[00:13] <cjwatson> could somebody review my grub2 upload?
[00:15] <ogra> can someone let jasper-iniramfs through ?
[00:15] <ogra> (i'd really like to have it on tomorrows images)
[00:19] <cjwatson> ogra: looking
[00:19] <ogra> thanks
[00:19] <ogra> its the same upload as before, just with the typo fixed
[00:19] <cjwatson> accepted
[00:19] <ogra> thanks :)
[06:02] <micahg> could someone please look at bug 631221
[06:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 631221 in calendarserver (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync calendarserver 2.4.dfsg-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) (affects: 10) (dups: 2) (heat: 366)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/631221
[07:35] <ara> morning!
[10:02] <cjwatson> micahg: done
[10:10] <ogra> hrm .... http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-netbook/ports/daily-preinstalled/20100921/
[10:11] <ogra> antimony agrees www/full/ doesnt have them either
[10:11]  * ogra would have said we have a space prob, but apparently there are 96G free atm
[10:12] <ogra> uuuh
[10:13] <ogra> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-netbook/maverick/ports_daily-preinstalled-20100921.log
[10:13] <ogra> ===== Building Ubuntu-Netbook daily CDs =====
[10:13] <ogra> Tue Sep 21 03:14:35 UTC 2010
[10:13] <ogra> .: 5: CONF.sh: not found
[10:13] <ogra> ===== Publishing =====
[10:14] <cjwatson> was that a by-hand build of any kind?
[10:14] <cjwatson> so antimony was just upgraded to lucid; I'll check whether it's related to that
[10:15] <ogra> no, thats a cron build
[10:15] <ogra> the normal daily
[10:16] <cjwatson> looks like a bash/dash thing, will fix by backporting from upstream
[10:16] <ogra> nromal daily has it too, yeah
[10:16] <ogra> (x86 i mean)
[10:20] <cjwatson> fixed
[10:21] <cjwatson> ARCHES='armel+omap armel+omap4' for-project ubuntu-netbook cron.ports_daily-preinstalled, right?
[10:21] <cjwatson> I'll rerun yours first as a reward for reporting it ;-)
=== doko_ is now known as doko
[11:28] <ara> Riddell, around?
[11:29] <Riddell> hi ara
[11:33] <Riddell> ara: are you able to edit the test cases?
[11:34] <Riddell> for Kubuntu Desktop i386 and Kubuntu Desktop amd64 I'd like "Live Session" replaced with "Live Session Desktop" and "Live Session Netbook"
[11:34] <ara> Riddell, hello
[11:34] <ara> Riddell, yes, I can do thtat
[11:35] <ara> so, you want a new testcase?
[11:35] <Riddell> ara: yes
[11:35] <ara> we need to modifiy the text then
[11:36] <Riddell> ara: also for images "Kubuntu Netbook Arm (omap)" should be "Kubuntu Mobile Arm (omap)"
[11:36] <ara>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
[11:36] <ara>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
[11:36] <ara>                                                                                                                                                                           
[11:36] <ara> Riddell, how we distinguish Kubuntu Live Session Desktop and Netbook
[11:36] <ara> ?
[11:37] <ara> Riddell, also, I pinged you to ask you one thing :)
[11:37] <Riddell> ara: well they look different, one looks like a typical desktop setup while the other looks like a netbook setup.  which starts up depends on the hardware you have
[11:38] <ara> Riddell, that's the thing we need to determined
[11:38] <ara> we need a proper testcase, so people aren't confused
[11:38] <Riddell> ara: if the session works
[11:38] <Riddell> does the workspace start up, can you launch applications, can you launch the installer
[11:39] <Riddell> is it translated, do the plasmoids all work, can you connect to the network etc
[11:39] <ara> Riddell, that's not what I mean, I meant the distinction on launching one hting or the other
[11:39] <ara> i.e., which is the size limit?
[11:39] <ara> when does a desktop becomes a netbook and vice-versa?
[11:39] <Riddell> ara: the netbook workspace starts if you have no CD drive, have a battery and a screen < 700 pixels high
[11:40] <Riddell> otherwise it starts the desktop workspace
[11:40] <ara> OK :)
[11:40] <ara> that's what I needed :)
[11:40] <ara>  Riddell, I am getting the plymouth text mode with text "Ubuntu 10.10" (and purple colour). where do I filed the bug?
