| ogra_ac | kirkland, ping | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| paissad_ | Daviey, ok | 00:02 |
| kirkland | ogra_ac: hi | 00:11 |
| ogra_ac | kirkland, your change to user-setup isnt the the bzr tree | 00:11 |
| ogra_ac | kirkland, was that only the bs=16M in user-setup-apply ? | 00:12 |
| * ogra_ac tires to get the branch fixed since he committed his fix already | 00:12 | |
| ogra_ac | (before looking at the package indeed) | 00:13 |
| kirkland | ogra_ac: yes, that's all | 00:15 |
| ogra_ac | ok | 00:16 |
| kirkland | ogra_ac: sorry about that | 00:17 |
| kirkland | not sure how that happened | 00:17 |
| ogra_ac | well, dont worry, i'm sorting | 00:17 |
| === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk | ||
| === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
| === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk | ||
| === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
| kees | slangasek: erm, seems like a "status" stanza is needed in upstart. it's a regression that arbitrary checks can't be added. | 00:38 |
| slangasek | kees: I'm of the view that this doesn't belong in upstart because upstart itself has no use for such a thing and it would be provided solely for external consumers, so there's no reason to involve upstart at all in the design; but Keybuk might take a different view if you ask him | 00:40 |
| kees | slangasek: hm, as a sysvinit replacement, there is sense to "is my service operational?" beyond "is there a pid for it?" seems to me like that overlaps with upstart. I'll ask him. | 00:43 |
| slangasek | kees: I agree that there's a need for querying such information, I just don't see any reason for pid 1 to mediate it | 00:44 |
| slangasek | in fact, I can see that introducing some nice security holes ;) | 00:45 |
| kees | slangasek: fair enough. | 00:45 |
| kees | slangasek: right, the shift in who is doing what does pose a risk | 00:45 |
| kees | if Keybuk agrees, I guess it should just live in the "service" command. | 00:46 |
| kees | though "status" from upstart should be renamed. | 00:46 |
| ArneGoetje | YokoZar: xfonts-baekmuk is an alias package. I don't think it's necesary any more. | 01:52 |
| === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening | ||
| werew433 | hellow I want to create driver for my Radeon X700 for full 3D on 10.04, where I can find radeon developers? | 10:54 |
| ion | You can program a 3D accelerated driver but you can’t find the project contact info on the web? :-) | 10:56 |
| werew433 | ok I find them | 11:04 |
| paissad_ | i try to build a package for lucid i386 , i did first (pbuilder-dist lucid i386 create) .... i did a chroot in that environnement .. installed needed packages and so on ... but here is the error i get when i run the debian/rules | 11:14 |
| paissad_ | http://dpaste.com/251926/ | 11:14 |
| paissad_ | here is the debian/rules file -> http://pastebin.com/4KnnLvPj | 11:16 |
| paissad_ | i did run debian/rules get-orig-source | 11:16 |
| paissad_ | this works in a normal environnement (no chroot) | 11:17 |
| === zyga_ is now known as zyga | ||
| === dywi_ is now known as dywi | ||
| jellington | hey everyone, I was just wondering after upgrading my netbook to meerkat, how do I add items to the unity launcher? | 16:40 |
| ScottK | jellington: Support is in #ubuntu+1 for Maverick. | 16:45 |
| jellington | alright | 16:47 |
| paissad_ | guys, when run 'debuild -us -uc', i don't get the *diff file ... i don't know why | 16:48 |
| paissad_ | here is the files i have http://pastebin.com/t3HDUm6S | 16:48 |
| paissad_ | may someone explain or help me ? | 16:48 |
| paissad_ | sorry, here is a better pastebin ;) http://pastebin.com/YiceNGFb | 16:50 |
| paissad_ | thanks in advance | 16:50 |
| ScottK | paissad_: You're using Debian source format version 3. It has debian.tar.gz instead of diff.gz that version 1 uses. | 16:51 |
| paissad_ | ScottK, ahhh, yeah that's it ! of course ... so knowing that i have a debian repository, i put the debian.tar.gz instead of the diff.gz ? | 16:52 |
