[07:32] <fta2> jdstrand, mdeslaur: fyi, and as expected: Branch ~chromium-team/chromium-browser/channels] Rev 293: linux/stable (6.0.472.55 -> 6.0.472.59)
[07:34] <fta2> jdstrand, mdeslaur: 9 security fixes (6 high, 3 low). i'll prepare it asap
[09:12] <fta2> bug 635949
[09:12] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 635949 in chromium-codecs-ffmpeg (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 5 other projects) "6.0.472.53~r57914 -> 6.0.472.55~r58392 upgrade (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/635949
[09:18] <fta2> jdstrand, mdeslaur: bug 638736
[09:18] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 638736 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "6.0.472.55~r58392 -> 6.0.472.59~r59126 upgrade (affects: 1) (heat: 260)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/638736
[14:00] <jdstrand> fta: ack. would you mind letting me know when you are ready to upload to maverick and lucid? if it is sooner than .55 is in lucid, we can go straight to .59 in lucid-proposed
[15:33] <chrisccoulson> asac - http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/30ab811a-97c3-41a2-8d6b-94e902100914
[15:33] <chrisccoulson> the build ID is one of ours :)
[15:33] <asac> niccceeee!!!
[15:33] <asac> congrats
[15:34] <asac> thats a major milestone in history for sure :-P
[15:34] <chrisccoulson> i've just been looking through to see if people are actually submitting them
[15:34] <asac> now gain karma by closing all crash bugs in launchpad ;)
[15:34] <chrisccoulson> heh, yeah, that's my next task i think ;)
[15:34] <asac> chrisccoulson: how can i search for all ubuntu crashes?
[15:34] <chrisccoulson> asac - i'm not sure yet. i'm going to ask ted in a bit, but he looks quite busy
[15:35] <asac> kk
[15:35] <asac> let me know
[15:35] <asac> awecome stuff for sure!
[15:35] <chrisccoulson> i've just been searching for linux crashes and then picking out the buildID's that i recognise
[15:35] <chrisccoulson> but that's not a very efficient way
[15:35] <asac> right ;)
[16:10] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, can i have a USN for firefox please?
[16:14] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: this is for the regression fixes?
[16:15] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, yeah, it is
[16:16] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: in this case we know what the issues are, so you don't need a USN in the changelog. if you insist, use -2
[16:16] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, oh, that's ok then
[16:16] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[16:16] <jdstrand> (that is what I will be using)
[16:16] <jdstrand> cool
[16:18] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, although, mdeslaur already gave me a USN for thunderbird
[16:18] <chrisccoulson> not sure if you want to re-use that for something else
[16:19] <chrisccoulson> 986
[16:20] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: I would, but I don't want to trigger a rebuild for it
[16:20] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, i've got to do a rebuild anyway
[16:20] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: if you are going to rebuild it, then yes, adjust the changelog and let me know
[16:20] <jdstrand> ah
[16:20] <jdstrand> then yes, let's remove it
[16:23] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: ok. I have allocated it to something else
[16:45] <fta> jdstrand, if you have the ack, go ahead, i have to check a few things before i'm ready
[16:45] <fta> ..with .59
[16:46] <jdstrand> fta: I don't have the ack-- it hit lucid-proposed yesterday and we need to wait 7 days
[16:48] <fta> jdstrand, oh.. well, *sigh*... with such a fast release pace, it doesn't make sense to wait that long
[16:49] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, i'm going to be really popular in a minute when i take over all these builders
[16:49] <fta> i know it's the process, but yet, it delays hot fixes for a week
[16:49] <chrisccoulson> right before final freeze...
[16:49] <jdstrand> fta: it is the normal SRU process. that is why the TB is discussing it
[16:49] <chrisccoulson> :)
[16:49] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: awesome
[16:50] <chrisccoulson> i did mention to kate on IRC yesterday that might happen though
[16:58] <fta> kees, most probably the best pie coverage we can have for now: http://paste.ubuntu.com/494252/
[17:00] <kees> fta: that's totally fine by me. I'm stumped currently so hopefully upstream can figure it out.
