Riddell | comment needed on bug 328989 | 00:51 |
---|---|---|
ubottu | Launchpad bug 328989 in eeepc-acpi-scripts (Ubuntu) "eeepc-acpi-scripts package should be removed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/328989 | 00:51 |
LaserJock | can a MOTU approve a release nomination or does it take a core dev? | 01:49 |
LaserJock | for a Multiverse package/bug | 01:49 |
RAOF | I'm pretty sure a MOTU can do that. | 01:52 |
LaserJock | k, if somebody gets a chance to approve the nominations on bug #638365 I'd appreciate it | 01:54 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 638365 in userful-multiplier (Ubuntu) "Please remove userful-multiplier from Multiverse" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/638365 | 01:54 |
ScottK | LaserJock: Approved. Need to get someone to upload the SRUs now (sorry, no time) | 01:56 |
LaserJock | ScottK: np, we don't have uploads ready. I'm just trying to shepherd upstream along | 01:57 |
ScottK | OK. Great. | 01:57 |
LaserJock | ScottK: they got confused/worried when the main task was closed | 01:58 |
LaserJock | ScottK: so I wanted to open tasks so they have something to track | 01:58 |
ScottK | Heh. | 01:58 |
genupulas | guys was the discussion going or not | 02:43 |
ajmitch | that was odd | 02:45 |
micahg | is there a guide for how to handle soname bumps in packaging | 06:48 |
RAOF | micahg: There's the library packaging guide. | 06:49 |
RAOF | micahg: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html | 06:49 |
micahg | RAOF: yep, got that, thanks, luckily upstream handle the soname change, I jsut need to make sure I update the package appropriatelyt | 06:50 |
RAOF | micahg: In case it's not obvious from that guide, basically all you need to do is change the binary package name to libfoo$NEWSO | 07:08 |
micahg | RAOF: right, but apparently the package is a mess, there's an unversioned -dev package with a versioned -dev.install fiile :-/ | 07:09 |
micahg | RAOF: should I version the package or unversion the files? | 07:09 |
RAOF | That's… interesting. | 07:09 |
RAOF | Generally we don't have versioned -dev packages. | 07:09 |
micahg | RAOF: k, I'll unversion the files then | 07:10 |
lifeless | versioning the dev is useful if you want to support people building against multiple library versions at once | 07:13 |
lifeless | with a provides: unversioned-dev | 07:13 |
lifeless | most libraries don't need that sort of flexability | 07:14 |
micahg | lifeless: nah, it's not a major package and the old version can't be used at the moment anyways | 07:14 |
micahg | RAOF: do you have time to sponsor a universe package? | 07:39 |
micahg | from bzr.... | 07:39 |
RAOF | Probably not, sorry. I need to leave in a couple of minutes. | 07:40 |
micahg | RAOF: k | 07:40 |
RAOF | If you still haven't found a sponsor by the time I get back, I'll give it a look | 07:41 |
micahg | RAOF: k, thansk' | 07:45 |
micahg | hi hyperair, do you have time to sponsor a bzr branch? | 08:06 |
micahg | or anyone who's available for sponsoring a universe package from bzr :) | 08:13 |
micahg | didrocks: do you have time to sponsor a bzr branch | 08:18 |
didrocks | micahg: not right now. I want to finish my paperwork from the morning, but I can do it then (in approx one hour) | 08:19 |
micahg | didrocks: that's fine, as long as it's before noon UTC, can I give you the URL? | 08:19 |
Rhonda | launchpad still can't do unsubscribes from individual bugs that give implicit subscription, right? | 08:19 |
didrocks | micahg: sure | 08:20 |
