[03:09] <skeeby> greetings
[05:45] <AbhiJit> bye
[10:41] <algnod_>  Hi, I am new to triaging and I have confirmed the following Bug #643399. Can this bug be set to triaged? Or is this an upstream bug? What would be the importance of this bug? thanks
[10:41] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 643399 in xscreensaver (Ubuntu) "screensaver and screen locking not activating if keyring dialogue is open (affects: 2) (heat: 772)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/643399
[10:44] <jibel> Hi algnod_, looking
[10:48] <jibel> algnod_, what importance would you set ?
[10:48] <jibel> algnod_, you can find doc about importance at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance
[10:54] <jibel> micahg, about sru in bug 576991, if I can install gnome-shell and gjs in -proposed can we consider it is fixed ?
[10:54] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 576991 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 5 other projects) "Add a wrapper for LD_LIBRARY_PATH to gnome-shell so we don't have to rebuild gjs for xulrunner updates (affects: 11) (dups: 1) (heat: 86)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/576991
[10:55] <micahg> jibel: are you on i386?
[10:55] <jibel> micahg, yes
[10:57] <micahg> jibel: k, I have to fix the FTBFS on amd64 first, then rebuild gnome-shell, but yes, that's the basic test that it's installable and works (ideally, try downgrading/upgrading xulrunner to make sure it doesn't uninstall)
[10:58] <jibel> micahg, I was asking because 1.9.2.10+build1+nobinonly is available on every distro. and I can't downgrade/upgrade from an ubuntu repo.
[10:58] <micahg> jibel: well, with the disto packages, if you tried xulrunner from the dailies, it would break
[10:59] <micahg> with -proposed packages it shouldn't
[10:59] <jibel> micahg, okay.
[10:59] <micahg> jibel: there's always 1.9.2.3 in the lucid pocket from release :)
[10:59] <jibel> micahg, right, I'll try with that one.
[11:01] <jibel> micahg, add a comment to the report when it's ready for testing on amd64
[11:01] <micahg> jibel: k, will do
[11:01] <jibel> algnod_, I think you've been disconnected, did you received my last message about importance ?
[11:30] <pyghassen> hey guys is here where you report for bugs?
[11:34] <rusivi> pyghassen: what have you noticed as a bug?
[11:35] <pyghassen> oh you bet
[11:36] <pyghassen> many actually
[11:36] <pyghassen> it's all about gnome
[11:36] <rusivi> let us take it one at a time please :D
[11:36] <rusivi> What is possible bug #1?
[11:36] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1 in tilix (and 19 other projects) "Microsoft has a majority market share (affects: 603) (heat: 2948)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
[11:36] <rusivi> :)
[11:36] <pyghassen> ok starting by i lose the wifi password for everytime I reboot!!!!!!!!
[11:37] <rusivi> ty ubot2 ;)
[11:37] <pyghassen>  all the ubuntu version we have that upper menu bar right?
[11:37] <rusivi> pyghassen: would you like to take this discussion into the channel #ubuntu?
[11:37] <rusivi> so more people have exposure to the possibilities?
[11:37] <pyghassen> starting from the left we found the power button then the user session ..
[11:38] <pyghassen> it changes every time?
[11:38] <pyghassen> ok this is a bug for sure
[11:38] <rusivi> oh I beg your pardon please continue.
[11:39] <pyghassen> what aren't those what you call bugs?!!
[11:39] <rusivi> no sorry I interrupted. please continue.
[11:40] <pyghassen> well the 1st one i already asked in the #ubuntu but no one seems to be interested
[11:40] <rusivi> i'll check there real quick be back in sec
[11:40] <pyghassen> ok man
[11:41] <pyghassen> on more thing I always face
[11:42] <rusivi> pyghassen: Yes?
[11:45] <pyghassen> i have 2 Go ram, when I open netbeans + firefox .. i have 1.2 Go used memory, but keep working for hours, when I close the netbeans, but it still 1 Go used memory, especially when i go on suspend, the memory still up until the next reboot so it go back to normal
[11:46] <rusivi> pyghassen: regarding the first issue of wifi password not being saved by Network Manager, did you download the CD and MD5sum the download or did you order CD through the mail?
[11:47] <pyghassen> well I installed it many times, 3
[11:47] <pyghassen> 3 times for this PC only
[11:47] <pyghassen> coz i always have the same problems
[11:47] <rusivi> ok, so you verified the MD5SUM each download?
