=== Sgiomlaireachd is now known as away_Sgiomlairea [00:10] * away_Sgiomlairea is now away - Reason : dinner === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk === away_Sgiomlairea is now known as Sgiomlaireachd [02:44] * Sgiomlaireachd is no longer away : Gone for 2 hours 34 minutes 41 seconds === amitk-afk is now known as amitk === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk [07:30] ping? [07:33] lucent, is there anyone in particular you want to ping? If you have a question, just ask. [07:37] JFo: thanks, when I disconnect a firewire device from one of my controllers, all controllers stop working correctly [07:37] dmesg is kind of quiet though, I only see the storage layer complain [07:38] how do I get more info about firewire? [08:00] crickets. hence the ping? [08:47] lucent: Can you paste me the output of lsmod at paste.ubuntu.com please? [08:48] lag: one moment, will do [08:49] lag: http://paste.ubuntu.com/508598/ [08:49] lucent: Obviously with the Firewire controller up and working [08:50] Okay, that's good [08:50] Wait one [08:51] I have a ricoh chipset that's built into the laptop, and an expresscard with a TI chipset [08:52] since using the new firewire stack my problems are data corruption on either one or both, after removing a storage device from either firewire bus [08:52] old firewire stack never showed these problems for me. [08:52] lucent: Issue: echo 1 | sudo tee -a /sys/module/firewire_ohci/parameters/debug [08:53] lag: okay, no output [08:54] Try: echo -1 | sudo tee -a /sys/module/firewire_ohci/parameters/debug [08:54] output "-1" [08:56] If that doesn't work paste me the result of "ls /boot/config-`uname -r`" [08:56] /boot/config-2.6.35-22-generic [08:57] Yes, cat that file and paste me the output [08:57] oh okay! [08:57] By the way, when you issued "echo -1 | sudo tee -a /sys/module/firewire_ohci/parameters/debug" did you then unplug your Firewire device and check your logs? [08:58] lag: http://paste.ubuntu.com/508602/ [08:58] All that command does is place the Firewire module into debug mode [08:58] and no sir, I didn't know that I should... [08:58] Sorry, I assumed too much :) [08:58] That's what you need to do [08:58] Let me check your .config [08:59] That's good - you have CONFIG_FIREWIRE_OHCI_DEBUG=y [09:00] lag: I am willing and motivated to reproduce this bug again with firewire debug on, take logs, whatever but I'm just needing some help like you have said to get that information :) [09:01] dmesg should be sufficient [09:02] dmesg at http://paste.ubuntu.com/508603/ [09:02] And now you have your output :) [09:03] Is there anything else I can help you with? ;) [09:04] that's fantastic [09:04] in theory should I be able to unload the firewire modules ? [09:04] I've tried and it led to kernel panic [09:05] Are you able to paste the panic? [09:05] I don't know that it will panic again if I do so again this time, but is firewire supposed to be unloadable at runtime? [09:05] "so... would it be a bug if I did get a panic?" is my question [09:05] Yes [09:05] Any panic is a bug [09:06] good to know, then. [09:06] thank you for the advice. I will go try to catch this bug and report [09:06] Thank you [09:07] Insure to attach the pastes you've sent me [09:07] They would be helpful [10:29] well, I updated my Maverick box and everything that was working nicely has gone to crap now [10:36] * ikepanhc try to remember when I pushed the upgrade button... [10:36] JFo: Such as? [10:36] ah, I updated 7hr ago... [10:39] general sluggishness [10:39] diagnosing now === smb` is now known as smb [10:41] looking like it may be rhythmbox badness [10:42] as that is the last of the items to test across all of my trials [10:45] doing a final test to see [10:49] yep, rhythmbox is effing hosed [10:50] playing through a song and suddenly it stops playing. go to the interface and it appears to be set to play, but clicking the pause button causes the song to start for a second then go to the next song [10:50] while looking, for all intent and purpose as if it were paused [10:51] which explains some of the other oddities I have been seeing tonight === diwic is now known as diwic_afk [11:17] JFo: I thought you used musica [11:22] smb, can you look at bug #644452 ? It appears that rfkill is the