[00:36] <sladen> I occasionally hear of reports of a script for expiring bugs that uses the LP API
[00:37] <sladen> does anyone have a pointer for this---I spent about an hour hunting last night, without success
[00:38] <TiK> hi
[00:38] <TiK> how might I report a big I have found?
[00:38] <TiK> er bug
[00:40] <sladen> TiK: http://launchpad.net/launchpad/+filebug
[00:40] <wgrant> TiK: What have you found a bug in?
[00:41] <TiK> rythmbox in 10.10
[00:41] <TiK> it's broken w/ ipod
[00:41] <TiK> I had to run 19.04 in a VM to update
[00:42] <wgrant> TiK: Try the "Report a Problem..." item in Rhythmbox's Help menu
[00:46] <TiK> to late
[00:46] <wgrant> Hm?
[00:46] <TiK> ill do both
[00:46] <TiK> I filed a bug already
[00:47] <TiK> brb
[00:47] <sladen> TiK: what's the link to the bug number?
[00:48] <wgrant> It was bug #651652
[00:48] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 651652 in Launchpad itself "IPOD SUPPERT (rythmbox) 10.10 (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/651652
[00:49] <TiK> back
[00:49] <TiK> yeah
[00:49] <wgrant> It's far better for it to be refiled than retargeted, as we will get apport information that way.
[00:49] <TiK> I know
[00:49] <TiK> I said I would do both
[00:56] <TiK> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/651659
[00:56] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 651659 in rhythmbox (Ubuntu) "ipod will not update correctly in 10.10 using rythmbox (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[00:57] <TiK> i love launchpad
[00:58] <TiK> this is a big issue imo
[00:59] <TiK> gonna update my ipod in .04 bb
[01:04] <TiK> hah "seppert" quick typing isn't good
[03:31] <MTecknology> Any chance someone is around to make a PPA private?
[03:41] <kklimonda> MTecknology: isn't it unavailable for "free" accounts?
[03:42] <persia> kklimonda, Typically, but who says a given account is "free" :)
[03:43] <kklimonda> persia: hmm, indeed - but I've assumed that there is a nice gui for making a ppa private and you get a "how to make a ppa private" email along with the paid LP license or whatever it is :)
[03:43] <persia> I think making a PPA private requires a LOSA to access the nice GUI.
[03:44] <kklimonda> btw
[03:44] <kklimonda> why there is still rt.ubuntu.com?
[03:44] <kklimonda> it feels like some secret organization inside Canonical ;)
[03:55] <persia> kklimonda, rt.ubuntu.com isn't secret.  It's the way we request stuff from #canonical-sysadmin for infrastructure managed by Canonical.
[03:57] <kklimonda> persia: any reason it couldn't be done with LP?
[04:01] <persia> RT is a bit more feature-full for that sort of things (workqueues, etc.), but also just legacy: rt.ubuntu.com predates LP.
[04:23] <MTecknology> kklimonda: ya.. you first go through and purchase the ticket; then once you apply it to a project there's 1yr that it's active;  you need a losa to make the change
[04:23] <MTecknology> which seem to be vacant..
[04:23] <MTecknology> wgrant: perhaps you're still around?
[04:23] <persia> Well, it's Thursday.
[04:23] <wgrant> MTecknology: Still? It has just gone 1pm.
[04:24] <wgrant> spm: ^^
[04:24] <wgrant> But he may be lunching.
[04:24] <MTecknology> wgrant: alrighty, thanks :)
[04:24] <persia> "losa" ought be sufficient ping anyway
[04:25] <nhandler> 36
[04:26] <MTecknology> 37
[04:26] <MTecknology> :P
[04:27]  * persia wishes irssi had better OOB signaling semantics
[04:27] <wgrant> Yes :(
[04:53] <spm> kklimonda: speaking 1. very much personally and 2. as someone who uses both RT and LP for task tracking, LP is no where near as efficient for *task* tracking/management as RT. LP is focused around bugs. it may not seem like it, but use both a lot and the difference is painfully obvious.
[04:55] <spm> MTecknology: which project?
[04:58] <MTecknology> spm: https://edge.launchpad.net/~kalliki/+archive/testing
[05:04] <spm> MTecknology: is done, have at it!
[05:04] <lifeless> spm: could it be that LP is slow?
[05:04] <MTecknology> spm: thanks :)
[05:05] <spm> lifeless: in what respect? it's seems normal to me atm?
[05:05] <wgrant> RT's more flexible priorities are handy for task tracking.
[05:07] <lifeless> spm: har har har
[05:07] <spm> dashboards are win
[05:07] <spm> lifeless: heh, actually I wasn't joking - thought that was a serious "OMG LP IS SLOW ATM" comment. :-)
[05:07] <lifeless> spm: it is, but no slower than yesterday.
[05:08] <spm> ah
[05:10] <spm> rephrase. *flexible* dashboards that I can adjust to a view that suits *me*, are win. we have several that we use across the entire ISO team, but I spend most of my life looknig at just 2; noe for me, and one for all losas. saved search queries are another plus
[05:12] <lifeless> ctrl-D ?