[17:08] <fta> jdstrand, the TB has been discussing that for months, do you know what's taking so long? can i read some minutes/notes/emails/whatever somewhere?
[17:43] <fta> kees, wrt https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2010-September/000501.html   for your 1st question, i'd say none (except the armel ftbfs because i can't proactively test that arch)
[17:44] <fta> kees, as for the build-deps, if it's a problem, i can drop them all in favor of in-source libs
[17:46] <fta> kees, as for -proposed, all lucid releases passed through it, so 10 or 11
[17:47] <fta> (+ since maverick is opened)
[17:50] <micahg> chrisccoulson: should I upload whatever is available for Maverick tonight?
[17:51] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, if you like
[17:52] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, will probably do around 0400 UTC when I add the new translations to .desktop
[17:52] <chrisccoulson> micahg - oh, you've got uploads for thunderbird and firefox?
[17:52] <micahg> Firefox yes, thunderbird, idk
[17:53] <chrisccoulson> ah, bugger. i was just in the process of doing the 3.6.10 upload
[17:55] <micahg> chrisccoulson: np, I'll do a second upload later
[17:55] <chrisccoulson> cool, thanks
[17:56] <micahg> chrisccoulson: we got 9 language additions/updates for Firefox, nice
[18:01] <chrisccoulson> interesting, i just noticed this at the end of a firefox-4.0 build from lintian:
[18:02] <chrisccoulson> E: firefox-4.0-core: unstripped-binary-or-object ./usr/lib/firefox-4.0b7pre/components/libmozgnome.so
[18:02] <chrisccoulson> i wonder why that's happening :/
[18:02] <chrisccoulson> and E: firefox-4.0-core: shlib-with-executable-bit usr/lib/firefox-4.0b7pre/components/libmozgnome.so 0755
[18:03] <micahg> :(
[18:03] <micahg> chrisccoulson: nobinonly must need an update
[18:03] <micahg> oh, wait, this is after a build :-/
[18:04]  * micahg hasn't woken up yet
[18:04] <chrisccoulson> oh, i see the problem
[18:05] <chrisccoulson> when we move these components around at the end of the build, we copy it back from debian/tmp, after dh_strip runs
[18:05] <chrisccoulson> so we delete the stripped lib and copy the unstripped one back there
[18:05] <micahg> ah
[18:05] <micahg> why are we adding it back there?
[18:06] <chrisccoulson> micahg - we delete it from firefox-gnome-support and then copy it from debian/tmp to firefox
[18:06] <micahg> ah, yeah, that's probably not right
[18:16] <jdstrand> fta: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2010-August/000459.html and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2010-September/000501.html
[18:16] <jdstrand> fta: I sent a response to the latter, but it needs to be approved
[18:17] <fta> jdstrand, ^^ see above (1/2h ago)
[18:26] <chrisccoulson> oops, must remember orig.tar.gz when uploading package
[19:16] <kees> fta: okay, cool; thanks.
[20:08] <fta> kees, do you know anything about PIE confusing valgrind?
[20:09] <kees> dunno, never tried it. wouldn't surprise me if it does confuse it a bit.
[20:10] <fta> upstream said they had to drop pie because of that
[20:10] <kees> sounds like a bug in valgrind :)
[20:14] <kees> fta: from the sound of it, valgrind supports PIE
[20:15] <fta> well, i don't know, someone said so in the upstream bug
[20:53] <fta> pfff, uploaded libvpx to the -dev ppa nearly 5d ago, some dists still have to wait more than 1d to get a chance to build
[20:55] <micahg> chrisccoulson: looks like it was good that you uploaded today, seems like they want to release today :)
[20:55] <micahg> chrisccoulson: did you get a USN for the updates?