[11:40] <ara> (in Kubuntu, I mean)
[11:40] <Riddell> is bug 613636
[11:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 613636 in plymouth (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu Maveric ISOs show purple "Ubuntu 10.10" boot splash instead of the blue Kubuntu one. (affects: 1) (heat: 80)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613636
[11:41] <ara> OK, thanks
[11:41] <Riddell> maybe I should look at that today
[11:41] <Riddell> ara: also need "Kubuntu Desktop Arm (omap)" with "Live Session" test case
[11:42] <ara> with both?
[11:43] <Riddell> ara: how do you mean?
[11:45] <Riddell> we need both "Kubuntu Mobile Arm (omap)" and "Kubuntu Desktop Arm (omap)"
[11:47] <ogra> cjwatson, merci :)
[12:32] <sistpoty|work> cody-somerville: are you ok to act as ubuntu-release delegate for xubuntu for this cycle again?
[12:32] <sistpoty|work> oh, and does anyone happen to know wether seb128 is on vac? he and cody are the only persons on my list from whom I haven't got a confirmation yet
[12:33] <cjwatson> I vaguely remember seb128 being on vacation, yes
[12:34] <sistpoty|work> oh, hm. what do we do with gnome then?
[12:37] <sistpoty|work> maybe just not delegate gnome for this cycle and try to get it sorted out early for natty?
[12:38] <ogra> sistpoty|work, for urgent requests try didrocks, though note that he is overworked already
[12:39] <sistpoty|work> ogra: would be ok for me
[12:43] <doko> what do we do with the libcairo-perl test failures, just ignore them?
=== jjohansen is now known as jj-afk
[13:17] <doko> ogra: OOo now built in maverick, should be downloadable in about 20min. please can you check it?
[13:17] <ogra> doko, oh, didnt GrueMaster contact you yet ?
[13:18] <ogra> he was tasked with the kakadu tests
[13:18] <doko> ogra: no
[13:18] <ogra> yesterday actually
[13:18] <ogra> bah
[13:18] <doko> anyway, it's now in the archive
[13:18] <ogra> ok
[13:18] <doko> still building for lucid
[13:25] <ScottK> Riddell: Is libosip2 supposed to be in Universe?
[13:25] <ScottK> (it's in the Kubuntu package set)
[13:26] <Riddell> ScottK: I'm onto it
[13:26] <Riddell> doko moved it there
[13:26] <ScottK> I can accept it into Main when I review it if you want?
[13:26] <Riddell> presumably to revoke kees MIR and get me to add a .symbols file, which I'm doing now
[13:26] <Riddell> ScottK: yes please do
[13:26] <ScottK> OK.
[13:27] <ScottK> Still waiting for the diff.
[13:27] <doko> Riddell: no, I didn't move it there ... really please keep an eye on component mismatches that you introduce when promoting stuff
[13:28] <Riddell> shrug, someone did, after I'd already moved it to main with bug 595162
[13:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 595162 in libosip2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libosip2 (affects: 1) (heat: 40)" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/595162
[13:29] <ScottK> Riddell: Done.
[13:30] <Riddell> ScottK: kdesdk needing review too while you're in the mood
[13:30] <ScottK> Yep.  Waiting for the diff.
[13:33] <doko> Riddell: preparing libexosip too?
[13:33] <Riddell> doko: yes
[13:34] <doko> Riddell: ok, closing these bug reports. wasn't aware of these, and didn't demote it myself (if it was ever promoted)
[13:37] <ScottK> Riddell: libexosip should get promoted too when I review/accept it?
[13:37] <doko> ScottK: yes, see bug #595165
[13:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 595165 in libexosip2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libexosip2 (affects: 1) (heat: 40)" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/595165
[13:38] <ScottK> Riddell: For kdesdk - When you added back poxml, you dropped some antlr related files for it's .install file.  Shouldn't those get put back too?
[13:39] <ScottK> Riddell: libexosip accepted too.
[13:41] <Riddell> ScottK: no those files don't exist in our build
[13:41] <ScottK> OK.
[13:41] <Riddell> not sure why they do in Debian's, but they're not needed
[13:41] <ScottK> Riddell: Accepted that one too.
[13:41] <Riddell> maybe they have different antlr packaging
[13:46] <stgraber> That pidgin upload simply includes a tested upstream patch to fix Bonjour support (in current maverick, a user can't initiate a new Bonjour conversation).
[13:46] <ScottK> Riddell: FYI, quassel just did a security release.  I'm packaging it now.
[13:49] <Riddell> ScottK: thanks, anything needing done for lucid or older?
[13:50] <ScottK> Riddell: Yes.  See Bug 629774.
