[00:35] <randomusername> hey wgrant
[00:39] <wgrant> randomusername: Hi.
[00:40] <randomusername> I wish I could say that I'm happy, but I'm watching Ellen on TV
[00:45] <randomusername> anyhow
[00:45] <randomusername> what is up, wgrant?
[00:48] <wgrant> randomusername: So, you need to merge your accounts. But you only have access to the one you want to remove, so we may need an admin to do it.
[00:50] <randomusername> merge accounts and remove the +launchpad from the email, right?
[00:51] <wgrant> Well, you'll need to leave the non-+launchpad email in your account for now.
[00:51] <wgrant> Until we fix the bug.
[00:51] <wgrant> Or the same thing will happen again.
[00:52] <wgrant> But Launchpad only ever sends mail to your primary email address, so everything will be fine if you leave your primary set to the +launchpad address.
[00:53] <randomusername> what would happen if someone sends again a .po file with the trigger email?
[00:54] <wgrant> If you have the address on your main profile: nothing.
[00:54] <wgrant> If you don't: you end up in the situation you're in now.
[01:12] <randomusername> wgrant: do I need to fix a date with an admin to do this procedure?
[01:16] <wgrant> randomusername: I suggest asking at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion
[01:16] <wgrant> Give your new and old usernames and email addresses, and reference bug 637968.
[01:17] <wgrant> And make sure tiagosilva29 gets merged into tiagosilva, and not the other way around.
[01:18] <randomusername> can't I just email them via launchpad contacts?
[01:18] <randomusername> I don't want to post the emails over there
[01:20] <randomusername> hey, you're australian! no wonder you're up at this time of the night
[01:20] <randomusername> day there
[01:20] <wgrant> OK, omit the email addresses.
[01:21] <wgrant> But use Launchpad Answers, so the admin can verify that it's actually you.
[01:26] <prettyrobots> I just created a  launchpad account but I am unable to change my user name from the default and I am also unable to login into the help forums.
[01:29] <wgrant> prettyrobots: Your first issue is bug #633926
[01:29] <wgrant> prettyrobots: https://edge.launchpad.net/people/+me/+edit should work OK -- it's running the latest fixed code.
[01:29] <wgrant> prettyrobots: But why can't you log into the help forum?
[01:30] <prettyrobots> wgrant: Thank you.
[01:30] <prettyrobots> Sec.
[01:32] <prettyrobots> wgrant: Okay. Second must have been a network issue.
[01:32] <prettyrobots> I'm able to log in.
[01:32] <prettyrobots> Thank you.
[01:32] <prettyrobots> Log into launchpadhelp, that is. Thank you.
[01:32] <randomusername> wgrant: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/125444
[01:33] <randomusername> I dunno if this is going to help
[01:33] <randomusername> I'm too tired to write properly
[01:34] <wgrant> randomusername: I've added a comment.
[01:37] <wgrant> randomusername: It should be OK now.
[01:37] <wgrant> randomusername: You might have to log out and in again.
[01:38] <randomusername> gonna do that, and sleep
[01:38] <randomusername> thanks for the assistance wgrant, again
[01:38] <wgrant> Great. Sorry it took so long to get sorted out.
[01:38] <randomusername> I will try to meet here again at the same time tomorrow
[01:38] <randomusername> no problem
[01:38] <randomusername> as long as it gets fixed
[01:38] <randomusername> :P
[01:39] <randomusername> good night
[01:39] <wgrant> It should be fixed.
[01:39] <wgrant> Night.
[05:25] <poolie> thumper: i thought i was meant to get incremental diffs when people post more stuff to a mp, but i don't seem to get anything...
[05:26] <thumper> poolie: abentley is working on this now
[05:26] <thumper> poolie: not done yet
[05:27] <poolie> np, just wondered
[07:46] <prayii> Hello. I'm trying to change my name on launchpad from phillip-ray to prayii and I keep getting the error message "Sorry, you don't have permission to access this page." when I click save. Any suggestions?
