[01:41] is it possible to delete source packages uploaded to launchpad in my ppa? [01:42] i uploaded a package that failed, so i rebuilt the package and tried to reupload it but I got a rejection message because I cant upload the same file twice [01:43] jonrafkind: You can delete them, but it won't let you upload the same version again. That wouldn't make sense. [01:43] jonrafkind: You need to increment the version. [01:43] so i need to update all the version numbers in control/changelog as well? [01:44] jonrafkind: It should only be in the changelog. [01:44] If you have the version elsewhere, you probably have another problem. [01:44] oh ok, what is this: Standards-Version: [01:44] i wasnt sure what it was, i just copied it into my file [01:44] That specifies the version of Debian Policy with which your package complies. It's not your package's version. [01:44] ok, can I safely delete it? [01:45] jonrafkind: No. [01:45] what should I set it to? [01:45] jonrafkind: You should set it properly, though. [01:45] Normally the latest version of Debian Policy, if your package complies with it. [01:46] which is..? [01:46] i dont think I use 'debian policy', i dont even know what that is [01:46] oh sorry you said 'complies' not 'compiles', haha [01:47] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ -- the latest version is 3.9.1.0. [01:48] so if I leave out this field (Standards-Version) will I get a rejection email from launchpad? [01:49] jonrafkind: No, but you should always have it. [01:49] i dont want to lie and say i comply with something when I have no idea if I comply with it [01:49] Your package should comply with some version of policy. === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates [01:50] im making a package for my ppa [01:50] i dont really care at this point if i comply with some debian policy [01:50] If you don't comply then you are likely to break people's systems. [01:50] It's not that hard to check compliance. [01:50] i dont comply because of copyright issues [01:50] (probably) [01:51] What do you mean? [01:51] i have a game, i have copyrighted art in it [01:51] that i dont have the copyrights to [01:51] The PPA Terms of Service forbid you from uploading that. [01:51] It's not distributable. [01:52] alright fine, ill just upload the source then [01:53] It's not an "alright fine" sort of thing. It's a "that's not legal and could get people in lots of trouble" thing. [01:53] fine alright === maco2 is now known as maco [04:01] hello! I was just wondering for PPAs if there is a way to say that not all members of a team can upload, for example only administrators? [04:19] Why can't I branch from launchpad faster than about 80kB/sec? [04:50] hi does anyone if there is a way to find out the overall total of downloads for ur project? [04:52] ub3rst4r: bug 431011 [04:52] Launchpad bug 431011 in Launchpad Foundations "offer per-project statistics (affected: 4, heat: 7)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/431011 [04:54] shouldnt that be a blueprint? [04:55] any idea when this is getting implemented? [04:56] ub3rst4r: when it's ready to be worked on it might be added to one [04:56] we don't really use blueprints [04:56] even if we did, we wouldn't do/not do something just because it was/wasn't a blueprint. [04:56] mrooney1: At the moment you can add uploaders in addition to the owner, but you can't remove the owning team's privileges. [04:57] kthx [04:58] wgrant: theres another 50 or so revs coming across to prod on monday, [04:58] wgrant: up through 11609 [04:58] lifeless: We're 10 days behind on QA? [04:59] yes [04:59] (I have a regression fix branch that will probably need CPing soon) [04:59] 11610 isn't qa'd. [04:59] Ah. [05:00] -> airport. [05:40] wgrant: ah okay, thanks. I have an open users team for my app and thought that team was a good place for a PPA, until someone pointed out that anyone can upload then and it isn't very secure [05:41] is there a good way to move a PPA? I guess if I delete it apt will complain and hopefully the people using it will visit the team page and see a notice I could put up [05:44] mrooney1: You can't move it, no. [05:44] Anyone using that PPA probably can't trust their system any more, though. [05:46] well, I can see that no one has uploaded anything but me [05:46] Ah, good. [05:47] it was just someone pointing it out [05:47] I wonder if it would be worth a warning in LP though, I had not at all put it together than an open team + PPA = anyone can upload, until it was pointed out [05:47] I think there's a bug for that. [05:47] ah ok [08:55] i uploaded a package for lucid, i copied the binaries (from my launchpad account) from Lucid to Maverick ... but i just would like to know if it's still necessary to copy binaries for Karmic or even Jaunty ? [08:56] i think that most people upgraded their version of release .. no ? [08:56] paissad: Nothing is "necessary" -- do what you want. If you have users on Jaunty or Karmic, copy to them too. [08:56] But most people should be running Lucid or later, so I wouldn't bother. [08:57] in any case, they just can pick from Lucid or Maverick, that would work too [12:04] hi, my bug watch is failing to sync bug statuses and comments, OOPS-1731CCW9145 and OOPS-1734CCW440 [12:04] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1731CCW9145 [12:04] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1734CCW440 [12:04] wrt bug 647332 [12:04] Launchpad bug 647332 in rekonq (Ubuntu) "[maverick] Rekonq crashes without network connection. (affected: 2, heat: 441)" [Low,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/647332 === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates === shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_ === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer [19:56] is launchpad itself translatable? [19:58] serfus: no, it's not [19:59] james_w, hum, that's a shame... thanks anyway :) === yofel_ is now known as yfoel === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk