[00:29] <ScottK> Down to 50 bugs/bug tasks on the release team list and AFAIK, none of them waiting for release team action.
[00:29] <ScottK> \o/
[00:33] <bdrung_> ScottK: by removing bug #645339 from the list ;) (btw, it doesn't require any action from u-release or u-archive any more)
[00:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 645339 in webfav (Ubuntu) (and 18 other projects) "Drop transitional and removed packages from Recommends (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/645339
[00:33] <ScottK> bdrung_: In part.
[00:33] <ScottK> I could have left that in and there still wouldn't be any bugs waiting on release team review, which is the important bit.
[00:45] <bdrung_> ScottK: it's better to not have ubuntu-release subscribed
[00:45] <ScottK> I agree (unless some specific issue comes up, which I don't expect).
[02:11] <cjwatson> OMG, I just noticed that checkrdepends doesn't check Pre-Depends
[02:11]  * cjwatson is rewriting it in Python anyway; probably just as well!
[02:12]  * doko_ mumbles to make it python3 compatible ...
[02:22] <cjwatson> doko_: get back to me when there's a python3-apt :-/
[02:23] <cjwatson> or a python3-debian, come to that
[02:24] <doko_> cjwatson: I have a patch for that for unstable, but the maverick version is too different ...
[02:26] <doko_> we'll get these for natty
[02:46] <wgrant> cjwatson: So you're happy with per-pocket and per-status queue admin perms?
[02:55] <cjwatson> per-status?
[02:56] <wgrant> cjwatson: Well, I guess that's not necessary if you want -release to be able to accept from NEW too.
[02:56] <cjwatson> I'm not sure what you mean by per-status
[02:56] <wgrant> cjwatson: Well, -release should clearly be able to accept from UNAPPROVED, but it's not clear that they should be able to handle NEW.
[02:56] <cjwatson> oh, I see
[02:57] <cjwatson> ideally that would be per-status, yes
[02:57] <cjwatson> I'd prefer to be able to say clearly that NEW packages all go through ubuntu-archive
[02:57] <wgrant> Right, that was the plan.
[13:18] <cjwatson> libdvdread> commented on the associated bug - most of the Recommends should just be removed
[14:10] <bdrung_> where can i see which package is on which seed?
[15:30] <ScottK> bdrung_: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ is probably not exactly what you were looking for, but might be close enough.
[15:31] <bdrung_> ScottK: is there no tool that maps a package name to a seed list?
[15:31] <ScottK> There is one that maps it to package set.
[15:33] <ScottK> Thats edit_acl.py in https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/trunk
[15:33] <ScottK> That may be close enough.
[15:33] <ScottK> (depending on your needs)
[15:41] <iulian> ScottK: Please accept mythbuntu-live-autostart as well.
[15:42] <ScottK> iulian: I will if you want (I didn't know you were reviewing it), but please see the question I just asked superm1 on #ubuntu-motu.
[15:42]  * iulian looks.
[15:43] <iulian> OK.  I will leave it to you then. :)
[15:46] <ScottK> (that or feel free to tell me what I missed when I was reviewing)
[16:17] <iulian> ScottK: I think you haven't missed anything.  I just don't see the artwork changes in the diff.
[16:17] <iulian> So, the question you've just asked was a good one.
[16:17] <ScottK> OK.  Thanks.
[16:19] <iulian> s/was/is/
[16:48] <cjwatson> bdrung_: you can just run germinate locally and slice and dice the output whichever way you like
[16:55] <cjwatson> libdvdread rejected at uploader's request
[17:00] <bdrung_> ScottK: does the FFe for gnash applied to 0.8.8-5 too?
[17:00] <bdrung_> ScottK: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/g/gnash/current/changelog
[17:00] <ScottK> bdrung_: If the difference between what I approved and this is bugfix, yes.
[17:01] <bdrung_> ScottK: there's one "new feature": Renamed mozilla-plugin-gnash package to browser-plugin-gnash.
[17:01] <bdrung_> ScottK: i have tested the upgrade and it works
[17:02] <ScottK> bdrung_: OK.  Ack for that then.
[17:02] <ScottK> So the answer is it didn't, but I've now extended it.
[17:03] <bdrung_> ScottK: thanks. can you state that on bug #636667?
[17:03] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 636667 in gnash (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync gnash 0.8.8-5 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/636667
[17:04] <ScottK> bdrung_: I'm just leaving.  Please just copy/paste the IRC log into the bug.  That will do.
[17:04] <bdrung_> ScottK: k, thx
[17:17] <cjwatson> lp_archive@cocoplum:~$ time cron.NBS
[17:17] <cjwatson> real    0m55.616s
[17:17] <cjwatson> the phrase "that's more like it" comes to mind
[17:18] <cjwatson> (previously scaled linearly with a large constant term according to the number of packages, so could easily take 20 minutes or more - I saw it take upwards of an hour sometimes)
[17:18] <cjwatson> to anyone using checkrdepends on cocoplum, please note that the suite is now given as an option rather than as a weird second argument
[17:24] <ScottK> Nice.
[17:24] <cjwatson> cron.NBS now runs hourly
[17:24] <cjwatson> (from ~lp_archive/dak/cron.sync, for those following along on cocoplum)
[17:27] <cjwatson> this rewrite should also make it feasible to check whether kernel udebs are built into the current d-i build, but I haven't got round to that yet
[17:52] <stgraber> hmm, seems like we have some broken language-packs again
[17:52] <stgraber> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/maverick/edubuntu-dvd/20100925/livecd-20100925-amd64.out
[17:52] <stgraber> language-pack-kde-an, language-pack-kde-ht, language-pack-kde-sc and language-pack-kde-tk
[17:52] <stgraber> ArneGoetje: ^
[18:22] <ScottK> cjwatson: I accepted libdvdread after the recommends were fixed per your comment in the bug.
[19:11] <cjwatson> ScottK: thanks
[19:11] <cjwatson> stgraber: I think you want dpm for that nowadays
[19:31] <stgraber> cjwatson: oh right, old habits ;)
[19:32] <doko__> cjwatson: all the ruby packages in nbs seem to be false positives