| lamont | smb`: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/645653 | 00:38 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 645653 in linux (Ubuntu) "kernel is unbuildably large (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Confirmed] | 00:38 |
| kees | hah | 00:52 |
| lamont | kees: you say that now... | 00:57 |
| jjohansen | lamont: don't worry openoffice will catch up in size | 00:59 |
| lamont | jjohansen: I'm seriously considering quotas at around 15GB when natty opens | 01:05 |
| lamont | karmic was a mere 14GB | 01:12 |
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
| jjohansen | lamont: the kernel build is a pig, I am not sure what we can do about it | 01:18 |
| lamont | jjohansen: removing .o files after the link stage comes to mind as a likely option | 01:21 |
| jjohansen | lamont: that has to be done incrementally however, and then it interferes with the ability to incremental builds | 01:22 |
| lamont | building the .deb files one at a time (skipping dh_builddeb) would be a much less sane but doable option | 01:22 |
| lamont | still, not being able to build packages in a ppa that we build in the distro is just plain bad | 01:23 |
| jjohansen | agreed | 01:23 |
| jjohansen | and we need kernel ppas | 01:23 |
| lamont | anyway, afk for me. | 01:27 |
| === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk | ||
| * vanhoof waits and keeps his fingers crossed that https://edge.launchpad.net/~leannogasawara/+archive/kernel-ppa holds all the fixes he needs :D | 02:02 | |
| === amitk is now known as amitk-afk | ||
| === amitk-afk is now known as amitk | ||
| === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks | ||
| === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk | ||
| lag | cnd: ping | 13:53 |
| === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks | ||
| === amitk is now known as amitk-afk | ||
| === ivoks is now known as ivoks-itc | ||
| ogasawara | smb, bjf, sconklin, kees: fyi bug 643971 | 16:42 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 643971 in linux (Ubuntu) "security updates issued Sept. 18, 2010 causes system to repeatedly boot into initramfs (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/643971 | 16:42 |
| kees | ogasawara: weird; doesn't really sound kernel related. | 16:45 |
| smb | ogasawara, thanks for the pointer. looking... | 16:45 |
| smb | kees, Yeah | 16:45 |
| smb | Feels a bit like maybe a udev race but probably need to read more closely | 16:45 |
| ogasawara | kees: yah, the bug seems to need further investigation | 16:45 |
| smb | ogasawara, kees Hm, nothing really obvious in the dmesg there. Likely the files were taken from the good boot anyway | 16:52 |
| === jj-afk is now known as jjohansen | ||
| kees | smb: your quick handling of the root-escalation vulns has been noticed: http://lwn.net/Articles/405662/ :) | 18:51 |
| smb | kees, Gosh I wanna see. if I would remember the subscription details... :/ | 18:52 |
| jjohansen | smb: you have to set up an lwn account then send the account details to someone in canonical /me hasn't done it yet either | 19:01 |
| smb | jjohansen, Yeah, I have part 1 but try to remember the someone for part 2 | 19:02 |
| jjohansen | smb: Email maria.randazzo@canonical.com with your lwn username which will be generated once | 19:04 |
| jjohansen | you have created an account | 19:04 |
| smb | jjohansen, Ah thanks, should do that | 19:05 |
| Edgan | When is 2.6.32-25 going to get released as an official update to Lucid? | 19:17 |
| bjf | Edgan: can't give a specific date for that, it's working it's way through our process | 19:21 |
| Edgan | bjf: I keep running into an issue with kernels going into limbo with a message in dmesg about 120 seconds. It is getting old. | 19:29 |
| bjf | Edgan: do you have a bug number we can look at? | 19:30 |
| bjf | Edgan: have you tried the 2.6.32-25 kernel and does it fix this problem for you? | 19:30 |
| Edgan | bjf: I am pretty sure it is fixed in -25. The one that just did it was a pre-25. Give me a minute and I will dig up at least one bug number. | 19:30 |
| Edgan | bjf: pre-25, as in pre-release of 25. | 19:30 |
| bjf | Edgan: interestingly enough if it fixes more bugs it could help us get it to updates quicker (my thinking anyway) | 19:31 |
| Edgan | bjf: Here is at least a similar bug, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/588046 | 19:32 |
| ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 588046 in linux (Ubuntu) ""task blocked for more than 120 seconds" freezes system in Lucid: xfs (affects: 3) (heat: 39)" [Medium,Triaged] | 19:32 |
| Edgan | bjf: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/543617 is another | 19:34 |
| ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 543617 in linux (Fedora) (and 3 other projects) "Unmount of an fs with dirty cache buffers causes pathological slowdown (affects: 14) (dups: 2) (heat: 132)" [Unknown,Unknown] | 19:34 |
| bjf | Edgan: can you confirm that the -25 proposed kernel fixes the issue for you? | 19:34 |
| Edgan | bjf: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/linux/+bug/585092 here is the main one I was following | 19:35 |
| ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 585092 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "giant IO delays on unmount (affects: 2) (heat: 40)" [Medium,Fix released] | 19:35 |
| bjf | Edgan: thanks, looking at all 3 | 19:35 |
| Edgan | bjf: I can confirm it fixed an issue with one of my servers that the symptom was a 120 second message. Which exact bug, not 100% sure on, but I think it is the last | 19:35 |
| vanhoof | ogasawara: do you have https://edge.launchpad.net/~leannogasawara/+archive/kernel-ppa/+build/1971068 built anywhere atm? | 19:37 |
| Edgan | bjf: Actually more than one. I have four build machines, and one had the issue. All the same hardware and workload. So I loaded -25 on them. Then I had someone doing mpi work on another machine, and -25 seems to have fixed it too. | 19:37 |
| vanhoof | ogasawara: looks like the build failed due to low disk space | 19:37 |
| Edgan | bjf: I suspect it will also fix my backup server, that I just ran into it on. | 19:38 |
| bjf | Edgan: two of those bugs have been marked "verification-done" which indicates the proposed fixed the issue for the tester | 19:38 |
| Edgan | bjf: ok | 19:38 |
| pmatulis | what do H71 or H74 kernels refer to? | 19:39 |
| ogasawara | vanhoof: that's a bug we just found out about | 19:40 |
| ogasawara | vanhoof: I can kick off a build for amd64 on tangerine and post it | 19:41 |
| ogasawara | vanhoof: i386 built fine | 19:41 |
| === ivoks-itc is now known as ivoks | ||
| * ogasawara lunch | 21:04 | |
| * jjohansen -> lunch | 21:15 | |
| === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!