[11:48] <pyghassen> I don't think that's the issue
[11:48] <rusivi> Well if you did not verify it is a possible issue but let us continue, no big deal.
[11:48] <pyghassen> coz I had this problem since the 9.04 as far as i remember
[11:49] <pyghassen> could u help me on that, coz i don't know how to do it
[11:49] <rusivi> sure let me get the link for you
[11:49] <pyghassen> ok tkanks man
[11:50] <pyghassen> thanks
[11:51] <rusivi> Regarding Ubuntu 9.04 MD5SUMs http://releases.ubuntu.com/9.04/MD5SUMS
[11:51] <rusivi> Once you download the .iso you may open a Terminal, change your directory to where the .iso is, then type for example 'md5sum ubuntu-9.04-desktop-i386.iso'
[11:51] <rusivi> if it matches you nailed it
[11:51] <rusivi> :)
[11:52] <pyghassen> ok
[11:53] <pyghassen> for 10.04 should be http://releases.ubuntu.com/10.04/MD5SUMS right?
[11:53] <rusivi> yes
[11:57] <pyghassen> well you're right man it didn't match!!
[11:57] <pyghassen> 9a95ed6f6ec38fb58c446dba1add6a08
[11:57] <pyghassen> d044a2a0c8103fc3e5b7e18b0f7de1c8
[11:57] <pyghassen> what's up with that?
[11:58] <pyghassen> is it a problem
[11:58] <pyghassen> i downloaded it from ubuntu.com
[11:58] <pyghassen> i guess this is common right?
[11:58] <rusivi> May I please have you copy and paste the name of the .iso you downloaded?
[11:59] <pyghassen> ok
[11:59] <pyghassen> to be exact
[11:59] <pyghassen> d044a2a0c8103fc3e5b7e18b0f7de1c8  ubuntu-10.04-desktop-i386.iso
[12:08] <rusivi> pyghassen: Regarding md5sum mismatches, it is a deal breaker.  MD5SUM mismatches may happen downloading through ubuntu.com for numerous reasons. The commonality of this is unknown to me as I do not have privy to that information.
[12:09] <rusivi> :D
[12:11] <pyghassen> so I need an original ubuntu CD right
[12:11] <pyghassen> well the last one I GOT IT WAS 9.04
[12:12] <pyghassen> coz they didn't send me any after that
[12:12] <rusivi> As long as the MD5SUM is verified then one may move forward in the bug process.
[12:12] <pyghassen> should i install it, and upgrade from the internet until i reach 10.04!!!!
[12:13] <pyghassen> but bugs should be fixed when i update right?
[12:14] <persia> pyghassen, You're perfectly safe downloading one: just check the checksum, and try again if it doesn't match (or get it another way (torrents, etc.).
[12:14] <persia> That said, it's also safe to upgrade: from 9.04 be sure to upgrade to 9.10 before upgrading to 10.04, or you may hit an untested path.
[12:15] <pyghassen> aha
[12:15] <pyghassen> ok thank you guys
[12:15] <persia> If you're having trouble with downloads or with upgrades, the folk in #ubuntu are likely to be significantly more helpful: we're mainly focused on tracking bugs here, rather than specific issues related to infrastructure (which CD folks have, whether downloads are clean, etc.)
[12:15] <pyghassen> you really make me understand the source of all these problems
[12:16] <pyghassen> code strong and bye, i'll be visiting from while to while
[12:17] <AbhiJit> hi
[14:31] <nigelb> vish: ack.  My irssi has been a mess over the past 2 to 3 weeks.
[14:31] <nigelb> Anyway, I'll get in touch with the student
[14:38] <hggdh> nigelb: try weechat ;-)
[15:26] <nigelb> hggdh: no thanks.  I'm happy with what I have :D
[15:26] <hggdh> nigelb: heh. I tried irssi, and gave up. Weechat suits me better
[15:27] <nigelb> hggdh: weechat does client/server?
[15:28] <hggdh> nigelb: don't know, never needed it...
[15:28]  * hggdh goes look
[15:28]  * nisshh high-fives nigelb
[15:28] <nisshh> irssi forever! :)
[15:32] <hggdh> nigelb: nope
[15:33] <nigelb> hggdh: see, irssi rocks
[15:33]  * nigelb hugs nisshh 
[15:33] <nisshh> :)
[15:33] <nigelb> though, my computer screen + resolution sucks
[15:33] <hggdh> nigelb: heh
[17:01] <om26er> I want a UIFe for bug 619932 what should I do?