[20:55] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, i'm trying to get everything done as quick as possible
[20:56] <chrisccoulson> micahg - no new USN - it will just be announced with the old numbers, as the uploads are only fixing regressions
[20:56] <micahg> chrisccoulson: no, they usually have a -2 for stuff like this
[20:56] <chrisccoulson> micahg, yeah, that's what i meant ;)
[20:56] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k
[20:56] <chrisccoulson> but jdstrand said i didn't need to worry about putting the number in the changelog
[20:57] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ok, good
[20:57] <micahg> chrisccoulson: thanks
[20:58] <chrisccoulson> micahg - have you seen https://edge.launchpad.net/builders ?
[20:58]  * micahg thinks we're going to get flamed :P
[20:58] <chrisccoulson> yeah, i'm going to go and hide away for the evening once i've done seamonkey ;)
[20:59] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, I'll deny everything :)
[20:59] <chrisccoulson> i don't know how busy you are this evening, but these uploads still need a bit of testing
[21:00] <micahg> chrisccoulson: well, I need to get thunderbird-locales and firefox translations in before feature freeze
[21:00] <micahg> oops
[21:00] <micahg> final freeze
[21:00] <micahg> I'll start testing on maverick after they're built
[21:07] <chrisccoulson> excellent, lucid amd64 build done already and the crash symbols sent to mozilla
[21:07] <chrisccoulson> all in about 1 hour :)
[21:09] <micahg> cool
[21:10] <micahg> idk if I'll get FF 4.0 beta 6 up tonight
[21:10] <chrisccoulson> that's ok
[21:10] <chrisccoulson> micahg - do you think we should aim for tb 3.1.5 in lucid now?
[21:11] <micahg> chrisccoulson: the only thing that worries me is the crashiness of TB3.1, idk if it's worse or better than 3.0, it seems different
[21:11] <micahg> it's still an issue on the TB meeting agenda
[21:12] <chrisccoulson> ah, ok
[21:13] <chrisccoulson> do thunderbird crashers normally go to http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/products/Thunderbird?duration=28 ?
[21:13] <chrisccoulson> it's looking a bit thin for thunderbird
[21:14] <chrisccoulson> i like the top 2 crashers for 3.0.8
[21:14] <chrisccoulson> that's ted's crashme extension ;)
[21:17] <mdeslaur> oooh! new 64-bit flash player is out!
[21:17] <mdeslaur> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
[21:17] <Dimmuxx> wooooo
[21:17] <Dimmuxx> some thing good with ie9 at least
[21:17] <micahg> :(
[21:18]  * micahg can't tell people to stop using it anymore
[21:18] <mdeslaur> hahaha
[21:18] <mdeslaur> I just hope they actually _release_ it this time
[21:18] <micahg> mdeslaur: yes, then I can actually support it :)
[21:21] <chrisccoulson> die nspluginswrapper die :)
[21:21] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: nsapportwrapper
[21:21] <chrisccoulson> :)
[21:22] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, although, i was thinking about having a go at mozilla bug 588749
[21:22] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 588749 in Plug-ins "[OOPP] Support i386 plugins on x86_64 arch (Linux)" [Normal,Reopened] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588749
[21:23] <chrisccoulson> but i'd need to learn how this stuff works
[21:23] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: yeah, learning how stuff works stops a lot of my projects too :)
[21:24] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: does anything else besides flash use nspluginwrapper currently?
[21:24] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, the (adobe) acrobat plugin too if you install acrobat on amd64
[21:25] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: ah, yes...forgot about that one
[21:25] <chrisccoulson> i'm not sure what else
[21:25] <micahg> chrisccoulson: that crash graph is off because new versions were just released
[21:26] <micahg> chrisccoulson: but 3.0.7 and 3.1.3 seem to have about the same # of crashes
[21:26] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: apt-cache rdepends only gives me acroread and flash
[21:30] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I'd like to get maverick almost out the door before updating lucid
[21:33] <Dimmuxx> electronic id in Sweden needs nspluginwrapper still so don't remove it :P
[21:35]  * micahg wanted to merge from Debian, but it didn't work too well