root of this guys problem. Had the HP platform driver changed from Lucid to Maverick? [11:22] Launchpad bug 644452 in linux (Ubuntu) "Atheros AR928X not connecting on wireless HP G60-468CA (affects: 10) (dups: 3) (heat: 253)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/644452 [11:23] tgardner, Let me have a look. I haven't followed that driver [11:27] lag, pete uses musica [11:27] Ah, okay === diwic_afk is now known as diwic [12:00] Hi, people! [12:04] I have a problem with debugging kernel crash on 8.04.4. [12:05] I got crash dump with kdump, and trying to debug it with crash utility. [12:06] crash utility exit with error: [12:06] please wait... (gathering module symbol data)a) [12:06] crash: invalid kernel virtual address: 4a2001 type: "pgd page" [12:09] avruser: What kind of crash are you trying to debug? [12:13] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt [12:14] Okay, can you past your dmesg at paste.ubuntu.com please? [12:14] ok [12:20] http://paste.ubuntu.com/508708/ [12:20] I don't see a panic? [12:21] this is current dmesg [12:22] Perhaps I should have been more clear :) [12:22] Can you paste the panic? [12:23] If it's not in the current dmesg, it will most likely be in /var/log/kern.log or /var/log/messages [12:23] (or both) [12:24] ok [12:24] Thanks [12:32] Panic was not logged in any log files, but at the moment of crash on the monitor appears this messages: [12:32] Code: Bad EIP value [12:32] EIP: [<0000 0000>] 0x0 SS:ESP 0068:c043bf14 [12:32] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt [12:36] http://paste.ubuntu.com/508716/ [12:36] part of kern.log at time of crash [12:44] avruser: It's hard to say whether that last line is related to the crash [12:45] avruser: I need the lines prior to "Code: Bad EIP value" to make any sense of it [12:45] avruser: Did it dump the at any point? A list of function names [12:47] avruser: Have you changed any hardware recently? A Bad EIP value can be related to dodgy hardware; NICs, ATA Disks etc [12:48] I was used bluetooth dongle [12:48] Try and use it again [12:48] See if you can replicated the issue - narrow it down to a piece of hardware [12:48] Bad RAM can cause the EIP issue too [12:49] I can replicate this crash [12:49] How? [12:50] s/Did it dump the at any point/Did it dump the stack at any point [12:50] It happens then i pass voice through the usb bluetooth dongle [12:51] Shouting at it? [12:51] I'd kernel panic if you shouted at me too :) [12:52] :) [12:52] I'd need more information if I was going to rectify this [12:52] What were the lines preceding "Code: Bad EIP value" [12:53] OK, I need to connect monitor to my server [12:57] avruser: Is there any solid reason why your server is still running Hardy? [13:10] 'cause LTS [13:10] So is Lucid :) [13:10] I need very stable system [13:11] hardy got many patches [13:11] Did you install dahdi yourself? [13:11] yes [13:11] I got some trace from my screen:) [13:12] Good, good [13:12] avruser, the number of patches is pretty much proportional to age of the release [13:13] avruser: I think people would be even more inclined to help you if you didn't have such an old OS, despite the fact that we're still supporting it [13:13] Besides, I think your problem my lie in dahdi [13:13] I've just installed it [13:13] Going to have a play [13:14] I experience this problem only when i make call through the chan_mobile [13:15] this module use bluetooth stack [13:16] How can I do that? [13:16] Do I need specific hardware to do that? [13:16] I have a bluetooth enabled phone and a dongle? [13:16] This enough [13:17] Have you chan_mobile compiled? [13:17] I also have dahdi installed [13:17] From asterisk-addons 1.6.2 [13:17] In the repos? Or from source? [13:18] Just installed asterisk-1.6.2 [13:20] 8.04.4 have not asterisk-1.6 and addons-1.6 in off repo [13:20] I have installed from source [13:20] I can't see addons [13:20] But the asterisk-1.6 is in the Lucid repos [13:21] I've just installed it [13:21] Now how do I reproduce this bug? [13:22] Connected to Asterisk 1.6.2.5-0ubuntu1 currently running on computer (pid = 15415) [13:23] Do you have chan_mobile? [13:23] asterisk -r [13:23] I did that [13:23] I have CLI now [13:24] computer*CLI> channel [13:24] originate redirect request [13:24] module