micahg | didrocks: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/update-2.11.0/+merge/37706, the only thing I didn't do was the release commit | 08:20 |
micahg | Rhonda: right | 08:20 |
dholbach | good morning | 08:22 |
micahg | didrocks: thanks, I'm going to go to sleep then | 08:23 |
didrocks | micahg: there is a soname bump | 08:24 |
micahg | didrocks: yes | 08:25 |
didrocks | micahg: I'm not sure, you didn't mention it for the FFe to be accepted | 08:25 |
micahg | didrocks: FFe was accepted, bug 650601 | 08:25 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 650601 in libfxscintilla (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please update libfxscintilla to 2.11.0" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/650601 | 08:25 |
micahg | didrocks: oh, you're saying I didn't mention the soname bump | 08:25 |
micahg | didrocks: I didn't realize it until tonight | 08:25 |
didrocks | micahg: yeah, I'm looking at the rdepends | 08:26 |
didrocks | micahg: not sure it can be uploaded | 08:26 |
micahg | didrocks: should be none, binaries aren't in the archive since Lucid | 08:26 |
didrocks | grrr, rdepends is currently broken | 08:26 |
didrocks | micahg: I wait to be sure first :) | 08:26 |
didrocks | micahg: can you look at rdepends ? | 08:26 |
micahg | didrocks: I tried, it won't do it without the binary in the archive | 08:27 |
micahg | let me see if I can do it from p.u,.c | 08:27 |
micahg | didrocks: I"ll check in a karmic chroot :) | 08:29 |
didrocks | micahg: hehe, I think this is the only soluton right now :) | 08:29 |
didrocks | did they change the API? is there an ABI breakage? | 08:30 |
micahg | didrocks: no rdepends | 08:30 |
Rhonda | micahg: That's sad because constant flowing in responses to a bug makes me think about removing myself from yet another such implicit subscription. :/ | 08:30 |
didrocks | micahg: what's the point of the library then? :) | 08:30 |
micahg | Rhonda: I think they're working on it, I can find the bug for you alter | 08:30 |
didrocks | micahg: if there is no rdepends :) | 08:31 |
micahg | didrocks: idk, it was in archive, I offered to update | 08:31 |
didrocks | micahg: I'll check with colin, but I'm really unsure about the timeline as there is a ABI change (and I don't know if there is anything more like ABI breakage/soname bump) | 08:31 |
Rhonda | micahg: I added to that bug years ago without any progress at all since. | 08:32 |
Rhonda | micahg: Actually someone even wanted to mark it as duplicate for a completely different issue. And then the "send patches" got thrown around in there too, "now that launchpad is open source". *sigh* | 08:32 |
didrocks | hum, soname bump even | 08:32 |
micahg | didrocks: well, I bumped the library version, so anyone that uses the library would need a rebuild anyway | 08:34 |
didrocks | micahg: I answer on the bug report, I'll talk with colin later and we'll see what to do | 08:34 |
didrocks | micahg: right, and it's very late for such a transition in the cycle | 08:34 |
micahg | didrocks: ok, I didn't figure that he'd ok it since there were no rdepends and it's not in debian, but he did, so I finished it | 08:34 |
micahg | didrocks: we have no binaries at the moment anyways | 08:35 |
didrocks | micahg: yeah, but I think he was thinking that you already did the work before to see there is no bump | 08:35 |
didrocks | no binaries? | 08:35 |
didrocks | oh right | 08:35 |
micahg | didrocks: nope, only the source is in archive ATM | 08:35 |
didrocks | the last line is karmic | 08:35 |
didrocks | not maverick :) | 08:35 |
didrocks | oh ok, so no worry for this then | 08:35 |
