all the ideas for a config/patchbay you have now [20:59] cya