Riddellcomment needed on bug 32898900:51
ubottuLaunchpad bug 328989 in eeepc-acpi-scripts (Ubuntu) "eeepc-acpi-scripts package should be removed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/32898900:51
LaserJockcan a MOTU approve a release nomination or does it take a core dev?01:49
LaserJockfor a Multiverse package/bug01:49
RAOFI'm pretty sure a MOTU can do that.01:52
LaserJockk, if somebody gets a chance to approve the nominations on bug #638365 I'd appreciate it01:54
ubottuLaunchpad bug 638365 in userful-multiplier (Ubuntu) "Please remove userful-multiplier from Multiverse" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/63836501:54
ScottKLaserJock: Approved.  Need to get someone to upload the SRUs now (sorry, no time)01:56
LaserJockScottK: np, we don't have uploads ready. I'm just trying to shepherd upstream along01:57
ScottKOK.  Great.01:57
LaserJockScottK: they got confused/worried when the main task was closed01:58
LaserJockScottK: so I wanted to open tasks so they have something to track01:58
genupulasguys was the discussion going or not02:43
ajmitchthat was odd02:45
micahgis there a guide for how to handle soname bumps in packaging06:48
RAOFmicahg: There's the library packaging guide.06:49
RAOFmicahg: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html06:49
micahgRAOF: yep, got that, thanks, luckily upstream handle the soname change, I jsut need to make sure I update the package appropriatelyt06:50
RAOFmicahg: In case it's not obvious from that guide, basically all you need to do is change the binary package name to libfoo$NEWSO07:08
micahgRAOF: right, but apparently the package is a mess, there's an unversioned -dev package with a versioned -dev.install fiile :-/07:09
micahgRAOF: should I version the package or unversion the files?07:09
RAOFThat's… interesting.07:09
RAOFGenerally we don't have versioned -dev packages.07:09
micahgRAOF: k, I'll unversion the files then07:10
lifelessversioning the dev is useful if you want to support people building against multiple library versions at once07:13
lifelesswith a provides: unversioned-dev07:13
lifelessmost libraries don't need that sort of flexability07:14
micahglifeless: nah, it's not a major package and the old version can't be used at the moment anyways07:14
micahgRAOF: do you have time to sponsor a universe package?07:39
micahgfrom bzr....07:39
RAOFProbably not, sorry.  I need to leave in a couple of minutes.07:40
micahgRAOF: k07:40
RAOFIf you still haven't found a sponsor by the time I get back, I'll give it a look07:41
micahgRAOF: k, thansk'07:45
micahghi hyperair, do you have time to sponsor a bzr branch?08:06
micahgor anyone who's available for sponsoring a universe package from bzr :)08:13
micahgdidrocks: do you have time to sponsor a bzr branch08:18
didrocksmicahg: not right now. I want to finish my paperwork from the morning, but I can do it then (in approx one hour)08:19
micahgdidrocks: that's fine, as long as it's before noon UTC, can I give you the URL?08:19
Rhondalaunchpad still can't do unsubscribes from individual bugs that give implicit subscription, right?08:19
didrocksmicahg: sure08:20
micahgdidrocks: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/update-2.11.0/+merge/37706, the only thing I didn't do was the release commit08:20
micahgRhonda: right08:20
dholbachgood morning08:22
micahgdidrocks: thanks, I'm going to go to sleep then08:23
didrocksmicahg: there is a soname bump08:24
micahgdidrocks: yes08:25
didrocksmicahg: I'm not sure, you didn't mention it for the FFe to be accepted08:25
micahgdidrocks: FFe was accepted, bug 65060108:25
ubottuLaunchpad bug 650601 in libfxscintilla (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please update libfxscintilla to 2.11.0" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/65060108:25
micahgdidrocks: oh, you're saying I didn't mention the soname bump08:25
micahgdidrocks: I didn't realize it until tonight08:25
didrocksmicahg: yeah, I'm looking at the rdepends08:26
didrocksmicahg: not sure it can be uploaded08:26
micahgdidrocks: should be none, binaries aren't in the archive since Lucid08:26
didrocksgrrr, rdepends is currently broken08:26
didrocksmicahg: I wait to be sure first :)08:26
didrocksmicahg: can you look at rdepends ?08:26
micahgdidrocks: I tried, it won't do it without the binary in the archive08:27
micahglet me see if I can do it from p.u,.c08:27
micahgdidrocks: I"ll check in a karmic chroot :)08:29
didrocksmicahg: hehe, I think this is the only soluton right now :)08:29
didrocksdid they change the API? is there an ABI breakage?08:30
micahgdidrocks: no rdepends08:30
Rhondamicahg: That's sad because constant flowing in responses to a bug makes me think about removing myself from yet another such implicit subscription.  :/08:30
didrocksmicahg: what's the point of the library then? :)08:30
micahgRhonda: I think they're working on it, I can find the bug for you alter08:30
didrocksmicahg: if there is no rdepends :)08:31
micahgdidrocks: idk, it was in archive, I offered to update08:31
didrocksmicahg: I'll check with colin, but I'm really unsure about the timeline as there is a ABI change (and I don't know if there is anything more like ABI breakage/soname bump)08:31
Rhondamicahg: I added to that bug years ago without any progress at all since.08:32
Rhondamicahg: Actually someone even wanted to mark it as duplicate for a completely different issue. And then the "send patches" got thrown around in there too, "now that launchpad is open source".  *sigh*08:32
didrockshum, soname bump even08:32
micahgdidrocks: well, I bumped the library version, so anyone that uses the library would need a rebuild anyway08:34
didrocksmicahg: I answer on the bug report, I'll talk with colin later and we'll see what to do08:34
didrocksmicahg: right, and it's very late for such a transition in the cycle08:34
micahgdidrocks: ok, I didn't figure that he'd ok it since there were no rdepends and it's not in debian, but he did, so I finished it08:34
micahgdidrocks: we have no binaries at the moment anyways08:35
didrocksmicahg: yeah, but I think he was thinking that you already did the work before to see there is no bump08:35
didrocksno binaries?08:35
didrocksoh right08:35
micahgdidrocks: nope, only the source is in archive ATM08:35
didrocksthe last line is karmic08:35
didrocksnot maverick :)08:35
didrocksoh ok, so no worry for this then08:35
didrocksI'm looking at the packaging and will sponsor consequently08:36
didrocksmicahg: sorry for the confusion, thanks a lot, I'll sponsor it today :)08:36
* directhex uploaded an ARM FTBFS bugfix08:36
micahgdidrocks: I started on teh package and made sure it built before requesting the FFe, but I didn't check it throughly for pacakging issues until tonight08:36
micahgdidrocks: I now know to check for soname bumps before requesting FFes :)08:37
micahgdidrocks: thanks a lot, I can go to sleep then08:37
didrocksmicahg: yeah, it's an important parameter for packages in the archive, in this case, less :)08:37
didrocksmicahg: enjoy your evening!08:37
micahgdidrocks: have a great day!08:37
didrocksthanks :)08:38
hyperairmicahg: have you gotten your sponsor?08:41
micahghyperair: yes, thanks08:41
hyperairmicahg: ah okay then.08:41
didrocksmicahg: just a note (when you will be back), no need to add in the changelog "rename libfxscintilla17-dev to libfxscintilla19-dev and then rename libfxscintilla19-dev to libfxscintilla-dev"08:42
didrocksjust the end count like "rename libfxscintilla17-dev to libfxscintilla-dev" :)08:42
micahgdidrocks: ah, sorry, yeah, the original package actually I don't think ever worked :-/08:42
didrocksmicahg: no worry :)08:42
=== hannesw_ is now known as hannesw
* micahg is really off now :)08:45
hyperairmicahg: i don't really have the time to figure out bzr again. could you stick it in revu or something?08:46
didrocksmicahg: hyperair will do the full review (thanks again!) as there is this soname bump and I'm not sure to get enough time because of that doing a proper job on it :)08:49
* hyperair just realized that that was libfxscintilla and not libwxscintilla09:11
dapalScottK: since you've acked most of the depends requiring a FFe, would you please also (finally) ack josm?10:19
dapalScottK: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/josm/+bug/613926 , thank you :)10:19