didrocks | I'm looking at the packaging and will sponsor consequently | 08:36 |
didrocks | micahg: sorry for the confusion, thanks a lot, I'll sponsor it today :) | 08:36 |
* directhex uploaded an ARM FTBFS bugfix | 08:36 | |
micahg | didrocks: I started on teh package and made sure it built before requesting the FFe, but I didn't check it throughly for pacakging issues until tonight | 08:36 |
micahg | didrocks: I now know to check for soname bumps before requesting FFes :) | 08:37 |
micahg | didrocks: thanks a lot, I can go to sleep then | 08:37 |
didrocks | micahg: yeah, it's an important parameter for packages in the archive, in this case, less :) | 08:37 |
didrocks | micahg: enjoy your evening! | 08:37 |
micahg | didrocks: have a great day! | 08:37 |
didrocks | thanks :) | 08:38 |
hyperair | micahg: have you gotten your sponsor? | 08:41 |
micahg | hyperair: yes, thanks | 08:41 |
hyperair | micahg: ah okay then. | 08:41 |
didrocks | micahg: just a note (when you will be back), no need to add in the changelog "rename libfxscintilla17-dev to libfxscintilla19-dev and then rename libfxscintilla19-dev to libfxscintilla-dev" | 08:42 |
didrocks | just the end count like "rename libfxscintilla17-dev to libfxscintilla-dev" :) | 08:42 |
micahg | didrocks: ah, sorry, yeah, the original package actually I don't think ever worked :-/ | 08:42 |
didrocks | micahg: no worry :) | 08:42 |
=== hannesw_ is now known as hannesw | ||
* micahg is really off now :) | 08:45 | |
hyperair | micahg: i don't really have the time to figure out bzr again. could you stick it in revu or something? | 08:46 |
didrocks | micahg: hyperair will do the full review (thanks again!) as there is this soname bump and I'm not sure to get enough time because of that doing a proper job on it :) | 08:49 |
* hyperair just realized that that was libfxscintilla and not libwxscintilla | 09:11 | |
dapal | ScottK: since you've acked most of the depends requiring a FFe, would you please also (finally) ack josm? | 10:19 |
dapal | ScottK: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/josm/+bug/613926 , thank you :) | 10:19 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 613926 in josm (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync josm 0.0.svn3514-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,In progress] | 10:19 |
ScottK | dapal: Done | 10:21 |
dapal | great, thank you :) | 10:21 |
dapal | now, looking for a sponsor :) | 10:22 |
Rhonda | erm … | 10:22 |
Rhonda | dapal: "Please resubscribe ubuntu-sponsors once all these packages are available in the archive." | 10:23 |
Rhonda | This doesn't seem to have happened? :) | 10:23 |
ScottK | dapal: I'll approve it as sponsor too. | 10:23 |
dapal | ScottK: great, thanks :) | 10:23 |
dapal | Rhonda: oh, you there? :) -- yes, I forgot that too | 10:23 |
dapal | ScottK: no need to subscribe ubuntu-sponsors then? | 10:24 |
ScottK | Correct. | 10:24 |
dapal | great, thanks! | 10:24 |
Rhonda | dapal: everywhere :P | 10:24 |
dapal | Rhonda: gar. There's no Rhonda-free place on earth then? :( | 10:24 |
Rhonda | You can try #kde, #emacs or other evil sides of the force. :P | 10:25 |
dapal | omg. | 10:25 |
dapal | Rhonda: I'm scared now. | 10:26 |
Rhonda | Then the mission is accomplished. | 10:26 |
coolbhavi | ari-tczew, morning mate | 10:41 |
ari-tczew | hello coolbhavi | 10:44 |
ari-tczew | coolbhavi: are you ready to start natty development? | 10:44 |
coolbhavi | ari-tczew, yes balancing everything at the moment :) | 10:45 |