[07:59] <spm> prayii: https://launchpad.net/~prayii <== not sure what was wrong for you, but changed.
[08:05] <prayii> spm: thank you very much. =D
[08:43] <amitprakash> hi.. while compiling desktop agnostic 3.90 i am getting a default/libdesktop-agnostic/DesktopAgnosticVFS-1.0.gir:3:1: error: Unsupported version '1.0' .. how do I resolve this?
[08:53] <bilalakhtar> Ahem, the Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed bug has been marked fix committed and appears to be in edge, but still bugs aren't being auto-closed. Am I seeing it the wrong way or will the fix have to land in production before it gets fixed completely?
[09:41] <jwb_> hi
[09:42] <jwb_> launchpad user "rusivi1" is going all over launchpad and just blindly setting confirmed bugs from confirmed to incomplete with the comment "does this still happen in maverick" or "does this still happen in lucid?"
[09:42] <jwb_> is there any way someone can yank this guy's account and/or roll back his stupidity?
[09:43] <jpds> jwb_: He's in #ubuntu-bugs
[09:44] <jpds> jwb_: Guess it's best to assume good faith.
[09:45] <jwb_> good faith and cluelessness
[09:45] <jwb_> thanks for the tip
[13:19] <gary_poster> doctormo: ping?
[13:20] <fta2> hhm, this build started 3h ago, but it's still showing "started 2min ago": https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/beta/+build/1960628
[14:38] <fta2> definitely weird, this build is jumping from builder to builder without really building anything: https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/beta/+build/1960628
[14:43] <fta2> just jumped from fermium to louvi
[14:51] <fta2> poof, another restart, once again on louvi
[14:51] <fta2> :(
[14:53] <StevenK> bigjools: ^ This build is bouncing between buildds
[14:54] <bigjools> StevenK: what does the b-m log say?
[14:54] <StevenK> bigjools: Haven't checked, and I don't want to break my rule :-P
[15:04] <fta2> ahh, it's finally doing something, after ~6h of bouncing around
[15:13] <bigjools> 6 hours?!
[15:15] <bigjools> ok I know what's going on
[16:24] <drubin> What can we do about https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/new-background-ubuntu ? assigning ubuntu members and making mark the drafter?
[16:24] <tgm4883> yea, and why did I get an email about it
[16:25] <nigelb> can somone please mark that as spam
[16:25] <drubin> how?
[16:25] <drubin> because he assigned it to Ubuntumembers
[16:25] <nigelb> drubin: admins
[16:25] <drubin> :)
[16:25] <drubin> there should be report
[16:27] <nigelb> did some kind soul remove the ubuntu members assignment? if so, thanks
[16:28] <nigelb> ok, just FYI, I'm filing a qestion for that spec to be removed as its spam and perhaps warn the user.
[16:28] <tgm4883> I'd say ban
[16:28] <tgm4883> but thats just me
[16:28] <popey> the user only signed up today
[16:28] <popey> so its hardly hardship for them to be warned
[16:28] <popey> newtroll is new
[16:28] <tgm4883> popey, !
[16:28] <popey> tgm4883!
[16:29] <tgm4883> I've been meaning to track you down
[16:29] <drubin> I wasn't suggesting we ban them. Simply remove/edit the assigners
[16:29] <popey> ruh roh
[16:29] <nigelb> there is disabled until you specify why we shouldn't ban you thingie
[16:29] <tgm4883> heh
[16:29] <nigelb> drubin: well, the screenshots do mention that its spam/troll
[16:29] <drubin> yes they do.
[16:30] <nigelb> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/125533
[16:32] <bcurtiswx_> hey guys, you'll probably want to delete https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/new-background-ubuntu and ban user
[16:32] <tgm4883> heh
[16:32] <nigelb> heh
[16:32] <nigelb> question already opened :)
[16:32]  * tgm4883 thinks this will need to be in /topic
[16:33] <nigelb> yes
[16:33] <nigelb> lots of ubuntu memebers
[16:33] <bcurtiswx_> ah, so i'm like user #312 thats mentioned this?
[16:33] <nigelb> bcurtiswx_: 5th?
[16:33] <tgm4883> there will be more though
[16:33] <bcurtiswx_> lol, OK. i feel better
[16:33] <nigelb> oh yes, plenty more
[16:34] <nigelb> ubuntu members are /very/ fast :)
[16:34] <popey> meh, its funny, laugh :)
[16:34] <bcurtiswx_> it is funny, but ..
[16:34] <nigelb> popey: it is funny, but...
[16:34]  * bcurtiswx_ hates stupid people
[16:34] <popey> not _that_ stupid :)
[16:34] <bcurtiswx_> nigelb, nice .. real nice
[16:34] <nigelb> bcurtiswx_: haha
[16:35] <bcurtiswx_> yeah you will probably need it in the topic
[16:35] <nigelb> heh, good idea
[16:36] <lucidfox> I could use help setting up a packaging recipe
[16:37] <bcurtiswx_> well, user is deleted..
[16:37] <nigelb> bcurtiswx_: sinzui is fast :)
[16:37] <lucidfox> Suppose I want to have a separate branch containing just the packaging files, and then nest it. Will I need to have that branch locally out of the main source tree?
[16:37] <nigelb> I suspended the user. We need an admin to clear the description and
[16:37] <nigelb> retarget the spec to obsolete-junk
[16:37] <nigelb> bcurtiswx_: ^^
[16:38] <lucidfox> or actually wait...
[16:38] <lucidfox> I could add debian to .bzrignore and keep a local copy of the branch in the source tree, right?
[16:38] <bcurtiswx_> nigelb: awesome :) muchas gracias.  Back to work for me <sarcasm> woooo </sarcasm>
[16:40]  * sinzui is looking for a losa now to remove the blueprint
[16:40] <nigelb> sinzui: sorry about the muck up with the question, I accidentally closed it :D
[16:40] <nigelb> sinzui: Thank you :)
[16:40] <Myrtti> is there going to be a short explanation about that ^? I'd like to know why on earth did I get that email
[16:41] <Myrtti> in a blog post perhaps :-)
[16:41] <nigelb> Myrtti: someone assigned a blueprint to ubuntu members team, we all got a mail because of that :(
[16:44] <Myrtti> right, I'd still suggest a blogpost about it :-P
[16:44] <nigelb> heh
[16:44] <SpamapS> something horrible going on right now?
[16:44] <nigelb> nah, just a troll
[16:45] <SpamapS> Have gotten oopses for the last few minutes trying to submit a bug
[16:48] <popey> aaand, its gone
[16:48] <nigelb> \o/
[16:49] <nigelb> sinzui: you folks rock :)
[16:55] <fta> bigjools, what was the problem with my build?
[16:55] <lucidfox> What should be the format for debian/changelog for Launchpad bzr daily builds?
[16:56] <lucidfox> or there should be no debian/changelog?
[16:59] <lucidfox> What are stacked branches?
[17:09] <yathish> hi
[17:10] <nigelb> hello
[17:29] <stgraber> ping
[17:29] <stgraber> can someone kill my build on meitnerium
[17:29] <stgraber> it's been sitting in a loop for an hour
[17:47] <geser> stgraber: usually I see someone ping lamont with those requests
[17:54] <stgraber> lamont: ^ https://edge.launchpad.net/~stgraber/+archive/with-backports/+build/1961068
[17:59] <lucidfox> ...blimey
[17:59] <lucidfox> I accidentally targeted the wrong PPA for manual bzr builds
[18:01] <james_w> lucidfox: because it picks the first in the list?
[18:01] <lucidfox> yes, rather than the one specified for daily builds - I didn't notice and didn't cancel in time
[18:02] <lucidfox> ah well, I have write access to that PPA, I'll just delete the packages
[18:03] <james_w> lucidfox: so if you request a manual build it defaults to where the daily builds go?
