[09:24] <jml> hello
[09:29] <wgrant> Evening.
[09:30] <jml> I am sitting next to the people who are this very moment working on releasing Ubuntu
[09:30] <jml> it's exciting
[09:32] <wgrant> Excellent.
[09:32] <wgrant> Launchpad hasn't broken yet?
[09:34] <jml> not that I know of
[09:34] <jml> but I'm around all day in case it does
[09:35] <jml> it turns out that when you take twenty computers away from the build farm, the build queue starts to build up
[09:35] <thumper> jml: good luck
[09:35] <wgrant> Although this barely counts as building up.
[09:36] <jml> thumper: thanks.
[09:36]  * thumper is back tomorrow
[09:36] <thumper> although I've been thinking I'd like longer off
[09:36] <thumper> life a few years
[09:36] <jml> wgrant: it's a brave new world
[09:36] <jml> thumper: a few years off would be nice
[09:36] <thumper> but I've got bills to pay
[09:36] <wgrant> I expect some explosions from i-f-p, but I guess we'll see.
[09:38] <jml> now that shipit is not the same thing as Launchpad, I think we're going to be alright
[09:38] <jml> but, touch wood
[09:38] <wgrant> The DB split has happened?
[09:39] <jml> not afaik, but the app servers are split
[09:39] <wgrant> True.
[09:41] <jml> time for a cup of the brown muck that comes out of the espresso machine
[09:45] <thumper> jml: how's the press ups going?
[09:45] <jml> thumper: lousy
[09:46] <jml> thumper: only being able to do three at a time being the root cause
[09:46] <thumper> so you need to do 20 sets?
[09:46] <jml> but aggravated by working in the office a lot recently
[09:46] <thumper> what?
[09:46] <thumper> people not dropping to do pressups all the time?
[09:47] <jml> no. they seem to be worried about releasing this Ooboo-thingy
[09:48] <thumper> surely they have time between builds and things :)
[09:48] <jml> heh
[09:48] <jml> although other office worker's are managing, it seems, so it's no excuse
[09:48] <jml> s/'//
[09:58] <mwhudson> i have managed about 10 so far i think
[10:18] <thumper> mwhudson: I've noticed that you've not updated the wiki :)
[10:18] <thumper> I was going to hassle you tomorrow about it
[10:21] <mwhudson> yeah, i keep forgetting
[10:44] <wgrant> Where is SSO support these days?
[10:45] <wgrant> All links have mysteriously vanished.
[10:47] <jml> I don't know.
[19:08] <lifeless> moin
[21:05] <mwhudson> good morning
[21:13] <thumper> morning
[21:14] <lifeless> hi thumper
[21:14] <thumper> hi rob
[21:29] <thumper> we are in release freeze now aren't we?
[21:29] <thumper> lifeless: anything particularly interesting happen last week that I should know about?
[21:30] <lifeless> yes
[21:31] <lifeless> we had to rollback the branchrevision patch
[21:31] <lifeless> it was going to take 3 hours to run
[21:31] <lifeless> I have some ideas for how we might get it done for november
[21:32] <thumper> lifeless: just the db patch?
[21:32] <thumper> all the code should still run fine
[21:32] <lifeless> thumper: the primary one is: create a new table, branchrevision2, which we don't query, but we insert all the same data into, and modify the code to keep totally up to date. Have a garbo job sync them up, and then during downtime rename branchrevision2 to branchrevision.
[21:33] <thumper> lifeless: I'd love to hear how we can do it
[21:33] <lifeless> thumper: I reverted the db-devel commit
[21:33] <lifeless> thumper: if that was more than the db patch, then more was reverted
[21:33] <thumper> arse
[21:33] <thumper> there is much more than just the db patch there
[21:33] <thumper> well
[21:33] <thumper> not much more
[21:33] <thumper> but more than just the patch
[21:34] <thumper> the rest was test fallout
[21:34] <thumper> lifeless: I plan to spend some of this cycle working out how to store less in the branchrevision table
[21:34] <lifeless> thumper: have you spoken with jam yet?
[21:34] <thumper> lifeless: I had planned to before I took a break but didn't
[21:34] <lifeless> no worries
[21:34] <thumper> I plan on catching up with him early this week
[21:47] <lifeless> cool
[22:10] <jml> lifeless: thanks for the review.
[22:12] <lifeless> de nada
[22:13] <jml> lifeless: do you want to see it again before it lands?
[22:14] <jml> with any luck I'll be able to delete a couple of layers and a pile of test boilerplate from Launchpad once we're using a more recent testtools
[22:14] <jml> lifeless: I'd appreciate your thoughts on https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/testtools/+bug/657780 too
[22:14] <_mup_> Bug #657780: Per-test decorator syntax for test runner <testtools:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/657780>
[22:16] <jml> anyway, I'm off. so amazingly tired.
[22:18] <lifeless> jml: will look at that bug
[22:19] <lifeless> if you make radical changes
[22:19] <lifeless> or if you'd like me to look at the tests in detail, then I'm happy to review it again
[22:19] <lifeless> otherwise I say JFDI
[22:21] <lifeless> jml: ^
[22:46] <lifeless> man, its cold n wet today
[22:51]  * thumper goes to make a coffee before wallyworld turns up
[23:02] <wallyworld> morning
[23:03] <thumper> wallyworld: morning
[23:03] <wallyworld> thumper: welcome back, let me know if you want to skype sometime
[23:04] <thumper> wallyworld: I do, and soonish
[23:04] <wallyworld> ok, you know where i am
[23:20] <lifeless> losa ping
[23:21] <lifeless> losa unping
[23:21] <spm> :-)
[23:35] <thumper> wallyworld: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jameinel/launchpad/lp-service/+merge/37531