[17:01] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 619932 in adium-theme-ubuntu (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "message timestamps are too verbose (affects: 8) (dups: 3) (heat: 56)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/619932
[17:24] <vish> nigelb: nope.. not forgiven!
[18:05] <devildante> bdmurray: ping
[18:18] <AbhiJit> bye
[19:09] <charlie-tca> software sources in maverick needs repository gpg key for http://extras.ubuntu.com  What package is that?
[19:10]  * yofel got that key over updates
[19:10] <devildante> +1 to yofel
[19:10] <charlie-tca> Not supposed to have to keep adding it
[19:11] <charlie-tca> It should be there after the install restarts
[19:11] <yofel> ubuntu-extras-keyring maybe?
[19:12] <devildante> yofel: yep, I just checked
[19:12] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[19:12] <devildante> np ;)
[19:26] <bcurtiswx_> ejat must be stuck in the freenode revolving door
[19:31] <charlie-tca> seems so
[19:32] <jarl> Hi. Can anyone tell me where to report bugs for http://webapps.ubuntu.com/certification/make/Dell/
[19:32] <jarl> The issue is that some models are listed several times...
[19:32] <maco> launchpad.net/ubuntu-website i think
[19:33] <hggdh> let me check
[19:35] <hggdh> jarl: I am checking with the certification folks...
[19:40] <jarl> hggdh: Thanks... I am waiting...
[19:41] <hggdh> jarl: certify-web (but I was told it is not a bug -- the entries have different SKUs from Dell, but the offering name is the same
[19:41] <hggdh> but I agree it is confusing
[19:43] <hggdh> BTW -- I do not know if it is rendering on my FFOX, but the Ubuntu logo at the bottom of http://webapps.ubuntu.com/certification/ is doubled
[19:43] <jarl> hggdh: SKUs? What is that? So if I buy a Dell Vostro 3700, I can't even be sure ubutu will run, only if it is among the certified SKUs (which I have no way to check/know)
[19:44] <jarl> hggdh: It's not just confusing. Such certification list is more or less useless if I can't be sure the models (all SKUs) are certified.
[19:45] <hggdh> jarl: I have no answer for you on this (and I think your bug is even more warranted now). SKU is the offering code -- like the barcode we see on products
[19:45] <jarl> hggdh: I know it's probably not to you I should express my thoughts, but do you know where to do that?
[19:46] <hggdh> jarl: please open the bug and point it there, this would be the best place (I am passing over this chat to the certification area, but I would really like to have it from you in a bug)
[19:47] <jarl> hggdh: I will... thanks...
[19:48] <hggdh> jarl: thank YOU. We need this feedback (I have not bought a machine recently, last time I bought one I went for what I wanted fully knowing there might be problems
[19:49] <hggdh> so I had not looked with a buyer's eye on the certification site...
[19:49] <jarl> hggdh: The link https://launchpad.net/certification is a 404 PageNotFound, so where should I point my frustration (open a bug)?
[19:50] <hggdh> open a bug manually and give me the bug #, and I will set it correctly
[19:50] <jarl> hggdh: What other value would such a certification otherwise give Dell, if it were not to guide/steer consumers towards their product :-) ?
[19:51] <hggdh> jarl: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/certify-web/+filebug
[19:51] <hggdh> heh
[19:55] <hggdh> jarl: I am told that this is being solved on the new certificate web site -- but I would still like the bug, if you do not mind
[20:05] <jarl> hggdh: Here is the bug report, please comment on it: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/certify-web/+bug/650550
[20:05] <ubot2> jarl: Error: Bug #650550 is private.
[20:05] <jarl> hggdh: Here is the bug report, please comment on it: bug#650550
[20:06] <AlexzAK> Hi all
[20:08] <jarl> hggdh: Can you find the bug? It seems like if I copy/paste the complete url, my comment is block by ubot2 claiming  Bug #650550 is private whatever that means.
[20:08] <ubot2> jarl: Bug 650550 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/650550 is private
[20:08] <hggdh> jarl: yeah, I cannot access it either :-(
[20:09] <hggdh> jarl: but the certification folks can, and will
[20:09] <hggdh> this error means the bug is not accessible for the normal Ubuntu people (like you and me)
[20:10] <hggdh> jarl: but YOU do have access to it, correct?
