[00:08] doko: meh. I'd sort of like to be in sync [00:08] otherwise we'll waste time diagnosing weird stuff [00:08] bleh, who NEWed linux? it's all gone to universe [00:09] use kernel-overrides [00:10] * cjwatson fixes it up with security-kernel-overrides [00:11] or I would if LP hadn't apparently exploded [00:13] ... downtime, I guess [00:14] cjwatson, yeah was some downtime [00:14] 2200-0000 UTC, so that would be now [00:14] yeah ... bah [00:15] any luck with the problem at hand? [00:16] i think i've sorted it out, am trying get a test build started to confirm [00:18] I'd like to try test-building something on !powerpc to make sure that the new linux-libc-dev works, but I can try that in a chroot locally [00:20] cjwatson, good plan, before it polutes the chroots [00:35] a not very randomly chosen sample of anna and man-db still compile [00:36] which includes man-db's rather rudimentary test suite so binaries also still run [01:01] LP's back up sufficiently to run change-override, so have moved things back to main where they belong [01:01] cjwatson, thats good news. the build is looking plausable on ppc, not quiet sure how long it'll run yet [01:02] am inclined to upload it so you can new, and we can sleep [01:02] sounds good [01:03] need sleep myself, have to handle the kids tomorrow morning [01:05] building the package now [01:10] cjwatson, ok its uploaded, should be on the queue as soon as the queue runner finds it [01:12] ok it's there [01:14] accepted, thanks [01:14] just looking at that queuebot bug [01:14] cjwatson, heh it'll wait till tommorrow [01:15] if I do that I'll forget [01:15] (it's a one-liner anyway) [01:18] (slightly too late to demonstrate the fix, unfortunately) [01:24] auto reconnect ? === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk [01:24] stgraber: no, code upgrade [01:25] I'll add a "don't report initial queue" option for next time === jj-afk is now known as jjohansen [08:43] apw: hm, still broken on powerpc [08:44] cjwatson, ok that overnighter also failed to build for a new error, i have a fix for the error it hit, but am flying blind fixing it as i cannot do a full build on the porters due to chroot issues... do we want to hope this fixes it en-toto or wait for the porters to be fixed [08:44] (from -devel) [08:44] flying blind testing it [08:53] hm, it got quite a distance through didn't it? [08:53] yeah i have fixed the build failure in that flavour [08:53] I'd say upload blind but keep going on davis in parallel [08:53] ack [08:53] what is odd is the build seems to progress in a different order on a buildd than a full build with dpkg-buildpkg -B seems to [08:53] cjwatson, who owns the porters is that #is ? === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk === hyperair is now known as Guest68417 [13:29] cjwatson, ok porters fixed and testing done, sadly failed, another build failure in perf. I have fixed that and have built all the components on the porter successfully [13:30] so i believe i now have a fixed source package, a full test is building as belt-and-braces [13:32] i beleive this should be the final version, and i suspect I should just upload it [13:40] apw: I suspect so, from the sound of it [13:41] interesting ride, this [13:41] cjwatson, ports can be a major pain at this stage, normally we can let them drift [13:41] i am not sure the kernel has gated the release before [13:44] I don't mind letting them drift if they've built once, but I'm concerned about having the architectures out of sync for major toolchain components right at the start - the point of splitting off ports is to make them consume less developer time, and while I realise this is a bit of extra time at the start I think that having things too out-of-sync would consume more developer time in the long run [13:45] and we're not behind schedule or anything so it seems worth spending a bit of time now for less hassle later [13:45] cjwatson, fair enough. i am pretty hopeful from the testing i have managed to do that this one should build fine on all arches === skaet_afk is now known as skaet [15:00] cjwatson, we might need to rescore that ppc build [15:01] apw: done === jj-afk is now known as jjohansen === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf [22:26] cjwatson, ok finally all those builds finished, so once powerpc is new'd we have a full set of linux-libc-dev [23:12] looks like somebody's done it [23:12] doko: do we need to wait for your new gcc-4.5? I assume it'll take a while [23:12] cjwatson: no [23:13] binutils should be built however [23:13] doko: did you NEW linux/powerpc? [23:13] cjwatson: yes. anything wrong? [23:13] did do the same for the other archs [23:13] doko: if you could use the kernel-overrides script in future to make sure the overrides are synced up with the last ABI, that would be good [23:13] ahh, ok [23:14] can fix it up after the fact, though not 'til it's finished publishing [23:14] anyway, not urgent, linux-libc-dev will still be in main which is what matters for now [23:14] well, I did see that linux-libc-dev did end up in main, and that was good enough for me [23:14] (the actual kernel and such has gone to universe) [23:15] I guess not much depends on linux-headers any more [23:15] binutils has finished building and seems to be published [23:15] ok, binutils is in the archive as well, so we can open [23:15] we need to wait for linux-libc-dev/powerpc to be published [23:16] ahh, ok [23:16] another 20min [23:16] ok, feel free to ask a LOSA for it, I'm off to bed :-) [23:16] will write the announce email tomorrow [23:16] I can start an autosync pass tomorrow if you like [23:17] cjwatson: on #is or #soyuz? [23:17] probably more likely to find somebody on #is [23:17] though there's a reasonable number of sysadmins on #soyuz too [23:19] cjwatson: see #is [23:21] * apw is glad to see that lot finally build