[00:27] ScottL, Indeed. We'll have to modify a few things in the metapackage source as we modify the seeds. [00:28] In the etherpad summary which I'm hoping you are using to flesh things out, the seeds: line in update.cfg is one of the entries. [01:07] persia, i did save the etherpad summary and i am using it to flesh things out, along with various conversations you and luke have had with me ;) [01:08] ScottL: Yes thats right [01:08] You will need to update the update.cfg file to switch to natty [01:08] OK. Just wanted to make sure, because that had a couple sections that were directly tracking stuff in the metapackage source :) [07:05] ScottL: Exactly: _vanilla_ based realtime kernel not _ubuntu_ based realtime kernel. [07:07] TheMuso: Very simple question: Is there a way to don't specify distribution release (3rd field in debian/changelog) to let package be distribution agnostic? I would want avoid to copy packages over and over into our PPA only changing distribution version. [07:08] abogani: For PPAs, I don't believe that is possible, you could ask in #launchpad to be sure. [07:08] TheMuso: I'm already googled and I have also check Debian manuals but I don;t see nothing useful [07:08] There has to be a distro release target for the upload. [07:08] TheMuso: Ok. Thanks Luke. [07:08] No problem. [07:13] If one hosts them somewhere else (e.g. people.ubuntu.com) and compiles them oneself, one can use non-release strings. [07:14] Mind you, keeping indices up-to-date and the like might be tricky. [07:47] ScottL: Could you say me if my last in devel ml email is understandable, please? [07:47] ScottL: Thanks in adance. [08:09] abogani: are you going to uds? [08:15] jussi01_: No. [08:15] :( === jussi01_ is now known as jussi [08:15] jussi01_: Why? [08:17] * abogani isn't be able to sustain an English conversation. [08:18] You do fine in IRC. [08:20] yes, I agree, you do just fine. [08:22] Please guys for one time believe in me [08:22] * abogani goes to drink coffe [08:23] I don't disbelieve you. Speech and writing are different in *so* many ways, especially writing on the internet. [08:23] I'm just saying you seem close with the writing, so the speech oughtn't be too far away. [08:42] ScottL: Could you say me if my last in devel ml email is understandable, please? [08:43] abogani: I'd say he is in bed at this point. [08:48] yeah, it's 3:50 am where he's at... :D [08:48] Ops :-) [08:51] abogani: But if you're talking about the advice on working with closed drivers, then I would say it's coherent. :) [08:52] astraljava: Exactly. Thanks. [10:48] hi guys! I'm back [10:49] hey. Welcome back. [10:51] persia, I have a lot of work to do [10:51] Always :) [10:52] eh eh, work is never over [11:14] Hi there Alessio! [11:16] hi astraljava [11:57] ScottL, http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/naspro-core.html [11:58] ScottL, :) waiting for permafrost and naspro-bridges-bad now [12:21] hi quadrispro , i hope you had a good vacation and welcome back :) [12:29] ScottL, I had great holidays, I really love London [12:46] :) [12:46] never been to the UK although I hope to go sometime [13:17] ScottL, wah-plugins has been accepted in unstable -> http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wah-plugins.html [13:19] awestome, quadrispro! [13:19] now if debain would just release then i would feel better about being able to get packages into ubuntu ;) [13:20] but seriously, quadrispro, paultag has been hanging around also and looking to package stuff as well, i pointed in at REVU (tag ubuntustudio) [13:20] http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/tag/ubuntustudio [13:21] to see if we couldn't get some movement on those packages [13:21] i am presuming it would be quicker to get them into debian and then we can archive the package in REVU then [13:22] Not necessarily quicker: roughly the same process (two developers look at it) [13:22] But better long-term. [13:23] Actually, with the squeeze freeze, and ftp-masters being intentionally slow about NEW, might be faster to get stuff into Ubuntu, but harder to maintain it that way. [13:27] yes, it is so [13:28] however, I'll have a look ASAP, now I'm very busy with fixing bugs on my packages to let them enter squeeze [13:30] That's more important, really. Getting squeeze released (and bugfixes in) helps our natty more than other things. [13:33] :) [15:35] http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/linux-audio-update-fall-fashions?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+linuxjournalcom+%28Linux+Journal+-+The+Original+Magazine+of+the+Linux+Community%29&utm_content=Google+International [15:41] heh. We get mentioned for our spring release under the headline "fall fashions" :) [16:27] abogani: i just read the backscroll (well, irc logs) and saw your question - i second astraljava's comment, your english is perfectly understandable (although some of the technicalities were beyond my understanding at this point) [16:27] * scott-work is very ignorant about much of the close drivers [16:28] scott-work: Thanks. [16:29] abogani: you are welcome :) i'm glad to help anytime you need it [22:10] jussi01: pinged Ng today, no answer yet, but i left him the ticket link - https://rt.ubuntu.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=15226 [22:10] jussi01: should i back off for a couple of days now ? [22:19] ScottL, Might be worth not just asking Ng, but rather asking open-ended questions on #canonical-sysadmin (there are a few of them, of which Ng is one). [22:19] But it's important not to ask too much/too often, or they'll just ignore you. [23:58] persia, i will wait another couple of days and then ask again on #canonical-sysadmin, but not focus on Ng this time