[01:22] * PartyBot1 (~floodbot@ubuntu/bot/partybot) has joined #ubuntu-proxy-users <-- this can't be useful... [01:22] Unless it's supposed to? [01:26] partybot is a clone of floodbot [01:27] probably just uses the same config [01:34] Yeah, Ljl is still sorting out some issues with the configs iirc [01:40] I wasn't sure since it's not opped in there [01:42] Yeah, it isn't grouped to the FloodBot account [04:15] G'day. Was the removal of the banforward *!*@gateway/web/*$#ubuntu-proxy-users in #ubuntu deliberate? [04:22] huh, there's *!*@gateway/web/* instead. except webchat people can still speak. so I'm gonna guess there's magic going on. never mind. [04:22] s/there's/there's +q/ [08:46] Hola. Given that http://paste.ubuntu.com/ is no longer requiring logins or whatever, y'all might want to change #ubuntu's topic to point there instead of pastebin.com again. [09:04] ok [09:05] done [09:05] thanks [09:05] easy to fix [09:05] I'm off === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening [13:37] 13:28 <@PartyBot1> *** Ubuntu-Release RSS feed, [05/10/10 14:28:54] : Maverick release will be delayed due to recent sale of Canonical to Oracle. Check Mark Shuttleworth's blog for further details [13:37] what's the bot on about ? [13:38] heh... [13:38] Its a 'joke'. But I don't like it, and I never did the past few releases when it did it. [13:38] I don't think that's funny [13:38] me either. [13:38] I think that's stupid and miss-leading [13:38] in a channel where idiots will take that as fact and start spouting off about it, it's not good [13:38] I don't mind the isitout date calculation thing though. [13:39] telling people canonical has been sold to Oracle is just stupid though [14:48] moin [14:49] hi, how can we help you? [14:49] how can i find german ubuntu-ops channeö? [14:50] Test_: Try #ubuntu-de-ops [14:50] there are only three peoples, but maybe you can help me to [14:50] *too [14:51] I start to explain... [14:52] For a few months.. my behavior wasnt excellent... i know... so the operator called fuchs banned me and told me, that i first should come back into this channel in two months.. [14:52] Test_: We do not handle #ubuntu-de issues here. If anywhere, #ubuntu-de-ops or possibly #ubuntu-irc [14:52] ok [18:56] who changed party bots Oracle line ? [18:59] ljl probably [19:00] upon request [19:01] not impressed with the replacment [19:02] heh, it is a little passive aggressive [20:23] IdleOne: jussi asked ljl to remove it in -ops-monitor. [20:23] I know I saw [20:23] er, maybe an extra comma in there somewhere. [20:24] and ljl removed it and replaced it [20:25] I understand how it could be misunderstood and taken as fact by some. [20:25] I thought it was in poor taste last release too. [20:26] perhaps, but I still feel it was "funny" [20:26] IdleOne: you there? [20:27] yeah [20:27] you don't see me? [20:27] Is what nikon_ in #ubuntu just asked equivalent to sysrq+k ? [20:27] Or am I mistaken? [20:28] I only use it on my laptop and I need to use my fn key which makes me confused as to what the real key combo is. [20:29] Pici: it is [20:30] seems the ctrl is ignored [20:30] and it restarts X [20:30] In ubottu, LjL said: !no maps is gps [20:32] Misterio called the ops in #ubuntu (ian__ is trolling) [20:33] Pici: did you get my response? [20:34] IdleOne: I did, but I was thinking. [20:35] the command is not harmful, annoying for sure [20:35] which command ? [20:35] ctrl-alt-prntsc-k [20:36] sysrq, that will interupt your machine [20:36] it ignores the ctrl and issue alt-sysrq-k [20:36] so issuing a sysrq will hang a system [20:37] I suppose you would lose any data not saved [20:37] plus interupt a service [20:37] ctrl-alt-printscreen-k = sysrq-k then? [20:37] that too [20:37] yes Pici it does [20:38] which if it's in a remote location, such as a data centre, means remote hands [20:38] or it is = I mean [20:38] ikonia: when you put it that way. the command is harmful. [20:39] it's a great tool, but I often find people who are asking for it shouldn't be using it [20:40] the thing is that the way he posed his question, made it seem like it would bring up a window to save a screenshot [20:40] that's naughty, as thats plain miss-leading [20:40] yup [20:40] can anyone tell me