| Riddell | hum, well server is built but is failing to appear at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/20100928.2/ | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| Riddell | I wonder if that's the mirrors full up | 00:02 |
| === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
| Riddell | ooh there it is | 00:05 |
| Riddell | mathiaz: images up http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/20100928.2/ | 00:05 |
| mathiaz | Riddell: \o/ - thank ya! | 00:05 |
| === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk | ||
| * stgraber just noticed this morning's -meta change including the ubuntu font ... | 00:35 | |
| stgraber | I'll be pushing a new edubuntu-meta change refreshing our dependencies to include it | 00:36 |
| Riddell | is it really that important? it's not set as default or anything | 00:36 |
| stgraber | well, currently it means that our DVD has it in the live environment as we derive from Ubuntu but installing from a minimal system won't because edubuntu-meta is out of sync | 00:37 |
| stgraber | so I don't really care having it or not, I care about inconsistent installations | 00:37 |
| ScottK | stgraber: Is gcompris on your ISO? | 00:38 |
| stgraber | ScottK: yes | 00:38 |
| ScottK | stgraber: You might see about getting it moved from the ubuntu-desktop packageset to yours (since it's in Universe). | 00:38 |
| Riddell | stgraber: ok as you wish | 00:39 |
| stgraber | ScottK: that's weird, it was in our packageset for karmic then was apparently moved to ubuntu-desktop with lucid. | 00:42 |
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
| stgraber | cjwatson: ^ any chance you can fix that when you have a minute ? | 00:47 |
| stgraber | Riddell: I just checked and we won't need a meta package update as edubuntu-desktop simply depends on ubuntu-desktop solving all of our issues ;) For some reason I didn't remember that part of the magic. | 00:48 |
| Riddell | phew | 00:48 |
| NCommander | Riddell: what happened to my dove image? | 01:03 |
| Riddell | NCommander: still going | 01:10 |
| mathiaz | Riddell: hm - seems that -server isos have disappered | 01:13 |
| mathiaz | Riddell: 20100928.2 is no longer available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/ | 01:13 |
| Riddell | umm | 01:13 |
| Riddell | spooky | 01:13 |
| Riddell | mathiaz: they're still there on antimony but maybe they're not on one of the mirrors | 01:14 |
| Riddell | elmo did say they were getting full | 01:14 |
| mathiaz | Riddell: ok | 01:15 |
| * mathiaz hopes they'll show up eventually | 01:15 | |
| NCommander | Riddell: very slow :-/ | 01:17 |
| Riddell | NCommander: yes, and I need to go to bed now | 01:17 |
| Riddell | mathiaz: I'm copying the images over to http://jasmine.19inch.net/~jr/tmp/ubuntu-server/ incase you need them now | 01:18 |
| mathiaz | Riddell: I won't need them now | 01:18 |
| mathiaz | Riddell: it would be great if they can show up in a couple of hours | 01:18 |
| Riddell | NCommander: going to sleep now, feel free to kill the process if it doesn't get done soonish | 01:19 |
| NCommander | Riddell: k | 01:39 |
| maxb | Hi, Bazaar in maverick is 2.2.0. 2.2.1 is released, with some fairly important bugfixes. Can you advise if we should aim for a SRU or a (very) late-breaking release pocket upload? (pitti suggested the latter in bug 636930, but that was some days ago, so may no longer be valid) | 01:40 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 636930 in bzr (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 4 other projects) "Upgrading a repository fails with 'Inter1and2Helper' object has no attribute 'source_repo' (affects: 5) (dups: 4) (heat: 288)" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/636930 | 01:40 |
| ScottK | maxb: Since it's eligible for post-release micro-version update, I don't see a strong reason to wait. If all the same testing is done as for a post-release update, I think it would be reasonable to drop it in between RC and final. | 02:02 |
