[01:48] * freeflying === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk === Zhenech_ is now known as Zhenech [03:40] I need some help with a package that works ok in lucid, but fails to build for maverick. [03:40] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/57210297/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-i386.xserver-xorg-input-wizardpen_0.7.3-2maverick1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [03:41] The error is odd and unfamiliar to me. Permission denied executing ./configure [03:41] doctormo: it's not +x permission [03:41] a few reasons that could have broken: [03:41] 1- [03:41] the permissions are actually different in this package [03:41] 2- previously it was run with 'sh ./configure' and now it's not [03:41] though that seems a bit unlikely [03:42] 3- previously something was running autoconf, which recreated/chomdded it [03:42] seems unlikely too [03:42] hth [03:44] hth? [03:44] "hope that helps" [03:44] it's probably #1 [03:44] poolie: Checking the source dir, the configure file is +x, I wonder if it's in the deb source though like that. [03:46] Ah perhaps it's because the make source produces an output which is different... hmm, interesting weirdness. [03:47] This is why I dislike semi-abandoned codebases, no upstream to ask for help. [03:59] micahg: Looks like http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320081 ? [04:00] bugs.gentoo.org bug 320081 in Server "www-misc/zoneminder-1.24.2 fails to build with ffmpeg-0.6" [Normal,New] [04:00] hello scottk [04:00] Hello poolie [04:01] micahg: http://www.zoneminder.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=64281 looks interesting too. [04:03] ScottK: could you sponsor, or give us some further feedback on, the SRU in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/636930 [04:03] Launchpad bug 636930 in Launchpad Bazaar Integration "Upgrading a repository fails with 'Inter1and2Helper' object has no attribute 'source_repo'" [High,Triaged] [04:03] i think your concerns from last time are now addressed [04:03] ScottK: k, I ended up pushing to PPA since they're empty [04:03] it builds fast [04:03] poolie: We're definitely into SRU territory now. [04:03] that's fine [04:03] It's also late here, so I don't have time to sponsor it tonight. [04:04] Since it's an SRU, it can't get accepted until Sunday, so no rush .... [04:04] right, it's not urgent [04:04] i'd just like to know if we have to do anything else to make it move [04:05] ScottK: our diff is to fix a problem with ffmpeg [04:05] micahg: Are you sure we still need it? [04:05] ScottK: that was what I was going to try next :) [04:07] OK. I'm off to sleep. Good night. [04:07] ScottK: night, thanks [04:21] hyperair: hi, can you sponsor a debdiff? [04:31] micahg: fxscintilla? [04:31] you still haven't found another sponsor? [04:31] i thought someone else was looking into it? [04:31] hyperair: heh, no that's already built :), bug 656101 [04:31] Launchpad bug 656101 in zoneminder (Ubuntu) "Please merge zoneminder 1.2.4-7 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/656101 [04:31] zoneminder eh [04:36] g30 [04:46] Now that even universe is hard frozen, are sync request still processes (it's for bug 613926, that has been approved before freeze), or should I upload with ack-sync? [04:46] Launchpad bug 613926 in josm (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync josm 0.0.svn3514-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613926 [04:47] ScottK, ^ (as you acked it) [04:47] fabrice_sp: he's offline, you can try slangasek [04:48] thanks micahg ! I saw it in the log not so long ago [04:48] will wait to see if slangasek reply to your ping [04:49] by the way, you have a second vote for Motuship ;-) [04:49] fabrice_sp: heh, thanks [04:50] upload rights come in handy towards the end of the cycle [05:05] micahg: you added a trailing empty line at the bottom of debian/changelog. [05:05] micahg: i'll just remove it, but please don't add it in the future. [05:05] micahg: one \n is enough =) [05:06] hyperair: ugh, I don't have that in my debdiff [05:06] micahg: it's in your debdiff. [05:06] @@ -222,3 +236,4 @@ [05:06] various scripts; replaced with GPL. [05:06] [05:06] -- Peter Howard Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:09:01 +1100 [05:06] + [05:06] see that trailing + [05:06] oh, I think that came with it [05:06] I just didn't notice [05:06] * micahg checks [05:06] yes, it was in the last upload :) [05:06] nah, it didn't [05:06] it wasn't. [05:07] i debdiffed against the last upload. [05:07] or rather, i import-dsc'd everything into git for proper examination [05:07] hmm, you're right, it was grab-merge then :) [05:08] I've never seen that before, I'll watch for it now [05:08] it could be a quirk of your text editor [05:09] some have a habit of adding one extra \n [05:09] hyperair: from grab-merge patch: http://paste.ubuntu.com/507743/ [05:10] * hyperair used apt-get source and dget [05:10] hmm maybe someone should look into grab-merge. [05:10] i mean not grab-merge, but merge.ubuntu.com's code itself [05:11] micahg: anyway apart from that it looks good, so i'll just testbuild and upload. [05:11] hyperair: k, thanks, BTW, pbuilder fails [05:11] i use sbuild. [05:11] what happens in pbuilder? [05:12] hyperair: underfined reference or something [05:12] hmm [05:12] well i'll see if it happens [05:16] micahg: looks like it built. i'll upload it then ) [05:16] =) [05:16] hyperair: cool, thanks [05:17] uploaded === bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs [07:10] I was thinking yesterday about the MOTU acronym meaning, and the fact that we want to get rid of the split between main and universe, and I was wondering: shouldn't we change Master of the Universe to Master of the Unseeded. I know that we loose something in the change, but that may be more accurate. What do you think? [07:10] fabrice_sp: when it happens, it seems appropriate [07:12] micahg, what do you mean? It's early for my english parser :-) [07:12] the term is appropriate once the archive reorganization happens [07:13] well, atually, the reorganization is happening now [07:13] (otherwise you won't be able to upload to -mozilla set ;-) ) [07:13] fabrice_sp: well, that's part of it, I'm sure it'll be discussed at UDS [07:14] is there a planned session for that? [07:15] fabrice_sp: I don't see one yet [07:17] oh. I'll wait a bit then (or send an email later). I have to go now. Bye! [07:17] fabrice_sp: have a good day [07:25] Good Morning! [07:26] good morning dholbach ! [07:26] hey coolbhavi [07:27] hey dholbach how are you doing? [07:27] good good - how are you? [07:27] m doing fine too === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks === maxb_ is now known as maxb === cdbs is now known as bilalakhtar [11:15] While we still have components and component-based uploading, MOTU's current expansion is correct [11:16] Archive Upload Rights for motu: archive 'primary', component 'universe' in maverick [11:16] that === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk [11:50] Oh, right, requestsync … === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks === andreas_ is now known as anoteng [14:48] micahg: package uploaded, but branch is still hanged, === ara__ is now known as ara [16:00] ari-tczew: k, I'm not going to worry about it === dapal is now known as release === release is now known as pollo === pollo is now known as dapal === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk === giskard_ is now known as giskard [17:56] I'm looking for someone who is familiar with licenses... [17:59] !ask | ari-tczew [17:59] ari-tczew: Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) [17:59] ;-) [18:00] ok, I have granted ACKs for new package (revu/clementine), but debian/copyright have to be checked by someone familiar with licenses. === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks [18:13] ScottK: maybe you? ^^ [18:13] ari-tczew: Not until after release. Too much other stuff to do. [18:14] ScottK: I understand. @start natty? [18:14] ari-tczew: Not before that. No promises. [18:14] why do you think it's suspect? [18:15] Laney: bdrung has suggested it with giving a comment on revu. [18:15] ScottK, about bug 613926: should I upload the sync with syncpackage, or it will be synced by an archive admin? [18:15] Launchpad bug 613926 in josm (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync josm 0.0.svn3514-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/613926 [18:15] you acked it yesterday [18:16] ari-tczew: I think he just means that someone needs to check that d/copyright is correct [18:16] the licenses used are fine [18:17] fabrice_sp: Go ahead and upload it with syncpackage. [18:17] ok [18:19] Laney: did you look at clementine's d/copyright? [18:19] yes [18:20] you need to check it's complete and correct [18:21] Laney: this file is handled by upstream author. what do you think, can we trust him? [18:21] no [18:21] the archive admin will check it, you need to too or risk a reject [18:21] Laney: so I asked who is familiar with d/copyright [18:22] because I'm not good person to do it. [18:22] why not? [18:22] I'm not familiar with licenses. [18:22] Laney: I thought that as motu I can upload package by myself (new package). [18:23] Well first of all you should have a working knowledge of them. But second of all you don't really need to be: you just have to check that what is in copyright matches the license statements in the package, and that nothing has been missed out. [18:23] ari-tczew: all NEW source packages get a copyright review [18:23] you can if you are able to check d/changelog - that's the same for everyone [18:23] d/copyright.. [18:25] Laney: ok, so when natty will be started, I'll subscribe ubuntu-archive [18:25] it needs two acks [18:25] Laney: bdrung and me [18:25] neither of you have acked it on revu [18:26] and you should review the copyright file... [18:26] and the archive doesn't need to be subscribed to anything, they review from the NEW queue [18:26] Laney: I'm not familiar with licenses. I'm looking for someone who is familiar with d/copyright. [18:27] This is a good time to learn. Archive administrators aren't the people to do this for you. [18:28] Laney: oh, I just forgot. I'm only laborer. [18:28] It's fairly routine work, just takes a lot of time: checking that what is written there matches up with the source [18:34] ScottK: bug #655929: can I proceed with the upload of that package with the changes we mentioned? [18:34] Launchpad bug 655929 in ppa-purge (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please update ppa-purge to the 0.2.8 version" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/655929 [18:34] BlackZ: Yes. [18:35] ScottK: thanks [18:37] Time for me to run off again.... === ivoks is now known as ivoks-icecream === ivoks-icecream is now known as ivoks === ara__ is now known as ara === didrocks1 is now known as didrocks === ara__ is now known as ara === ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk === hannesw_ is now known as hannesw === lool- is now known as lool