[11:45] stats just want to tell you that there is an ubuntu web font used in askubuntu [11:45] where is it hosted? [11:51] AlanBell: http://sstatic.net/askubuntu/all.css?v=7710c2ff227d [11:51] Ctrl+F ubuntu [11:52] interesting stuff [11:59] just updated bug 655305 with that info [11:59] Launchpad bug 655305 in ubuntu-font-family "font.ubuntu.com needs the font hosted for web embedding (affects: 2) (heat: 37)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/655305 [12:01] interesting that they are referencing "Ubuntu Mono","Ubuntu Beta Mono A" [12:06] ya [12:13] newz2000: what is the latest on the wiki update? any of my branches going to make it in tomorrow? [12:14] personally I would be a lot more comfortable updating the theme that is there but not making it default quite yet [12:14] there are still lots of things that don't look great under the light theme, such as the info pages with the revision history etc [12:15] ideally there should be a trunk branch for the code in the Ubuntu-website project rather than your +junk area [12:15] I don't think I can do a merge request to your branch, but I attached my branch to all the bugs I worked on [13:11] newz2000: what did you think of my suggestion to add an accessible theme to the wiki (non-default, but selectable in preferences) [14:34] AlanBell: Sorry, didn't catch your suggestion so didn't consider it yet, sounds reasonable [14:34] it was burried in my long rambling email [14:35] AlanBell: will you be around a couple min? I've got to reboot real quick [14:35] sure [14:35] http://moinmo.in/ThemeMarket/SimpleMente [15:10] newz2000: back? [15:10] AlanBell: yes, sorry. Got mobbed when I rebooted [15:10] hah [15:11] AlanBell: ive me 90 seconds [15:13] hey AlanBell [15:13] Yes, today I will try to package all the work done on the wiki together [15:13] I've not looked over your patches but I did look at your demo site [15:13] Thanks for the work you did, how happy are you with the rsults? [15:16] pretty happy [15:17] the dots at the top I am not happy with right now [15:17] they were an experiment which I think failed :) [15:17] Can you give me a link to your demo site? (if it is still up) [15:17] http://libertus.co.uk:8080 can you see that? [15:19] AlanBell: yep [15:19] good, my laptop picked up the same IP as before then :) [15:19] wow, that's amazing [15:20] I am going to back out the bigger dots at the top, don't like them so much [15:20] yeah, I think we've deviated a bit radically from the designer's intent with the background image and the dots [15:20] I was trying to get some of the popular bits from the askubuntu.com site in [15:21] the theory was to have a run of dark dots in a line across, which continues into light dots in the margins [15:22] AlanBell: are you pushing your changes into lp? [15:22] * newz2000 has not had a chance to look yet [15:22] I've not seen an merge proposal yet though [15:22] can I do that to your branch? [15:23] or does it have to be in ubuntu-website project first? [15:23] AlanBell: push them up to LP somewhere and then submit it as a merge proposal (through the web interface) [15:23] ok, it is on LP, I will just fix the nasty dots and do the merge proposal [15:23] thanks a bunch for your help Alan, I'll be merging this stuff in today [15:25] AlanBell: oh, don't be disapointed, but I'll probably reject your MP and cherry pick some parts out of it. [15:25] I will use your work but probably not the whole patch [15:25] I don't want you to think I'm ungrateful, I'm extraordinarily grateful [15:26] thats fine [15:26] have a look now [15:26] great [15:28] lp:~alanbell/ubuntu-website/light-moin-theme is where it is at [15:29] where was your branch? [15:32] This branch is not mergeable into lp:~newz/+junk/light-wiki. [15:34] AlanBell: ok, I'll just poke at that [15:36] http://moinmo.in/ThemeMarket/SimpleMente is the accessible theme, quite plain but screenreader friendly [15:37] 13:10 < akgraner> I like the headers in Purple oops I mean aubergine and the links in orange though [15:37] 13:10 < akgraner> Love it! Love it! Love it!! - did I mention I love that part [15:46] AlanBell: I'll look at it [15:47] She'll be disapointed about the aubergine [15:47] It's not part of the Ubuntu web branding [15:47] * newz2000 tries to take the guidelines very seriously [15:51] yeah, read all them :) [15:51] There's a funny story behind this [15:51] When the brand guidelines came out, they said that "orange = Ubuntu, aubergine = Canonical" [15:51] And then Lucid shipped with a purple desktop wallpaper. :-) [15:51] Got everyone really confused. [15:51] actually no, they said aubergine=commercial [15:52] ah, right [15:52] then they split "enterprise" and "developer" with different dot sizes and pitches [15:52] yeah, clever. [15:52] and there are 5 different aubergines [15:53] in theory in at least one of the design documents (or it might have been a draft I was reviewing) Canonical should be aubergine with orange as an accent colour and Ubuntu should be orange with Aubergine as an accent colour [15:54] there were pie charts for the quantities to use [15:56] the voice slider, thats the one [15:56] ok, you may have gotten into them more than I have. :-) [15:57] yeah, but I tend to take the captain Jack Sparrow approach to such things [15:57] more of a guideline than an actual law :) [15:59] http://design.canonical.com/brand/5.%20Ubuntu%20colour%20palettes%20and%20colour%20landscape.pdf found the pie charts [16:00] oh yeah, forgot about those [16:01] some things like cool grey as a background are nice in theory, but then I asked some low vision users in #ubuntu-accessibility to have a look at it, then I made the text darker and the background lighter until they said it stopped looking fuzzy and hard to read [16:02] yeah, I've thought that about the server pages especially [16:03] -accessibility is a great channel to idle in, you can always post a link to a development site and ask for feedback on it either in terms of low vision or screen reader use [16:08] good tip [16:21] newz2000: there are a whole heap of 404 errors for missing images in /assets/ on my box, I kind of assumed that was because I set it up wrong [16:21] Hm... [16:21] You probably don't have all the files actually [16:21] http://paste.ubuntu.com/511730/ [16:22] yeah, I am not too bothered about them, but they probably should be fixed one way or another for deployment [16:24] and web hosting of the font is comming very soon according to sabdfl this morning Bug #655305 [16:24] Launchpad bug 655305 in ubuntu-font-family "font.ubuntu.com needs the font hosted for web embedding (affects: 2) (heat: 37)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/655305