[18:03] <lucidfox> no, it defaults to the first one in the list - I think it's counterintuitive
[18:03] <james_w> yes, I would agree
[18:15] <OdyX> Hi. Short question: do the PPA builds get requeued when stalled due to "Dependency-wait" or should I hit the retry build button each time.
[18:15] <OdyX> ?
[18:15] <lamont> stgraber: I assume the build has been superseded?
[18:16] <lamont> stgraber: because otherwise, it'll just try and loop again
[18:27] <stgraber> lamont: I removed it from my PPA and pushed an older package that built just fine
[18:27] <lamont> cool
[18:28] <maxb> OdyX: Yes, PPA packages do get processed by the dependency-wait requeuer. However, it may not always make the right decision, and in any case, it'll be faster to hit retry if you know you've just resolved a dependency issue
[20:42] <rusivi> Can someone from the malone team please review malone bug 638260 for wishlist status?
[20:59] <deryck> rusivi, hi.  I looked at that bug earlier today, commented, and marked it invalid.  Have you since commented and want another review?
[21:00] <deryck> I see.
[21:01] <deryck> rusivi, I think what you're asking for is sort by bug id.  Why?  Bug id doesn't mean oldest.  Some bugs have older dates but more recent bug ids.  You actually care about this distinction?
[21:03]  * nigelb can't particularly visualize a need for it.
[21:03] <deryck> right.
[21:04] <deryck> rusivi, I have to leave, sorry.  But if you explain in the bug why you think bug id sort is needed, I'll consider that and consider changing to wishlist status.
[21:07] <allquixotic_> Hi, is there a way to import a bunch of bugs from a file? Something like maybe a CSV or an openoffice spreadsheet, any common tabulated data format... I find it more tedious to click all the buttons in the launchpad UI than it'd be to whip up a spreadsheet from my old bugtracker and import them en masse to launchpad.
[21:12] <nigelb> allquixotic_: what are you looking for? you could whip up a script or something for it quite easily
[21:13] <allquixotic_> nigelb: What kind of script could I write that would automatically import the bugs to Launchpad? Would I have to literally make it click the buttons in the launchpad UI after parsing the http output, or something? I'll note that I'm using your launchpad.net service, not my own Launchpad instance, and that I'm a paid commercial project on launchpad.net.
[21:13] <allquixotic_> I can already see the code before my eyes for a script to export from my old bugtracker to an OpenOffice ODS, but I have no idea how to go from there to launchpad.
[21:14] <nigelb> err, I'm only a volunteer.
[21:14] <allquixotic_> oh -- sorry :)
[21:14] <maxb> I believe there is some sort of XML format for bulk bug imports
[21:14] <lifeless> there is
[21:14] <lifeless> uhm
[21:14] <lifeless> http://blog.launchpad.net/bug-tracking/launchpads-bug-import-format
[21:15] <lifeless> allquixotic_: ^
[21:15] <allquixotic_> thanks, lifeless :)
[21:15] <allquixotic_> Looks like this will point me in the right direction
[21:17] <james_w> is the owner of the target branch subscribed to merge proposal changes?
[21:19] <lifeless> by default on new branches
[21:24] <james_w> I just got email for the initial proposal (probably by virtue of being a member of the team owning the target branch), and the first comment, but then not the next two comments or the status change when the merge proposal went to Merged
[21:25] <james_w> salgado's idea is that I got the initial because the target branch owner was requested to review, then when the second comment went in asac claimed that review, and so I was no longer asked to review it and didn't get the email
[21:35] <thumper> james_w: any idea why there are no official package branches for apport?
[21:36] <james_w> thumper: because there are non-official ones that are preferred, and having official ones too just confused things
[21:36] <thumper> james_w: but we can mark any sp branch as the main one
[21:36] <james_w> yes
[21:38] <james_w> however, that implies various things, mostly that the importer will try and work with that branch
[21:38] <lifeless> james_w: why haven't the real ones been nominated though?
