[12:05] <thorwil> doctormo: got any other "Community Feedback", aside of the one reply on the list?
[12:06] <doctormo> thorwil: 1 more from the list and 1 on dA, not thrilling response I must say.
[12:15] <thorwil> not a thrilling response -- there's a pattern
[12:23] <doctormo> thorwil: But at least there are some helpful pointers to how we can improve connectiveness in the community.
[12:23] <doctormo> In the report
[15:15] <Nulo_Px> hi, does anyone know anything for real, about the new highly expected font?
[15:15] <Nulo_Px> (the topic was set on July)
[15:18] <vish> Nulo_Px: Read all about it at » bug 629622 ;)
[15:18] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 629622 in ubuntu (and 2 other projects) "MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.70 in Maverick (10.10) (affects: 10) (heat: 96)" [Wishlist,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/629622
[15:18] <doctormo> Nulo_Px: It's called 'Ubuntu' was commissioned by Canonical and made by a professional font forge. It's an open use license and full foss compatible.
[15:19] <Nulo_Px> tks
[15:27] <Nulo_Px> this new font is fantastic, the first time I find a font really beautiful and easy to read
[16:48]  * vish  spies someone named t-w- subscribed to the wiki pages again! ;p
[16:48] <vish> gah! i really need to check if people are around :(
[19:16] <vish>  * vish  spies someone named t-w- subscribed to the wiki pages again! ;p
[19:19] <thorwil> lol
[19:20] <thorwil> vish: and here i refrained from making a remark regarding you remembering the link of that restored page, to not reveal this :)
[19:21] <thorwil> spreadubuntu will see a facelift and i have been asked if i would like to help with the logo design
[19:21] <vish> thorwil: yea, finally thought i should lookup that page..  ;)
[19:21] <vish> thorwil: wasnt tough to revert.. thanks for the tip :)
[19:24] <vish> well, it actually turned out that i was pretty smart back then when i deleted the main page!  ;p
[19:24] <thorwil> wonder if the spreadubuntu/art.ubuntu-owl.org split makes sense on a technical level
[19:24] <thorwil> vish: how so?
[19:24] <vish> the page i was actually looking for was /not/ deleted
[19:25] <vish> thorwil: i thought i deleted > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/HumanityIcons/Guidelines  , but i think i knew i might need it at some point ;)
[19:26] <vish> thorwil: well, having spreadubuntu as a part of the owl site would be much better..
[19:27] <vish> spread ubuntu doesnt even have a decent enough link to atleast look official!
[19:29] <thorwil> vish: seems they had some plan involving some action from canonical. i guess about an ubuntu subdomain. obviously didn't happen
[19:30] <vish> thorwil: yeah, i'v been asking around for an art.ubuntu.com link as well.. if there is a need for it ;)
[19:31] <vish> thorwil: instead of having the info on the wiki , the art.ubuntu.com site can be a hug for info and a collection of blogs from people contributing to artwork
[19:31] <vish> hub even!
[19:32] <thorwil> vish: if you blog, it could syndicate ... 4 people!!!
[19:32] <vish>  4 wow!
[19:33] <vish> thorwil: well , planet now aggregates blogs from Ubuntu members , but art.ubuntu.com can be just for people who have done some artwork for Ubuntu at some point..
[19:33] <vish> i thing it would be an encouragement , sorta
[19:34] <vish> qa.ubuntu.com does not mandate being an Ubuntu member
[19:34] <vish> but very few non-ubuntu members have started blogging there..
[19:34] <vish> but they can..
[19:46] <thorwil> good evening jpgnizak