[14:34] <newz2000> oh, I believe it is fixed, forgot to close the bug
[16:25] <popey> newz2000: will ubuntu.com be updated for rc?, it currently announces the beta
[16:26] <newz2000> popey: yep
[16:26] <newz2000> There has been debate about dropping the term "RC" because it's viewed as technical jargon and most of the world understands the concept of beta
[16:26] <newz2000> (dropping it from our advertising)
[16:26] <popey> right
[16:27] <newz2000> but not this time. ;-) I just have to get the word from the release team where the final pieces are
[16:27] <popey> cool
[17:51] <daker> newz2000, i don't if we can change the structure of the light-base-theme
[17:52] <newz2000> daker: not sure what you mean by that
[17:53] <daker> the structure of the document doesn't really help when trying to make something with
[17:53] <daker> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-website-community/ubuntu-website/light-base-theme/annotate/head:/index.html
[17:54] <daker> actually it has "header, aside, section ..."
[17:55] <newz2000> daker: you've really lost me, it could be because my head is full of release day stuff
[17:55] <daker> sorry :D
[17:56] <newz2000> what's the context? Are there some changes to the theme happening?
[17:57] <daker> we are working (me, mhall119 & cjohnston ) on that
[17:58] <daker> newz2000, we are trying to follow the desing guidelines
[17:59] <newz2000> The design guidelines were not made with community websites in mind. As it turns out, they weren't even made for wiki.u.c
[17:59] <newz2000> The main ones to consider are the font (use ubuntu font), the logo usage guidelines and the color pallete. Also, understand the dots/ grid and take it into consideration
[18:00] <daker> brb
[18:01] <newz2000> I found this out 2 weeks ago, last week I got some updated design guidance but it's not quite ready
[18:01] <newz2000> however it does take into consideration community sites
[18:21] <daker> back
[18:22] <daker> newz2000, oki
[19:46] <zkriesse> OMG! its a popey !