what their dialog box on print screen says when you open up the multiple desktop printscreen (ctrl+alt+PrtSc+k)? [20:41] nikon is known issue user [20:41] (didn't know it was him) [20:42] ikonia: Has he been banned/kicked before? [20:42] I'm being lazy and not checking the bt [20:42] not %100 certain, not checked [20:42] I'd put money on at least once [20:43] I've asked him to join here and set a forward. [20:43] hello [20:44] ikonia Pici 28752 [20:44] err 27852 that is [20:44] nikon_: I'm not sure what the best way to say this is, so I'll just say it. [20:44] sure ok [20:44] nikon_: The command that you were asking about is malicious. [20:45] malicious? [20:45] I don't know if you're doing it on purpose or not, but asking other people to do that particular key combination is potentially 'dangerous' [20:47] sorry. nothing malicious happens here tho, im just having a problem with the program [20:48] ctrl-alt-printscreen could potentially trigger sysrq. And sysrq-k will kill all your active processes. [20:48] whaat [20:48] shit man [20:49] sorry i didnt mean to do that [20:49] man im way off today. i thought i was going to get ops for helping people or smth when you invited me [20:50] Sorry. [20:51] i informed #ubuntu about my mistake [20:51] nikon_: Thank you. [20:51] thanks again i don't want to get anyone angry :S [20:53] err [20:54] that rang a teensy bit hollow after grepping my logs a little [20:54] if you grep your logs for his current host you'll find "zedkappa" quitting a short while ago [20:55] if you then grep your #ubuntu logs for that nick you'll find him connecting from the same isp (dynamic ip, presumably) and mentioning the terms "dcc" and "send" [20:55] 22:05 -!- nikon_ is now known as zedkappa [20:56] Well, I'm feeling nice today, so I'm not going to ban him again. we have enough bans on the channel as it is. [20:56] see 2010-09-09 and 2010-09-20 [20:56] And we're going to need room for 10.10 [20:56] * marienz nods [20:56] Pici: like to make more room? [20:57] I vote for clearing the ban list [20:57] :) [20:57] just let everybody back in and lets hug it out [20:57] We were discussing something like that earlier today 'elsewhere'; [20:58] there's IIRC two bans set by me, both can be cleared [20:59] I would rather not attempt to do it with this onscreen keyboard and 5 px font [21:03] I'm just looking at doing a /msg chanserv clear #ubuntu-uk bans, all seem oldish, thought it was relevant [21:03] * Pici sighs [21:04] I'd be pretty dissapointed if we totally cleared #ubuntu's bans are there are some long term issue users on it, a big good house keep wouldn't go amiss though [21:05] At one point we discussed removing all bans that didn't have a comment on the bantracker. [21:06] I think thats been mentioned before [21:06] Also, I'm going home. I have Lauterino in pm, he seems to think that he can say anything in #ubuntu as long as hes nice. [21:08] Feels like hes trolling me. [21:08] I think I've seen him before [21:08] that "I've been coding" and "you don't like coders" comment is osmething someone said to me recently [21:08] Sometimes I think I'm too calm when I talk to these people. [21:08] bin him - he can accept the rules or not [21:09] I muted him for a bit. [21:45] Gary: I wouldn't clear the bans in -uk [21:46] they just seem rather old to me Seeker` [21:46] it takes a lot to get banned from -uk though, and most of the bans there are a fairly good coverage of persistent trolls [21:50] Seeker`: They haven't gotten me yet. [21:52] jpds: it can be arranged [22:27] who -q lauretino? [22:27] err Lauterino [22:30] ah PC did [22:31] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from lauterino) [22:40] 2010/10/05 23:38:17 [#ubuntu] +q *!*@ip-255-198-241-92.dialup.ice.net by IdleOne [22:40] IdleOne: ? [22:40] 2010/10/05 23:39:51 [#ubuntu] +b *!*@ip-255-198-241-92.dialup.ice.net by IdleOne [22:40] guess there is one useless [22:40] yup the +q [22:40] will remove it now [22:41] IdleOne: what prompted the ban? [22:41] I asked in nicely in PM to follow the rules [22:41] he responded with [22:41] IdleOne> You have been explained the rules about being on topic in #ubuntu [22:41] follow them please [22:41] No, dont care, and be so evil [22:42] still rambling in PM