[20:10] <jarl> hggdh: That's sad... That some bugs are behind closed doors...
[20:10] <AlexzAK> Why some bugs is private?
[20:11] <hggdh> jarl: not really, there are cases where it is warranted (like security)
[20:11] <hggdh> and cases where the project owners decided to do so
[20:12] <AlexzAK> I commited several new bugs realted to installer. And checked some old bugs.... and they state is undecided! (#386742, #272694, #256007, #492911) It is normal? What to do with such bugs?
[20:12] <hggdh> AlexzAK: depends on the bug. For example, crash bugs start their life private, until all private details have been removed
[20:12] <hggdh> bug #386742,
[20:12] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 386742 in phonon (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[Karmic] Phonon includes NOT found! (affects: 13) (dups: 1) (heat: 16)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386742
[20:12] <jarl> hggdh: Can I make it public?
[20:13] <AlexzAK> hggdh: I must agreed with it
[20:13] <hggdh> jarl: you should be able to, yes, you are the OP
[20:14] <jarl> hggdh: I can see (in upper right corner) a block saying "This report is private", but I can't find a place to change it.
[20:15] <hggdh> jarl: to the right of the block you should have a ! sign, click on it
[20:16] <jarl> hggdh: There is no ! signs nor any other signs or any links or active areas around that block.
[20:17] <charlie-tca> no yellow circle?
[20:17] <hggdh> jarl: no problem -- your bug is already being discussed
[20:18] <jarl> hggdh: Wait a minute... In Konqueror that is, in firefox, there is a ! sign.
[20:18] <hggdh> oh, so this is some setting in konqueror, probably you have Javascript disabled
[20:18] <jarl> hggdh: Now you should be able to see it as well: bug#650550
[20:19] <hggdh> jarl: yes, I see it
[20:20] <hggdh> thank you, jarl, perfect
[20:21] <AlexzAK> hggdh: So about old bugs... What i should do with it?
[20:23] <jarl> hggdh: Thanks a lot for the time, now back to shopping (ignoring the cert list, which aparantly is unrliable anyway)
[20:23] <sense> Has the upstream bug tracker for OpenOffice.org been modified already/
[20:24] <jarl> hggdh: I have not disable javascript in konqueror, I just don't think KHTML component is as complying as gecko...
[20:25] <hggdh> AlexzAK: bug #386742 is an upstream issue, and should be worked there (you stated you were using trunk, not our package)
[20:25] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 386742 in phonon (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[Karmic] Phonon includes NOT found! (affects: 13) (dups: 1) (heat: 16)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386742
[20:25] <hggdh> bug #272694,
[20:25] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 272694 in synaptic "Internal Error: filter name is longer than 55 chars!? Will be truncated.Please report Segmentation fault " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/272694
[20:27] <hggdh> AlexzAK: for the above bug... there is not really much to work on: there is no backtrace (you are missing pretty much *all* symbols), and we do not know how it happens
[20:28] <AlexzAK> hggdh: #386742 libqt4-phonon-dev and cmake was from repository..
[20:28] <hggdh> bug #256007,
[20:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 256007 in synaptic "Synaptic gives error, then closes" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256007
[20:30] <AlexzAK> So why not to close bug #272694 with comment "Not enought info"?
[20:30] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 272694 in synaptic "Internal Error: filter name is longer than 55 chars!? Will be truncated.Please report Segmentation fault " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/272694
[20:31] <hggdh> AlexzAK: the above one is about a package *NOT* provided by us -- serna. I will close invalid
[20:33] <hggdh> AlexzAK: indeed, such a comment (about lacking information) should have been made.
[20:33] <hggdh> AlexzAK: but -- as I guess you are now aware -- we lack enough resources to timely look at all bugs
[20:34] <hggdh> bug #492911
[20:34] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 492911 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "[i965gm] Laptop display all in black stripes after update to kernel 2.6.31-16 (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/492911
[20:34] <AlexzAK> I could not provide any info about bug #272694 and think we should just close it
[20:34] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 272694 in synaptic "Internal Error: filter name is longer than 55 chars!? Will be truncated.Please report Segmentation fault " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/272694
[20:36] <hggdh> AlexzAK: I just asked you for more data -- preferrably, how to reproduce it. If you can repeat the bug at will, better
[20:37] <hggdh> for the #492911 bug, I don't do X, so I do not know. Bryce did look at it, though
[20:40] <AlexzAK> how can i add debug symbols when some app crashed with SIGSEGV?