[08:57] <swoody> how do I purge a mailing list before I delete a team? I deactivated it, but am still unable to see an option to purge it :/
[09:00] <wgrant> spm: Does that require an admin?
[09:06] <swoody> ah, found it, both team and project deletion need admin powa! :)
[12:23] <LinuxJedi> hi guys, any idea why the triage details are suddenly showing up in the project row as well as the targeted release row in this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/drizzle/+bug/647360
[12:23] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 647360 in Drizzle elliott "drizzzledump mysql migration needs documenting (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [High,Fix released]
[12:23]  * LinuxJedi is pretty sure this wasn't happening yesterday
[12:24] <LinuxJedi> it appears to be happening for all our bugs
[12:24] <LinuxJedi> which is causing duplicates in the milestone view
[13:33] <tumbleweed> We allow usernames with +s in them? This guy has just opened some bugs, but I can't see his profile https://edge.launchpad.net/~guy+launchpad-net
[13:34] <tumbleweed> i.e. bug 651992
[13:34] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 651992 in Ibid "failed dependency in setup.py (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/651992
[13:39] <wgrant> tumbleweed: That account has been renamed.
[13:39] <wgrant> But +s are normally fine.
[13:39] <wgrant> (ghalse is the new name)
[13:40] <wgrant> You must have looked at the link at just the wrong time.
[13:40] <tumbleweed> wgrant: ok, I suspected as much
[15:16] <paissad_> hello guys,
[15:16] <paissad_> i have an account in launchpad and some packages into my dedicated repo there
[15:17] <paissad_> but i would like to know if i'm obliged to upgrade to Maverick before creating a package for Maverick ?
[15:17] <paissad_> thanks in advance
[16:40] <shadeslayer> paissad_: nope
[16:41] <shadeslayer> but you should have a maverick pbuilder to test build those pacjages
[16:41] <shadeslayer> *packages
[16:41] <shadeslayer> just replace lucid with maverick in the first line of the changelog
[17:28] <paulmck> Hello!  Any hints on what I need to do to be able to update https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+spec/linaro-tr-kernel-memory-regions?  I am logged in as https://blueprints.launchpad.net/~paulmck, and am supposed to have the relevant permissions.
[17:32] <jml> paulmck: looking...
[17:34] <paulmck> jml: Never mind -- pilot error.  I am used to the "Change details" link, and just now learned of the little icon near "Whiteboard".  Apologies for my confusion!!!
[17:35] <jml> paulmck: np :)
[19:55] <Linden940> I need a hand real fast if anyone could help
[19:55] <Linden940> I am the team leader for team-dallas and I am trying to set up a project page for that team but I dont know how to link them
[19:55] <Linden940> how would I do that?
[22:13] <xrg_> admins here? Could you take a look at lp:~openerp-dev/openobject-addons/trunk-dev-addons3 , please?
[22:14] <mars> xrg_, what is the problem?
[22:15] <xrg_> mars: thanks. This repo is slow. The format is reported as "unnamed" .. One check and perhaps upgrade to 2a would do.
[22:16] <mars> rockstar or abentley, perhaps you have some input? ^
[22:17] <abentley> mars: use nosmart+lp in the URL.  Or look at the web page.
[22:18] <mars> xrg_, ^ does that help?
[22:19] <xrg_> abentley: the issue is that in our testing server, the "trunk-dev-addons3" is the only branch that takes too much time to fetch.
[22:20] <xrg_> abentley: so wanted to perform any regular maintenance (you might think suitable)
[22:20] <abentley> xrg_: There's no maintenance that we do.
[22:22] <xrg_> stupid question: what is format 7 and what is 2a ?
[22:22] <rockstar> xrg_, you could try `bzr upgrade lp:~openerp-dev/openobject-addons/trunk-dev-addons3`
[22:22] <rockstar> xrg_, format 7 and 2a are the branch and repository formats.
[22:22] <xrg_> rockstar: it is fairly large, will it perform well remotely?
[22:23] <xrg_> rockstar: I tried 'bzr check' for a start, but cancelled agter 5hrs and 1.3GB
[22:33] <rockstar> xrg_, if it's in format 7 and 2a, it doesn't need an upgrade.
[22:34] <xrg_> rockstar: agreed. I'm trying a "pack" now.
[22:34] <xrg_> brb
[22:44] <xrg_> rockstar: is it possible, please, that you can try a "pack" locally? Isn't the remote one abusing bandwidth?
[22:47] <xrg_> (still running my pack command, may abort if you say so )
[23:34] <askhl> Hi.  When I try to copy a lucid PPA package to maverick in the same PPA while keeping the binaries, it says 'binaries conflicting with the existing ones'.  Isn't this a bit strange, and what should I do?
[23:49] <maxb> xrg_: I was curious, and copied your branch locally. It packed down to just 12MB for me
[23:52] <maxb> askhl: That is indeed odd. Smells potentially like a bug. What is the PPA and the sourcepackage name and version you are copying?