| maxb | Right, that makes sense | 02:11 |
| mathiaz | ScottK: IIUC accepting bzr would require an ISO respin | 03:50 |
| ScottK | mathiaz: That's why I said after RC. | 04:31 |
| ara | good morning! | 07:15 |
| ara | Riddell, morning | 08:31 |
| ara | Riddell, rekonq is crashing for me in kvm, is that known? | 08:31 |
| ara | seb128, as RAOF has confirmed that it is a mesa issue, I think we should add it to the release notes for RC | 09:14 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| Riddell | ara: not known to me | 09:34 |
| ara | Riddell, OK, thanks, I will file a bug | 09:34 |
| ara | Riddell, bug 650934 | 09:42 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 650934 in rekonq (Ubuntu) "Rekonq crashes in a KVM with 800MB ram (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/650934 | 09:42 |
| cjwatson | stgraber: hm, this is odd, can't immediately figure out why it went to desktop ... | 10:03 |
| cjwatson | ubuntu-desktop I mean | 10:03 |
| cjwatson | germinate shows it in edubuntu/desktop-gnome, edubuntu/desktop-kde, edubuntu/ubuntu-edu-preschool, and edubuntu/ubuntu-edu-primary | 10:05 |
| Daviey | Hey! What are the chances of a respin happening before RC? We don't need one, but wondered if foundation are likely to call one. | 10:06 |
| * cjwatson hasn't heard of a reason right now | 10:07 | |
| cjwatson | not globally anyway, edubuntu might need one | 10:07 |
| Daviey | ok great, the current situation with the server seems to be pretty sound. The only edge case of concern is people using the on cd archive to upgrade UEC, will get a silent failure. There is a work around for this, if we had a respin it would close this edge case - but not worth making a new ISO for that IMO. | 10:10 |
| Daviey | (new installs are unaffected) | 10:11 |
| cjwatson | what package is the workaround in? | 10:12 |
| Daviey | eucalyptus-java-common, has been fixed to stop euca' before attempting to upgrade the database. The work around, would be a copy and paste # stop eucalyptus ; do-upgrade() ; start eucalyptus, after reboot | 10:14 |
| Daviey | (database schema upgrade is handled in packaging) | 10:15 |
| cjwatson | did we not respin after that fix last night? | 10:17 |
| cjwatson | maverick-server-amd64.list:/pool/main/e/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-java-common_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4_amd64.deb | 10:17 |
| cjwatson | maverick-server-i386.list:/pool/main/e/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-java-common_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4_i386.deb | 10:17 |
| cjwatson | eucalyptus-java-common | 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 | maverick | amd64, armel, i386, powerpc | 10:18 |
| cjwatson | all in sync | 10:18 |
| Daviey | ahh, sorry - i was mistaken | 10:20 |
| Daviey | i didn't realise there was a new spin last night | 10:20 |
| cjwatson | there was some difficulty pushing to cdimage mirrors I think | 10:21 |
| cjwatson | let me see if that's resolved | 10:21 |
| cjwatson | looks ok, you want 20100928.2 | 10:22 |
| Daviey | cjwatson: so, the server team should be considering 20100928.1 as the RC candidate? | 10:22 |
| cjwatson | .2 | 10:22 |
| cjwatson | surely? | 10:22 |
| Daviey | that isn't on cdimages.* | 10:22 |
| cjwatson | it is on some of them | 10:22 |
| cjwatson | I just checkd | 10:22 |
| cjwatson | +e | 10:22 |
| Daviey | ahh | 10:23 |
| cjwatson | (p.s. official name is cdimage.ubuntu.com not cdimages) | 10:23 |
| cjwatson | it's also on the ISO tracker | 10:23 |
| cjwatson | ok, so I just deleted a pile of older builds; let's see if that helps cdimage pick it up | 10:23 |
| cjwatson | try it again in a few minutes? | 10:23 |
| Daviey | cjwatson: rockin' thanks. | 10:23 |
| Daviey | So, when .2 shows up - we will spend today doing some pre-RC testing. | 10:24 |