ubottuLaunchpad bug 613926 in josm (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync josm 0.0.svn3514-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,In progress]10:19
ScottKdapal: Done10:21
dapalgreat, thank you :)10:21
dapalnow, looking for a sponsor :)10:22
Rhondaerm …10:22
Rhondadapal: "Please resubscribe ubuntu-sponsors once all these packages are available in the archive."10:23
RhondaThis doesn't seem to have happened? :)10:23
ScottKdapal: I'll approve it as sponsor too.10:23
dapalScottK: great, thanks :)10:23
dapalRhonda: oh, you there? :) -- yes, I forgot that too10:23
dapalScottK: no need to subscribe ubuntu-sponsors then?10:24
dapalgreat, thanks!10:24
Rhondadapal: everywhere :P10:24
dapalRhonda: gar. There's no Rhonda-free place on earth then? :(10:24
RhondaYou can try #kde, #emacs or other evil sides of the force. :P10:25
dapalRhonda: I'm scared now.10:26
RhondaThen the mission is accomplished.10:26
coolbhaviari-tczew, morning mate10:41
ari-tczewhello coolbhavi10:44
ari-tczewcoolbhavi: are you ready to start natty development?10:44
coolbhaviari-tczew, yes balancing everything at the moment :)10:45
ari-tczewcoolbhavi: do you will merge new upstream releases, right?10:45
coolbhaviari-tczew, yes but based on debian changes10:46
ari-tczewif someone needs help today before close archive, I have a time a little bit10:55
=== dyfet` is now known as dyfet
ubottuCurrent time in Etc/UTC: October 06 2010, 12:07:3713:07
=== xfaf is now known as zul
=== ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks
Rhondabilalakhtar: I have no clue what you were refering to to ari a few days ago what you hilighted me with.14:05
bilalakhtarRhonda: ah, just leave it14:05
=== xfaf is now known as zul
lfaraoneWould adding a mimetype handler so that clicking on an XO bundle installs it (which should be the normal action) be a new feature? (it'd just be adding a mimetype handler, and it should have been that way in the first place)15:43
blueyedI am trying to build the vanilla kernel according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/GitKernelBuild but it fails: http://pastebin.com/96Xh9xgM16:58
blueyedThe translated error: "dpkg-gencontrol: error: package linux-image-2.6.36-rc6-custom+ not in control info"17:01
blueyedApparently it's missing the 10.00 here, or something similar.17:01
blueyedprobably this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=58812617:11
ubottuDebian bug 588126 in kernel-package "kernel-package: Fails to build linux-image on 2.6.35-rc4 if CONFIG_LOCALVERSION is set" [Important,Fixed]17:11
ari-tczewmicahg: ping18:00
micahgari-tczew: pong18:00
ari-tczewmicahg: any ideas for libjdic-java? :P18:00
micahgari-tczew: heh, sorry about that, got overwhelmed this cycle, I'll get to it after UDS (for real this time :))18:01
micahgari-tczew: we're migrating to 4.0.x in Natty, so one way or another we'll fix it :)18:01
ari-tczewmicahg: migrating to 4.0.x of what?18:02
micahgari-tczew: Firefox18:02
micahgari-tczew: can you sponsor a bzr merge for me18:03
blueyedrequest-sync uses natty already.. so how can I get a kernel-package sync for maverick (universe)? impossible?18:03
ari-tczewmicahg: ah, so libjdic-java is related to firefox?18:03
micahgari-tczew: it build depends on xulrunner18:03
micahgari-tczew: can you sponsor a bzr merge for me?18:03
ari-tczewmicahg: sure18:04
micahgari-tczew: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/update-2.11.018:04
* micahg needs to request merge18:04
* ari-tczew hates .edge. domain18:05
Laneyblueyed: you can specify the release18:05
micahgoh, nm18:05
micahgari-tczew: https://code.launchpad.net/~micahg/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/update-2.11.0/+merge/3770618:06
micahgari-tczew: just needs to release commit and tag18:06
BlackZSarvatt: ping18:06
micahgari-tczew: if you want me to do those, I can18:06
ari-tczewmicahg: so go ahead :)18:07
blueyedLaney: sure.. will use it. thanks.18:07
ari-tczewmicahg: I see that didrocks could sponsor it.18:08
Sarvattwhats up BlackZ?18:08
didrocksari-tczew: micahg: hyperair was on it, right?18:08
didrocksor is it another lib? :)18:09
ari-tczewdidrocks: dunno! :>18:09
micahgari-tczew: I tried, he was too busy and handed off to hyperair who isn't so familiar with UDD18:09
