[02:26] Quick question for anyone out there... [02:26] I am attempting to compile a package that is looking for an older version of a dependency. [02:26] The package is looking for “hal 0.5.10”; however, I have “hal 0.5.14” installed on my system. [02:27] Can someone provide me with some pointers on how to upgrade a dependency within a package? [02:28] what's in the Build-Depends line in debian/control ? [02:30] Riddell: checking now [02:32] actually I am not sure where this information is located.. I did a grep on the source code and I do not see it [02:32] Riddell: where should I look for this ? [02:33] kmckinney: are you actually building a package or building an application's source code you've downloaded? [02:34] I am building the source code for package gnome-device-manager [02:34] I eventually want to upgrade this package from hal to udev and fix several bugs that have been reported [02:37] also - I am still a newbie to Ubuntu development.. [02:44] well I'm not a gnome user but I thought gnome-device-manager was obsolete [02:46] Riddell: it is obsolete but I am trying to bring it back to life. [02:46] If I can successfully upgrade the package to use udev instead of hal this will give it life again [02:47] #ubuntu-app-devel for application development on Ubuntu [02:47] Riddell: thanks [02:47] kmckinney: ping someone in upstream GNOME [02:48] I don't recall if that app is going to still be around or whatever [02:48] but porting it to udev should happen upstream anyway [02:48] jcastro: who should I chat with about this? [02:48] check out the gnome desktop devel list. [02:49] ok [02:49] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list [02:49] that should get you started [02:49] ok [02:49] thanks [02:49] cheers === asac_ is now known as asac [08:43] kenvandine: please reupload empathy with a bug reference [09:45] morning folks [09:59] morning sabdfl [10:01] morning ivanka, fagan [10:02] morning sabdfl [10:17] aloha [10:20] morning czajkowski [10:35] pitti, mvo, you guys around hanging around at all? [10:44] rickspencer3: yes, I am [10:44] at least until 10:10 UTC :) [10:45] pitti, what happens then? [10:45] rickspencer3: well, the 10.10 announcement, I hope? :-) [10:45] * rickspencer3 sips puts on sun glasses [11:12] pitti, mvo well? [11:13] yippieee! [11:13] ROCK [11:13] spot landing! [11:13] #u-r-p is just crazy [11:13] fun to watch every time again [11:13] * mvo takes a fine cup of tea to celebrate [11:14] yay [11:24] robbiew: nice time stamp [11:34] ok guys, time to start working on Natty! [11:34] ;) [11:34] * rickspencer3 whip cracking noises [11:34] rickspencer3: can't, not open yet :) [11:34] * pitti waves and wishes everyone a nice Sunday [11:34] pitti, check again [11:34] :) [11:34] bye pitti! [11:34] time for sun and hike! [11:35] rickspencer3: ah, LP bug; it's not on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu, but queues do exist apparently [11:35] cu tomorrow [11:35] elmo just opened Natty :) [11:35] bye pitti [11:35] rickspencer3: have a save travel home [11:36] I'll see you Tuesday, traveling tomorrow [11:36] 61 release parties taking place from today onwards [11:36] good work, guys. [11:37] nice [11:37] aquarius, you too! === doko__ is now known as doko [11:55] pitti: did you get the torrent fixed? [11:57] aquarius: The new version of python-vte that was uploaded to -proposed today fixes the $TERM not set issue. [12:01] sense, yay! [12:02] indeed [12:02] am way sick of typing export TERM=xterm into guake windows :) [12:03] So was I. Thanks to Mathieu Trudel not anymore! [12:03] so it'll be srued? [12:03] -proposed means it was srued right? [12:04] aquarius: I'm not familiar with the SRU-process, all I know is that it is in maverick-proposed already. [12:04] sweet. that'll do me :) [12:04] worst comes to worst I can alwys just yank the deb :) [12:05] yeah [12:10] sense, am not seeing a new python-vte in http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick-proposed/ [12:11] *** 1:0.26.0-0ubuntu2 0 [12:11] 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-proposed/main amd64 Packages [12:11] That's what I've got here. [12:12] oh, it's in main. d'oh :) [12:12] Yes it is! [12:13] installing :) [12:14] hrm, guake still complaining about TERM not being set :( [12:15] restarted? [12:16] ya, killed guake and restarted it [12:16] that ought to be enough [12:16] yeah [12:16] That is strange. [12:16] although I only installed the new python-vte and not a new vte (because it doesn't seem to depend on a newer vte, so I assume it doesn't need it) [12:17] aquarius: I think it does. The Python bindings work by calling the functions in the C library. [12:17] So you need the new library as well. [12:17] ah [12:17] then it probably ought to depend on the newer version :) [12:18] Well, the Pyhton bindings work without the new C library, the bug just isn't fixed in that case. [12:18] fair [12:18] installing new libvte [12:19] yay! fixed! [12:19] yay! [12:19] * aquarius does a little dance [12:21] Great! [12:24] good man. I never would have thought to check -proposed :) [12:25] :) [12:33] hrm. libqt4-multimedia isn't in maverick. Who would know about that, I wonder? === robbiew is now known as robbiew_ [13:55] aquarius: probably not anyone on a gtk channel :) [13:55] aquarius: upstream replaced it with libqtmultimediakit1 [13:55] although anyone who cares will recommend still using phonon [13:58] pitti, uploaded [14:22] Riddell, aha, cool, I'm glad you're around :) The reason I ask is that I have a lucid third-party package that depends on libqt-multimedia, which obviously won't install on mav since libqt-multimedia isn't there, and I wondered what I'd do to fix it :) [14:23] aquarius: recompile it to use qtmultimediakit I suppose, the API is much the same [14:24] Riddell, k, cheers. I have nudged the upstream people to do a 10.10 package (they have lucid in their ppa, but no mav ppa) [14:24] I didn't know there were any actual qtmultimedia uses out there, it's a badly written and pointless module === bilalakhtar_ is now known as bilalakhtar [15:47] nigelb: no, seems it's blocked on my end (ISP) [16:03] Great Work for 10.10.10 everyone :) [16:04] pitti: hrm, it didn't work for me for 10 mins [16:04] worked later [23:00] Hey robert_ancell, welcome back. [23:01] TheMuso, hey, good to be back! [23:11] ...except for the email backlog.