ari-tczew | coolbhavi: do you will merge new upstream releases, right? | 10:45 |
coolbhavi | ari-tczew, yes but based on debian changes | 10:46 |
ari-tczew | if someone needs help today before close archive, I have a time a little bit | 10:55 |
=== dyfet` is now known as dyfet | ||
nigelb | @now | 13:07 |
ubottu | Current time in Etc/UTC: October 06 2010, 12:07:37 | 13:07 |
=== xfaf is now known as zul | ||
=== ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks | ||
Rhonda | bilalakhtar: I have no clue what you were refering to to ari a few days ago what you hilighted me with. | 14:05 |
bilalakhtar | Rhonda: ah, just leave it | 14:05 |
=== xfaf is now known as zul | ||
lfaraone | Would adding a mimetype handler so that clicking on an XO bundle installs it (which should be the normal action) be a new feature? (it'd just be adding a mimetype handler, and it should have been that way in the first place) | 15:43 |
blueyed | I am trying to build the vanilla kernel according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/GitKernelBuild but it fails: http://pastebin.com/96Xh9xgM | 16:58 |
blueyed | The translated error: "dpkg-gencontrol: error: package linux-image-2.6.36-rc6-custom+ not in control info" | 17:01 |
blueyed | Apparently it's missing the 10.00 here, or something similar. | 17:01 |
blueyed | probably this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588126 | 17:11 |
ubottu | Debian bug 588126 in kernel-package "kernel-package: Fails to build linux-image on 2.6.35-rc4 if CONFIG_LOCALVERSION is set" [Important,Fixed] | 17:11 |
ari-tczew | micahg: ping | 18:00 |
micahg | ari-tczew: pong | 18:00 |
ari-tczew | micahg: any ideas for libjdic-java? :P | 18:00 |
micahg | ari-tczew: heh, sorry about that, got overwhelmed this cycle, I'll get to it after UDS (for real this time :)) | 18:01 |
micahg | ari-tczew: we're migrating to 4.0.x in Natty, so one way or another we'll fix it :) | 18:01 |
ari-tczew | micahg: migrating to 4.0.x of what? | 18:02 |
micahg | ari-tczew: Firefox | 18:02 |
micahg | ari-tczew: can you sponsor a bzr merge for me | 18:03 |
blueyed | request-sync uses natty already.. so how can I get a kernel-package sync for maverick (universe)? impossible? | 18:03 |
ari-tczew | micahg: ah, so libjdic-java is related to firefox? | 18:03 |
micahg | ari-tczew: it build depends on xulrunner | 18:03 |
micahg | ari-tczew: can you sponsor a bzr merge for me? | 18:03 |
micahg | s/merge/update/ | 18:04 |
ari-tczew | micahg: sure | 18:04 |
micahg | ari-tczew: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/update-2.11.0 | 18:04 |
micahg | oops | 18:04 |
* micahg needs to request merge | 18:04 | |
* ari-tczew hates .edge. domain | 18:05 | |
Laney | blueyed: you can specify the release | 18:05 |
micahg | oh, nm | 18:05 |
micahg | ari-tczew: https://code.launchpad.net/~micahg/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/update-2.11.0/+merge/37706 | 18:06 |
micahg | ari-tczew: just needs to release commit and tag | 18:06 |
BlackZ | Sarvatt: ping | 18:06 |
micahg | ari-tczew: if you want me to do those, I can | 18:06 |
ari-tczew | micahg: so go ahead :) | 18:07 |
blueyed | Laney: sure.. will use it. thanks. | 18:07 |
ari-tczew | micahg: I see that didrocks could sponsor it. | 18:08 |
Sarvatt | whats up BlackZ? | 18:08 |
didrocks | ari-tczew: micahg: hyperair was on it, right? | 18:08 |
didrocks | or is it another lib? :) | 18:09 |
ari-tczew | didrocks: dunno! :> | 18:09 |
micahg | ari-tczew: I tried, he was too busy and handed off to hyperair who isn't so familiar with UDD | 18:09 |
didrocks | yeah, it's quite busy there :/ | 18:09 |
