[09:06] doko: ttx mentioned to me that there was a situation developing in Debian re ant - can you fill me in on the details? [09:15] I thought it was about adopting the ant1.7 and ant (1.8) debian packages, but we seem to already have them [09:15] * ttx is a bit confused as well [09:19] ttx: we do - lucid has 1.7 and maverick has 1.8 [09:21] JamesPage: maverick also has "ant1.7" that is bound to 1.7 [09:21] for packages incompatible with ant 1.8 [09:21] I suspect the "situation developing" was that some software suddenly didn't work with 1.8, and needed to be switched to build with ant1.7 [09:22] I suspect it to be mostly "developed" at this point, but there may still be things needing modification. [09:23] persia: doko wanted us to handle something when Natty opens [09:23] so I think he had something specific in mind [10:35] JamesPage, ttx: we still have ant1.8 in the archive, which should be removed, I see that the default is already 1.8, so maybe I wasn't awake when telling you about getting it fixed early for natty [10:36] ack [10:41] doko: ok - will ant1.8 be removed for maverick or natty? [10:51] JamesPage: yes, if you take care of it ;p [10:51] file a bug report and subscribe ubuntu-archive [10:52] if we don't have any b-d's or b's on ant1.8 we could do it even now [10:59] No b-d's or b's on ant1.8 in either lucid or maverick - I'll file a bug report now :-) [11:00] doko: should this be removed for just maverick as its now the default ant option? [11:04] JamesPage: yes, I introduced ant1.8 late in lucid to get a recernt ant without changing the default. debian did decide to update to 1.8 and provide an ant1.7, but that was too late for lucid [11:04] doko: OK understand - just read the bug report associated with the lucid FFE [11:09] doko, ttx: raised under bug 645063 [11:09] Launchpad bug 645063 in ant1.8 (Ubuntu) "Please remove ant1.8 from maverick archive (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/645063