[00:38] smb`: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/645653 [00:38] Ubuntu bug 645653 in linux (Ubuntu) "kernel is unbuildably large (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Confirmed] [00:52] hah [00:57] kees: you say that now... [00:59] lamont: don't worry openoffice will catch up in size [01:05] jjohansen: I'm seriously considering quotas at around 15GB when natty opens [01:12] karmic was a mere 14GB === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf [01:18] lamont: the kernel build is a pig, I am not sure what we can do about it [01:21] jjohansen: removing .o files after the link stage comes to mind as a likely option [01:22] lamont: that has to be done incrementally however, and then it interferes with the ability to incremental builds [01:22] building the .deb files one at a time (skipping dh_builddeb) would be a much less sane but doable option [01:23] still, not being able to build packages in a ppa that we build in the distro is just plain bad [01:23] agreed [01:23] and we need kernel ppas [01:27] anyway, afk for me. === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk [02:02] * vanhoof waits and keeps his fingers crossed that https://edge.launchpad.net/~leannogasawara/+archive/kernel-ppa holds all the fixes he needs :D === amitk is now known as amitk-afk === amitk-afk is now known as amitk === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk [13:53] cnd: ping === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks === amitk is now known as amitk-afk === ivoks is now known as ivoks-itc [16:42] smb, bjf, sconklin, kees: fyi bug 643971 [16:42] Launchpad bug 643971 in linux (Ubuntu) "security updates issued Sept. 18, 2010 causes system to repeatedly boot into initramfs (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/643971 [16:45] ogasawara: weird; doesn't really sound kernel related. [16:45] ogasawara, thanks for the pointer. looking... [16:45] kees, Yeah [16:45] Feels a bit like maybe a udev race but probably need to read more closely [16:45] kees: yah, the bug seems to need further investigation [16:52] ogasawara, kees Hm, nothing really obvious in the dmesg there. Likely the files were taken from the good boot anyway === jj-afk is now known as jjohansen [18:51] smb: your quick handling of the root-escalation vulns has been noticed: http://lwn.net/Articles/405662/ :) [18:52] kees, Gosh I wanna see. if I would remember the subscription details... :/ [19:01] smb: you have to set up an lwn account then send the account details to someone in canonical /me hasn't done it yet either [19:02] jjohansen, Yeah, I have part 1 but try to remember the someone for part 2 [19:04] smb: Email maria.randazzo@canonical.com with your lwn username which will be generated once [19:04] you have created an account [19:05] jjohansen, Ah thanks, should do that [19:17] When is 2.6.32-25 going to get released as an official update to Lucid? [19:21] Edgan: can't give a specific date for that, it's working it's way through our process [19:29] bjf: I keep running into an issue with kernels going into limbo with a message in dmesg about 120 seconds. It is getting old. [19:30] Edgan: do you have a bug number we can look at? [19:30] Edgan: have you tried the 2.6.32-25 kernel and does it fix this problem for you? [19:30] bjf: I am pretty sure it is fixed in -25. The one that just did it was a pre-25. Give me a minute and I will dig up at least one bug number. [19:30] bjf: pre-25, as in pre-release of 25. [19:31] Edgan: interestingly enough if it fixes more bugs it could help us get it to updates quicker (my thinking anyway) [19:32] bjf: Here is at least a similar bug, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/588046 [19:32] Ubuntu bug 588046 in linux (Ubuntu) ""task blocked for more than 120 seconds" freezes system in Lucid: xfs (affects: 3) (heat: 39)" [Medium,Triaged] [19:34] bjf: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/543617 is another [19:34] Ubuntu bug 543617 in linux (Fedora) (and 3 other projects) "Unmount of an fs with dirty cache buffers causes pathological slowdown (affects: 14) (dups: 2) (heat: 132)" [Unknown,Unknown] [19:34] Edgan: can you confirm that the -25 proposed kernel fixes the issue for you? [19:35] bjf: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/linux/+bug/585092 here is the main one I was following [19:35] Ubuntu bug 585092 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "giant IO delays on unmount (affects: 2) (heat: 40)" [Medium,Fix released] [19:35] Edgan: thanks, looking at all 3 [19:35] bjf: I can confirm it fixed an issue with one of my servers that the symptom was a 120 second message. Which exact bug, not 100% sure on, but I think it is the last [19:37] ogasawara: do you have https://edge.launchpad.net/~leannogasawara/+archive/kernel-ppa/+build/1971068 built anywhere atm? [19:37] bjf: Actually more than one. I have four build machines, and one had the issue. All the same hardware and workload. So I loaded -25 on them. Then I had someone doing mpi work on another machine, and -25 seems to have fixed it too. [19:37] ogasawara: looks like the build failed due to low disk space [19:38] bjf: I suspect it will also fix my backup server, that I just ran into it on. [19:38] Edgan: two of those bugs have been marked "verification-done" which indicates the proposed fixed the issue for the tester [19:38] bjf: ok [19:39] what do H71 or H74 kernels refer to? [19:40] vanhoof: that's a bug we just found out about [19:41] vanhoof: I can kick off a build for amd64 on tangerine and post it [19:41] vanhoof: i386 built fine === ivoks-itc is now known as ivoks [21:04] * ogasawara lunch [21:15] * jjohansen -> lunch === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk