| vishwa_ti | Hi folks | 08:00 |
|---|---|---|
| amitk | Guys, is this cpu to old to support acpi-cpufreq ? http://pastebin.com/nti2sKSZ | 08:00 |
| amitk | vishwa_ti has this problem | 08:00 |
| amitk | apw: lag: ^ | 08:01 |
| === diwic is now known as diwic_afk | ||
| slangasek | so would anyone here like to have the mini-PCIe card to blame for bug #654937? iwlagn replacement card is now on order :) | 08:03 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 654937 in linux (Ubuntu) "r8192se_pci: rtl8191SEVA2 fails to transmit certain mumble packets (affects: 1) (heat: 497)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/654937 | 08:03 |
| slangasek | (also, bug #655769) | 08:03 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 655769 in linux (Ubuntu) "running powertop with r8192se_pci module loaded results in a kernel panic (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/655769 | 08:03 |
| amitk | vishwa_ti: btw, do you have speedstep settings in your bios enabled (if any?) | 08:04 |
| vishwa_ti | amitk: I have done any settings explicitly..is it disabled by default? | 08:06 |
| amitk | vishwa_ti: depending on how old the machine is, it might be | 08:06 |
| vishwa_ti | amitk: let me check that | 08:07 |
| lag | amitk: WGT http://pastebin.com/nti2sKSZ - you need to speak with cking | 08:07 |
| lag | He shouldn't be too long | 08:07 |
| amitk | lag: true, thanks | 08:08 |
| lag | amitk: vishwa_ti: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cpufrequtils#Intel | 08:09 |
| lag | Seems to answer your question | 08:09 |
| amitk | lag: IIRC we compile-in all drivers (and link them in order of preference), so if it isn't getting auto-loaded there is a chance that it isn't supported | 08:12 |
| lag | amitk: This may well be true | 08:14 |
| * smb yawns | 08:14 | |
| lag | amitk: But as a debugging exercise vishwa_ti could at least give it a go | 08:14 |
| lag | amitk: So I'm guessing that the module isn't being loaded automatically then? | 08:15 |
| lag | Morning smb | 08:15 |
| smb | morning | 08:15 |
| vishwa_ti | I enabled speedstep settings in bios..still I do not see acpi-cpufreq | 08:16 |
| amitk | lag: there is no 'module' since it is compiled-in. And /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_driver is read-only. So I don't think we can force it from sysfs. THere is perhaps a command-line parameter to force cpufreq driver... | 08:17 |
| amitk | vishwa_ti: you won't see anything in lsmod. Check /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_driver | 08:17 |
| lag | amitk: Let me have a look | 08:17 |
| vishwa_ti | ya now I see acpi-cpufreq when I cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_driver | 08:17 |
| amitk | vishwa_ti: \o/ you're set! You should also see ondemand now | 08:18 |
| vishwa_ti | yep.. | 08:18 |
| * amitk packs up | 08:18 | |
| lag | :) | 08:18 |
| amitk | thanks lag | 08:19 |
| lag | amitk: np | 08:19 |
| vishwa_ti | thanks a lot amitk, lag | 08:19 |
| lag | vishwa_ti: You're very welcome | 08:20 |
| apw | slangasek, i am sure tim will want it | 08:27 |
| lucent | I'm the guy posting about firewire device and data corruption on the mail list :) | 08:29 |
| lucent | eager to test patches I heard mentioned | 08:30 |
| TeTeT | apw: Hi, can I get your help with getting an SRU done for bug 586325? Our customer LVM is waiting for the patch to appear in an official kernel since quite a while | 08:30 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 586325 in linux (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 2 other projects) "[i965q] Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo E: changing resolution results in non working X (affects: 1) (heat: 40)" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/586325 | 08:30 |
| === diwic_afk is now known as diwic | ||
| smb | lucent, I believe it was manjo saying he had patches. Though his day begins later | 08:31 |
| lucent | smb: thanks! good to know | 08:32 |
| apw | TeTeT, looking | 08:37 |
| lag | lucent: I believe he's going to update bug 657081 when he has a kernel ready | 08:53 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 657081 in linux (Ubuntu) "New firewire stack unreliable with Texas Instruments TSB82AA2 IEEE-1394b (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/657081 | 08:53 |
| lucent | I'm excited :) | 08:54 |
| apw | smb, launchpad working [sic] for you ? | 09:09 |
| apw | seems more broken than usual for me | 09:10 |
| smb | apw, It works for me as much as I use it currently (which is not at all) | 09:10 |
| JFo | it is failing for me more than normal | 09:11 |
| diwic | apw, I think we need to report these things to Marjo so he'll get feedback from more than my (limited) experience of LP | 09:11 |
| JFo | marjo isn't able to help this | 09:11 |
| JFo | this needs to be reported to Francis I imagine | 09:11 |
| smb | apw, Hm, it seems to bring up bug reports I had been looking at in the past, but this is not a very conclusive teste | 09:11 |
| apw | not getting timeouts even so i assume its in a HEAP | 09:12 |
| * JFo tries something | 09:12 | |
| smb | apw, I assume you stopped going to edge | 09:12 |
| diwic | JFo, if Marjo is our representative, it'll be good for him with more than the one example I gave him of LP failure | 09:12 |
| JFo | ah yes, that bit is true | 09:13 |
| apw | well the link i was using was a raw link so to 'non-edge' in the first instant | 09:13 |
| apw | it has now switched over to edge, so its make progress, at a glacial pace | 09:13 |
| smb | apw, At the moment at least for the bug report I tried the reload time seemed reasonable | 09:13 |
| smb | apw, whicht link do you try | 09:14 |
| apw | https://launchpad.net/bugs/657081 | 09:14 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 657081 in linux (Ubuntu) "New firewire stack unreliable with Texas Instruments TSB82AA2 IEEE-1394b (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 09:14 |
| smb | report is up here | 09:14 |
| apw | ok that one works | 09:14 |
| apw | https://launchpad.net/bugs/586325 | 09:14 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 586325 in linux (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 2 other projects) "[i965q] Fujitsu Siemens Esprimo E: changing resolution results in non working X (affects: 1) (heat: 40)" [Undecided,Triaged] | 09:14 |
| apw | and that one doesn't seem to ... wtf | 09:14 |
| smb | apw, done | 09:15 |
| diwic | never underestimate Murphy's law | 09:15 |
| apw | double wtf | 09:15 |
| smb | apw, I can even see the last of the 118 comments | 09:15 |
| smb | apw, One would not believe that I am farther away from it | 09:16 |
| apw | finally got the content... what is up with this thing | 09:16 |
| smb | apw, Maybe you looked at too many bugs and now got bandwith controlled because clearly you are a bot. :-P | 09:18 |
| apw | heh nothing would supprise me anymore | 09:18 |
| TeTeT | lol | 09:19 |
| lag | smb: bug 22070 | 09:29 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 22070 in linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 8 other projects) "Logitech Quickcam Messenger is not usable (affects: 15) (dups: 3) (heat: 140)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22070 | 09:29 |
| lag | Ignore the 2.6.20 | 09:30 |
| lag | This is a current Lucid bug | 09:30 |
| bo | apw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/658789 | 09:49 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 658789 in xorg (Ubuntu) "black screen on sony vpccww1, nouveau on nvidiagt230m, maverick. External hdmi monitor works (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 09:49 |
| apw | bo to | 09:50 |
| apw | ta | 09:50 |
| bo | ? | 09:52 |
| apw | TeTeT, do you have kit to test this resolution bug ? | 09:54 |
| apw | the patch does not backport trivially and so will require testing before we can SRU it | 09:54 |
| TeTeT | apw: yes, I do have an Esprimo E here | 09:55 |
| TeTeT | apw: smb provided me with a patched kernel back in June, this runs in production now at the customers site. but they have missed the last updates of the kernel cause of this | 09:56 |
| apw | smb, you have a backport of that resolution patch already ? | 09:57 |
| smb | TeTeT, Hm, was that when I just made something compile for you or picked in the patch myself...? I fail to remember now | 09:58 |
| smb | apw, I would need to check, seems like an awfully long time ago | 09:59 |
| lucent | ...in a galaxy far far away | 09:59 |
| TeTeT | smb: not sure what you did, I know I failed with the kernel due to the abi bump | 09:59 |
| apw | there is no mention of your involvement in the bug | 09:59 |
| TeTeT | apw: he just setup the kernel for me so it would compile in a PPA | 09:59 |
| smb | TeTeT, Then it is probably the thing were I just made the kernel compile in some way but had not really looked into what was added to it | 10:00 |
| TeTeT | apw: this is the PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~tspindler/+archive/ubuntu-kernel-lvm | 10:00 |
| apw | TeTeT, do you have a source tree for that somewhere? so i can see what version of the patch was tested ? | 10:01 |
| TeTeT | apw: I'm afraid I deleted that tree a long time ago due to space constraints. I check if I have it as an email somewhere, at least the patch | 10:13 |
| apw | TeTeT, ok so the testing on that is moot then as we don't know if its the same patch, its likely not to be honest as it is so old | 10:14 |
| TeTeT | apw: ok, but testing should not be a problem. The customer has a test lab with T61, x61 and the Esprimo E setup to check | 10:16 |
| apw | TeTeT, i am somewhat supprised this is something they hit often | 10:17 |
| TeTeT | apw: they have a Java application that only runs in 1024x768, this is why a lot of their employees switch between resolutions. They come from RH and it used to work there | 10:18 |
| apw | TeTeT, and you said you had the affected machine too? so you could pre-test it before sending a test to the customer ? | 10:18 |
| TeTeT | apw: yes, I can test it on a T61 to make sure it's not breaking anything else and on the Esprimo E | 10:19 |
| apw | ok cool. i'll get you some test kernels shortly | 10:19 |
| TeTeT | apw: this is the patch I sent to smb: https://pastebin.canonical.com/38506/ | 10:20 |
| TeTeT | apw: can resend the email if you want | 10:20 |
| apw | TeTeT, its close to the current version, and we want that latest one tested anyhow as that is the official upstream solution | 10:23 |
| * apw feels all sneezy ... damn that steve | 10:33 | |
| smb | Nothing as annoying as catching the cold from your colleagues... | 10:34 |
| apw | indeed | 10:34 |
| apw | smb are we aware of any issues mounting root, with lsi h/w ? | 10:50 |
| apw | (for lucid) | 10:50 |
| apw | possibly with a udev segfault ? | 10:51 |
| smb | apw, I am aware of certain newer controllers not being supported at all and potential multipath issues. But failing to moint root, not yet | 10:51 |
| apw | claims of 'changes to sysfs layout breaking udev' ... no evidence as such tho. | 10:51 |
| smb | apw, any hinting to changing sysfs between what and lucid? | 10:52 |
| smb | not aware of a change that would change the sysfs layout whithin the stable release | 10:52 |
| apw | me either, i suspect its utter conjecture ... asking them to file a bug | 10:53 |
| apw | TeTeT, ok i've put a link to the kernels in the bug | 11:05 |
| TeTeT | apw: thanks, I'll try these today | 11:09 |
| apw | smb, the patch (untested) for that issue is here: http://people.canonical.com/~apw/lp586325-lucid/0001-drm-i915-Unset-cursor-if-out-of-bounds-upon-mode-cha.patch | 11:10 |
| smb | apw, Ok, thanks. I will add it to the next round of proposals for drm33 stable updates | 11:11 |
| JFo | back on after a while, I must sleep a bit. | 12:07 |
| === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero | ||
| === bladernr is now known as bladernr_ | ||
| === ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === cmagina is now known as cmagina-afk | ||
| apw | smb, you need to mark your blueprints as a 'series goal' of natty | 14:40 |
| apw | (now that natty exists :)) | 14:41 |
| smb | apw, Ok, will do so in a minute or two. Thanks. :) | 14:41 |
| === cmagina-afk is now known as cmagina | ||
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
| tgardner | apw, do we need CONFIG_INIT_PASS_ALL_PARAMS=y in the natty enforcer? | 15:16 |
| apw | tgardner, i recon so yes | 15:17 |
| apw | tgardner, shall i shove that in before i close hthis puppy | 15:18 |
| tgardner | apw, sure | 15:19 |
| tgardner | just so we don't forget | 15:19 |
| === diwic is now known as diwic_afk | ||
| tgardner | apw, am also thinking we should drop armel from natty for now | 15:21 |
| tgardner | natty master, that is | 15:22 |
| apw | tgardner, ok can do | 15:22 |
| apw | will that render the ISOs unbuildable, ie. do we need to move those out to a new branch in short order | 15:22 |
| tgardner | apw, hmm, how do we get a linux-libc-dev in place though? | 15:22 |
| apw | well there is one now, from the previous version | 15:22 |
| apw | we'll use that to build ourselves | 15:23 |
| apw | as much as we rely on it, which is basically not at all | 15:23 |
| apw | or did you mean for arm | 15:23 |
| tgardner | apw, right. I'm not too worried about ISO building just yet. lets sort which branches we're gonna carry going forward. | 15:23 |
| apw | iirc we carried just the linux-libc-dev for armel in master, ie. it built from there | 15:24 |
| tgardner | apw, thats my recollection as well | 15:24 |
| apw | Package: SRCPKGNAME-libc-dev | 15:25 |
| apw | Architecture: i386 amd64 lpia ia64 powerpc sparc armel | 15:25 |
| apw | from lucid | 15:25 |
| tgardner | apw, I was thinking more about dropping the development arm flavours for now. leave versatile for qemu. | 15:26 |
| apw | that sounds acceptable, and easy to test | 15:26 |
| apw | i guess most of them will come in in at least some form from linaro anyhow | 15:27 |
| tgardner | apw, yep, I'm gonna try to get Rigby to do all the work | 15:27 |
| tgardner | for the master kernel version at least | 15:27 |
| apw | do we need to be having a session/part of a session on arm or do we assume others will cover that | 15:28 |
| apw | and we can just rock up and say no :) | 15:28 |
| tgardner | I suppose we should talk to them about it, huh? | 15:28 |
| cking | apw, here's a graph of the write rate as the head moves across the disc: http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/write-rates.png | 15:28 |
| apw | i guess we can add it to our agenda for the 'flavours' one | 15:29 |
| apw | cking, those regular up-ticks are unexpected | 15:29 |
| bjf | tgardner, are you expecting the stable team to pick up the linaro pull requests now? | 15:29 |
| tgardner | bjf, I was just test building it. but for the future I've no strong preference. Guess we should decide. | 15:30 |
| tgardner | I've sorta been covering the arm bases | 15:30 |
| cking | apw, why? it's a mechanical, surely you can expect perfect linear I/O transfer rate | 15:31 |
| apw | i assume you mean 'can't' | 15:31 |
| apw | not expecting perfection, by my brain says there is a periodic uptick | 15:32 |
| apw | three showing on there, and wondering whether they are real | 15:32 |
| apw | or just noise | 15:32 |
| apw | 3 maybe 4 | 15:32 |
| cking | apw, I've got finer grained data to work on, I could shove it into a fft and see if there are any underlying harmonics | 15:32 |
| apw | :) | 15:33 |
| cking | could be because somebody walked passed the machine and this disturbed the heads slightly ;-) | 15:33 |
| cking | urgh, nearly time for tooth extraction. | 15:34 |
| smb | apw, Are you still on the specs document. Clicked on edit to change a link and saw you have a lock there | 15:37 |
| apw | smb, hrm not sure i think i have | 15:38 |
