[00:20] <slangasek> huh, why are all the ubuntu seeds branches using branch format 6
[00:20] <slangasek> this is perhaps not something I should change the week of release ;)
[00:21] <micahg> slangasek: maybe so hardy people can work with them
[00:21] <slangasek> micahg: that would be silly :)
[00:45] <Riddell> cjwatson: upstream pulseaudio comments on the patches https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/655409
[00:45] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 655409 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "KDE related updates to pulseaudio (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[01:47] <ScottK> I've been away, so I don't know where we are wrt respins and such, but if we can get bug 636482 without causing a server respin, I think we should.
[01:47] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 636482 in python-django (Debian) (and 1 other project) "Update python-django to 1.2.3 version to fix an XSS vulnerability (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 26)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/636482
[01:48] <ScottK> slangasek: ^^^ - Thoughts?
[05:20] <cjwatson> ScottK: no respins yet
[05:20] <cjwatson> (as in uploads won't trigger them)
[05:21] <ScottK> cjwatson: I'd say we should go ahead and sync python-django then.
[05:21] <ScottK> It'll save a USN after release and it's been tested/reviewed.
[05:22] <ScottK> BTW, I'll be ~offline again tomorrow (your today, I presume) as I was the previous one.
[05:23] <cjwatson> ok
[05:25] <cjwatson> ScottK: according to comment 10 it can't be synced yet though
[05:25]  * ScottK looks
[05:26] <cjwatson> may be better off with somebody sponsoring kklimonda's package
[05:26] <cjwatson> (or rebasing it on 1.2.3-1)
[05:28] <ScottK> I marked in the bug.
[06:57] <micahg> cjwatson: are you around?
[07:32] <doko_> cjwatson, azeem_: looks like Riddell didn't see the opensync discussion here, and did go forward to remove the unbuildable packages
[07:37] <ara> morning all!
[07:50] <slangasek> ScottK: python-django> doesn't appear to impact the server, so looks ok from here
[07:58] <SpamapS> are we spinning isos yet? I just figured out bug 653362 .. simple fix .. hopefully ready for a sponsored upload before iso's start
[07:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 653362 in dovecot (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "package mail-stack-delivery 1:1.2.12-1ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 3) (dups: 2) (heat: 26)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/653362
[08:13] <SpamapS> FYI: hopefully this can get sponsored/uploaded before the isos spin: https://code.launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/ubuntu/maverick/dovecot/karmic2lucid2maverick-upgrade-fix/+merge/37707
[08:14] <micahg> slangasek: if I already have an FFe, does a universe package have to be uploaded before noon UTC, or am I good for after that?
[08:17] <slangasek> micahg: the deadline is there to ensure that packages are successfully built on all architectures before the door is closed; so you should regard the deadline as a hard one
[08:18] <micahg> slangasek: k, I guess I have to wait up for a sponsor then
[08:37] <micahg> cjwatson: unping
[08:38] <micahg> slangasek: got a sponsor so no worries
[09:04] <ara> morning seb128, robbiew
[09:05] <seb128> hey ara
[09:08] <cjwatson> SpamapS: I still have to fix grub ...
[09:54] <robbiew> ara: morning (sorry...had window closed)
[09:58] <Riddell> doko_: uh oh, they weren't ment to be removed?
[10:21] <doko_> Riddell: the latest plan was to revert the opensync upgrade, not sure I do want to touch this after the removals, at least NBS is empty
[10:24] <ScottK> I'd appreciate it if someone would do the sync in bug 613926
[10:24] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 613926 in josm (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync josm 0.0.svn3514-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main) (affects: 3) (heat: 22)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613926
[10:37] <pitti> is there still time to do an upload of upower (trivial patch: initialize a GError, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/upower/commit/?id=a4e099c5bff9f9fdb9067a0a6bb206d4c34745ae)
[10:38] <pitti> it's causing a lot of crashes (bug 648414)
[10:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 648414 in upower (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "upowerd assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/upower/upowerd: double free or corruption (out): 0x00d13ec0 *** (affects: 38) (dups: 41) (heat: 338)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/648414
[10:38] <pitti> or should this become an SRU at this point?
[10:41] <pitti> I'll upload it (works fine here, see test case in bug); please reject if it's too late, then I'll prepare an SRU
[10:48] <Riddell> skaet: who is spinning CDs and when?
[10:50] <Riddell> pitti: well given that nobody is spinning CDs it should be ok to accept
[10:50] <Riddell> let me look
[10:51] <pitti> so, we'll pre-publish on Saturday, so I guess we should have the final images tomorrow, so that we can still test them all?
[10:52] <Riddell> we should start testing today in the hope of having final images
[10:52] <Riddell> but we were told that would happen from london and london isn't responding
[10:52] <Riddell> so shrug
[10:53] <pitti> I'll reinstall my main workstation with today's desktop images, for testing and kicks
[10:53] <pitti> (over lunch presumably, so in about an hour)
[10:54] <pitti> Riddell: ok, I'll review some other bits in the queue, like d-i, grub-installer, and this utouch-grail thing
[10:56] <pitti> Riddell: i. e. "final call for the last passengers to the HMS Maverick"
[10:56] <ara> :D
[10:57] <pitti> ah, utouch-grail is an SRU already
[10:58] <pitti> dovecot looks fine, and nasty "fail to install" bug, accepting
[10:58] <Riddell> accepted upower
[11:22] <cjwatson> I think I have a fix for Marjo's critical grub2 bug
[11:22] <cjwatson> well, workaround, it's not really a proper fix
[11:23] <cjwatson> ev: we'll need a ubiquity upload containing grub-installer 1.55ubuntu4
[11:23] <ev> cjwatson: right-o
[11:23] <mvo> can we please remove secvpn from the archive? because of bug #327482 it will not even work on most ubuntu systems (all that don't have inittab)
[11:23] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 327482 in secvpn (Ubuntu) "access to non-existent /etc/inittab (affects: 48) (dups: 31) (heat: 70)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/327482
[11:23] <cjwatson> ev: (won't quite be in the archive yet)
[11:23] <ev> indeed
[11:24] <Riddell> mvo: I can do that
[11:25] <mvo> hm, looks like I disconnected, did my message "can we please remove secvpn from the archive? because of bug #327482 it will not even work on most ubuntu systems (all that don't have inittab)" made it?
[11:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 327482 in secvpn (Ubuntu) "access to non-existent /etc/inittab (affects: 48) (dups: 31) (heat: 70)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/327482
[11:26] <cjwatson> can you subscribe ubuntu-archive to that and we'll queue it?
[11:26] <cjwatson> Riddell: the reason you weren't getting a response is that we were busy looking at the last critical bug
[11:27] <cjwatson> so there's no point spinning anything yet anyway
[11:27] <cjwatson> I did say that I was going to be doing this on Wednesday morning ...
[11:27] <Riddell> fair enough
[11:27] <mvo> sure, thans
[12:00] <cjwatson> grub2 uploaded
[12:00] <cjwatson> fixes Marjo's machine!  might fix others, it seems quite plausible
[12:00] <cjwatson> PCI bus enumeration going wrong is a very believable candidate for breaking lots of machines
[12:06] <cjwatson> ev: any progress on that ubiquity upload?
[12:06] <ev> cjwatson: on it now
[12:06] <cjwatson> ta
[12:09]  * ara hugs cjwatson for fixing grub2
[12:10] <cjwatson> hopefully I haven't broken anything in the process.  I don't *think* so
[12:12] <cjwatson> pitti,Riddell: could one of you please review grub2?
[12:25] <cjwatson> ara,fader_: I'd appreciate wide testing of grub2 on affected machines (and non-affected machines too for regression testing, but particularly affected machines) to find out what percentage of them that fixes
[12:25] <cjwatson> I can't say for sure that all of the systems on which you've had problems are suffering from the same bug.  Obviously I hope they are
[12:25] <ara> cjwatson, I don't have access to any affected machine, but count me in for regression testing ;-)
[12:25]  * cjwatson nods
[12:37] <cjwatson> who's reviewing and can they please review grub2? :)
[12:57] <Riddell> cjwatson: I'll look
[13:00] <pitti> back; my install attempts failed three times, but seems to have ben bad media (squashfs errors)
[13:00] <pitti> with a different usb stick, today's ubuntun daily installs without a hitch
[13:00] <Riddell> cjwatson: accepted
[13:00] <pitti> cjwatson: seems Riddell beat me to it
[13:02] <ogra_ac> cjwatson, TI discovered a silicon temperature prob for which we have an x-loader fix and a test which runs since last evening and still have to run for about 2hm, when does the freeze kick in?
[13:02] <ogra_ac> s/hm/h
[13:03] <Riddell> accepting brasero too
[13:03] <pitti> Riddell: I'll update the xubuntu seeds to fix the oversize
[13:04] <pitti> done
[13:04] <pitti> cjwatson: ^ FYI (cd check mail just came in)
[13:05] <Riddell> NCommander: should we care about these problems? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/maverick_probs.html
[13:07] <doko> please review llvm-2.8
[13:08] <cjwatson> ogra_ac: please upload
[13:08] <cjwatson> Riddell: thanks
[13:09] <cjwatson> Riddell: I don't think those should be major, apart from maybe openjdk (which I thought doko had fixed?)
[13:09] <cjwatson> we don't care about kvm virt usb-creator on armel AFAIK
[13:10] <doko> no, openjdk is by intent. the old version on armel, the new version on the other archs
[13:11] <doko> well, openjdk-6-source is a real problem, but openjdk-6-jdk only suggests it
[13:11] <doko> as long as eclipse doesn't build on armel ...
[13:31] <cjwatson> Evan reckons that we should try to fix bug 630529 too
[13:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 630529 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Installing from USB drive writes boot sector to USB not HDD (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Critical,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/630529
[13:31] <cjwatson> we're working on this ...
[13:41] <ara> cjwatson, any ETA for the ISOs?
[13:45] <doko> Riddell: so the last binaries for libopensync-plugin-moto  should be removed too?
[13:48] <cjwatson> ara: 13:31 <cjwatson> Evan reckons that we should try to fix bug 630529 too
[13:48] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 630529 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Installing from USB drive writes boot sector to USB not HDD (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Critical,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/630529
[13:48] <cjwatson> 13:35 -!- cyphermox [~cyphermox@ubuntu/member/pdpc.supporter.active.cyphermox] has quit [Quit: Quitte]
[13:48] <cjwatson> oops
[13:48] <cjwatson> 13:31 <cjwatson> we're working on this ...
[13:49] <ara> OK
[13:49] <cjwatson> going as fast as possible
[13:50] <cjwatson> I realise the lack of stuff to test is a problem
[13:52] <pitti> I guess smoketesting today's dailies can't hurt, but we shouldn't add them to the tracker yet
[13:54] <Riddell> doko: removed
[13:56] <doko> ok, removing libopensync0-dev and libopensync0 too
[14:01] <Riddell> doko: you mean you want me to remove them?
[14:02] <doko> Riddell: no, I did
[14:02] <doko> Riddell: but you could accept the llvm packages ;)
[14:02] <doko> I don't understand what the scilab upload is supposed to fix ...
[14:05] <doko> I can't see who did upload the package
[14:06] <cjwatson> ubiquity 2.4.7 uploaded
[14:07] <cjwatson> we're also waiting for a signed wubi.exe (IS is on it)
[14:10] <cjwatson> doing a full test install with 2.4.7
[14:10] <cjwatson> (from usb) - had already tested the active bit of the change but best be safe
[14:12] <Riddell> accepting llvm
[14:17] <doko> Riddell: sorry, clang belong to it as well
[14:19] <cjwatson> can somebody review that ubiquity upload?  then we can run the publisher as soon as it's built and then start spinning CDs (subject to wubi signing which apparently is complicated)
[14:19] <cjwatson> I realise it might take a little while to review as it isn't entirely trivial.  Evan and I pair-programmed it
[14:24] <Riddell> cjwatson: looking
[14:24] <fader_> cjwatson: I'm guessing your grub changes are not in an ISO yet but will be in the next spin?
[14:24] <cjwatson> fader_: correct
[14:25] <fader_> cjwatson: Cool.  All set up to re-test.
[14:26] <Riddell> cjwatson: isn't this ment to also update grub-installer 1.55ubuntu4
[14:26] <Riddell> ?
[14:27] <Riddell> looks like it is already at 1.55ubuntu4
[14:27] <Riddell> ah that happened a couple of hours ago
[14:27] <cjwatson> that was 2.4.6, yes
[14:27] <cjwatson> queuebot is a little confused due to the rmadison lag
[14:28] <cjwatson> the one thing to note is that the bug fixed in 2.4.7 is still present in grub-installer, for d-i installations
[14:28] <cjwatson> I think it's higher-priority in desktop installations so I'd rather defer that part to natty
[14:31] <Riddell> cjwatson: ok accepting
[14:31] <cjwatson> thank you
[14:31] <Riddell> cjwatson: might be an idea to report bug 630529 on d-i as well then
[14:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 630529 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "Installing from USB drive writes boot sector to USB not HDD (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/630529
[14:32] <cjwatson> mm, fair point
[14:33] <cjwatson> done
[14:37] <Riddell> doko: accepted clang
[15:03] <azeem_> doko: hrm, so reverting is off the table?
[15:04] <doko> azeem_: afai, not off the table, but now requires now some more work.
[15:04] <doko> afaiu
[15:04] <azeem_> ok
[15:23] <cjwatson> ubiquity/amd64 is published, but not i386.  I'm going to run the publisher by hand shortly to catch up
[15:23] <cjwatson> and try to make things go a bit faster
[15:57]  * cjwatson taps fingers waiting for the publisher
[15:57] <cjwatson> (it's running cron.germinate now)
[16:03] <ttx> I like that calm before the storm...
[16:05] <cjwatson> just walking skaet through manual CD builds
[16:22] <cjwatson> server is done but there was a glitch in mirroring that meant that oem-config 2.4.7 wasn't there on i386 - skaet is respinning
[16:24] <cjwatson> (get the respins done early!)
[16:30] <cjwatson> ara: who can give skaet admin access to iso.qa?
[16:30] <ara> cjwatson, I can
[16:30] <cjwatson> aha
[16:30] <ara> skaet, which is your id at the iso tracker?
[16:33] <skaet> hi ara,   kate.stewart
[16:35] <ara> skaet, done. can you refresh the page and see if you have access to the admin menu?
[16:37] <cjwatson> she does
[16:37] <cjwatson> just queueing up other builds now first
[16:48] <smoser> skaet, ttx uec images build 20101006.1 started. will appear at http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/server/maverick/20101006.1 ~ 4 hours
[16:49] <ttx> smoser: ack
[16:58] <skaet> smoser, thanks.
[17:33] <micahg> ok, so I thought I had a sponsor before noon UTC, but the sponsor didn't upload, so should I still try to find someone for bug 650601 to upload?
[17:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 650601 in libfxscintilla (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please update libfxscintilla to 2.11.0 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/650601
[17:41] <cjwatson> crap, forgot to set OFFICIAL="Release"
[17:42] <cjwatson> so the images generated so far are labelled wrongly
[17:43] <cjwatson> sorry about that folks
[17:47] <ttx> smoser: does that affect your cloud images ^^ ?
[17:48] <ttx> smoser: cjwatson says no
[17:48] <fader_> cjwatson: FYI, it looks like bug 641259 is still hitting us on some servers :(
[17:48] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 641259 in grub2 (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "grub does not appear to load after maverick post-beta install (affects: 10) (heat: 74)" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/641259
[17:48] <ttx> so you're still on track :)
[17:48] <smoser> well, libfxscintilla does not affect cloud images
[17:48] <smoser> but grub2 does
[17:50] <cjwatson> fader_: they'll have to stay broken now
[17:50] <cjwatson> I have no more available options
[17:50] <cjwatson> fader_: did we fix any of them?
[17:50] <fader_> cjwatson: Ack, I expected as much but wanted to let you know
[17:50] <fader_> cjwatson: I've tried two so far to no avail, but I'll keep trying the others
[17:50] <cjwatson> fader_: also, there should be a new bug
[17:50] <cjwatson> oh, wait, well
[17:50] <cjwatson> that bug was about servers
[17:51] <fader_> I want to do the 10.04-grub-workaround to make sure they installed properly first
[17:51] <cjwatson> let's see how your testing goes
[17:51] <ara> skaet, cjwatson: rebuilding already?
[17:51] <skaet> yup,  there rebuilding now...
[17:51] <cjwatson> ara: 17:41 <cjwatson> crap, forgot to set OFFICIAL="Release"
[17:51] <cjwatson> 17:42 <cjwatson> so the images generated so far are labelled wrongly
[17:51] <cjwatson> 17:43 <cjwatson> sorry about that folks
[17:51] <ara> cjwatson, OK, thanks!
[17:51] <cjwatson> smoser: the bit that doesn't affect cloud images is the OFFICIAL="Release" labelling that I forgot
[17:52] <cjwatson> fader_: maybe one could be shipped to UDS or something?
[17:52] <fader_> cjwatson: Good idea, I'll see what it would take to make that happen
[17:54] <smoser> ok. good. yeah, i'm still on track for 20101006.1 to be testable when it arrives (maybe 3 hours from now -- 20:00 UTC)
[17:59] <cjwatson> fader_: are any of the affected servers in the UK?
[17:59] <cjwatson> fader_: if they are, elmo says I can get one brought to the office
[17:59] <fader_> cjwatson: Yes, all of the affected ones are in the UK
[17:59] <cjwatson> woo
[17:59] <fader_> cjwatson: Let me finish up verification that 10.10 installed correctly on one of them and I'll give you the info on it
[17:59] <cjwatson> ok, if you can give me a sample hostname that would be good
[18:00] <fader_> cjwatson: The host I'm checking right now is "doubah"
[18:00] <cjwatson> server, desktop reposted
[18:00] <cjwatson> (ubuntu)
[18:00] <cjwatson> ubuntu alternate rebuilding
[18:00] <cjwatson> then skaet takes over again :)
[18:01] <micahg> cjwatson: my sponsor fell through for libfxscintilla, should I still try to get it uploaded?
[18:02] <cjwatson> micahg: might as well
[18:02] <micahg> cjwatson: k, thanks
[18:03] <cjwatson> not promising to accept it; but I can promise that we won't accept it if it isn't uploaded
[18:03] <micahg> cjwatson: heh, ok, thanks
[18:03] <cjwatson> generally, during hard-freeze periods (launchpad says "pre-release freeze") you can err on the side of uploading
[18:03] <cjwatson> since we can always hold/reject if need be
[18:33] <cjwatson> kubuntu desktop posted
[18:43] <cjwatson> kubuntu alternate posted
[18:43] <cjwatson> (pub)
[19:31] <lfaraone> If I can approve FFes for a set of packages, can I A) approve a FFe requested by someone else and upload the same, B) request and ACK my own FFe for that same set of packages?
[21:13] <smoser> cjwatson, slangasek, or anyone else with ability, could youplease populate tracker with 20101006.1 for uec images and ec2
[21:13] <smoser> http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/server/maverick/20101006.1/published-ec2-daily.txt
[21:48] <doko> cjwatson, Riddell: if there are image rebuilds, I'd like to fix http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12092
[21:48] <ubot4> sourceware.org bug 12092 in libc "strstr broken for some inputs on pre-SSE4 machines" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]
[22:43] <stgraber> any ETA on the first DVD builds (I'm mostly interested in Edubuntu) ?
[22:59] <NCommander> Riddell: openjdk is a problem,but not one I think that's going to get solved. Linaro was working on it, but I'm not sure of the current status of their fix
[23:00] <ogra_ac> NCommander, ??
[23:00] <ogra_ac> whats the problem ?
[23:01]  * ogra_ac is pretty sure that was fixed weeks ago by using a different version on arm
[23:01] <ogra_ac> (and i think i tlaked about it in the meeting more than once)
[23:04] <NCommander> ogra_ac: I know we have two different java versions for armel, but I thought that was a stopgap until the 1.9 branch could be properly fixed on ARM
[23:04] <ogra_ac> NCommander, we dont
[23:04] <ogra_ac> we only have one openjdk on arm
[23:04] <ogra_ac> and another one on the other areches
[23:05] <ogra_ac> and thats on purpose (as i said in the past)
[23:07] <NCommander> ogra_ac: must have missed that
[23:07]  * NCommander scures away
[23:09] <ogra_ac> NCommander, it just shows up on ftbfs because neither doko nor cjwatson wanted to maintin a PAS hack for it
[23:09] <ogra_ac> just ignore it
[23:10] <NCommander> Ignore More: On
[23:11] <ogra_ac> :)
[23:11] <NCommander> ogra_ac: on the plus side, apport is pretty much fixed, I just need to upload a bunch of stuff to the porting box, and we're in business
[23:11] <ogra_ac> awesome
[23:12] <ogra_ac> how is portland ?
[23:12] <ogra_ac> have you been adopted already ? :)
[23:12] <NCommander> ogra_ac: great, I feel better that I have in a very long time.
[23:12] <NCommander> (I assume you heard I was in Portland from GrueMaster)
[23:12] <ogra_ac> yeah, i can imagine how portland can do that to you
[23:13] <ogra_ac> yeah
[23:14] <NCommander> ogra_ac: more that being home was just not the place I could be anymore