show like chan_mobile.so [13:24] Where? [13:24] in CLI [13:24] cmd? [13:24] yes [13:25] system1*CLI> chan_mobile.so [13:25] No such command 'chan_mobile.so' (type 'core show help chan_mobile.so' for other possible commands) [13:25] 'module show like chan_mobile.so' command [13:26] what version of kernel? [13:27] It would help if the modules were listed in lexicographical order [13:27] chan_phone.so Linux Telephony API Support 0 [13:28] Did you installed asterisk-addons? [13:28] http://paste.ubuntu.com/508753/ [13:28] No [13:28] It wasn't there [13:30] http://paste.ubuntu.com/508754/ [13:30] Perhaps asterisk-mobile [13:31] avruser: Nope [13:31] yes, maybe [13:32] It's still not there [13:32] Are you sure it's not been renamed to -phone? [13:33] did you installed asterisk-mobile? [13:33] Yes [13:34] restart asterisk? [13:34] Why don't you email me the module? [13:34] /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_mobile.sh [13:34] /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_mobile.so [13:34] no problem [13:35] lag: can we complete this tomorrow? [13:35] We can continue on Monday [13:35] I might be around tomorrow [13:35] But I can't promise [13:36] Thanks:) [13:36] Can you email me the commands that you use to replicate this bug [13:37] sure [13:38] Good Bye! [14:01] how do I get the full dmesg output? man page for dmesg hints at -s option, however I can find no example of this === diwic is now known as diwic_Afk === diwic_Afk is now known as diwic_afk [14:17] * ericm|ubuntu reconnects [15:06] ogasawara: \o/ [15:06] ogasawara: you made my week [15:06] lol [15:06] progress++ [15:06] heh [15:07] vanhoof: cking did all the leg work testing :) , but it indeed sounds promising [15:08] Is there a (ex or currently) release manger around that can spare me a couple of minutes? [15:08] lag: as in the entire distro release manager? or kernel release manager? or ....? [15:09] lag, kernel release manager = ogasawara [15:10] Anyone with release manager permissions on LP :) [15:10] Yes, I know that cooloney :) [15:10] lag: ah, that might be a different story in you need LP permissions somewhere. [15:10] lag: what do you need changed in LP? [15:11] bug 22070 [15:11] Launchpad bug 22070 in linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Logitech Quickcam Messenger is not usable (affects: 15) (dups: 3) (heat: 144)" [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22070 [15:11] whoa, 2.6.20 [15:12] lag: and what do you need changes with that bug? [15:12] s/changes/changed/ [15:12] Just looking [15:12] ogasawara: well he's here with a machine in hand :) [15:13] I need the Nominated for Mavericks removing [15:13] And the Lucids removing from linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu) and linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) [15:14] lag: ah, so that's a quirk in launchpad that you can't remove the nomination once it's been added. You can only decline it now. [15:14] That seems silly [15:14] lag: it is, but I can decline them for you. [15:15] I would have only like to add the nominated for on on line too, but it added them all :( [15:15] That's fine :) [15:15] lag: yah, also another quirk that's annoying [15:15] Just leave The top Lucid one [15:15] lag: ack [15:15] Thanks Leann [15:15] * ogasawara wonders if I decline a nomination for one, if it'll decline it for all [15:16] Another stupid quirk? [15:17] well that's stupid, it does decline it for all [15:18] Grrrr [15:18] What about if you allow the top Lucid one? [15:18] lag: ok, so I approved the Lucid nomination which of course approved it for all the packages [15:18] Then deline the others? [15:18] Doh! [15:19] Whaaaa, now what? [15:19] lag: so then I just marked the Lucid nominations for linux-source-2.6.15 and linux-source-2.6.20 as Inavlid [15:19] Ah, okay [15:19] what a painful process [15:19] No kidding [15:20] Once you've declined it, can you change it again? [15:21] I remember why I nominated it for Maverick now [15:21] lag: yep, I can approve it [15:21] No I can split them and mark Maverick as Fix Released === diwic_afk is now known as diwic [15:21] Can you approve Maverick please [15:21] I think I can then change then to invalid etc after [15:21] s/then/them [15:22] lag: sure, although it's