[02:46] <intrader> Reporting back about bug 631130. An automatic update updated the NVIDIA driver to version .18 (from .17). I am still testing, but it seems better. I have noted in bug report
[02:46] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 631130 in opensuse (and 3 other projects) "In all apps, slow UI since 10.04 install (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 20)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/631130
[05:39] <xelister> kmail's address book is unusable, making entire program unsuitable for any serious use
[05:39] <xelister> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/643248  can we set its prio
[05:39] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 643248 in kdepim (Ubuntu) "kmail problems with kaddressbook - what is used for autocomplete, how to edit it (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New]
[05:46] <persia> xelister, Looks like it's "Medium" to me (normal class of bug), but I don't like to set importance until we're a little closer to having any idea why it doesn't work, personally.
[08:47] <micahg> where would a bug against the xfce menu go?
[08:48] <persia> Probably xfce3-panel or libsfcemenu
[08:48] <persia> Err, libxfce4menu
[08:49]  * micahg will file against the panel, there are 2 entries for logout
[08:49] <persia> And xfce4-panel
[08:49] <persia> Oh, that might be a xubuntu-settings thing.  Dunno.
[08:50]  * micahg will file and check with charlie-tca later
[08:50] <persia> That's best :)  It probably needs triage to determine what causes the issue: same as with gnome-panel, where any of 10 packages can cause the issue
[09:25] <mr_pouit> micahg: can you make a screenshot of that?
[09:26] <micahg> mr_pouit: how can I get the menu to stay open for a screenshor?
[09:26] <mr_pouit> mmh, add a delay?
[09:27] <micahg> mr_pouit: will do
[09:32] <micahg> mr_pouit: done, bug 644969
[09:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 644969 in xfce4-panel (Ubuntu) "2 Log Out menu entries in the Xfce menu (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/644969
[09:34] <mr_pouit> thanks
[09:35] <mr_pouit> micahg: I think you're using the default menu file (from xfce not xubuntu)
[09:35] <micahg> mr_pouit: how can I check?
[09:36] <mr_pouit> in the plugin configuration, check from which directory is the menu file
[09:38]  * micahg doesn't know where that is
[09:41] <mr_pouit> micahg: mmmh, $HOME/.config/xfce4/panel/menu-plugin.rc or something like that
[09:41] <micahg> mr_pouit: it doesn't show one
[09:43] <mr_pouit> micahg: do you use gdm?
[09:44] <micahg> mr_pouit: I switched to kdm
[09:44] <mr_pouit> and do you use the 'xfce' or 'xubuntu' session?
[09:44]  * micahg can make sure that the xubuntu session is loaded next time and verify
[09:44]  * micahg doesn't remember
[09:44] <mr_pouit> anyway, it will probably only work with gdm
[09:45] <micahg> oh?  that sounds like a bug
[09:46] <mr_pouit> micahg: well, that's not really a bug, it just relies on a gdm script which sets XDG_CONFIG_DIRS automatically...
[09:46] <micahg> oh, so maybe it's a bug in kdm if that's not being set
[09:47] <mr_pouit> well, wishlist at most, but the xsession.d script from gdm is ubuut-specific afaik
[09:47] <micahg> I have a xfce4-menu-1.rc file in that directory
[09:47] <micahg> well, I won't switch back to gdm until they fix the user list issue
[09:49] <persia> which user list issue?
[09:49] <micahg> persia: no option to turn off the user list, was that fixed for maverick?