didrocks | sorry micahg | 18:09 |
micahg | didrocks: it's ok, we'll try to get it uploaded and hopefully accepted (it builds fast) | 18:09 |
BlackZ | Sarvatt: can you please review https://code.launchpad.net/~eugenesan/ppa-purge/trunk/+merge/33368 ? | 18:10 |
BlackZ | Sarvatt: if you want, I could do that | 18:10 |
ari-tczew | heh, UDD is not hard to use. | 18:10 |
micahg | ari-tczew: k, commit revision is in, go ahead | 18:10 |
hyperair | micahg: what's UDD? | 18:13 |
BlackZ | Sarvatt: I have some comments about it | 18:13 |
micahg | hyperair: Ubuntu distributed Development (using bzr for uploads/updates/merging) | 18:13 |
ari-tczew | micahg: how do you adding tags to branch? | 18:13 |
hyperair | ari-tczew: specifically, let's just say i don't like bzr. | 18:14 |
hyperair | get me a diff, sure, debian.tar.gz, sure, full dsc set, sure, but bzr branch? nothanksbai | 18:14 |
micahg | ari-tczew: debcommit -r :) | 18:14 |
hyperair | micahg: yeah i figured as much | 18:14 |
ari-tczew | mhm | 18:14 |
micahg | ari-tczew: that way the package importer shouldn't overwrite my changes when you upload | 18:14 |
micahg | we'll see if it works :) | 18:14 |
ari-tczew | micahg: good point | 18:15 |
micahg | hyperair: the only reason I know bzr is thanks to asac and his training on the mozilla team branches | 18:17 |
* micahg still has issues with git | 18:17 | |
* ari-tczew hates inhale his neighbours cigarette smoke | 18:19 | |
Sarvatt | BlackZ: I added you to the xorg-edgers, would be much appreciated if you could. the only issue I see is the changelog, would want to condense that all into one and just bump the version once | 18:22 |
tumbleweed | ari-tczew: "bzr mark-uploaded" (as described in UDD documentation) will tag | 18:23 |
BlackZ | Sarvatt: agreed; I will comment on it ASAP, however, why don't you add a separate team for commit to the ppa-purge's bzr repository? | 18:24 |
BlackZ | s/add/create | 18:24 |
Sarvatt | I will but I'm very busy at the moment and don't want to delay you :) | 18:24 |
BlackZ | thanks Sarvatt :) | 18:28 |
* hyperair grumbles about his miserable crap of a connection | 18:31 | |
cdbs | hyperair: really? | 18:35 |
cdbs | hyperair: people have even worse connections! like mine | 18:35 |
hyperair | cdbs: oh yeah? have you seen how many times i've reconnected in the past few minutes? | 18:35 |
micahg | cdbs: nice name :) | 18:35 |
cdbs | micahg: I am bilalakhtar :) | 18:36 |
micahg | cdbs: I know :) | 18:36 |
cdbs | wanted a smaller nick | 18:36 |
hyperair | why not dh7? | 18:36 |
cdbs | one that westeners could pronounce easily | 18:36 |
hyperair | cdbs is old outdated technology =p | 18:36 |
hyperair | fyi, bilal akhtar is pretty easy to pronounce | 18:36 |
cdbs | hyperair: I like cdbs for some *old* reasons | 18:36 |
micahg | hyperair: that's a highly contentious point | 18:36 |
hyperair | micahg: it is in my book, and that's all that matters to me =p | 18:36 |
hyperair | micahg: needless to say, it takes extra persuading to get me to sponsor a cdbs package rahter than a dh7 package. | 18:37 |
cdbs | micahg: When will you apply for MOTU? | 18:37 |
hyperair | mostly because i've forgotten how cdbs works | 18:37 |
hyperair | eh, micahg isn't a motu yet? | 18:37 |
hyperair | oh right, he was asking for sponsors >_> | 18:37 |
hyperair | silly me | 18:37 |
micahg | hmmm, I was going to wait until life slowed down a litlle | 18:37 |
cdbs | micahg: Your syncs and merges so far have been flawless | 18:38 |
cdbs | micahg: And you have been working well with chris-ccoulson as well | 18:39 |
