[00:07] <slangasek> ScottK: right - sorry, wound up afk in there before it showed up in the queue, and then it looks like cocoplum got a kernel security reboot :)
[00:07] <slangasek> doko: looking
[00:08] <ScottK> Nice.  In any case it's accepted and IIRC he pre-queued the respins
[02:13] <ScottK> lamont: It looks like https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gworldclock/1.4.4-9ubuntu1/+build/1961565 could (still) stand to be shot in the head.
[02:36] <ScottK> Ah.  Looks like it finally died. lamont: nevermind or thanks as applicable.
[03:45] <ScottK> slangasek and doko: looking into libfvm a bit more, I find http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591346 which seems to me like the problematic conflicts is not policy compliant.  Thoughts?
[03:45] <ubot4> Debian bug 591346 in hdf5 "Allow the installation of libhdf5-serial and libhdf5-openmpi at the same time" [Serious,Open]
[07:29] <ScottK> FWIW, if it helps anyone's motivation to review the pending inkscape upload, it would help with NBS to get it accepted.
[08:58] <cjwatson> ScottK: inkscape> looking
[08:59] <cjwatson> yep, looks ok.  diff more comprehensible when one looks at packaging-only
[09:27] <cjwatson> I don't understand this libcpan-meta-perl upload.  What FTBFS is it fixing?  The last upload built fine, and http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ doesn't list it.  It seems to be due to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586275, but that doesn't seem to be biting us.
[09:27] <ubot4> Debian bug 586275 in sbuild "sbuild: alternative build-deps and Provides do not work correctly" [Important,Open]
[09:28]  * cjwatson wades through the enormous ubuntu-docs diff
[09:42] <cjwatson> gst-plugins-good0.10: asked slomo in #ubuntu-devel for a version without changelog formatting errors
[13:47] <jdstrand> hey, so there is a security vulnerability in bzip2. I have pocket copyied the following to maverick: bzip2 1.0.5-4ubuntu1, clamav 0.96.1+dfsg-3ubuntu5.1, and dump 0.4b43-1build1
[13:48] <jdstrand> bzip2 and clamav are in main and dump in universe
[13:49] <cjwatson> thanks
[13:49] <cjwatson> that's OK at the moment
[13:50] <jdstrand> I haven't adjusted overrides for dump or the two binaries of clamav in universe yet, as they haven't shown up where I could see them to do that
[13:51] <jdstrand> in case people are wondering, dpkg no longer statically links bzip2, so I won't be touching it
[14:51] <barry> i have a small fix to computer-janitor that i'd like to get a freeze exception for: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/computer-janitor/+bug/434431
[14:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 434431 in computer-janitor (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Computer Janitor (GTK) does not have a panel icon (affects: 7) (dups: 1) (heat: 42)" [Low,Fix committed]
[15:08] <barry> cjwatson: i have a fix for bug 433431 in computer janitor.  is it okay to upload?
[15:08] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 433431 in aptdaemon (Ubuntu) "aptd crashed with error in connect() (dup-of: 424793)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/433431
[15:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 424793 in aptdaemon (Ubuntu) "aptd crashed with error in connect() (affects: 63) (dups: 64) (heat: 24)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/424793
[15:37] <stgraber> Just pushed two ltsp-cluster packages to universe, that's a bugfix so the service starts in Maverick, no bug linked as nobody noticed it yet ;)
[15:47] <robbiew> barry: hmm
[15:47] <barry> robbiew: just askin' ;)  it's minor so okay to defer to n
[15:48] <robbiew> barry: those are always the toughest...easy to slip in, improves experience..but breaks UI freeze for a rather trivial issue...hmmm
[15:49] <barry> robbiew: that's why you and skaet are here :)
[15:50] <robbiew> the patch is trivial
[15:51] <robbiew> I think it's worth fixing...cjwatson, thoughts?  -> "barry: i have a small fix to computer-janitor that i'd like to get a freeze exception for: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/computer-janitor/+bug/434431"
[15:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 434431 in computer-janitor (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Computer Janitor (GTK) does not have a panel icon (affects: 7) (dups: 1) (heat: 42)" [Low,Fix committed]
[15:56] <cjwatson> I think that's fine
[15:57] <barry> cjwatson: thanks.  do i need to do anything other than just dput it as normal?
[15:57] <cjwatson> just upload.  (reason I think it's fine is that I doubt people will have taken screenshots involving an obviously broken icon)
[15:58] <cjwatson> (not for docs, anyway)
[15:58] <barry> cjwatson: +1, thanks
[15:58] <cjwatson> do notify the doc team just in case though
[15:58] <barry> cjwatson: +1
[16:01] <bdrung_> do i need a release team ack for sponsoring a bug fix sync (bug #637443)?
[16:01] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 637443 in ndiswrapper (Ubuntu) "Sync ndiswrapper 1.56-3 (main) from Debian incoming/unstable (main) (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/637443
[16:02] <cjwatson> sponsoring as in giving an ack?