| smb | apw, OK, I aborted. Just to let you know, stable process is clearly hardware and not devprocess ;-) | 15:39 |
| apw | smb, nope when i dit the Specs page it says i don't have a lock | 15:39 |
| apw | smb, what they moved it _again_ ? | 15:39 |
| apw | someone needs to fix the system so we don't have to rename the damn things every time someone changes their mind | 15:39 |
| smb | If it worked before then yes. Or was a typo there | 15:39 |
| === cking is now known as cking-afk | ||
| === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks | ||
| === diwic_afk is now known as diwic | ||
| apw | tgardner, are we calling the first upload -1 or -0 | 16:01 |
| tgardner | apw, don't care. the current ABI number is fine. | 16:01 |
| apw | tgardner, ack | 16:02 |
| hermes | Fellow Programmers, I am a Linux Enthusiast and I am inclined towards system programming. I am looking forward to contributing in whatever way possible towards the Kernel. Could anyone help me getting started? | 16:23 |
| bjf | hermes, http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel | 16:25 |
| === cking-afk is now known as cking | ||
| hermes | bjf: I think I want to precisely ask like, would I have access like to the current issues or bugs in kernel and could I try to get my hands dirty and submit a patch for evaluation | 16:26 |
| hermes | bjf: Or like a team who work on something, and I could get involved to contribute with them | 16:27 |
| apw | all of our bugs are public, as is our mailing list, and all contributions are welcome | 16:27 |
| hermes | apw: great | 16:28 |
| bjf | hermes, JFo can help you get going on looking at bugs | 16:29 |
| hermes | bjf: thats is great, I would want a little help initially to get set myself up | 16:31 |
| bjf | ogasawara, you have some stable release patches queued for maverick somewhere? you planning on pushing those today? | 16:39 |
| ogasawara | bjf: yep, I've got them ready to push. just wanted to double check with you guys first that it's ok | 16:40 |
| ogasawara | bjf: I've also already build and boot tested | 16:40 |
| ogasawara | bjf: then I think I can officially hand off the Maverick git repo to you guys | 16:40 |
| bjf | ogasawara, good for me, i think it's cool with sconklin and smb | 16:40 |
| * smb is cool 8he thinks) | 16:40 | |
| tgardner | ogasawara, aren't you officially on stable duty for the next while? | 16:40 |
| ogasawara | tgardner: yep, but will go through sconklin for that | 16:41 |
| tgardner | ack | 16:41 |
| AndChat| | I kno u guys r busy but I've got an issue in the kernel i'd like to shine some light on | 16:43 |
| apw | AndChat|, you'd need to elucidate | 16:44 |
| AndChat| | http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1593695 | 16:44 |
| AndChat| | Basicly myth hangs when using dvb module cx23885 to tune channels causing kernel oops | 16:49 |
| ogasawara | bjf, smb, sconklin: pushed 2.6.35.5, 2.6.35.6, and 2.6.35.7 patch sets to Maverick tip | 16:50 |
| bjf | ogasawara, cool, thanks | 16:50 |
| smb | ogasawara, I am probably throwing myself behind the train but did those have tracking bugs? | 16:51 |
| hermes | bjf: Should I ask JFo personally or shud I ask him here | 16:51 |
| ogasawara | smb: yep, lemme find them real quick | 16:51 |
| ogasawara | bug 645522 | 16:52 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 645522 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "Maverick update to 2.6.35.5 stable release (affects: 2) (heat: 199)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/645522 | 16:52 |
| ogasawara | bug 649208 | 16:52 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 649208 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "Maverick update to 2.6.35.6 stable release (affects: 2) (heat: 392)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/649208 | 16:52 |