[13:50] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 629774 in quassel (Ubuntu) "Undisclosed ctcp based DoS vulnerability (affects: 1) (heat: 262)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/629774
[13:51] <Riddell> no CVE number?
[13:52] <ScottK> Not AFAIK.
[13:52] <ScottK> I don't think they felt like doing the paperwork.  They just mailed vendor-sec.
[13:58] <doko> now looking at bug #597254 ...
[13:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 597254 in srtp (Ubuntu) "[MIR] srtp (affects: 1) (heat: 40)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/597254
[14:01] <Riddell> srtp has the troublesome property of not building locally for me :(
[14:37] <ScottK> Riddell: ^^^ quassel security fix for you.
[14:43] <sistpoty|work> ScottK: did you send a mail to u-d-a regarding final freeze for unseeded universe yet?
[14:43] <ScottK> sistpoty|work: I did.  It's in the moderation queue.
[14:43] <ScottK> Maybe robbiew has been busy.
[14:44] <sistpoty|work> ah, k, thanks
[14:47]  * Riddell moves  kubuntu-mobile  to main
[15:00] <robbiew> ScottK: I don't have access to u-d-a moderation :/
[15:00] <ScottK> Shoot.  Who does?
[15:00] <ScottK> cjwatson: Do you?
[15:00] <robbiew> ack...I believe he does
[15:06] <cjwatson> yes
[15:07] <cjwatson> ScottK: moderated
[15:07] <ScottK> cjwatson: Thanks.
[15:09] <sistpoty|work> \o/
[15:16] <ogra> ScottK, sistpoty|work, you should offer a deal ... uploads get only approved if an FTBFS gets fixed additionally on a 1:1 relationship ;)
[15:17] <sistpoty|work> heh
[15:17] <persia> What happens to folk who mostly upload FTBFSs?  Are credits transferable?
[15:17] <ogra> only collectable i'd say
[15:18] <ogra> turns FTBFSers automatically into universe sponsors ;)
[15:18] <persia> heh
[15:56] <doko> please consider llvm-2.8, llvm-defaults and opengtl (bug #632727)
[15:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 632727 in opengtl (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 11 other projects) "FFe: include llvm 2.8 and corresponding package in maverick (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/632727
=== bjf[afk] is now known as bjf
[16:15] <doko> Riddell: srtp not accepted. can we demote linphone? the ortp library should be built separately
[16:17] <Riddell> doko: that won't help, libortp8 depends on libsrtp
[16:18] <doko> ohh joy ...
[16:41] <smoser> hi. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-api-tools/+bug/644074 i'm wondering if there is enough info there, or whatelse i would need to add to get that bug accepted for FFE.
[16:41] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 644074 in ec2-api-tools (Ubuntu) "upgrade ec2-api-tools to 1.3-57419 (api version 2010-08-31) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Medium,In progress]
[16:50] <sistpoty|work> smoser: have you tested the new features yet?
=== jj-afk is now known as jjohansen
[16:58] <doko> can I sync python-imaging from unstable? see bug #622388
[16:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 622388 in python-imaging (Debian) (and 1 other project) "_imagingcms.so missing in python-imaging (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/622388
[17:02] <sistpoty|work> doko: ACK
[17:05] <doko> sistpoty|work: thanks, synced
[17:09] <micahg> cjwatson: thanks
[17:13] <Cimi> hi
[17:32] <smoser> sistpoty|work, sorry, yes, tested some of them.
[17:36] <sistpoty|work> smoser: ok for me then, but please keep an eye open for regressions
[17:36] <smoser> ok, so i'm ok to upload ?
[17:36] <sistpoty|work> smoser: yep
[17:40] <ScottK> sistpoty|work: If you want me to push accept on packages you've reviewed the diff on, just give me a ping.
[17:41] <sistpoty|work> ScottK: ok, will do
[17:42] <sistpoty|work> however right now, I'll be heading home :)... cya
[18:52] <ScottK> That's some fast reviewing.
[21:11] <zul> hi can someone approve the upload for landscape-client FFE please (LP: #641264)
[21:53] <doko> Riddell: kdesvn: kdesvn-kio-plugins libsvnqt6
[21:53] <doko>    [Reverse-Depends: kdesdk, kdesvn-kio-plugins]
[22:18] <ScottK> slangasek: I'd appreciate it if you'd ack ^^^ clamav.  See Bug #644707 for details.
[22:18] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 644707 in clamav (Ubuntu) "FFe for clamav 0.96.3 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/644707
[23:51] <slangasek> ScottK: accepted
[23:51] <ScottK> slangasek: Thanks.