| micahg | chrisccoulson: what do you think about the flash packages? | 00:09 |
|---|---|---|
| chrisccoulson | micahg - which ones? | 00:10 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: flashplugin-installer, gnash | 00:10 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, we could try | 00:10 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I think it's appropriate | 00:11 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, i think it makes sense | 00:11 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k, well, I'll file it after lightning is in | 00:11 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: do you want me to look at the package tonight before you upload? | 00:11 |
| chrisccoulson | i think i'll just get it uploaded before i go to bed | 00:12 |
| chrisccoulson | we can fix any issues if we find them | 00:12 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k, I'm sure it's fine | 00:12 |
| fta | chromium-browser 77893 4.56% 14901 48053 14925 14 | 00:18 |
| fta | google-chrome-beta 77719 4.55% 12767 57963 6888 101 | 00:18 |
| fta | \o/ | 00:18 |
| micahg | fta: congrats | 00:19 |
| fta | next target is epiphany | 00:20 |
| fta | but it will take a while | 00:20 |
| micahg | fta: how close? | 00:20 |
| fta | epiphany-browser 165339 9.68% 6960 155851 2482 46 | 00:20 |
| fta | epiphany-gecko 86989 5.09% 482 86206 268 33 | 00:20 |
| * micahg wonders why there's an epiphany-gecko package in maverick | 00:21 | |
| fta | epiphany-webkit 4980 0.29% 4 3521 0 1455 | 00:22 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: you see any reason why we can't drop the epiphany transitional packages? | 00:22 |
| fta | for the upgrades | 00:23 |
| micahg | fta: in maverick? they were added in karmic | 00:23 |
| fta | oh, right. nm then | 00:24 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - we probably could drop them, but i think epiphany is mostly in sync with debian | 00:24 |
| chrisccoulson | (with the exception of a bookmark change last time i checked) | 00:24 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: we have Ubuntu changes | 00:25 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: maybe I should do a merge? | 00:25 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: we're 4 point releases behind | 00:26 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, that might be worth doing | 00:26 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: should I ask in -desktop or just propose it | 00:26 |
| * chrisccoulson wonders why we've not been tracking the unstable series for epiphany like the rest of gnome | 00:27 | |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: doesn't exist from what I can tell | 00:27 |
| micahg | oh, nm | 00:27 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - 2.31.5 is the current unstable version (for gnome 2.32) | 00:27 |
| micahg | it's very out of date, maybe that's why | 00:27 |
| micahg | last release was 2 months afo | 00:28 |
| micahg | *ago | 00:28 |
| chrisccoulson | we should probably update to 2.30.6 at least, anyway | 00:28 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k, I'll add it to my lis | 00:31 |
| micahg | *list | 00:31 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - thanks. perhaps ask didrocks tomorrow if he thinks it's worth updating to 2.31.5 | 00:31 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I'd personally think it's better to take the stable release unless there will be and we'll be updating to the 2.32.x release after release | 00:32 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, there'll be a 2.32 release, as it tracks the gnome release schedule | 00:32 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k, does that mean I can SRU 2.30.6 to lucid? | 00:32 |
| chrisccoulson | possibly. i think we relaxed the SRU criteria in lucid to make it easier to get gnome stable updates in | 00:33 |
| chrisccoulson | but you'd need to have a look at what changed between the 2 versions | 00:33 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k | 00:34 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: epiphany has a ton of bugs in Debian | 00:34 |
| chrisccoulson | heh :) | 00:34 |
| micahg | even more than we have | 00:35 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| era | yo. | 03:51 |
| era | any chance that chromium will have an ambiance theme for maverick? | 03:52 |
| JanC | if it's not in the repositories yet, I doubt it will | 04:19 |
| micahg | era: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/09/ubuntu-10-10-ambiance-radiance-themes-for-chrome-firefox-opera/ | 04:34 |
| micahg | hi chrisccoulson | 08:57 |
| chrisccoulson | hi micahg | 08:58 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I took a look at the lightning package, I noticed that no mozclient is used to pull a tarball | 08:58 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, that's ok for maverick. the old version didn't use it either | 08:59 |
| chrisccoulson | we can fix that once we've made it work with dh7 | 08:59 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: right, but there should at least be instructions on where to get the tarball | 08:59 |
| chrisccoulson | but, in the meantime, i just used thunderbird to create the tarball, but with the lightning release tag | 08:59 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: can you add a README.source that says that | 08:59 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, it should probably have instructions in there | 09:00 |
| chrisccoulson | i'll push the packaging to bzr and we can do it there | 09:00 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: so, do you want to do away with building a source in a separate tree | 09:01 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - you mean, like with the embedded tarball we use for everything else? | 09:02 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: yes, and build-tree/mozilla for the source decompression/build | 09:03 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - the only reason i did it like it is for now is that there doesn't seem to be any native support for embedded tarballs in dh7 (although, we could add the logic to debian/rules ourselves, but that just makes things more complicated) | 09:04 |