| ogasawara | bug 651425 | 16:52 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 651425 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "Maverick update to 2.6.35.7 stable release (affects: 1) (heat: 498)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/651425 | 16:52 |
| sconklin1 | Cable company is here to install my faster network. It shouldn't cause an outage . . . . but if I drop away that's why | 16:52 |
| bjf | hermes, here is good a good start | 16:52 |
| tgardner | smb, behind the the train ? | 16:52 |
| ogasawara | tgardner: heh, I guess that's better than in front of it :) | 16:53 |
| smb | ogasawara, cool, just wanted to make sure we got them to add to the changelog | 16:53 |
| hermes | bjf: alright | 16:53 |
| ogasawara | smb: I added them as BugLinks to the commits which update the version | 16:53 |
| smb | tgardner, ogasawara, right but if the purpose is to stop it... well probably as useless to throw one before than after. :) | 16:54 |
| tgardner | ah, I get it. | 16:54 |
| hermes | I am fairly new to the kernel programming, but I have a keen inclination towards systems programming. | 16:55 |
| hermes | Could anyone suggest me what shoud I start looking at | 16:55 |
| hermes | JFo: if you could help me get started I would appreciate than man | 16:55 |
| sconklin1 | hermes: a good first set of tasks are just to pull the kernel source from the distribution git repositories and build it locally | 17:02 |
| === sconklin1 is now known as sconklin | ||
| bjf | apw, tgardner do we have a start of an agenda for the mini-sprint in boston after uds? | 17:08 |
| === diwic is now known as diwic_afk | ||
| apw | bjf, i've not put anything anywhere yet, though we did have something ... | 17:28 |
| apw | i think there is a spot for the agenda on the wiki page though | 17:28 |
| apw | tgardner, is there a trick to getting the chroot builder scripts to work? the config perhaps? i am not getting any deb or deb-src lines in my /etc/apt/sources.list | 17:29 |
| apw | specifically for armel | 17:29 |
| tgardner | apw, which chroot flavour? | 17:29 |
| apw | armel for maverick | 17:30 |
| apw | as made by a make_release | 17:30 |
| tgardner | sdhould be 'sudo ./make_chroot maverick armel' | 17:30 |
| apw | where does POCKETS get set ? | 17:30 |
| === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk | ||
| tgardner | it tries to figure out if you are me, pete, then defaults to the regular mirror | 17:31 |
| apw | i'm running it with my own on the command line | 17:31 |
| tgardner | kteam-tools/chroot-setup/scripts/chroot-defs.conf | 17:31 |
| tgardner | function get_pockets () | 17:31 |
| apw | tgardner, yeah gets passed that | 17:32 |
| apw | yet behaves as if it does nto contain 'release' | 17:32 |
| tgardner | apw, hmm, etc/sources.list is trashed? | 17:32 |
| apw | tgardner, yeah its empty, present but empty | 17:33 |
| tgardner | uh, thats not cool | 17:34 |
| apw | tgardner, i guess i get to debug it :/ | 17:34 |
| tgardner | write_mirror is where that gets updated | 17:34 |
| cking | is there a k-t meeting today? | 17:34 |
| bjf | cking, nope, done until post uds | 17:35 |
| bjf | cking, you can quit for the day :-) | 17:35 |
| cking | in which case, I will be slipping off "early" today | 17:35 |
| * smb suddenly feels very gone | 17:36 | |
| manjo | any idea when the natty tree will be open ? | 17:38 |
| * tgardner wonders if manjo has been living in a cave | 17:38 | |
| cking | living a cave is what trolls like me do | 17:39 |
| apw | manjo, i'd not say for a couple of months yet | 17:39 |
| apw | else how can we have a holiday | 17:39 |
| manjo | apw, yep got that.. was wondering if we know what month etc ? I wanted to answer a partner on the time frame | 17:40 |
| cking | didn't we agree to keep it the same as maverick? | 17:41 |
| * apw *blink* | 17:41 | |
| cking | apw, http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/iotest-4k-writes.png - more graphs | 17:42 |
| apw | cking, i was rather partial to hardy's kernel ... | 17:42 |
| cking | yeah, we should revisit it I think for natty | 17:42 |
| apw | manjo, have you looked for the tree ? | 17:44 |
| manjo | yep I have it cloned on tangerine | 17:47 |
| tgardner | manjo, in that case you shold know the tree has been open for 6 weeks or more | 17:47 |
| apw | and if you meant the archive, it'll be open as soon as the toolchain is in | 17:48 |
| manjo | can you guys hear me on mumble? | 17:51 |
| smb | manjo, no | 17:51 |
| manjo | crap | 17:51 |
| manjo | is it mumble or you guys fscking with me ? :) | 17:52 |
| tgardner | manjo, eh? I can't hear you. | 17:53 |
| cking | manjo, cannot hear you | 17:54 |
| manjo | fack I give up | 17:57 |
| bjf | manjo, we can barely hear you | 17:57 |
| cking | manjo, how's that HDD testing progressing? | 17:57 |
| * cking thinks a mumble plug in to android is required | 17:58 | |
| manjo | cking, I ran stress for 3 days, sat, sun, monday, I had to kill it this morning. | 17:58 |
| manjo | cking, I am going to try your test kit you point us to | 17:58 |
| manjo | so far it looks good, I too try dding 2.5T worth of data into the disk and that works | 17:59 |
| manjo | I have brian from AMI testing the latest maverick on their bios | 17:59 |
| cking | manjo, collect the output and send it to me, I can analyse the throughput with some gnuplot magic | 17:59 |
| manjo | they have started to integrate maverick iso into their test bed | 17:59 |
| manjo | I chatted with him this morning and he will share the test results on their bios as soon as he is done documenting it | 18:00 |
| cking | is this firmware BIOS+ACPI or UEFI+ACPI? | 18:00 |
| manjo | cking, they are testing a few different BIOS versions to make sure the patches they put in for different distros are holding up | 18:01 |
| manjo | cking, UEFI | 18:01 |
| cking | in which case, it's not BIOS, it's UEFI :-) | 18:01 |
| manjo | yeah :) | 18:01 |
| manjo | UEFI BIOS | 18:02 |
| manjo | easy to type bios | 18:02 |
| cking | nooooo. UEFI is not BIOS | 18:02 |
| manjo | my fingers type bios more easily than UEFI | 18:02 |
| cking | heh, easy to do. BIOS has been around for donkeys | 18:02 |
| manjo | so. we have quiet a bit a testing going on with Maverick in AMI | 18:03 |
| lag | No meeting today? | 18:03 |
| cking | lag, nope | 18:03 |
| lag | 'cos Maverick has been released? | 18:03 |
| manjo | lag, usually not until after uds | 18:03 |
| lag | Woooooooooooooooo | 18:04 |
| manjo | probably after November 6, bjf ? | 18:04 |
| manjo | cking, I poked the guy at Seagate to send us some disks | 18:04 |
| cking | manjo, what spec are these? | 18:05 |
| manjo | cking, 3T disks | 18:05 |
| cking | sweet | 18:05 |
| lag | manjo: Can you poke the guy as Seagate to send me some of those disks? | 18:05 |
| manjo | not sure if they are 4K or not | 18:05 |
| bjf | manjo, lag, the topic seems to indicate Nov. 9 :-) | 18:05 |
| manjo | lag, this is for testing ? | 18:05 |
| cking | bjf, you expect us to read? | 18:05 |
| manjo | tgardner, tangerine is in boston ? | 18:06 |
| tgardner | manjo, yep | 18:06 |
| manjo | tgardner, I have an extra 2.5T disk ... do you want to add it to tangerine ? | 18:06 |
| tgardner | manjo, tangerine only supports 2.5" disks | 18:07 |
| manjo | bummer | 18:07 |
| manjo | cking, if the seagate disks arrive before UDS I will bring you one | 18:09 |
| manjo | I have not heard back from them as yet | 18:09 |
| cking | I'm not wetting myself waiting for them | 18:11 |
| lag | manjo: Of course | 18:11 |
| manjo | lag, :) ok | 18:17 |
| maxb | Hrm. The fact that the kernel no longer lets you attach a debugger to your own processes didn't make the release notes | 18:44 |
| maxb | Anyone point me to have to turn it off, given that omission? :-) | 18:44 |
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| tgardner | maxb, kees should be able to remember how. its a sysfs flag somewhere. | 18:46 |
| jjohansen | maxb: change /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope | 18:46 |
| maxb | yama? | 18:47 |