[20:46] <kamusin> devildante, booo!
[20:48] <AlexzAK> hggdh: Can't check is again... I use 10.04 now, and no such problems any longer (#492911)
[20:49] <AlexzAK> hggdh: Is there any way to help with bugs?
[20:50] <AlexzAK> hggdh: Some simple work to sort em and/or assign... If i will have free time how can i help?
[20:52] <hggdh> AlexzAK: your help will be very appreciated!
[20:52] <hggdh> Yes, there are lots of things to do on bugs... if you don't mind, http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs will give you a start
[20:53] <AlexzAK> hggdh: Ok. Thanks :)
[20:53] <hggdh> AlexzAK: you are welcome
[20:54] <AlexzAK> hggdh: I'll go now. Thanks again
[21:01]  * micahg thought maverick bugs were going to be targetted this week :(
[21:04] <charlie-tca> I thought we did that on a tuesday?
[21:06] <micahg> oh, maybe
[21:06] <bcurtiswx_> Is the main point for targeting jaunty bugs to see if they still exist in maverick?
[21:06] <bcurtiswx_> and invalidating all the rest for EOL ?
[21:08] <micahg> bcurtiswx: I would think maverick or Lucid (if SRUable)
[21:08] <bcurtiswx_> micahg, OK
[21:08] <micahg> karmic (if really high priority SRU :) )
[21:09] <charlie-tca> yes, please
[21:09] <bcurtiswx_> and if we invent a time machine, hoary (if really^5 high priority)
[21:09] <charlie-tca> Why not breezy, too?
[21:10] <charlie-tca> At least dapper, which is still good for servers :-)
[21:10] <bcurtiswx_> ;)
[21:11] <micahg> jaunty still has another month which is why I thought it would be more practical to target maverick ATM
[21:14] <charlie-tca> sound reasoning, but when we asked for a volunteer to do the BugDay, this is what came up
[21:14] <micahg> charlie-tca: I wish I had more time :)
[21:14] <cjae> bluetooth monolithic now does not even detect the bt dongle :(
[21:14] <charlie-tca> We missed last week, and wanted to have a bugday this week
[21:15] <micahg> charlie-tca: if I could clone myself, I'd have one clone work on Xubuntu development ;)
[21:15] <charlie-tca> At least it gives us a chance to make sure the Jaunty bugs are still valid
[21:15] <charlie-tca> Thanks, micahg
[21:15] <charlie-tca> I am thinking I spread too thin at times
[21:37] <ubuntuplus1cj> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluedevil/+bug/650603
[21:37] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 650603 in bluedevil (Ubuntu) "bluedevil does not recognize my bluetooth dongle at all mx 5500 kb and mouse (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[21:49] <ubuntuplus1cj> http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/3599/ sweet :)
[21:54] <rusivi> micahg: Just wanted to let you know that I am about to dive right into Jaunty bugs, I've been on a personal curiosity spree regarding VirtualBox/prior bugs replied/personal bugs
[21:55] <rusivi> ex. virtualbox in Ubuntu bug 595844
[21:55] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 595844 in virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) "Installing Ubuntu 10.04 as guest fails with unpartitioned disk under VirtualBox (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/595844
[21:56] <rusivi> What I think he wants is if for example, he has two separate disks one ext4 w/ Ubuntu installed other totally unpartitioned, he wants to fireup VirtualBox, target VBox to the unpartitioned disk and presto!
[21:56] <micahg> rusivi: I don't know if that's officially supported yet
[21:56] <rusivi> I agree this does seem so.