| cjwatson | stgraber: wow, that was more complicated than I expected it to be, but fixed now | 10:56 |
| cjwatson | stgraber: you gained edubuntu-live as well in the same process | 10:56 |
| cjwatson | and ubuntu-desktop lost those two and language-pack-kde-*, which is obviously correct anyway | 10:57 |
| * ogra would appreciate an armel rebuild ... i assume the archive should be setteled by now | 10:57 | |
| Riddell | NCommander, GrueMaster: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-netbook/ports/daily-preinstalled/20100929/ | 12:02 |
| NCommander | Riddell: yup, saw, thanks. Already did a successful test install :-) | 12:03 |
| cjwatson | robbiew: we're due an EOL announcement for jaunty soon, aren't we? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EndOfLifeProcess | 12:20 |
| cjwatson | ah, heh, I see you edited https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EndOfLifeAnnouncement recently so I guess you know ... | 12:21 |
| ScottK | IIRC it went out a few days ago. | 12:21 |
| ogra | Riddell, thanks a lot | 12:35 |
| Riddell | ogra: you're welcome. what did I do? | 12:37 |
| ogra | roll ne images :) | 12:37 |
| ogra | *new | 12:37 |
| * ogra was waiting to test the new bootloader on omap3 | 12:37 | |
| smoser | cjwatson, or slangasek could you populate iso tracker from http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/server/maverick/20100928.4/published-ec2-daily.txt | 13:19 |
| smoser | and also list 20100928.4 as the uec images to be tested. | 13:19 |
| cjwatson | smoser: done and done | 13:38 |
| ScottK | cjwatson: Does x-loader belong in some package set (I find it unusual to see packages in Main that don't)? | 13:38 |
| smoser | gracias. | 13:38 |
| cjwatson | ScottK: how odd. it *ought* to be in core | 13:40 |
| cjwatson | oh, eek | 13:47 |
| cjwatson | ScottK: thanks, nasty bug - it was using the i386 Packages file regardless of architecture, I think | 13:47 |
| ScottK | cjwatson: You're welcome. | 13:47 |
| ScottK | Convenient of wgrant to put the package sets on the package acceptance page so the lack would be there staring at me. | 13:48 |
| doko_ | ok to sync http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/libd/libdbd-sqlite3-perl/current/changelog ? fixes ftbfs | 13:55 |
| ScottK | doko_: Did your ucf update get resolved? I just went looking for the FFe bug and couldn't find it. | 13:56 |
| doko_ | ScottK: it was ufc | 13:56 |
| doko_ | anyway, not needed | 13:56 |
| ScottK | That would explain why I couldn't find it. OK. | 13:57 |
| ScottK | doko_: It's in Main, so it needs to wait until after RC. | 13:57 |
| ScottK | (after that, it looks good) | 13:57 |
| cjwatson | ScottK: how exciting. http://paste.ubuntu.com/502618/ | 14:06 |
| cjwatson | I'm going to apply that as it looks basically correct - TBH if the Ubuntu Studio guys want to fix ia32-libs they're welcome to it :-) | 14:06 |
| ScottK | Absolutely. | 14:07 |
| persia | Quite possibly the fix there will lead to work to drop that from Ubuntu Studio again. | 14:08 |
| ScottK | cjwatson: The correction to the package set already shows up on the LP package accept page. Very nice. | 14:17 |
| cjwatson | ScottK: yep, seems to be immediate, which is good | 14:19 |
| * Riddell out for a bit | 14:25 | |
| ScottK | There's a reasonable stack of Universe syncs in the queue if anyone has time to look ... | 14:55 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| ScottK | Is it known/on purpose we have a newer mountall in the archive than is on the Kubuntu live CD (i386) | 18:13 |
| ScottK | Riddell: ^^^? | 18:15 |
| doko | skaet: what is wrong with keeping bug #635891 open for natty? | 18:26 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 635891 in lprof (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 3 other projects) "libvigraimpex (main) build-depends on hfd5 (universe) (affects: 1) (heat: 188)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/635891 | 18:26 |
| skaet | doko, was just assigning it. | 18:27 |