hyperair | no dash needed ;-) | 18:39 |
cdbs | hyperair: to prevent a ping | 18:39 |
hyperair | haha i don't mind being pinged if people are talking about me. | 18:39 |
cdbs | oh | 18:41 |
cdbs | I wanted a discussion about the script grab-merge | 18:41 |
micahg | cdbs: nice to know I have 1 for on my application :) | 18:42 |
cdbs | I would like to make a change in it that it also creates a new file called merge-debuild that actually runs debuild instead of dpkg-buildpackage in merge-buildpackage. ideas? | 18:42 |
cdbs | 'It' above is grab-merge in ubuntu-dev-tools | 18:42 |
cdbs | micahg: hmm, yes | 18:43 |
cdbs | bye people | 18:45 |
lfaraone | ScottK: Can I both approve and sponsor a FFe request for ubuntu-sugar-remix-meta? | 18:56 |
shadeslayer | lfaraone: Scott is out afaik | 18:57 |
lfaraone | shadeslayer: okay. this is just a procedural question, I've not had the ability to approve FFes before. | 18:57 |
shadeslayer | ok .. | 18:58 |
lfaraone | I know you can't both upload something and accept it in the archive. | 18:58 |
fabrice_sp | lfaraone, Scott acked this morning a sync request from a Release team stand point and also ack it from a sponsor standpoint | 19:04 |
micahg | fabrice_sp: yes, but he's an actual member of the release team, not an adjunct :) | 19:10 |
lfaraone | fabrice_sp: cool. but I very much can't ack a FFe for a change I author, right? | 19:27 |
micahg | oh, what fabrice_sp said was ok, it's the lfaraone case that's the issue :) | 19:28 |
=== ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk | ||
fabrice_sp | lfaraone, a peer review is always welcome :-) | 19:51 |
cdbs | So as I mentioned earlier, would it be fine to get grab-merge in ubuntu-dev-tools to create another file called merge-debuild that workd like merge-buildpackage except for the fact that it runs debuild? | 20:11 |
cdbs | tumbleweed: ^^ | 20:11 |
micahg | cdbs: you generally want to look at the merge before running debuild | 20:11 |
cdbs | micahg: But you ultimately have to run it, right? | 20:12 |
tumbleweed | cdbs: I've never used merge-buildpackage, but sounds reasonable | 20:12 |
cdbs | micahg: And only after that can you run debdiff to see the changes yourself, right? | 20:12 |
cdbs | cdbs: oh, and if you don't know, I am bilalakhtar | 20:12 |
micahg | cdbs: right, but there are usually conflicts | 20:12 |
cdbs | micahg: Doesn't grab-merge create merge-buildpackage as well? | 20:13 |
cdbs | I could get it to create another file i.e. merge-debuild | 20:13 |
micahg | idr | 20:13 |
cdbs | micahg: it does | 20:13 |
ari-tczew | who is familiar with bzr merging>? | 20:18 |
kklimonda | ari-tczew: well, what is the problem? :) | 20:24 |
ari-tczew | kklimonda: I did: bzr merge-package lp:foo | 20:27 |
ari-tczew | then bzr commit | 20:27 |
ari-tczew | now, push ? | 20:27 |
micahg | ari-tczew: you should do debcommit instead of bzr commit so that bugs are closed | 20:28 |
micahg | or linked, more appropriately | 20:28 |
ari-tczew | fu**.. | 20:28 |
micahg | ari-tczew: not a problem, bzr uncommit, debcommit | 20:29 |
ari-tczew | try again | 20:29 |
fabrice_sp | Should I ping someone to get Bug 613926 synced? (before freeze) | 20:29 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 613926 in josm (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync josm 0.0.svn3514-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613926 | 20:29 |
ari-tczew | fabrice_sp: ack-sync/syncpackage is not good? | 20:30 |
micahg | fabrice_sp: freeze is passed (noon UTC today) | 20:30 |
