[13:32] <shadeslayer> coolbhavi: ok so the patch was done, but i cant seem to be able to use it in my package :(
[13:32] <shadeslayer> i have this rules file http://paste.ubuntu.com/505094/
[13:37] <shadeslayer> anyone else have a ideaa?
[14:36] <persia> shadeslayer, I can't find enough context to understand what to suggest.  If you're still about, could you provide some?
[14:50] <shadeslayer> persia: ive added a patch to a 1.0 format package, with that rules file
[14:50] <shadeslayer> but i dont see the patch being applied :(
[15:05] <persia> shadeslayer, How did you add the patch?
[15:05] <shadeslayer> persia: by following quilt section of packaging guide
[15:06] <shadeslayer> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete#quilt (Example Package: xterm)
[15:06] <shadeslayer> ive never worked with patches + 1.0 source format :(
[15:07] <persia> quilt new, quilt add, quilt refresh, quilt pop ?
[15:08] <shadeslayer> yes
[15:09] <persia> OK, so that would be right.
[15:09] <persia> Now, how isn't it working?
[15:10] <shadeslayer> its not applying the patch during debuild -S -sa
[15:10] <shadeslayer> or debuild even...
[15:10] <shadeslayer> thats the part im having trouble figuring out
[15:10] <persia> That's fine.  Format 1.0 packages don't apply patches at source build time.
[15:11] <shadeslayer> uh.. alright, but i can still reproduce my issue that the patch is supposed to fix
[15:11] <shadeslayer> persia: also... quilt uses -p1 right?
[15:12] <persia> quilt doesn't set a -p level as such, it's more complicated than that.
[15:13] <shadeslayer> hmm.. well.. what to do
[15:13] <shadeslayer> persia: heres the patch http://paste.ubuntu.com/505135/
[15:13] <shadeslayer> package is choqok
[15:14] <persia> OK.  What happens if you call `debian/rules patch` in the source directory?
[15:15] <shadeslayer> it seems to have patched the file
[15:16] <shadeslayer> patching file microblogs/twitter/twittereditaccount.cpp
[15:16] <persia> and `debian/rules unpatch` ?
[15:16] <shadeslayer> Removing patch kubuntu_01_consumerkey.diff
[15:17] <persia> Well, that's expected output.
[15:17] <persia> So, if you do a binary build, do you see similar entries in your build log?
[15:17] <shadeslayer> yeah, but when i install the deb file i created with debuild, it doesnt use the consumer key i specified
[15:19] <shadeslayer> maybe my patch is wrong.. who knows... ill talk with upstream
[15:19] <persia> Aha!  So I think you want  /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk instead of /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make (based on /usr/share/doc/quilt/README.Debian
[15:19] <shadeslayer> ok lets see
[15:26] <lucidfox> http://volatile-minds.blogspot.com/2010/10/re-elect-jesus-christ-vote-for-rick.html
[15:26] <lucidfox> o_O
[15:26] <lucidfox> What is this doing on Planet Ubuntu?
[15:28] <persia> lucidfox, Are you complaining about the content or the poster?
[15:32] <shadeslayer> persia: thanks, works now :D
[15:34] <lucidfox> persia> Content
[15:35] <persia> lucidfox, The common way to deal with that has been to firstly contact the poster, and ask for them not to post that, or if they must, please send only some tags to Planet Ubuntu.  If this is not received well, inform the Community Council that you find the content objectionable for some reason, and there will be discussion.
[15:35] <persia> I think there's only ever been one case where it needed the second: most folk seem to post mostly related stuff *or* filter what hits planet.
[15:36] <persia> (and the case in question was, potentially, on-topic, in some ways)
[19:05] <juanito28> hola alguien habla español
[19:06] <crimsun> juanito28: por lo general inglés, por favor
[19:07] <juanito28> no speak ingles
[19:19] <zooko> I'm working on this wiki page: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/OSPackages
[19:20] <zooko> I seem to remember that ubuntu always had working https, but at the moment it appears not.
[19:20] <zooko> Oh well, back to http.
[20:44] <Mjiig> hi everyone, i'm not a motu (or good enough to be one :)) but i wanted to ask if anyone had any recommendations for projects i could do/help on as i learn C?
[21:25] <geser> tumbleweed: I saw your commit to u-d-t (r767): have you checked that checkUpload returns True/False? see my comment regarding it in lpapicache.py: "checkUpload() throws an exception if the person can't upload"
[21:26] <tumbleweed> geser: it returned True/False in my tests, but then so did isSourceUploadAllowed (I thought)
[21:26] <tumbleweed> oh, I didn't test for false False with checkUpload, good catch