| skaet | making sure it was on someone's monitoring list, for writing release notes, if its not going to be fixed. | 18:29 |
| persia | skaet, Isn't it better to do that with a release-notes task? | 18:30 |
| persia | That way it shows up in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes | 18:30 |
| persia | (and we can track when it gets release-noted separately from when it gets fixed) | 18:30 |
| skaet | persia, will be doing that too. | 18:31 |
| skaet | just changed the assigned to field to be the desktop team, from unassigned. | 18:32 |
| doko | need somebody to approve for bug #642344 tiles (unapproved) and mvel2 (new), new upstream version just taken and renamed from debian | 19:47 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 642344 in libspring-2.5-java (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 3 other projects) "libspring-2.5-java needs an initial manual build (affects: 1) (heat: 12)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/642344 | 19:47 |
| ScottK | doko: I just approved tiles. | 19:48 |
| doko | ScottK: then you have to approve mvel2 too =) | 19:49 |
| ScottK | OK | 19:50 |
| stgraber | cjwatson: thanks (for the packageset change) | 19:53 |
| ScottK | doko: I'll have to look at New tonight or tomorrow, but seems fine. | 19:56 |
| doko | ScottK, cjwatson: would be nice to have it built tomorrow morning/noon my time. still doing the manual bootstrap with #is | 19:57 |
| ScottK | OK. Will try. If some else gets to it first, I won't mind. | 19:57 |
| doko | hmm, why doesn't my grace upload show up? | 20:00 |
| ScottK | doko: It's in the queue, but it's in the Xubuntu packageset, so not accepting until after RC. | 20:01 |
| doko | ahh, ok | 20:01 |
| doko | ScottK: what about drizzle, will it be removed? just asking for NBS ... | 20:03 |
| ScottK | Yes. | 20:03 |
| ScottK | Upstream decided they'd rather ship nothing at this point and I think we aren't going to disagree. | 20:03 |
| ScottK | There's a removal bug pending. | 20:04 |
| CardinalFang | I have a question about our current release state. The "unapproved" queue has close to 40 items in it. Is "approved" frozen while we make RC images or something like that? | 20:16 |
| persia | CardinalFang, For anything that lands on an image undergoing validation, yes (unless the image fails validation and the release team for that image needs a specific package for a respin) | 20:19 |
| CardinalFang | persia, okay. I (=Online Services) care about two packages in the "unapproved" queue. I don't know what I should be doing now. Waiting, perhaps? | 20:28 |
| persia | Which packages? | 20:28 |
| ScottK | CardinalFang: Unless it rises to the level of "We should not release the RC unless we fix this", waiting is appropriate. | 20:29 |
| CardinalFang | persia, ubuntuone-client, desktopcouch . | 20:30 |
| persia | Yeah, those need waiting. | 20:30 |
| CardinalFang | ScottK, I don't think we should stop RC, no. | 20:30 |
| persia | CardinalFang, If it was some package that wasn't used on any image, and you had a really good reason, you could beg, but those appear on images. | 20:30 |
| ScottK | Stuff that's not in Main or seeded on an image, I'm pushing through, so those wouldn't be waiting. | 20:33 |
| persia | Ah, with that information, yes no need for package names to reach a conclusion :) | 20:35 |
| CardinalFang | persia, okay, I guess my only question is, wait for what? What happens next for me? | 20:42 |
| CardinalFang | I guess I fear being asleep when someone asks a question about them. | 20:42 |
| persia | Wait for RC to be released. | 20:43 |
| CardinalFang | persia, okay. Sorry for sounding neurotic. | 20:44 |
| ScottK | doko: mvel2 source accepted. | 22:53 |
| doko | ScottK: thanks | 23:10 |
| Riddell | ScottK: hmm, no I didn't see that it had the old mountall | 23:48 |
| Riddell | cjwatson: just how serious is that mountall bug? | 23:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!