didrocksyeah, it's quite busy there :/18:09
didrockssorry micahg18:09
micahgdidrocks: it's ok, we'll try to get it uploaded and hopefully accepted (it builds fast)18:09
BlackZSarvatt: can you please review https://code.launchpad.net/~eugenesan/ppa-purge/trunk/+merge/33368 ?18:10
BlackZSarvatt: if you want, I could do that18:10
ari-tczewheh, UDD is not hard to use.18:10
micahgari-tczew: k, commit revision is in, go ahead18:10
hyperairmicahg: what's UDD?18:13
BlackZSarvatt: I have some comments about it18:13
micahghyperair: Ubuntu distributed Development (using bzr for uploads/updates/merging)18:13
ari-tczewmicahg: how do you adding tags to branch?18:13
hyperairari-tczew: specifically, let's just say i don't like bzr.18:14
hyperairget me a diff, sure, debian.tar.gz, sure, full dsc set, sure, but bzr branch? nothanksbai18:14
micahgari-tczew: debcommit -r :)18:14
hyperairmicahg: yeah i figured as much18:14
micahgari-tczew: that way the package importer shouldn't overwrite my changes when you upload18:14
micahgwe'll see if it works :)18:14
ari-tczewmicahg: good point18:15
micahghyperair: the only reason I know bzr is thanks to asac and his training on the mozilla team branches18:17
* micahg still has issues with git18:17
* ari-tczew hates inhale his neighbours cigarette smoke18:19
SarvattBlackZ: I added you to the xorg-edgers, would be much appreciated if you could. the only issue I see is the changelog, would want to condense that all into one and just bump the version once18:22
tumbleweedari-tczew: "bzr mark-uploaded" (as described in UDD documentation) will tag18:23
BlackZSarvatt: agreed; I will comment on it ASAP, however, why don't you add a separate team for commit to the ppa-purge's bzr repository?18:24
SarvattI will but I'm very busy at the moment and don't want to delay you :)18:24
BlackZthanks Sarvatt :)18:28
* hyperair grumbles about his miserable crap of a connection18:31
cdbshyperair: really?18:35
cdbshyperair: people have even worse connections! like mine18:35
hyperaircdbs: oh yeah? have you seen how many times i've reconnected in the past few minutes?18:35
micahgcdbs: nice name :)18:35
cdbsmicahg: I am bilalakhtar :)18:36
micahgcdbs: I know :)18:36
cdbswanted a smaller nick18:36
hyperairwhy not dh7?18:36
cdbsone that westeners could pronounce easily18:36
hyperaircdbs is old outdated technology =p18:36
hyperairfyi, bilal akhtar is pretty easy to pronounce18:36
cdbshyperair: I like cdbs for some *old* reasons18:36
micahghyperair: that's a highly contentious point18:36
hyperairmicahg: it is in my book, and that's all that matters to me =p18:36
hyperairmicahg: needless to say, it takes extra persuading to get me to sponsor a cdbs package rahter than a dh7 package.18:37
cdbsmicahg: When will you apply for MOTU?18:37
hyperairmostly because i've forgotten how cdbs works18:37
hyperaireh, micahg isn't a motu yet?18:37
hyperairoh right, he was asking for sponsors >_>18:37
hyperairsilly me18:37
micahghmmm, I was going to wait until life slowed down a litlle18:37
cdbsmicahg: Your syncs and merges so far have been flawless18:38
cdbsmicahg: And you have been working well with chris-ccoulson as well18:39
hyperairno dash needed ;-)18:39
cdbshyperair: to prevent a ping18:39
hyperairhaha i don't mind being pinged if people are talking about me.18:39
cdbsI wanted a discussion about the script grab-merge18:41
micahgcdbs: nice to know I have 1 for on my application :)18:42
cdbsI would like to make a change in it that it also creates a new file called merge-debuild that actually runs debuild instead of dpkg-buildpackage in merge-buildpackage. ideas?18:42
cdbs'It' above is grab-merge in ubuntu-dev-tools18:42
cdbsmicahg: hmm, yes18:43
cdbsbye people18:45
lfaraoneScottK: Can I both approve and sponsor a FFe request for ubuntu-sugar-remix-meta?18:56
shadeslayerlfaraone: Scott is out afaik18:57
lfaraoneshadeslayer: okay. this is just a procedural question, I've not had the ability to approve FFes before.18:57
shadeslayerok ..18:58
lfaraoneI know you can't both upload something and accept it in the archive.18:58
fabrice_splfaraone, Scott acked this morning a sync request from a Release team stand point and also ack it from a sponsor standpoint19:04