| chrisccoulson | and because we can use bzip compression for the tarballs anyway, it doesn't really matter too much | 09:04 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: so you want to switch away from CDBS/dh mix to pure dh7? | 09:04 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - we should eventually move to dh7 entirely if we can. now i've done lightning, i can see where some of the limitations might be ;) | 09:05 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k, I've seen some heated CDBS/dh discussions on some l.d.o lists | 09:07 |
| chrisccoulson | oh, i'd be interested to see those ;) | 09:07 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: pkg-multimedia has had a few recently | 09:07 |
| chrisccoulson | thanks, i'll check them out | 09:08 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I tried gnash and it didn't work, but I think the issue was due to old build-deps, I'll try again with updated build-deps | 09:08 |
| chrisccoulson | oh, it didn't build? | 09:09 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: no, it built and installed and even with the correct alternative, but ubufox didn't recognize it, I was thinking it might have to do with the new binary package name | 09:10 |
| chrisccoulson | hmmm, that seems a bit strange | 09:10 |
| chrisccoulson | have you hosted the merge anywhere? | 09:10 |
| micahg | when I set the alternative manually, it was recognized | 09:10 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: no, but I can give you the debdiff from 0.8.8-5 | 09:11 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, i can take a look at that | 09:11 |
| micahg | http://paste.ubuntu.com/497567/, I dropped the translation timestamp updates | 09:13 |
| chrisccoulson | thanks | 09:13 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: it was at least recognized before the package name change, it just didn't work | 09:14 |
| * micahg doesn't understand the pfs yet | 09:14 | |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I already have an FFe filed, but I needed to provide more info | 09:15 |
| fta | micahg, did you try my script for the wiki? | 15:17 |
| dpm | hey chrisccoulson, on bug 632760 is someone looking into merging your patch to po2xpi? | 16:51 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 632760 in language-pack-pt (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Language variants don't work in Firefox because the language codes are separated with an underscore rather than a hyphen in chrome.manifest (affects: 1) (heat: 437)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/632760 | 16:51 |
| chrisccoulson | dpm - i think pitti did it already | 17:22 |
| chrisccoulson | you might want to check with him though | 17:22 |
| dpm | chrisccoulson, I'll do, thanks! | 17:22 |
| fta | dpm, did you try my script for the wiki? i still see the old page for firefox :( | 17:30 |
| dpm | fta, I had a look at the script but I haven't had the chance to update the pages, as I have to check which FF and TB translations have been merged. | 17:31 |
| dpm | let me try to do this in a few minutes | 17:31 |
| * chrisccoulson wonders what on earth the PPA builders are doing | 18:01 | |
| chrisccoulson | long queue, but half of them are idle | 18:01 |
| chrisccoulson | oh, well, they were a minute ago :/ | 18:03 |
| fta | chrisccoulson, it's because they are now doing the TranslationTemplatesBuildJobs | 18:05 |
| fta | and they're really bad at balancing the traffic, seems like they do it only once every 15min so if they get a build that take less time, they stay idle until the next cycle | 18:06 |
| fta | a real waste | 18:06 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: fta: there a builder sprint ATM with 2 LP devs | 18:07 |
| micahg | fta: also, ch-dev/daily was scored down, I had them rescore | 18:08 |
| fta | micahg, did they say why they did it? | 18:09 |
| micahg | fta: yeah, there were limited build resources before for lpia, so they lowered it for that arch | 18:09 |
| fta | weird as that ppa has a low activity | 18:10 |
| fta | much lower than the other 4 | 18:10 |
| micahg | daily has low activity? | 18:10 |
| fta | no, -dev | 18:10 |
| micahg | idk | 18:11 |
| fta | https://edge.launchpad.net/~kendalltweaver/+archive/peppermint/+build/1968710 | 18:11 |
| fta | ?? | 18:11 |
| micahg | fta: people do silly things :) | 18:12 |
| chrisccoulson | fta - yeah, i noticed that | 18:13 |
| micahg | This PPA contains some packages built with precompiled vanilla builds directly from Mozilla. For the full source code please visit: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/ | 18:13 |
| chrisccoulson | yet another person who's just bundling pre-compiled firefox binaries | 18:13 |
| micahg | I think that might violate the PPA TOS, no? | 18:13 |
| chrisccoulson | possibly, i'm not entirely sure about that tbh | 18:13 |
| chrisccoulson | if he breaks our installs, then i will poke him in the eyes with a blunt instrument | 18:13 |
| chrisccoulson | :) | 18:13 |
| micahg | heh | 18:13 |
| micahg | well, I should send out an announcement later to the team ML | 18:14 |
| micahg | I posted to identi.ca yesterday | 18:14 |
| micahg | k, I'm off to work...bbiab | 18:14 |
| dpm | fta, I've just updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Translations/Wanted/FirefoxDesktop - your script worked perfectly except for getting the Generic Name and Comment headers on the table swapped. I need to run now, but I'll take care of the TB page tomorrow. Thanks! | 18:42 |
| fta | great | 18:42 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: can you have a look at mozilla 580970 | 19:56 |
| ubot2 | Mozilla bug 580970 in Theme "Tabs on top with Ubuntu Radiance and Ambiance looks less unified than it could" [Minor,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580970 | 19:57 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, i've already tried to find somebody involved with theming to comment on that | 20:11 |
| chrisccoulson | no joy yet though | 20:11 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: thanks | 20:11 |
| gnomefreak | i still cant get chromium to save passwords even with a new profile and having saved passwords and bookmarks imported | 21:19 |
| gnomefreak | and now thunderbird is back to being unable to connect to pop and smtp so now i cant get email nor send it. | 21:36 |
| === gavin__ is now known as gavin | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!