[04:42] <micahg> does "$@" in a shell script quote every argument, or each argument individually?
[04:43] <cody-somerville> micahg, it isn't difficult to test but I think it puts it all in one quote
[04:44] <micahg> cody-somerville: that's what I thought, I guess I should write a test
[05:03] <micahg> requesting upload for Debian RC bug (LP bug 656659)
[05:25] <micahg> fabrice_sp: good morning, could you look at bug 656659 please
[05:26] <fabrice_sp> good morning micahg!
[05:26] <fabrice_sp> sure
[05:38] <fabrice_sp> micahg, uploaded. Thanks ! Anything else?
[05:38] <micahg> fabrice_sp: not at the moment, thanks!
[05:41] <ScottK> micahg: Two days before release is not time for a packaging overhaul.
[05:42] <ScottK> micahg: Could I have a ninvaders with just the minimal fixes.
[05:42] <fabrice_sp> ScottK, I know: I checked the changes and this are 3 lines
[05:42] <ScottK> OK.  I didn't see the diff yet, just read the changelog
[05:42] <fabrice_sp> I got scared also :-)
[05:42] <micahg> ScottK: oh, that's why I gave up on it the other night
[05:45] <micahg> ScottK: no, there are packaging changes, go ahead and reject, do you think it's worth making the simple diff?
[05:46] <fabrice_sp> packaging changes? which ones?
[05:46] <ScottK> micahg: Please just the bug fix and the debian/copyright update.
[05:47] <micahg> fabrice_sp: http://paste.ubuntu.com/508509/
[05:49] <fabrice_sp> ok: I thought it would be safe, as this are the equivalent in dh7 of old ones, and do not affect the package, but ok
[05:51] <micahg> is saying that I'm pulling select changes from the Debian version attribution enough?
[05:53] <micahg> I'll file a new bug so that the sync bug is open for natty
[05:53] <fabrice_sp> I would mention what the change do, and that it comes from debian
[05:53] <fabrice_sp> for each
[05:54] <micahg> fabrice_sp: I copied the changelog entries with a note on top
[05:54] <fabrice_sp> could you pastebin the proposal?
[05:54] <micahg> fabrice_sp: sure
[05:54] <micahg> http://paste.ubuntu.com/508512/
[05:55] <fabrice_sp> it's ok
[05:55] <\sh> moins
[05:55] <micahg> fabrice_sp: should I file a bug and attach it?
[05:56] <fabrice_sp> micahg, yes please
[05:56] <fabrice_sp> and close the bug in the changelog :-) (to know where it comes from)
[05:56] <micahg> yep :)
[05:57] <fabrice_sp> moins \sh
[05:57] <micahg> fabrice_sp: do you want to mark bug 656659 confirmed in the mean time
[05:58] <fabrice_sp> micahg, I was trying to see how we don't loose this sync request
[05:59] <micahg> fabrice_sp: mark confirmed and it'll go during the first sync of natty?
[05:59] <fabrice_sp> subscribe archive admin in the meantime, also?
[05:59] <fabrice_sp> not sure...
[06:00] <fabrice_sp> I'll confirm it anyway
[06:00] <micahg> fabrice_sp: hmm...good point
[06:00] <fabrice_sp> it will appear in MOM, so you won't forget ;-)
[06:00] <micahg> fabrice_sp: bug 656678, should I attach a pbuilder log?
[06:01] <fabrice_sp> micahg, no: I'll rebuild it anyway ;-)
[06:02] <micahg> fabrice_sp: k, I think you're all set, thanks for the help
[06:03] <fabrice_sp> thank you for your contribution ;-)
[06:05] <micahg> np
[06:13] <micahg> ScottK: is bug 646877 worth taking now or ask SRU?
[06:16] <micahg> *as
[06:18] <ScottK> micahg: Go for it.
[06:18] <micahg> ScottK: k, thanks
[06:20]  * ScottK is off to bed.  Will look at it tomorrow.
[06:22] <ScottK> Also leaving ninvaders in the queue for now so we have something to accept if we need to stimulate a publisher run.
[06:22] <micahg> ScottK: k, I'm test buillding gjs, then I'll upload
[06:22] <ScottK> Good night.
[06:22] <micahg> ScottK: you too, good night, and thanks
[08:28] <dholbach> good morning!
[08:36] <kklimonda> good morning
[08:36] <kklimonda> :)
[13:17] <ScottK> BlackZ: You added aptitude to build-depends and not depends on ppa-purge.  Would you please fix and upload again?
[13:20] <BlackZ> ScottK: will do, thanks
[13:20] <ScottK> Great.
[13:31] <BlackZ> ScottK: done
[13:31] <ScottK> OK.  Thanks.
[13:39] <ScottK> BlackZ: Looks good.  I'm going to leave it in queue for a while in case we need an upload to stimulate a publisher run in LP.
[13:40] <BlackZ> ScottK: ok
[13:53] <Hobbsee> was anyone planning to upgrade wine, or cherrypick the affected patch for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24193 ?
[13:53] <Hobbsee> apart from that, yay, no breakage
[13:54] <Rhonda> Oh, Hobbsee :)
[13:54] <Hobbsee> hi there Rhonda
[13:55] <ari-tczew> Hobbsee the legend
[13:55] <Hobbsee> i'm a legend now?
[13:56] <ScottK> YokoZar: ^^^
[13:56] <ari-tczew> Hobbsee: hehe maybe :P I just wanted say, that I saw some discussions about you, but I see you active on IRC first time.
[13:56] <ScottK> Hobbsee: I have a vague recollection that YokoZar looked into it and found side effects from the patch that were worse than the problem it solved, but I don't remember for sure.
[13:56] <Hobbsee> ari-tczew: haven't been here for a while, due to a different client
[13:57] <RainCT> Hey Hobbsee :)
[13:57] <Hobbsee> ScottK: right.  well, the problem it solves is making programs not crash, and actually run, so i'm hoping you're wrong there ;)
[13:57] <Hobbsee> heya RainCT
[13:57] <ScottK> Hobbsee: We'll find out in a bit.  It's still early in the day in California.
[13:58] <Hobbsee> ScottK: true that.
[13:58] <Hobbsee> ScottK: maybe it makes other programs break.  not seeing any bug reports in the wine tracker about it, though
[14:00] <Hobbsee> ScottK: obviously having it set globally is useful, and i can see why one wouldn't want to revert it there, but i'm not expecting the change in wine to make things suddenly go boom
[16:14] <YokoZar> Hobbsee: The patch doesn't build with wine 1.2
[16:14] <YokoZar> Hobbsee: but it'll be in wine 1.2.1
[16:14] <YokoZar> *doesn't apply, rather
[22:06] <Azendale> Is there a way to get pbuilder to build a package with debugging information?
[22:07] <dapal> put "nostrip" in the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS environment variable?
[22:08] <Azendale> dapal: In the terminal I'm running pbuilder from, or inside pbuilder somehow?
[22:08] <dapal> depends whether pbuilder retains the environment or not :)
[22:08] <dapal> (I don't know that, should google for it)
[22:09] <dapal> Azendale: you could try to set it in ~/.pbuilderrc , should work
[22:10] <Azendale> dapal:Ok, thanks, I'll try that
[22:42] <Azendale> dapal: It didn't seem to work
[22:42] <dapal> Azendale: ouch, then maybe things in pbuilderrc only work for "pbuilder --login"