sorta implied it's already Fix Released for Maverick [15:22] lag: as the linux task itself always reflects the actively developed release, ie Maverick at the moment [15:24] wow, so I approved it and it propagates the status automatically. [15:25] * lag tuts [15:25] Oh, you mean Fix Released [15:26] lag: right [15:26] Weird [15:26] lag: so for example the linux-source-2.6.15 package being Fix Released for Maverick makes no sense [15:27] Yep, just seen/changed that [15:28] Neither does the "Status tracked in Maverick" [15:28] yah, that's confusing too [15:28] Okay, I think that's correct now [15:29] Why does the "linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu)" have to be different? [15:29] And has no dropdown? [15:30] lag: I think that's due to the nominations now, eg each nomination has a dropdown [15:31] None of them are the same [15:31] Top one is "Status tracked...", but is white [15:32] The second one is the same, but yellow [15:32] And the last one is while with a dropdown [15:32] And is Won't fix [15:32] lag: the yellow highlight is due to the way the url is crafted [15:32] lag: eg https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/22070 points to the linux-source-2.6.15 package and thus highlights it [15:32] Launchpad bug 22070 in linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 8 other projects) "Logitech Quickcam Messenger is not usable (affects: 15) (dups: 3) (heat: 142)" [Undecided,Invalid] [15:37] Ah, okay [15:38] bug 22070 [15:38] Launchpad bug 22070 in linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 8 other projects) "Logitech Quickcam Messenger is not usable (affects: 15) (dups: 3) (heat: 140)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22070 [15:39] But the bug relates to linux-source-2.6.20 [15:39] Odd [15:45] lag: I'm guessing the bot just picks up the last package in the set of bug tasks [15:45] Stupid bot :) === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks === amitk is now known as amitk-afk === diwic is now known as diwic_afk [17:20] apw, bug #642241 [17:20] Launchpad bug 642241 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 [modified: usr/sbin/update-initramfs] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 1) (heat: 269)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/642241 [17:24] bug #642421 [17:24] Launchpad bug 642421 in linux (Ubuntu) "Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep (affects: 41) (dups: 2) (heat: 206)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/642421 === diwic_afk is now known as diwic === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk === diwic is now known as diwic_afk === ppetraki is now known as ppetraki-lunch [19:22] friends, how do I generate the [PATCH 0/0] such as this one http://paste.ubuntu.com/508973/ when submitting multipile patches ? [19:23] mpoirier, have you tried "git format-patch --cover-leter" ? [19:26] bjf: will this command generate the information I have in the paste bin ? [19:26] mpoirier, try it [19:27] mpoirier, i am assuming that you use git format-patch to create your patches? [19:27] yes. [19:27] Now I need to generate the final 0/0. [19:27] mpoirier, just add --cover-letter to the options you are already use [19:28] ok, I'll try. [19:47] bjf: git format-patch --cover-letter HEAD~6..HEAD will do the trick. [19:47] thanks for the tip. [19:48] mpoirier, git format-patch --cover-letter -6 [19:48] mpoirier, also: git format-patch --cover-letter HEAD~6... [19:50] bjf: indeed, they all seem to have the same effect. === ppetraki-lunch is now known as ppetraki [20:01] kees: hrm, for the day 0 Maverick kernel upload which is primarily CVE fixes, I was originally going to upload to -proposed and then get it immediately promoted to -updates. But does it need to get to the -security pocket as well? === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks [20:01] ogasawara: yup. but we can pocket-copy it there too. [20:01] kees: ok cool [20:02] ogasawara: this early in the cycle I'm not worried about build dep problems due to building in the regular queue vs security queue [20:02] for anything other than a 0day SRU, I'd be nervous :) [20:02] * ogasawara nods === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk === yofel_ is now known as yofel