micahgfabrice_sp: yes, but he's an actual member of the release team, not an adjunct :)19:10
lfaraonefabrice_sp: cool. but I very much can't ack a FFe for a change I author, right?19:27
micahgoh, what fabrice_sp said was ok, it's the lfaraone case that's the issue :)19:28
=== ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk
fabrice_splfaraone, a peer review is always welcome :-)19:51
cdbsSo as I mentioned earlier, would it be fine to get grab-merge in ubuntu-dev-tools to create another file called merge-debuild that workd like merge-buildpackage except for the fact that it runs debuild?20:11
cdbstumbleweed: ^^20:11
micahgcdbs: you generally want to look at the merge before running debuild20:11
cdbsmicahg: But you ultimately have to run it, right?20:12
tumbleweedcdbs: I've never used merge-buildpackage, but sounds reasonable20:12
cdbsmicahg: And only after that can you run debdiff to see the changes yourself, right?20:12
cdbscdbs: oh, and if you don't know, I am bilalakhtar20:12
micahgcdbs: right, but there are usually conflicts20:12
cdbsmicahg: Doesn't grab-merge create merge-buildpackage as well?20:13
cdbsI could get it to create another file i.e. merge-debuild20:13
cdbsmicahg: it does20:13
ari-tczewwho is familiar with bzr merging>?20:18
kklimondaari-tczew: well, what is the problem? :)20:24
ari-tczewkklimonda: I did: bzr merge-package lp:foo20:27
ari-tczewthen bzr commit20:27
ari-tczewnow, push ?20:27
micahgari-tczew: you should do debcommit instead of bzr commit so that bugs are closed20:28
micahgor linked, more appropriately20:28
micahgari-tczew: not a problem, bzr uncommit, debcommit20:29
ari-tczewtry again20:29
fabrice_spShould I ping someone to get Bug 613926 synced? (before freeze)20:29
ubottuLaunchpad bug 613926 in josm (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync josm 0.0.svn3514-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/61392620:29
ari-tczewfabrice_sp: ack-sync/syncpackage is not good?20:30
micahgfabrice_sp: freeze is passed (noon UTC today)20:30
fabrice_spI prefer to wait for an archive admin that late in the cycle20:30
ari-tczewmicahg: for main, not for universe20:30
fabrice_sphmm, aa has een subscribe before noon20:30
micahgari-tczew: no, freeze for universe was today at noon20:30
fabrice_spari-tczew, micahg  is right20:31
ari-tczewmicahg: wait wait wait, so if archive is closed, why we are going to upload? :D20:31
fabrice_spthat's why I'm asking20:31
micahgari-tczew: because I have an exception :)20:31
fabrice_spso do I :-P20:31
micahgari-tczew: I asked and I was told if it's not uploaded, there's *no* chance of it getting in, but if it's uploaded, there is a chance20:31
ari-tczewfabrice_sp: cjwatson maybe20:31
fabrice_spwell, let me chekc the timestamp20:31
kklimondaari-tczew: where do you want to push the branch? I don't think pushing it to lp:ubuntu/foo actuall does anything at the moment.20:32
ari-tczewkklimonda: lp:ubuntu/libfxscintilla20:32
micahgkklimonda: I used bzr push :parent (use bzr info to make sure :parent is what you want)20:33
kklimondaari-tczew: right, those branches are populated from the uploaded packages afaik. Unless something has changed recently, james_w ?20:33
kklimondaari-tczew: I'd just do a simple bzr bd -S to build source package and upload it using dput20:33
micahgkklimonda: only if it's not tagged20:33
ari-tczewmicahg: only "debcommit" is enough20:33
ari-tczewmicahg want to be sponsored through bzr20:34
kklimondamicahg: so if you create a tag (i.e. something like 1.2.3-0ubuntu1) then.. what is going to happen? :)20:34
micahgari-tczew: debcommit is the same as bzr commit except it uses the debian changelog as the commit message and automatically does the --fixes lp:foo20:34
micahgkklimonda: the importer shouldn't overwrite according to james_w20:34
micahgari-tczew: it was a new upstream release (no sane way to do a debdiff)20:35
kklimondamicahg: but does it actually do anything useful with the branch?20:35
micahgkklimonda: you can keep the individual commits vs one big import commit20:35
ari-tczewmicahg: I created diff between /debian/ dirs20:35
micahgari-tczew: right, but then you have to fetch the orig.tar.gz and what not20:35
ari-tczewmicahg: ... let's back to uploading :P20:36
kklimondamicahg: ok, make sense20:36
ari-tczewmicahg: ok, debcommit is done. what next? bzr push?20:37
micahgari-tczew: run bzr tags to make sure my release tag is there20:38
ari-tczewmicahg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/507481/20:38
micahgari-tczew: looks good20:39
ari-tczewmicahg: bzr push lp:ubuntu/libfxscintilla ?20:39
micahgso check bzr info to make sure the parent branch is the ubuntu maverick branch, then you can run bzr push :parent20:39
micahgari-tczew: as kklimonda I don't think that works yet20:40
ari-tczewmicahg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/507482/20:41
micahgoh, hmm, so maybe it will work :)20:41
ari-tczewmicahg: so, bzr push lp:ubuntu/libfxscintilla ?20:41
micahgari-tczew: yeah, see if it works20:41
kklimondabah, I got all my paperwork ready and now begins the joy of waiting for a meeting with the US consul and thinking of a way to convince him I'm not going to stay in US forever and work as a cleaner :/20:42
ari-tczewkklimonda: are you in US now?20:44
ari-tczewmicahg: Launchpad is processing new changes to this branch which will be available in a few minutes. Reload to see the changes.20:46
micahgari-tczew: we'll wait I guess20:47
ari-tczewmicahg: I hope that your branch will be automatically set up as merged.20:49
ari-tczewmicahg: it still doesn't uploaded :/ dut is waiting21:25
micahgari-tczew: hmmm21:26
micahgari-tczew: and the builders are empty :(21:27
ari-tczewmaybe james_w could help?21:27
james_wwhat with?21:27
micahgjames_w: branch scan taking an hour for lp:ubuntu/libfxscintilla21:28
ari-tczewjames_w: we are thinking that https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/maverick is loading too long21:28
ari-tczewmicahg: around yet?22:11
micahgari-tczew: I'm here22:11
micahgari-tczew: update still not done :-/22:12
ari-tczewmicahg: james_w is explaining it on #launchpad.22:12
ari-tczewmicahg: I'm going to bed soon, what's next?22:12
ari-tczewmicahg: what's the deadline about uploading to universe?22:21
micahgari-tczew: already passed 9 hrs agfo22:21
micahgari-tczew: so, we're on borrowed time22:21
kklimondahave you checked if the branch has been properly pushed?22:22
kklimondamaybe it's just a LP hickup and you can already upload package22:22
ari-tczewon #launchpad devs suggest bug about tags scanning22:22
kklimondaari-tczew: ask james if you can upload package anyway, it's not the best moment to waste time because of some bug :/22:24
ari-tczewkklimonda: do you mean dput?22:24
kklimondaari-tczew: well, you have to use dput anyway, right?22:24
ari-tczewkklimonda: right22:24
kklimondabuilders don't yet build packages from branches anyway.22:24
kklimondaso I'd just go and publish the package and then we can worry about branch being broken22:25
ari-tczewmicahg: ^^22:25
kklimondait's better then getting a red light from the admins after all this work22:25
micahgkklimonda: the idea was to not lose the bzr revisions I did22:25
kklimondamicahg: I know, but sometimes you have to compromise22:25
micahgwe're getting some action in #lp now22:25
* kklimonda is a huge proponent of the udd but still, the most important thing is package itself :)22:26
* ari-tczew is waiting like a truck to arrive out.22:27
micahgari-tczew: upload please :)22:31
ari-tczewmicahg: did you saw it? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/maverick/libfxscintilla/maverick/revision/422:39
micahgari-tczew: yes, but the tag isn't shown on the top level, I hope it's enough22:39
micahgari-tczew: ugh, I don't think it's enough22:41
ari-tczewmicahg: hmmm?22:41
micahgmaybe run bzr mark-uploaded and then push again?22:43
micahgand then upload?22:43
ari-tczewmicahg: dunno, I wouldn't take bzr till bug is not fixed.22:43
micahgari-tczew: I need to file a bug against the package importer, will have ot do later22:44
ari-tczewmicahg: so, could I upload your package?22:44
micahgari-tczew: go agead22:44
micahgmy branch is still there, we can clean up later22:44
ari-tczewmicahg: "Successfully uploaded packages."22:46
micahgari-tczew: thanks22:46
=== ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!