[09:50] <mr_pouit> micahg: anyway, these extras menu entries are added by xubuntu-default-settings, but with the xubuntu default menu file, the old ones are not visible (with the xfce4 menu file, they are though, and I don't really intend to fix that)
[09:50] <mr_pouit> micahg: so you can probably set $XDG_CONFIG_DIRS manually to fix that
[09:50] <micahg> mr_pouit: k, thanks
[09:50] <persia> micahg, No idea (but it oughtn't be that hard to fix if one wants to fiddle)
[09:52] <micahg> looks like it should be fixed, I'll try it now
[09:52] <micahg> brb
[09:58] <cjae> ok this is a huge and I have mentioned it since 7.04, if someone adds an incorrect deb line via gui or /etc/apt/sources.list the gui will crash letting non-cli users fix it
[09:58] <cjae> the only way I can see to fix it is editing sources list
[09:59] <cjae> by gui I mean synaptic
[10:03] <micahg> mr_pouit: looks much better with xubuntu session
[10:03] <micahg> persia: gdm user list thing still broke
[13:39] <AbhiJit> hi
[14:04] <xelister> hello
[14:06] <xelister> would it be possible for [one of] best email client on linux  to be at least as good as outlook was since around 1999 - to have a working address book? Because mine address book is not working - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/643248
[14:06] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 643248 in kdepim (Ubuntu) "kmail problems with kaddressbook - what is used for autocomplete, how to edit it (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New]
[14:09] <kamusin> ooh ubot2.0 has more superpowers :O
[16:31] <kamusin> bug 1
[16:31] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1 in tilix (and 19 other projects) "Microsoft has a majority market share (affects: 598) (heat: 3016)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
[16:46] <kamusin> bug 5
[16:46] <ubot2> kamusin: Bug 5 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/5 is private
[16:48] <micahg> !msgthebot | kamusin
[16:48] <ubot2> kamusin: Please investigate with me only with "/msg ubottu Bot" or in #ubuntu-bots.  Search for factoids with "/msg ubottu !search factoid".
[16:49] <devildante> micahg, sorry for that... I'm the one who tells him to do that :p
[16:49] <devildante> then again, I told him to /query ubot2 :p
[16:51] <devildante> anyway, I can't access bug 5 even though I'm in BC now
[16:51] <ubot2> devildante: Bug 5 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/5 is private
[16:51] <devildante> any reasons why?
[16:52] <devildante> (kamusin also can't access it)
[16:52] <kamusin> micahg,  sorry for the noise
[17:02] <charlie-tca> sometimes access also depends on the actual package it is filed against
[17:02] <devildante> I suppose it could be a private bug against Launchpad itself?
[17:03] <charlie-tca> possible
[17:06] <kamusin> well .. we tried  devildante :P
[17:06] <devildante> heh :p
[17:07] <dandel> which channel is the best channel to report and help test backport bugs?
[17:08] <devildante> this one? :p
[17:08]  * devildante is not sure
[17:08] <dandel> ok... then i'll get to reporting.
[17:08] <dandel> bug 607505 - (Vlc backport), has broken 64-bit packages on the testing.
[17:08] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 607505 in lucid-backports "[test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.3 (affects: 4) (heat: 25)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/607505
[17:09] <dandel> all that is seen is the 32-bit packages, and no 64-bit packages.
[17:09] <micahg> dandel: it should be 1.1.4 at thsi point
[17:09] <devildante> They will come in due time
[17:09] <micahg> dandel: I had the same issue when I tried to backport it
[17:10] <dandel> 1.1.4 or 1.1.3 doesn't matter... what matters is the testing packages that are put up don't always include the 64-bit version.
[17:10] <micahg> dandel: well, it's the responsibility of the whoever is driving/requesting the backport to work on it
[17:10] <dandel> another bug that is showing a break is bug 585045
[17:10] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 585045 in lucid-backports "[test-pkg-a] Please backport Calibre 0.7.13 (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/585045
[17:11] <micahg> dandel: there's nothing to report there, you can poke in #ubuntu-motu if a dev is available to look at it
[17:57] <charlie-tca> QA meeting in three minutes in #ubuntu-quality
[18:27] <MichealH> How would I go about a feature request?
[18:27] <MichealH> File a bug?
[18:31] <vish> MichealH: if its a small request then yes
[18:31] <vish> MichealH: if its a much larger change , nearly a new idea , then brainstorm
[18:33] <MichealH> vish: I would like the default evolution mesage to use branding
[18:34] <MichealH> vish: Would that be BIG or small
[18:35] <charlie-tca> That would mean sending all your messages html?
[18:35] <vish> MichealH: i dont know what that means by "to use branding"
[18:35] <MichealH> vish: To use the Ubuntu Branding
[18:35] <AbhiJit> bye gn
[18:35] <AbhiJit> sd
[18:35] <MichealH> charlie-tca: Its local on the computer
[18:36] <vish> MichealH: still not sure...  but yeah file a bug... thats not too big
[18:37] <MichealH> vish: I haz done it
[18:37] <vish> MichealH: bug#  ?
[18:37] <MichealH> I done the thing already!
