| nigelb | g32 | 01:36 |
|---|---|---|
| IdleOne | BINGO | 01:40 |
| AndrewMC | lol | 01:44 |
| nigelb | haha | 02:32 |
| bcurtiswx | creepily enough, i think thats actually a G number.. | 02:37 |
| bcurtiswx | gj :P | 02:37 |
| nigelb | bcurtiswx: "a g number"? | 03:26 |
| bcurtiswx | i was wrong, but on a BINGO card. | 03:27 |
| bcurtiswx | its in the N | 03:27 |
| bcurtiswx | nigelb, ^ | 03:27 |
| nigelb | ah, that | 03:27 |
| niko | anyone here aware about https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2010-October/004994.html ? | 09:47 |
| rww | niko: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2010-October/004997.html is probably a better thread to follow. There's been some discussion of it in #ubuntu-locoteams too. | 09:57 |
| avelldiroll | niko: yep I read it, and found myself agreeing with this message: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2010-October/005000.html ... and reading the following, its seems to be motivated by problems on only one chan : #ubuntu-california (I did not backlog much yet) ... i believe logging should be a decision made by the moderation team of the concerned channel, and deciding unilaterally | 10:03 |
| avelldiroll | such big modifications is sure to impacts contributions. my 2 cents | 10:03 |
| avelldiroll | ouch sorry for the long post | 10:03 |
| rww | avelldiroll: considering that the LoCo Council first asked the IRC Council about this back in May, before they got involved in #ubuntu-california's mess, I'm not sure that the latter motivated the former. | 10:04 |
| rww | or, to be less vague, it didn't motivate it. | 10:04 |
| rww | One of the reasons I recommend the thread I linked over the one I started is that the structure of my email conflated the two issues. | 10:06 |
| avelldiroll | ok ... i was only saying that based on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2010-October/005002.html ... as I said i did not backlog much yet on the subject | 10:06 |
| * rww nods | 10:10 | |
| rww | Considering that I don't see any LoCo Council people in here, you're probably better off asking in #ubuntu-locoteams or on loco-contacts itself if you want further details. | 10:12 |
| avelldiroll | yes, I know, or send to the concernd ML, as was asked in the first mail ... i was only replying to niko there, and as the mail (4997) indicated the decision/proposition was taken after taking advices from the irc council, i thought there could be a place to discuss it at first ... | 10:18 |
| kenvandine | hello irc team, can i please get someone to set my cloak? been a member for a while, but keep forgetting to get my cloak changed :) | 19:09 |
| erUSUL | !nicksetup | 19:10 |
| ubottu | To setup your nick so that you can be given a cloak, please follow the instructions here: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#nicksetup | 19:10 |
| erUSUL | kenvandine: also give the url of your launchpad page; thnaks | 19:10 |
| kenvandine | https://edge.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine | 19:11 |
| kenvandine | should be setup right, i have an old cloak still | 19:11 |
| erUSUL | you just have to wait for the usual suspects to notice you. | 19:16 |
| kenvandine | ok | 19:16 |
| * kenvandine has asked a couple times, but never lasted long enough to get a reply :) | 19:17 | |
| kenvandine | should be around for a few hours now | 19:17 |
| IdleOne | jussi Pici topyli ^^ | 19:18 |
| Pici | kenvandine: You're aware that this will replace your foresight cloak? | 19:58 |
| kenvandine | yeah | 19:58 |
| Pici | kenvandine: Okay, let me grab a staffer to enable it, one moment. | 19:59 |
| kenvandine | Pici, thx! | 19:59 |
| Pici | kenvandine: There you go :) | 20:04 |
| kenvandine | thx | 20:04 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!