[01:36] <nigelb> g32
[01:40] <IdleOne> BINGO
[01:44] <AndrewMC> lol
[02:32] <nigelb> haha
[02:37] <bcurtiswx> creepily enough, i think thats actually a G number..
[02:37] <bcurtiswx> gj :P
[03:26] <nigelb> bcurtiswx: "a g number"?
[03:27] <bcurtiswx> i was wrong, but on a BINGO card.
[03:27] <bcurtiswx> its in the N
[03:27] <bcurtiswx> nigelb, ^
[03:27] <nigelb> ah, that
[09:47] <niko> anyone here aware about https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2010-October/004994.html ?
[09:57] <rww> niko: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2010-October/004997.html is probably a better thread to follow. There's been some discussion of it in #ubuntu-locoteams too.
[10:03] <avelldiroll> niko: yep I read it, and found myself agreeing with this message: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2010-October/005000.html ... and reading the following, its seems to be motivated by problems on only one chan : #ubuntu-california (I did not backlog much yet) ... i believe logging should be a decision made by the moderation team of the concerned channel, and deciding unilaterally
[10:03] <avelldiroll> such big modifications is sure to impacts contributions. my 2 cents
[10:03] <avelldiroll> ouch sorry for the long post
[10:04] <rww> avelldiroll: considering that the LoCo Council first asked the IRC Council about this back in May, before they got involved in #ubuntu-california's mess, I'm not sure that the latter motivated the former.
[10:04] <rww> or, to be less vague, it didn't motivate it.
[10:06] <rww> One of the reasons I recommend the thread I linked over the one I started is that the structure of my email conflated the two issues.
[10:06] <avelldiroll> ok ... i was only saying that based on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2010-October/005002.html ... as I said i did not backlog much yet on the subject
[10:10]  * rww nods
[10:12] <rww> Considering that I don't see any LoCo Council people in here, you're probably better off asking in #ubuntu-locoteams or on loco-contacts itself if you want further details.
[10:18] <avelldiroll> yes, I know, or send to the concernd ML, as was asked in the first mail ... i was only replying to niko there, and as the mail (4997) indicated the decision/proposition was taken after taking advices from the irc council, i thought there could be a place to discuss it at first ...
[19:09] <kenvandine> hello irc team, can i please get someone to set my cloak?  been a member for a while, but keep forgetting to get my cloak changed :)
[19:10] <erUSUL> !nicksetup
[19:10] <erUSUL> kenvandine: also give the url of your launchpad page; thnaks
[19:11] <kenvandine> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine
[19:11] <kenvandine> should be setup right, i have an old cloak still
[19:16] <erUSUL> you just have to wait for the usual suspects to notice you.
[19:16] <kenvandine> ok
[19:17]  * kenvandine has asked a couple times, but never lasted long enough to get a reply :)
[19:17] <kenvandine> should be around for a few hours now
[19:18] <IdleOne> jussi Pici topyli ^^
[19:58] <Pici> kenvandine: You're aware that this will replace your foresight cloak?
[19:58] <kenvandine> yeah
[19:59] <Pici> kenvandine: Okay, let me grab a staffer to enable it, one moment.
[19:59] <kenvandine> Pici, thx!
[20:04] <Pici> kenvandine: There you go :)
[20:04] <kenvandine> thx