| paissad_ | no no | 16:53 |
| ScottK | paissad_: Are you working on a package that you hope to get into Ubuntu? | 16:54 |
| paissad_ | ScottK, no .. that will no go for Ubuntu, not for the moment .. but i maintain a repository that contains packages that many people use ... so i have to do a good job | 16:55 |
| ScottK | paissad_: #ubuntu-packaging is probably a better channel for you. | 16:55 |
| paissad_ | ScottK, the package is already created ... but knowing that there's no more diff.gz file, ... i just wonder what to put in the repository instead ^^ | 16:56 |
| paissad_ | btw, the package is also in PPA, so ... | 16:57 |
| ScottK | paissad_: This channel is for development of Ubuntu. What you're asking about is really off topic. | 16:57 |
| paissad_ | oh sorry | 16:58 |
| paissad_ | #ubuntu-motu is also for development of Ubuntu ? | 16:58 |
| ScottK | Yes. | 17:01 |
| ScottK | paissad_: #ubuntu-packaging (I think that's it's name) is for packaging help outside of Ubuntu (like PPAs) | 17:01 |
| hyperair | is anyone processing SRUs for maverick yet? | 17:36 |
| ScottK | None have been uploaded yet. | 17:38 |
| hyperair | ScottK: would you mind uploading one for me please? =) | 17:40 |
| hyperair | it's libgpod. | 17:40 |
| ScottK | I'm a bit tied up at the moment. Maybe later today. | 17:41 |
| hyperair | ScottK: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgpod/+bug/652855 | 17:41 |
| hyperair | sure | 17:41 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 652855 in libgpod (Ubuntu) "Please fakesync libgpod 0.7.95-1 from Debian experimental to maverick-updates" [Undecided,New] | 17:41 |
| ScottK | If it's an SRU it won't get accepted until after release anyway, so there's no rush. | 17:41 |
| * hyperair nods | 17:42 | |
| hyperair | ScottK: do i have to wait until libgpod is accepted before uploading banshee and banshee-community-extensions (bce depends on banshee which depends on libgpod) to -proposed? | 17:43 |
| hyperair | or can i just upload those two already? | 17:43 |
| ScottK | hyperair: No, they can all be uploaded, but if you're thinking of getting new releases in through updates, you ought to pre-coordinate with ubuntu-sru if you haven't. | 17:44 |
| hyperair | ScottK: pre-coordinate how? | 17:44 |
| ScottK | hyperair: Usually we don't accept new versions in -updates (except for the few packages that have micro-version update exceptions). | 17:45 |
| ScottK | So if you upload new versions to updates without talking to them, I think they are likely to just reject it. | 17:45 |
| * ScottK isn't on ubuntu-sru, so can't say for sure. | 17:45 | |
| hyperair | ScottK: so who in ubuntu-sru can i talk to about this? | 17:45 |
| ScottK | Normally pitti would be best, but he hasn't been around much. Not sure. | 17:46 |
| hyperair | i see. | 17:47 |
| hyperair | what about seb128? | 17:47 |
| ricotz | hyperair, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sru/+members#active | 17:48 |
| hyperair | well, why didn't i think about that? =) | 17:48 |
| === hunger_ is now known as hunger | ||
| paissad_ | is there another alternative to dput ? ... i know there's one .. but i've forgotten it | 18:12 |
| happyaron | dupload? | 18:15 |
| paissad_ | hmm, maybe | 18:17 |
| jonrafkind | i uploaded a file to my ppa ftp account using dput, am I supposed to take action after that? | 18:24 |
| jonrafkind | i was expecting the ubuntu servers to attempt to build my package and send me an email or something | 18:25 |
| cjwatson | jonrafkind: you should get an e-mail when the system accepts your upload, although you won't get an e-mail after the build unless the build fails. If you don't get an e-mail on accept, then see https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/UploadErrors | 18:30 |
| jonrafkind | oh oops ok I got an email about upload failure. i forgot the tilda in front of the path | 18:31 |
| jonrafkind | is this the right path to use? ~rafkind/ppa/ubuntu | 18:31 |
| ebroder | If you're using dput, then just upload to ppa:rafkind/ubuntu | 18:31 |
| jonrafkind | isnt that only in 9.10? i have 9.04 | 18:32 |