[18:38] <vish> MichealH: yeah , i meant what is the bug number .. ;)
[18:38] <MichealH> vish: I havent filed yet
[18:38] <MichealH> .topic
[18:38] <MichealH> Uhh...
[18:39] <vish> MichealH: huh! then i understood this wrong ;) <MichealH> vish: I haz done it
[18:42] <MichealH> vish: It wont let me file! :'(
[18:45] <elopio> good morning people.
[18:46] <elopio> it seems that pedro is away. Can somebody else be my mentor for today? :)
[18:46] <elopio> I have a couple of questions.
[18:46] <MichealH> Good evening elopio
[18:46] <MichealH> IM LAGGING
[18:46]  * MichealH restarts irssi
[19:08] <charlie-tca> elopio: feel free to ask your questions. Anyone here that can help you will be happy to.
[19:11] <elopio> charlie-tca: yes, thanks. I was going to shoot my question but got distracted :)
[19:11] <elopio> I'm triaging xournal bugs. But I don't know what to do with this one: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xournal/+bug/625145
[19:11] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 625145 in xournal (Ubuntu) "xournal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_hash_table_lookup() (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Medium,New]
[19:11] <elopio> should I forward it upstream?
[19:14] <charlie-tca> it looks like us
[19:14] <charlie-tca> I think it is something we did (as in ubuntu)
[19:18] <elopio> charlie-tca: so I'll better leave it as new?
[19:18] <njin> hello fellows, can someone decript ? bug 641998
[19:18] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 641998 in ubuntu "segfault at 0 ip 00007f7bd48ac7ac sp 00007fff53fa8610 error 4 in libperl.so.5.10.1[7f7bd47ef000+162000] (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/641998
[19:18] <charlie-tca> I think so. I don't know the package, myself.
[19:19] <elopio> ok. Thanks. I'll subscribe myself to see how it gets solved.
[19:22] <charlie-tca> njin: server bug in the kernel
[19:24] <njin> charlie-tca: thanks, assign to linux
[19:29] <njin> charlie-tca: ubuntu server use apport ?
[20:04] <hggdh> yes
[20:04] <charlie-tca> njin: not sure
[20:05] <hggdh> if it is not there, 'sudo apt-get install apport' will get it; keep in mind that, by default, apport is truned off on stable releases
[20:05] <njin> thanks
[20:05] <hggdh> welcome
[20:06] <hggdh> njin: when running on a server, ideally you will move the crash file over to a system where you can run a web browser
[20:07] <njin> hggdh: Thanks
[20:09]  * njin want to know if someone have notice about pedro_
[20:09] <charlie-tca> pedro_ is off today on holiday
[20:10] <njin> thanks
[20:10]  * charlie-tca doesn't know how many days "today" is
[20:10] <njin> LOL charlie
[20:10] <hggdh> charlie-tca: when we reach tomorrow, it will be today again...
[20:10] <charlie-tca> yup
[20:10] <njin> ahhhaa
[20:11] <hggdh> so, what you said will still be (possibly) true
[20:11] <charlie-tca> and, if pedro is not here,  pedro_ is off "today" on holiday
[20:11] <hggdh> there you go :-)
[20:11] <charlie-tca> :-)
[20:16]  * njin has just deleted another windows and a new ubuntu user is borning! Hip hip hurra
[20:17] <charlie-tca> Yay!
[21:06] <madsy> There is no 'git' metapackage. Can/should I report that to launchpad as a feature request?
[21:09] <micahg> madsy: git-all
[21:09] <madsy> Aha
[21:09] <madsy> Good thing I asked here first then
[22:14] <GrueMaster> I have a couple of bugs that I don't think are armel specific, but more netbook image related.  Problem is I don't know what to file them against.
[22:14] <GrueMaster> One is when I insert a USB drive, I get two file managers and a dbus error window.  Second is gnome-codec-install will fail if universe is not available in /etc/apt/sources.list.
[22:15] <GrueMaster> I don't know what creates sources.list on our preinstalled images, and haven't tried to reproduce it on x86 yet.  The other bug I have seen before on x86 but it has been a while.
[22:22] <GrueMaster> Any ideas?
[23:58] <ldunn> Looking at bug 642771, seems like a wishlist bug. Could I get someone to set the importance accordingly?
[23:58] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 642771 in rhythmbox-ubuntuone-music-store (Ubuntu) "my downloads needs a 'sort by status' option (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/642771