=== KombuchaKip1 is now known as KombuchaKip [01:02] mornin everyone :) === kgoetz is now known as Kamping_Kaiser === Meths_ is now known as Meths [14:47] <_spm_Draget> I have setup sftp on my server. Since configuring all rights is possible but prone to errors, I have the sftp-only user chrooted to directory X which is currently his homedirectory. Now, the bzr repository has to be under X for him to access. Symlinks do not work. But if others want to use it, they need to be able to access X too. Basically meaning I need the same chroot folder for all people using the repo. [14:48] <_spm_Draget> Or I have just one dedicated user that is for accessing that one bzr repositories and all teammembers share the same user/password. [14:48] <_spm_Draget> CAn anyone think of a more elegant solution? [15:35] If symlinks broke a chroot, it would kinda defeat the purpose 8-} [15:47] <_spm_Draget> Yeah, I know :P [15:48] <_spm_Draget> But I have configured webdav and sftp... sftp giving me a headache to make a flexibe authentification system on a shared repository as I explained above and webdav only working as an addition plugin that is not available some large distributions =( [15:53] Well, if you need multiple people to access something, they all need access to it. That means they need to not chroot somewhere that doesn't contain it. Not really a shortcut to that... [16:12] <_spm_Draget> fullermd: I thought about it... but using a shared chroot would break the concept of home-folder... I would have to chroot them to /srv or /srv/bzr… ofcourse all other /srv services have the appropiate userrights but I am still not completly happy with this. Hmm… ssh allows public key infrastructure. I never tried it, but maybe I can generate key for all users and if I want to disallow access I can block single keys, instead of [16:12] <_spm_Draget> having to change the password. [16:30] _spm_Draget: yup, that's the way to go [16:30] _spm_Draget: and disallow password for the login [19:53] vila: thx for fix in 661490. I somehow thought it was the >= instead of <= first, but got confused trying to understand how versions was supposed to be compared. [20:23] gthorslund: np, obviously this haven't been tested for a long time :-/ So, kudos for raising the issue ! [20:29] vila: I actually tried it since I wanted to test 539937. revno 75 said it fixed some issue like that. [20:30] gthorslund: yeah, I wondered about that too, but I don't use the plugin myself, so I just fixed the obvious [20:30] gthorslund: so any light you can shed on the subject will certainly be appreciated [20:37] Phew. Finally got my website rework done and live. It only took a year. [20:37] * fullermd scratches off one more thing that used to be in CVS... [20:41] fullermd: that still leave this ftp server... [20:41] * fullermd notes that he does NOT run ftpd :p [20:42] they all say that [20:42] Oh, not true. Some of them say "Why yes, I am running ft... AAUGH! Why are you stabbing me?? *sputter* *bleed*" [20:49] Haaaaaa, 10 not 11 and the Ubuntu font becomes so more enjoyable.... [20:51] fullermd: yeah, there is still a lot of education to be done to fully switch to ssh... Generating and handling keys is still seen as arcane... [20:52] Let 'em use passwords. That's fine. [20:52] Heck, let 'em use TFTP, come to that. I just want to kill FTP, burn the body, eat the ashes, crap them into a shallow grave, and dance on it. Is that so much to ask? [20:52] certainly not :) [20:53] * vila takes some distance just in case :) [20:55] 'till then, I'll just sit around watching my web log to see what I broke in redoing everything. Great excitement... [20:56] hehe