[16:02] <cjwatson> you don't need a release team ack provided you let ubuntu-archive do the sync
[16:25] <cjwatson> barry: ... and, if you hadn't explicitly closed the bug by hand, it would have been closed with the changelog :)
[16:26] <barry> cjwatson: gotta remember to be more patient next time :)
[16:47] <bdrung_> how high will be the change to get a freeze exception for ubuntu-dev-tool 0.103?
[16:48] <ScottK> bdrung_: Is it bug fix or really features?  Usually that one's not too hard to get an exception for.
[16:48] <bdrung_> ScottK: some bug fixes and many new scripts (= new features)
[16:49] <bdrung_> ScottK: http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/ubuntu-dev-tools/news/20100920T093212Z.html
[16:49] <ScottK> bdrung_: File an FFE that includes something to the effect that these have been tested by someone other than the person that wrote the script.  I'd leave out any for which that isn't the case.
[17:24] <robbiew> whew...loads of ubuntuone related requests today
[17:25] <ScottK> robbiew: Isn't Monday before RC the target for uploading fixes?
[17:26] <ScottK> You sound somehow suprised.
[17:27] <robbiew> heh...never surprised...especially when it comes to fixes for u1 ;)
[17:35] <bdrung_> ScottK: done: bug #643691
[17:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 643691 in ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) "FFe: Please sync ubuntu-dev-tools 0.103 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/643691
[17:37] <Laney> You should probably test that the LP API using tools work fine against production
[17:37] <ScottK> bdrung_: ^^^
[17:38] <bdrung_> Laney: do you have a list of the LP API using tools?
[17:40] <Laney> bdrung_: No, sorry.
[17:40] <Laney> bdrung_: You can probably grep for "ubuntutools.lp"
[17:43] <Laney> I don't envisage any problems as the API version was specified too
[17:43] <Laney> so maybe just testing a selection of them is enough?
[17:44] <jpds> u-d-t probably needs a testsuite.
[17:45] <Laney> yeah. But that would have to run against staging so wouldn't exercise this particular change.
[17:45] <Laney> but for other reasons, sure.
[17:46] <Laney> we really ought to actually do this splitting out of stuff too…
[17:50] <bdrung_> some tool are hard to test automatically.
[17:51] <bdrung_> for example i can't imagine a test for syncpackage.
[20:23] <doko> ScottK: Riddell around, or do you take care about the kde component mismatches?
[20:25] <ScottK> doko: I try to, but I haven't looked recently.  I have to ask someone else to change stuff anyway, so usually I leave it for others.
[20:26] <Riddell> I'll take a look tomorrow
[20:27] <doko> just thought you might be interested in the dvd builds
[20:42] <doko> Riddell: is linphone needed for kubuntu? see bug #595173
[20:42] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 595173 in linphone (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 5 other projects) "[MIR] linphone (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/595173
[20:42] <Riddell> doko: no, just a couple of libraries from the same source package
[20:43] <doko> Riddell: so just demote the binary linphone package?
[20:45] <ScottK> doko: Pushed your rebuilds through.
[20:58] <Riddell> doko: yes
[22:40] <micahg> cjwatson: are you still around?
[23:24] <cjwatson> micahg: hi
[23:24] <micahg> cjwatson: hi :), chrisccoulson mentioned that you said someone needed to look at lightning, we were unsure if you meant from the release team or peer review
[23:24] <cjwatson> hm?  I don't remember saying that
[23:25] <cjwatson> you sure it was me?
[23:25] <micahg> oh, ok, well, that's what he said...anyways, if not, can we get an ack on bug 531867 :)
[23:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 531867 in iceowl (Debian) (and 1 other project) "[FFe] [needs-packaging] Lightning 1.0 Beta for Thunderbird 3 (affects: 95) (dups: 5) (heat: 356)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/531867
[23:25] <chrisccoulson> cjwatson, i asked you last week about bug 531867, and i remember you saying it needs to be reviewed by somebody
[23:26] <chrisccoulson> at least i think that's what you said ;)
[23:32] <cjwatson> which channel was this in?  I can go back and look at logs
[23:33] <cjwatson> if you have a date/time, so much the better
[23:33] <chrisccoulson> [17:39] <cjwatson> chrisccoulson: it'll depend on whether somebody has time to review it; it won't be the most urgent thing on anyone's list, I think
[23:33] <chrisccoulson> from friday
[23:33] <chrisccoulson> i suppose my original question might help too :)
[23:33] <chrisccoulson> [17:38] <chrisccoulson> on the subject of freezes and mozilla, cjwatson, what is the chances of me getting a new package in to universe at this stage? (well, resurrecting an old one to be more precise)
[23:34] <cjwatson> ah
[23:34] <cjwatson> it's still not the most urgent thing on my list ;-)
[23:35] <chrisccoulson> cjwatson - that's ok :)
[23:35] <chrisccoulson> i think micahg was asking if it needed to be reviewed by somebody on the release team, or if it could be peer reviewed by somebody else
[23:37] <cjwatson> ffe approved anyway
[23:37] <cjwatson> an archive admin will need to review the actual package
[23:38] <chrisccoulson> cjwatson, thanks
[23:39]  * micahg hugs cjwatson