fabrice_sp | I prefer to wait for an archive admin that late in the cycle | 20:30 |
ari-tczew | micahg: for main, not for universe | 20:30 |
fabrice_sp | hmm, aa has een subscribe before noon | 20:30 |
micahg | ari-tczew: no, freeze for universe was today at noon | 20:30 |
fabrice_sp | ari-tczew, micahg is right | 20:31 |
ari-tczew | micahg: wait wait wait, so if archive is closed, why we are going to upload? :D | 20:31 |
fabrice_sp | that's why I'm asking | 20:31 |
micahg | ari-tczew: because I have an exception :) | 20:31 |
fabrice_sp | so do I :-P | 20:31 |
micahg | ari-tczew: I asked and I was told if it's not uploaded, there's *no* chance of it getting in, but if it's uploaded, there is a chance | 20:31 |
ari-tczew | fabrice_sp: cjwatson maybe | 20:31 |
fabrice_sp | well, let me chekc the timestamp | 20:31 |
kklimonda | ari-tczew: where do you want to push the branch? I don't think pushing it to lp:ubuntu/foo actuall does anything at the moment. | 20:32 |
ari-tczew | kklimonda: lp:ubuntu/libfxscintilla | 20:32 |
micahg | kklimonda: I used bzr push :parent (use bzr info to make sure :parent is what you want) | 20:33 |
kklimonda | ari-tczew: right, those branches are populated from the uploaded packages afaik. Unless something has changed recently, james_w ? | 20:33 |
kklimonda | ari-tczew: I'd just do a simple bzr bd -S to build source package and upload it using dput | 20:33 |
micahg | kklimonda: only if it's not tagged | 20:33 |
ari-tczew | micahg: only "debcommit" is enough | 20:33 |
ari-tczew | ? | 20:33 |
ari-tczew | micahg want to be sponsored through bzr | 20:34 |
kklimonda | micahg: so if you create a tag (i.e. something like 1.2.3-0ubuntu1) then.. what is going to happen? :) | 20:34 |
micahg | ari-tczew: debcommit is the same as bzr commit except it uses the debian changelog as the commit message and automatically does the --fixes lp:foo | 20:34 |
micahg | kklimonda: the importer shouldn't overwrite according to james_w | 20:34 |
micahg | ari-tczew: it was a new upstream release (no sane way to do a debdiff) | 20:35 |
kklimonda | micahg: but does it actually do anything useful with the branch? | 20:35 |
micahg | kklimonda: you can keep the individual commits vs one big import commit | 20:35 |
ari-tczew | micahg: I created diff between /debian/ dirs | 20:35 |
micahg | ari-tczew: right, but then you have to fetch the orig.tar.gz and what not | 20:35 |
ari-tczew | micahg: ... let's back to uploading :P | 20:36 |
kklimonda | micahg: ok, make sense | 20:36 |
ari-tczew | micahg: ok, debcommit is done. what next? bzr push? | 20:37 |
micahg | ari-tczew: run bzr tags to make sure my release tag is there | 20:38 |
ari-tczew | micahg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/507481/ | 20:38 |
micahg | ari-tczew: looks good | 20:39 |
ari-tczew | micahg: bzr push lp:ubuntu/libfxscintilla ? | 20:39 |
micahg | so check bzr info to make sure the parent branch is the ubuntu maverick branch, then you can run bzr push :parent | 20:39 |
micahg | ari-tczew: as kklimonda I don't think that works yet | 20:40 |
micahg | *said | 20:40 |
ari-tczew | micahg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/507482/ | 20:41 |
micahg | oh, hmm, so maybe it will work :) | 20:41 |
ari-tczew | micahg: so, bzr push lp:ubuntu/libfxscintilla ? | 20:41 |
micahg | ari-tczew: yeah, see if it works | 20:41 |
kklimonda | bah, I got all my paperwork ready and now begins the joy of waiting for a meeting with the US consul and thinking of a way to convince him I'm not going to stay in US forever and work as a cleaner :/ | 20:42 |
