[00:06] newz2000: ping [00:08] g'day/evenin all [00:25] zkriesse: whats the reason bug 49247 and bug 87160 marked invalid? [00:25] Launchpad bug 49247 in ubuntu (and 1 other project) "Improve visability of localised Ubuntu websites (heat: 2)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49247 [00:25] Launchpad bug 87160 in ubuntu-website "developerzone" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87160 [00:30] the date of both [00:31] 2009/2008 was the last comment on both respectively [00:31] Is that wrong? [00:32] Date is not relevant to the validity of the bug [00:32] And it was asked that you tag them for someone else to review [00:33] ok what's the "Tag" for that then [00:33] obslete [00:33] please re-read the logs from the conversatioon [00:33] obsolete [00:34] (correct spelling) [00:34] Ok I don't see a status Option for "Obsolete" [00:36] Its not a status option [00:38] Ok then how do I "Add" it... [00:39] Just comment on it? [00:39] Do you see where it says 'Add tags'? [00:39] Gotta understand I've really no idea what this team/group "does" [00:39] we fix bugs against the ubuntu websites [00:40] Ah ok [00:40] but triaging is the same across the board [00:40] Yes now I see it [00:40] Strange that I've never noticed it before [00:40] Anyway, Obsolete-Please Review Tag added [00:43] that ok? [00:43] bug #49247 [00:43] Launchpad bug 49247 in ubuntu (and 1 other project) "Improve visability of localised Ubuntu websites (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49247 [00:44] Just use "obsolete" [00:44] however I don't see the tag [00:45] it doesnt look like you added it [00:45] I typed it in and clicked the check button [00:46] bug #49247 [00:46] Launchpad bug 49247 in ubuntu (and 1 other project) "Improve visability of localised Ubuntu websites (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49247 [00:46] There check it now [00:46] ya.. there wasnt anything there until I added it [00:47] ok [00:47] there you go [00:47] awesomeness [00:55] hey mhall119, I'll be arund for just a bit if you still need me [00:56] newz2000: just wondering if my status change on ubuntu website editors means anything [00:56] mhall119: it means we love the work you've been doing and trust you [00:57] oh, suckers [00:57] I mean, cool, thanks [00:57] :-) Thanks for all you've been doing [00:57] glad to [00:59] cjohnston, AlanBell: I have no expectation that the whole will magically look good with the new theme. That theme has been there since 2005 [00:59] And, frankly, we reused the content area css from our hand-coded sites and compared to those, django spits out garbage markup [00:59] heya's newz2000 [00:59] hey zkriesse, how's it going? [01:00] fine [01:00] good. Getting the hang of the bug stuff? [01:00] what's django doing wrong now? [01:00] mhall119: I don't know of any current issues [01:01] " compared to those, django spits out garbage markup" [01:01] oh, sorry [01:01] newz2000: I think so... I think cjohnston gave me some pointers that kicked it into gear [01:01] compared to those *MOIN* spits out garbage markup [01:01] oh, ok [01:01] zkriesse: yeah, the taggin stuff [01:01] it makes it real easy to find things. We can close them out real quick then [01:02] newz2000: Yes....strange that I never saw that "Tag" option before [01:03] I was just marking them as invalid....fortunately cjohnston caught me before I got to far [01:03] it's a new-ish feature and it doesn't really stand out [01:03] zkriesse: this is how we roll. Training wheels first. ;-) [01:03] hehehe [01:04] I usually just go right to two wheelers but this is carefull worked [01:04] "work [01:05] We're actually just in the last few months getting things figured out real well [01:05] huh, about since the time cjohnston started helping actually [01:05] huh [01:05] well thanks for having me [01:06] what are you saying? [01:06] who's saying what? [01:07] cjohnston: some freaky coincedence about how you came around and things magically got cleaned up around the sime time [01:07] hehe [01:08] training wheels? [01:08] I stood cjohnston on the deep-end of the loco-directory and pushed ;) [01:09] that's how I roll ;) [01:09] mhall119: :-) [01:11] yes you did [12:31] hey newz2000, since the ubuntu font is under an open source license that basically allows us to use it as a web font, do you (or do you think somebody) mind doing this? [12:31] i would like to make the wp-theme use it as a web-font [13:35] stas: that is in progress [13:37] stas: bug 655305 [13:37] Launchpad bug 655305 in ubuntu-font-family "font.ubuntu.com needs the font hosted for web embedding (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/655305 [13:47] AlanBell: thanks, didnt know about it :) [16:08] akgraner: hey, got a question for you on the redirect for the fridge [16:08] The IS team hasn't said "no" but they have wondered if you want a blind redirect, [16:08] vs. maybe creating an interstital page that says, "the fridge has changed, now it's …" [16:09] ooh, let me do this in #ubuntu-news instead [17:27] newz2000: Surely newz.ubuntu.com would be better? [17:27] jpds: hah [22:06] I am doing some wiki hacking at lp:~alanbell/ubuntu-website/light-moin-theme [22:06] got the new emoticons working so far :-) [22:06] AlanBell: Moin hacking can be a trying experience. [22:07] I'm here for emotional support if you need it. ;-) [22:07] the broken emoticons was quite educational [22:07] because icons = { lots of stuff } is overridden in light.py that breaks all the emoticons [22:08] yeah, I konw the code you're talking about [22:08] So di dyou just have to remove that from the light theme? [22:08] but as they needed redefining anyhow I just tacked them all on the end [22:08] oh, I see [22:08] that makes sense [22:09] I think it is probably sanest to keep the icon filenames as provided by the design team [22:24] on a bit of a roll, knocking out loadsa bugs here [22:31] If anybody disturbs Alan they will have to contend with me. He's on a roll. Go Alan go!