[00:06] <mhall119> newz2000: ping
[00:08] <zkriesse> g'day/evenin all
[00:25] <cjohnston> zkriesse: whats the reason bug 49247 and bug 87160 marked invalid?
[00:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 49247 in ubuntu (and 1 other project) "Improve visability of localised Ubuntu websites (heat: 2)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49247
[00:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 87160 in ubuntu-website "developerzone" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87160
[00:30] <zkriesse> the date of both
[00:31] <zkriesse> 2009/2008 was the last comment on both respectively
[00:31] <zkriesse> Is that wrong?
[00:32] <cjohnston> Date is not relevant to the validity of the bug
[00:32] <cjohnston> And it was asked that you tag them for someone else to review
[00:33] <zkriesse> ok what's the "Tag" for that then
[00:33] <cjohnston> obslete
[00:33] <cjohnston> please re-read the logs from the conversatioon
[00:33] <cjohnston> obsolete
[00:34] <cjohnston> (correct spelling)
[00:34] <zkriesse> Ok I don't see a status Option for "Obsolete"
[00:36] <cjohnston> Its not a status option
[00:38] <zkriesse> Ok then how do I "Add" it...
[00:39] <zkriesse> Just comment on it?
[00:39] <cjohnston> Do you see where it says 'Add tags'?
[00:39] <zkriesse> Gotta understand I've really no idea what this team/group "does"
[00:39] <cjohnston> we fix bugs against the ubuntu websites
[00:40] <zkriesse> Ah ok
[00:40] <cjohnston> but triaging is the same across the board
[00:40] <zkriesse> Yes now I see it
[00:40] <zkriesse> Strange that I've never noticed it before
[00:40] <zkriesse> Anyway, Obsolete-Please Review Tag added
[00:43] <zkriesse> that ok?
[00:43] <zkriesse> bug #49247
[00:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 49247 in ubuntu (and 1 other project) "Improve visability of localised Ubuntu websites (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49247
[00:44] <cjohnston> Just use "obsolete"
[00:44] <cjohnston> however I don't see the tag
[00:45] <cjohnston> it doesnt look like you added it
[00:45] <zkriesse> I typed it in and clicked the check button
[00:46] <zkriesse> bug #49247
[00:46] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 49247 in ubuntu (and 1 other project) "Improve visability of localised Ubuntu websites (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49247
[00:46] <zkriesse> There check it now
[00:46] <cjohnston> ya.. there wasnt anything there until I added it
[00:47] <cjohnston> ok
[00:47] <cjohnston> there you go
[00:47] <zkriesse> awesomeness
[00:55] <newz2000> hey mhall119, I'll be arund for just a bit if you still need me
[00:56] <mhall119> newz2000: just wondering if my status change on ubuntu website editors means anything
[00:56] <newz2000> mhall119: it means we love the work you've been doing and trust you
[00:57] <mhall119> oh, suckers
[00:57] <mhall119> I mean, cool, thanks
[00:57] <newz2000> :-) Thanks for all you've been doing
[00:57] <mhall119> glad to
[00:59] <newz2000> cjohnston, AlanBell: I have no expectation that the whole will magically look good with the new theme. That theme has been there since 2005
[00:59] <newz2000> And, frankly, we reused the content area css from our hand-coded sites and compared to those, django spits out garbage markup
[00:59] <zkriesse> heya's newz2000
[00:59] <newz2000> hey zkriesse, how's it going?
[01:00] <zkriesse> fine
[01:00] <newz2000> good. Getting the hang of the bug stuff?
[01:00] <mhall119> what's django doing wrong now?
[01:00] <newz2000> mhall119: I don't know of any current issues
[01:01] <mhall119> " compared to those, django spits out garbage markup"
[01:01] <newz2000> oh, sorry
[01:01] <zkriesse> newz2000: I think so... I think cjohnston gave me some pointers that kicked it into gear
[01:01] <newz2000> compared to those *MOIN* spits out garbage markup
[01:01] <mhall119> oh, ok
[01:01] <newz2000> zkriesse: yeah, the taggin stuff
[01:01] <newz2000> it makes it real easy to find things. We can close them out real quick then
[01:02] <zkriesse> newz2000: Yes....strange that I never saw that "Tag" option before
[01:03] <zkriesse> I was just marking them as invalid....fortunately cjohnston caught me before I got to far
[01:03] <newz2000> it's a new-ish feature and it doesn't really stand out
[01:03] <newz2000> zkriesse: this is how we roll. Training wheels first. ;-)
[01:03] <zkriesse> hehehe
[01:04] <zkriesse> I usually just go right to two wheelers but this is carefull worked
[01:04] <zkriesse> "work
[01:05] <newz2000> We're actually just in the last few months getting things figured out real well
[01:05] <newz2000> huh, about since the time cjohnston started helping actually
[01:05] <zkriesse> huh
[01:05] <zkriesse> well thanks for having me
[01:06] <cjohnston> what are you saying?
[01:06] <zkriesse> who's saying what?
[01:07] <newz2000> cjohnston: some freaky coincedence about how you came around and things magically got cleaned up around the sime time
[01:07] <cjohnston> hehe
[01:08] <mhall119> training wheels?
[01:08] <mhall119> I stood cjohnston on the deep-end of the loco-directory and pushed ;)
[01:09] <mhall119> that's how I roll ;)
[01:09] <newz2000> mhall119: :-)
[01:11] <cjohnston> yes you did
[12:31] <stas> hey newz2000, since the ubuntu font is under an open source license that basically allows us to use it as a web font, do you (or do you think somebody) mind doing this?
[12:31] <stas> i would like to make the wp-theme use it as a web-font
[13:35] <AlanBell> stas: that is in progress
[13:37] <AlanBell> stas: bug 655305
[13:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 655305 in ubuntu-font-family "font.ubuntu.com needs the font hosted for web embedding (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/655305
[13:47] <stas> AlanBell: thanks, didnt know about it :)
[16:08] <newz2000> akgraner: hey, got a question for you on the redirect for the fridge
[16:08] <newz2000> The IS team hasn't said "no" but they have wondered if you want a blind redirect,
[16:08] <newz2000> vs. maybe creating an interstital page that says, "the fridge has changed, now it's …"
[16:09] <newz2000> ooh, let me do this in #ubuntu-news instead
[17:27] <jpds> newz2000: Surely newz.ubuntu.com would be better?
[17:27] <newz2000> jpds: hah
[22:06] <AlanBell> I am doing some wiki hacking at lp:~alanbell/ubuntu-website/light-moin-theme
[22:06] <AlanBell> got the new emoticons working so far :-)
[22:06] <newz2000> AlanBell: Moin hacking can be a trying experience.
[22:07] <newz2000> I'm here for emotional support if you need it. ;-)
[22:07] <AlanBell> the broken emoticons was quite educational
[22:07] <AlanBell> because icons = { lots of stuff } is overridden in light.py that breaks all the emoticons
[22:08] <newz2000> yeah, I konw the code you're talking about
[22:08] <newz2000> So di dyou just have to remove that from the light theme?
[22:08] <AlanBell> but as they needed redefining anyhow I just tacked them all on the end
[22:08] <newz2000> oh, I see
[22:08] <newz2000> that makes sense
[22:09] <AlanBell> I think it is probably sanest to keep the icon filenames as provided by the design team
[22:24] <AlanBell> on a bit of a roll, knocking out loadsa bugs here
[22:31] <newz2000> If anybody disturbs Alan they will have to contend with me. He's on a roll. Go Alan go!