[21:38] <james_w> which will expose some bugs currently
[21:38] <thumper> hmm...
[21:57] <james_w> thumper: I can make the change right now if you care about the branches and can help with any fallout
[21:59] <lifeless> james_w: only one way to find out about ze issues
[22:00] <james_w> lifeless: yes
[22:00] <james_w> lifeless: but I don't want to give myself more work when I can't keep up with the issues I already have
[22:00] <lifeless> james_w: do we have bugs filed for the issues?
[22:01] <james_w> which issues?
[22:01] <lifeless> rephrasing: is there some sort of progress bar that I can point e.g. poolie at for being able to have apport and similar things have their lp:ubuntu branches *be* the authoritative branches
[22:01] <james_w> no, unfortunately not
[22:01] <james_w> it's a 2 minute change for me to make, within an unknown amount of work following
[22:01] <lifeless> is there a 'next bug to fix' even.
[22:02] <lifeless> james_w: can we roll it back when the problem arises ?
[22:02] <james_w> next bug to fix for what?
[22:02] <james_w> yes, we can just unset the link again
[22:02] <lifeless> james_w: imagine that there is a progress bar. With bugs on it as progress markers.
[22:02] <james_w> right, but we don't have a single progress bar
[22:02] <lifeless> All I really care about is that the next marker - the next bug - is identified and can be pointed at.
[22:03] <james_w> it all depends on which direction you want to go in as to what is next
[22:04] <allquixotic> Hi, I have a commercial project on launchpad.net where I would like to allow the general public to report bugs, while still having the ability for project administrators to mark some bugs as private (only visible to the team). Is this possible? Currently I have some private bzr branches registered on Launchpad, but the bugs instance is fully public and I see no way to mark bugs as private (e.g. security vulns).
[22:05] <lifeless> certainly
[22:05] <lifeless> we just need to permit privat ebugs for that; I think it needs a question filed on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad to enable it
[22:07]  * maxb is glad there's no disk quota on bzr branches
[22:07] <maxb> having just push 850MB of kdebase
[22:08] <lifeless> say what
[22:17] <maxb> hmm, branch scanning is taking a while... maybe because I just pushed 82k revisions :-)
[22:18] <allquixotic> maxb: so THAT'S why my launchpad is running so slow ;)
[22:22] <maxb> oops. I think I really have tarpitted the scanner
[22:26] <soren> maxb: Ah, so it's /your/ fault...
[22:26] <soren> (That's another one off my christmas card list)
[23:07] <lifeless> james_w: well I'm saying we have a clear goal
[23:07] <lifeless> james_w: whichever bug is stopping us using apport 'properly' is the bug to fix next.
[23:07] <lifeless> james_w: if its filed already, lets highlight it.
[23:07] <lifeless> james_w: if its not filed, lets file it.
[23:07] <lifeless> james_w: if to file it we need an experiment, lets do that.
[23:08] <lifeless> james_w: but lets not just sit here without an open bug and without apport configured properly.
[23:09] <poolie> hi there lifeless
[23:14] <james_w> lifeless: I do not know what the bug is to file it
[23:15] <lifeless> james_w: so, we need to try and find out what goes wrong then, agreed ?
[23:15] <lifeless> hi poolie
[23:15] <james_w> yes
[23:24] <lifeless> james_w: lets do that then
[23:38] <herr> hey
[23:38] <herr> whatzuppp
[23:48] <TheMuso> Is it known that upload.ubuntu.com currently gives connectino refused when attempting to connect to it?
[23:48] <tkamppeter> Upload server is broken. On dbut I get [Errno 111] Connection refused.
[23:54] <lifeless> losa poing
[23:54] <Chex> lifeless: hi there, working it now
[23:55] <lifeless> is it the rollout? If so I can file an RT for future improvements
[23:55] <tkamppeter> upload server back working now.
[23:55] <TheMuso> Thanks guys.