| jjohansen | set it to 0 for no extra ptrace control | 18:47 |
| jjohansen | it is a collection of security restrictions that have been floating around for years | 18:47 |
| kees | maxb: why did it not make the release notes? it's been in the notes for like 5 months | 18:47 |
| jjohansen | ptrace restrictions, symlink, hardlink | 18:47 |
| maxb | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickMeerkat/ReleaseNotes <-- am I in the wrong place? | 18:47 |
| bo_ | apw: I filed a bug with kernel drm information as you asked to do. | 18:59 |
| kees | maxb: hm, here it is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickMeerkat/TechnicalOverview | 19:00 |
| kees | maxb: gah, but it vanished from there too | 19:01 |
| kees | maxb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickMeerkat/TechnicalOverview?action=recall&rev=38 <- search for "ptrace" there | 19:03 |
| kees | maxb: I'll try to get the releasenotes updated | 19:03 |
| * tgardner lunches | 19:22 | |
| jjohansen | bjf: when is the Lucid EC2 update going to get pushed? | 19:26 |
| bjf | jjohansen, should be in -proposed now, checking | 19:27 |
| === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks | ||
| bjf | jjohansen, -309.17 is in proposed, that was uploaded after your rebase | 19:30 |
| bjf | jjohansen, are you asking when will it be promoted to -updates? | 19:30 |
| jjohansen | bjf: ah yeah an estimate | 19:31 |
| bjf | jjohansen, at least another week | 19:32 |
| jjohansen | okay, thanks | 19:32 |
| gilson585 | Can someone assist me on bug 659348 | 19:34 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 659348 in linux (Ubuntu) "dvb module cx23885 hangs mythtv-setup (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/659348 | 19:34 |
| jjohansen | bjf: thanks, it came up in the server team meeting | 19:34 |
| bjf | jjohansen, that's what i figured | 19:35 |
| === sconklin1 is now known as sconklin | ||
| * jjohansen -> lunch | 19:58 | |
| ivoks | hi | 20:14 |
| ivoks | did you notice that -virtual is missinf nfs modules? | 20:14 |
| ivoks | (in maverick) | 20:14 |
| ivoks | that's bug 659084 | 20:19 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 659084 in linux-meta (Ubuntu) "2.6.35-22-virtual is missing nfs modules (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/659084 | 20:19 |
| cking | natty narwhal kills tux? http://www.mcphee.com/shop/product_images/c/906/11689__59447_zoom.jpg | 20:32 |
| manjo | cking, looks aaaaweful | 20:35 |
| cking | karmic koala gets impaled too if he's not careful | 20:36 |
| gilson585| | lol too funni | 20:36 |
| ogasawara | bjf: I notice you're monitoring patchworks for some of the kernel SRU's. just curious what your process is ... do you re-delegate to sconklin once they're ready to be applied (ie have garnered 2 acks). | 20:48 |
| sconklin | don't assume that we have a process ;-o | 20:49 |
| ogasawara | heh | 20:49 |
| bjf | ogasawara, no, after two acks i apply them to my own tree, do test builds, push to public then ask sconklin to review | 20:49 |
| bjf | ogasawara, after sconklin and smb say "looks good" i push to master repo | 20:49 |
| ogasawara | bjf: and I assume you just nudge them directly if you need a 2nd ack for a patch | 20:51 |
| bjf | ogasawara, yup | 20:53 |
| bjf | ogasawara, depending on your meaning of "nudge them directly" | 20:54 |
| bjf | :-) | 20:54 |
| * ogasawara lunch | 20:59 | |
| jjohansen | ivoks: nope didn't notice or else it would be fixed already | 21:01 |
| ivoks | jjohansen: ok | 21:02 |
| jjohansen | ivoks: thanks for bringing it up, will look into it | 21:03 |
| ivoks | jjohansen: it's enabled in config | 21:03 |
| ivoks | jjohansen: so i'm not really sure what's going on | 21:03 |
| jjohansen | ivoks: yep, its probably in the packaging phase | 21:03 |
| * tgardner bails for the day | 21:32 | |
| === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk | ||
| bjf | ogasawara, mumble | 21:57 |
| === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