[21:57] <rusivi> I'm not trying to generate bugsquad attention on it
[21:57] <micahg> rusivi: since the user is using sun's virtualbox, you should convert to question
[21:57] <rusivi> ah
[21:57] <rusivi> good call
[21:57] <micahg> rusivi: unless there is an issue with Ubuntu actually, seems like the user is using an old version as well, should ask the user to try with 3.2.8
[21:58] <rusivi> both good ideas
[21:58] <rusivi> he did mention later in comments that he used Oracle newest
[21:59] <micahg> rusivi: we have had some issues in the past with the boot process in Ubuntu WRT Virtualbox, so it's not necessarily Oracle's issue,
[21:59] <micahg> rusivi: WRT the latest, the user will have to upgrade to virtualbox-3,2 if the user actually wants the latest
[22:00] <rusivi> micahg: I recall one of my bugs prompted the newest release (not trying to gloat)
[22:00] <micahg> user mentions 2.8 which is very old
[22:00] <rusivi> sorry, I thought he meant 3.2.8
[22:00] <rusivi> which is newest
[22:00] <micahg> maybe
[22:00] <rusivi> I gave him benefit of doubt
[22:01] <micahg> rusivi: I'd say convert to question and try to work to completion there, if there's an actually bug, you can always convert back or link a new bug
[22:02] <rusivi> micahg: ok, do you also recommend coordinating with Felix on this?
[22:02] <micahg> rusivi: I wonder if the user is creating the disk in the VM before running the installer
[22:03] <rusivi> micahg: quick tangent, I did do a fresh install of in newest vbox-ose ubuntu-10.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso worked like a charm
[22:05] <rusivi> From the host perspective, either the OP wants VBox to simulatenously partition, unpartitioned space and then push an image there, or he is just having simple misunderstanding of VBox (did not MD5SUM, does not have AMD-V/INT CPU virtualization extensions, etc.)
[22:06] <rusivi> IMHO
[22:06] <rusivi> micahg: Either way, your suggestion of converting to question is best way to go and will do.
[22:20] <devildante> kamusin: booyaa! :p
[22:20] <kamusin> hey :p
[22:29] <rusivi> micahg: Quick question before your agreed upon suggestion is implemented: I feel compelled to include my thoughts about this issue to the stock response while simultaneously "converting to a question". However, I do not want to deviate from the stock answers as they tend to be the best way to go... (sorry for the micro-managment request but I want to nail it).
[22:29] <devildante> kamusin: did you want to talk to me?
[22:30] <micahg> rusivi: huh?
[22:31] <rusivi> hehe long story short, may I deviate from stock responses on bug 595844 or no?
[22:31] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 595844 in virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) "Installing Ubuntu 10.04 as guest fails with unpartitioned disk under VirtualBox (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/595844
[22:31] <rusivi> when I convert to a question?
[22:31] <kamusin> I sent you a pm :P
[22:32] <devildante> bdmurray, mega ping
[22:32] <rusivi> kamusin: me? via IRC/Launchpad/e-mail?
[22:32] <devildante> rusivi: the PM was for me :p
[22:32] <rusivi> devildante: I don't have any IRC pms....
[22:32] <kamusin> rusivi, was for devildante, don't worry
[22:32] <rusivi> np :D
[22:34] <bdmurray> devildante: so bugs tagged jaunty right?
[22:34] <devildante> bdmurray: yep :)
[22:35] <micahg> rusivi: I usually use the stock response (more or less) in convert to question and then add follow up questions to the new question
[22:36] <rusivi> micahg: sounds good
[22:36] <rusivi> micahg: ty
[22:41] <bdmurray> devildante: http://people.canonical.com/~brian/complete-graphs/jaunty/plots/jaunty-1day-triaging.png
[22:41] <devildante> yay! thanks :)
[22:44]  * kamusin hugs bdmurray 
[22:44]  * devildante hugs bdmurray too
[22:46] <kamusin> hggdh, Eebotu is dead :(
[22:46]  * devildante also thinks #libreoffice is a great place :p
[22:46] <hggdh> bloody hell
[22:46]  * kamusin runs
[22:46] <devildante> ubottu, NOOOOOOO
[22:49] <hggdh> eeebotu is back. Sorry. I do not yet know what is going on, but it seems to stop every 2/3 weeks. The script is running, just no actions
[22:50] <devildante> what the... you're not talking about ubottu?
[22:50] <devildante> what's eeebotu, then?
[22:51] <hggdh> devildante: a bot that lists all bugs reported against Ubuntu
[22:51] <devildante> ah, great :)
[22:51] <hggdh> devildante: #ubuntu-bugs-announce
[22:51] <kamusin> devildante, join to ubuntu-bugs-announce
[23:42] <Takyoji> Has there been any bug reports as of 'indicator applet' and 'indicator applet session' gnome-panel icons?
[23:42] <Takyoji> In regards of them "overlapping" or disappearing sometimes, etc