/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/10/03/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== maco2 is now known as maco
shadeslayercoolbhavi: ok so the patch was done, but i cant seem to be able to use it in my package :(13:32
shadeslayeri have this rules file http://paste.ubuntu.com/505094/13:32
shadeslayeranyone else have a ideaa?13:37
persiashadeslayer, I can't find enough context to understand what to suggest.  If you're still about, could you provide some?14:36
shadeslayerpersia: ive added a patch to a 1.0 format package, with that rules file14:50
shadeslayerbut i dont see the patch being applied :(14:50
persiashadeslayer, How did you add the patch?15:05
shadeslayerpersia: by following quilt section of packaging guide15:05
shadeslayerhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete#quilt (Example Package: xterm)15:06
shadeslayerive never worked with patches + 1.0 source format :(15:06
persiaquilt new, quilt add, quilt refresh, quilt pop ?15:07
shadeslayeryes15:08
persiaOK, so that would be right.15:09
persiaNow, how isn't it working?15:09
shadeslayerits not applying the patch during debuild -S -sa15:10
shadeslayeror debuild even...15:10
shadeslayerthats the part im having trouble figuring out15:10
persiaThat's fine.  Format 1.0 packages don't apply patches at source build time.15:10
shadeslayeruh.. alright, but i can still reproduce my issue that the patch is supposed to fix15:11
shadeslayerpersia: also... quilt uses -p1 right?15:11
persiaquilt doesn't set a -p level as such, it's more complicated than that.15:12
shadeslayerhmm.. well.. what to do15:13
shadeslayerpersia: heres the patch http://paste.ubuntu.com/505135/15:13
shadeslayerpackage is choqok15:13
persiaOK.  What happens if you call `debian/rules patch` in the source directory?15:14
shadeslayerit seems to have patched the file15:15
shadeslayerpatching file microblogs/twitter/twittereditaccount.cpp15:16
persiaand `debian/rules unpatch` ?15:16
shadeslayerRemoving patch kubuntu_01_consumerkey.diff15:16
persiaWell, that's expected output.15:17
persiaSo, if you do a binary build, do you see similar entries in your build log?15:17
shadeslayeryeah, but when i install the deb file i created with debuild, it doesnt use the consumer key i specified15:17
shadeslayermaybe my patch is wrong.. who knows... ill talk with upstream15:19
persiaAha!  So I think you want  /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk instead of /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make (based on /usr/share/doc/quilt/README.Debian15:19
shadeslayerok lets see15:19
lucidfoxhttp://volatile-minds.blogspot.com/2010/10/re-elect-jesus-christ-vote-for-rick.html15:26
lucidfoxo_O15:26
lucidfoxWhat is this doing on Planet Ubuntu?15:26
persialucidfox, Are you complaining about the content or the poster?15:28
shadeslayerpersia: thanks, works now :D15:32
lucidfoxpersia> Content15:34
persialucidfox, The common way to deal with that has been to firstly contact the poster, and ask for them not to post that, or if they must, please send only some tags to Planet Ubuntu.  If this is not received well, inform the Community Council that you find the content objectionable for some reason, and there will be discussion.15:35
persiaI think there's only ever been one case where it needed the second: most folk seem to post mostly related stuff *or* filter what hits planet.15:35
persia(and the case in question was, potentially, on-topic, in some ways)15:36
=== shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_
=== shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer
=== jcfp is now known as Guest6161
=== jorge is now known as jcastro
juanito28hola alguien habla español19:05
crimsunjuanito28: por lo general inglés, por favor19:06
juanito28no speak ingles19:07
zookoI'm working on this wiki page: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/OSPackages19:19
zookoI seem to remember that ubuntu always had working https, but at the moment it appears not.19:20
zookoOh well, back to http.19:20
Mjiighi everyone, i'm not a motu (or good enough to be one :)) but i wanted to ask if anyone had any recommendations for projects i could do/help on as i learn C?20:44
gesertumbleweed: I saw your commit to u-d-t (r767): have you checked that checkUpload returns True/False? see my comment regarding it in lpapicache.py: "checkUpload() throws an exception if the person can't upload"21:25
tumbleweedgeser: it returned True/False in my tests, but then so did isSourceUploadAllowed (I thought)21:26
tumbleweedoh, I didn't test for false False with checkUpload, good catch21:26
=== ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks
=== ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk
=== yofel_ is now known as yfoel

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!