[05:58] debfx: is there a version of firefox-kde-support yet for 4.0? [09:38] micahg: there are no changes necessary [09:38] the current firefox-kde-support package works fine with firefox 4.0 === maxb_ is now known as maxb [16:00] debfx: k, thanks, sorry I didn't have a chance to merge your changes yet, I'll get to it over the weekend [19:46] chrisccoulson: good news, TB 3.1.5 seems pretty stable [19:47] chrisccoulson: I just realized that when I've been bumping nss/nspr, I haven't been updating debian/control [19:47] micahg - i wouldn't worry too much about that [19:47] which I guess isn't an issue since if it's not met, it should use in source [19:48] yeah, that's fine [19:49] chrisccoulson: After UDS, I think I'll set up a blog so I can blog about team topics [19:50] i keep thinking about that, but then i'd probably struggle to get people to follow it ;) [19:50] chrisccoulson: you can add it to the planet [19:50] yeah, that's true i suppose [19:55] dpm, i think i will split my translators notes [19:56] dpm, put the ID on one side, and the rest on the other (#. vs #: or the opposite) but i'm not sure which is which in LP [19:58] fta, I think it's a great idea, it's less clutter for translators. It should go like this: [19:58] #. comments [19:58] #: IDs [19:59] that would mean 1 line of #: and several of #. [20:01] too bad lp doesn't

 the #:
[20:01]  i mean #.
[20:07]  fta, I'm not sure I follow, is there a problem with several #. lines?
[20:08]  dpm, yep, everything ends up in 1 single line, it's just ugly and difficult to read
[20:10]  fta, would it help if you would wrap the #. comments in several #. lines (or perhaps you do that already?)?
[20:13]  dpm, http://paste.ubuntu.com/508224/
[20:14]  fta, so you are saying that you are importing this and the #. comments all end up in one line?
[20:16]  fta, btw, I don't think it matters much, but generally #. comments go on top of #: source locations (the opposite of the pasted bit of pot file you've shown me)
[20:16]  dpm, yes, told danilos already, he said he meant to look nice but missed that case and i should just go and fix it
[20:16]  it looks like this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/508229/
[20:17]  can't screenshot, he removed everything, the page is empty now
[20:17]  fta, that's fine, I understand it from the pastebin
[20:18]  ugh, it looks a bit ugly, but if that's the way it is now in LP, so be it
[20:18]  it's 1 line patch in lp i assume (just add  )
[20:19]  if i knew where to look, i'd do it
[20:19]  fta, do you know if there is a bug for it alredy?
[20:19]  i don't think there's one
[20:20]  fta, if that helps (unless you haven't looked already), here's more info on Launchpad Translations hacking: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek/Sessions/LaunchpadTranslationsUnderTheHood
[20:20]  https://dev.launchpad.net/Hacking
[20:21]  fta, danilo is away tomorrow, but henninge is a LP Translations hacker and will be there. He might be able to tell you where to look at
[20:22]  i can probably find it with a grep ;)
[20:23]  if you don't mind downloading 600 MB worth of LP code + deps ;)
[20:26]  already did it once (wanted to package it) but gave up because it's not ready
[20:27]  never will, they don't want it to be packaged
[20:27]  * micahg wanted to package it as well
[20:31]  micahg, and? how far did you go?
[20:47]  fta: filed a bug :)
[20:47]  micahg, won't fix? ;)
[20:48]  fta: well, did they explicitely say they don't want it packaged?
[20:48]  I know they don't consider it a priority
[20:48]  micahg, yes, to avoid splitting the community or something like that
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
[23:55]  chrisccoulson: simple seamonkey crash fix that I couldn't do: https://bug522635.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=481492