ari-tczew | kklimonda: are you in US now? | 20:44 |
kklimonda | no | 20:45 |
ari-tczew | micahg: Launchpad is processing new changes to this branch which will be available in a few minutes. Reload to see the changes. | 20:46 |
micahg | ari-tczew: we'll wait I guess | 20:47 |
ari-tczew | micahg: I hope that your branch will be automatically set up as merged. | 20:49 |
ari-tczew | micahg: it still doesn't uploaded :/ dut is waiting | 21:25 |
ari-tczew | s/dut/dput | 21:25 |
micahg | ari-tczew: hmmm | 21:26 |
micahg | ari-tczew: and the builders are empty :( | 21:27 |
ari-tczew | maybe james_w could help? | 21:27 |
james_w | what with? | 21:27 |
micahg | james_w: branch scan taking an hour for lp:ubuntu/libfxscintilla | 21:28 |
ari-tczew | james_w: we are thinking that https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/maverick is loading too long | 21:28 |
ari-tczew | micahg: around yet? | 22:11 |
micahg | ari-tczew: I'm here | 22:11 |
micahg | ari-tczew: update still not done :-/ | 22:12 |
ari-tczew | micahg: james_w is explaining it on #launchpad. | 22:12 |
ari-tczew | micahg: I'm going to bed soon, what's next? | 22:12 |
ari-tczew | micahg: what's the deadline about uploading to universe? | 22:21 |
micahg | ari-tczew: already passed 9 hrs agfo | 22:21 |
micahg | ari-tczew: so, we're on borrowed time | 22:21 |
kklimonda | have you checked if the branch has been properly pushed? | 22:22 |
kklimonda | maybe it's just a LP hickup and you can already upload package | 22:22 |
ari-tczew | on #launchpad devs suggest bug about tags scanning | 22:22 |
kklimonda | ari-tczew: ask james if you can upload package anyway, it's not the best moment to waste time because of some bug :/ | 22:24 |
ari-tczew | kklimonda: do you mean dput? | 22:24 |
kklimonda | ari-tczew: well, you have to use dput anyway, right? | 22:24 |
ari-tczew | kklimonda: right | 22:24 |
kklimonda | builders don't yet build packages from branches anyway. | 22:24 |
kklimonda | so I'd just go and publish the package and then we can worry about branch being broken | 22:25 |
ari-tczew | micahg: ^^ | 22:25 |
kklimonda | it's better then getting a red light from the admins after all this work | 22:25 |
micahg | kklimonda: the idea was to not lose the bzr revisions I did | 22:25 |
kklimonda | micahg: I know, but sometimes you have to compromise | 22:25 |
micahg | we're getting some action in #lp now | 22:25 |
* kklimonda is a huge proponent of the udd but still, the most important thing is package itself :) | 22:26 | |
* ari-tczew is waiting like a truck to arrive out. | 22:27 | |
micahg | ari-tczew: upload please :) | 22:31 |
ari-tczew | micahg: did you saw it? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/maverick/revision/4 | 22:39 |
micahg | ari-tczew: yes, but the tag isn't shown on the top level, I hope it's enough | 22:39 |
micahg | ari-tczew: ugh, I don't think it's enough | 22:41 |
ari-tczew | micahg: hmmm? | 22:41 |
micahg | maybe run bzr mark-uploaded and then push again? | 22:43 |
micahg | and then upload? | 22:43 |
ari-tczew | micahg: dunno, I wouldn't take bzr till bug is not fixed. | 22:43 |
micahg | ari-tczew: I need to file a bug against the package importer, will have ot do later | 22:44 |
ari-tczew | micahg: so, could I upload your package? | 22:44 |
micahg | ari-tczew: go agead | 22:44 |
micahg | *ahead | 22:44 |
micahg | my branch is still there, we can clean up later | 22:44 |
ari-tczew | micahg: "Successfully uploaded packages." | 22:46 |
micahg | ari-tczew: thanks | 22:46 |
=== ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!