| happyaron | jonrafkind: then you'd change your ~/dput.cf | 18:32 |
| jonrafkind | yes.. | 18:32 |
| happyaron | .dput.cf | 18:33 |
| jonrafkind | but is my path right? | 18:33 |
| happyaron | yes it is | 18:33 |
| jonrafkind | ok | 18:33 |
| === fddfoo is now known as fdd | ||
| jonrafkind | are you sure thats the right path? i got this error: Could not find a PPA named 'ppa' for 'rafkind'. | 19:02 |
| jonrafkind | should i use the name of my ppa instead of the characters 'ppa' ? | 19:02 |
| happyaron | jonrafkind: what's your launchpad username | 19:02 |
| jonrafkind | rafkind | 19:02 |
| happyaron | jonrafkind: well, you didn't use the default name, ppa | 19:03 |
| happyaron | instead, you named it after "paintown" | 19:03 |
| jonrafkind | yea | 19:04 |
| happyaron | so ~rafkind/paintown/ppa and try again | 19:04 |
| jonrafkind | the directions are sort of ambiguous about this | 19:04 |
| happyaron | so ~rafkind/paintown/ubuntu, sorry | 19:04 |
| jonrafkind | ok | 19:04 |
| jonrafkind | this is pretty stupid how i get the path error after i upload the entire file | 19:04 |
| jonrafkind | it takes me 20 minutes to upload this file, and then i get an error about the wrong file path | 19:04 |
| happyaron | :( | 19:05 |
| jonrafkind | if the default name was ppa then why do the dput directions on the launchpad page say 'dput ppa:rafkind/paintown <source.changes> ' | 19:07 |
| jonrafkind | so if i changed my package name from 'ppa' to 'paintown' that should affect the 'ubuntu' in that path | 19:07 |
| jonrafkind | are you sure its not ~rafkind/ppa/paintown ? | 19:07 |
| jonrafkind | sorry i mean, 'that should not affect the ubuntu in the path' | 19:08 |
| happyaron | jonrafkind: 'ubuntu' is always the finishing thing in your path of launchpad ppa | 19:11 |
| jonrafkind | https://launchpad.net/~rafkind/+archive/paintown | 19:12 |
| jonrafkind | can you see the contents of this page? | 19:12 |
| jonrafkind | it says dput ppa:rafkind/paintown | 19:12 |
| happyaron | jonrafkind: yes, that's correct | 19:13 |
| jonrafkind | so.. that doesnt end with /ubuntu | 19:14 |
| jonrafkind | or you're saying the 9.10 version of dput is different from the ftp version? | 19:14 |
| jonrafkind | if i had just used 'ppa' as the name then it would be 'dput ppa:rafkind/ppa' ? | 19:14 |
| happyaron | jonrafkind: yes, if you have 9.10 or higher, just do that | 19:15 |
| jonrafkind | right, but i dont | 19:15 |
| jonrafkind | im just wondering about the naming convnetions | 19:16 |
| happyaron | jonrafkind: if not, you should use ~username/ppaname/ubuntu | 19:16 |
| ebroder | jonrafkind: Just add this block to your ~/.dput.cf: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/504628/ | 19:16 |
| ebroder | Then you can do dput ppa:rafkind/paintown or whatever | 19:16 |
| jonrafkind | ok. the directions were confusing because they say 'probably you should use the default name ppa' | 19:16 |
| ebroder | the ppa: URLs were a configuration, not a code, change | 19:17 |
| jonrafkind | but thats sort of ridiculous because when i created the ppa i wanted to give it a name | 19:17 |
| jonrafkind | it seems most likely that people will name their ppa something other than 'ppa' | 19:17 |
| jonrafkind | so the directions should say 'use the name that you chose when you created the ppa' | 19:17 |
| happyaron | jonrafkind: you may want to discuss these things at #launchpad, :) | 19:18 |
| jonrafkind | whats %(ppas)s ? | 19:18 |
| jonrafkind | is that a meta comment? | 19:18 |
| ebroder | jonrafkind: It doesn't matter. It's the magic that makes ppa: URLs work | 19:18 |
| jonrafkind | so if i use that and then do 'dput ppa:rafkind/paintown' it would work? | 19:19 |
| ebroder | Yes | 19:19 |
| jonrafkind | oh ok, and this is the only change between 9.04 and 9.10? | 19:19 |
| ebroder | It's the only one relevant to dput ppa: working | 19:19 |
| jonrafkind | ok, thanks | 19:20 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === amitk-afk is now known as amitk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!