[05:39] <magedragon25> maybe someone here can help me.....related to vmware server installation and header files
[05:44] <vish> !support » magedragon25
[05:44] <ubot2> vish: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)
[05:44] <vish> !support | magedragon25
[05:44] <ubot2> magedragon25: The official ubuntu support channel is #ubuntu. Also see http://ubuntu.com/support and http://ubuntuforums.org
[05:44] <magedragon25> tried those....not much help
[05:45] <vish> magedragon25¦ oh, maybe people who could help you werent around at that moment, you could try again later..
[05:45] <magedragon25> thanks anyways
[07:59] <cactaur> Hey all! So I'm currently trying to work with a bug I submitted. I've been going back and forth with a triager. However, when he asked me to try testing out a mainline kernel, I couldn't do it because there was an error. I'm not sure what to do now since the bug is not that the kernel won't compile, but I'm not sure where to turn to for help. Anyone have any advice?
[08:01] <nigelb> This wiki page might help you: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds
[08:04] <cactaur> Yes, I followed this guide. However, at installing the final debian package, I got an error about it being unable to install initrd. I was wondering where I should turn to because I don't think mainline builds are something many people need help with.
[08:06] <nigelb> ok, I'd recommend asking in #ubuntu-kernel but on a working day.  There is a possiblity there may not be anyone around today
[08:32] <njin> hello to all, can someone set importance to this ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/634211
[08:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 634211 in linux (Ubuntu) "/dev/dsp* disappeared after upgrade Lucid=>Maverick (affects: 11) (heat: 58)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[08:40] <njin> in this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelTeamBugPolicies if we launch the command "ubuntu-bug -p linux" as describeb terminal reply that is deprecated
[08:40] <njin> Can I fix it removing  -p
[08:40] <njin> ?
[09:00] <njin> can someone look https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/661081
[09:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 661081 in linux (Ubuntu) "Realtek 8187 Crashes computer when connect (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New]
[12:39] <xteejx> Wow it's been a while since I've had to grab a backtrace manually
[12:39] <xteejx> Afternoon all
[12:40] <ari-tczew> xteejx: are you interested in bug 595103 ?
[12:40] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 595103 in wu-ftpd (Ubuntu) "please merge wu-ftpd 2.6.2-32 (universe) from debian unstable (affects: 1) (heat: 37)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/595103
[12:40] <ari-tczew> bilalaktar will take this one, if you are not interested
[12:40] <xteejx> lol I've literally just messaged to that bug I saw the email
[12:41] <xteejx> Didn't even notice that anyone had commented
[12:41] <xteejx> Please, feel free to take it
[12:42] <ari-tczew> xteejx: thanks and please in future comment on bug, that you won't update patch
[12:43] <xteejx> ari-tczew: I know, but had forgotten about it, have been in hospital for 5 months, have only just came back to Ubuntu
[12:44] <ari-tczew> xteejx: sorry for hear that
[12:45] <xteejx> ari-tczew: It's cool, sorry about not updating it :)
[14:43] <vish> jibel¦ deactivated your inactive student wmrit from mentorship
[15:10] <hggdh> nigelb: still there?
[15:25] <nigelb> hggdh: yes
[15:26] <hggdh> nigelb: I would like to receive feedback (if any) on my presentation yesterday -- is it possible?
[15:27] <nigelb> hggdh: ah, let me get this server restarted and get back to you :)
[15:27]  * nigelb will poke in about 5 to 10 mins
[15:27] <hggdh> roj
[15:27] <nigelb> (depending on if it decides to be cranky or not)
[16:00] <xteejx> bug 127839 - how can I clean this up, its long been fixed but the Debian task is "new"
[16:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 127839 in net-snmp (Debian) (and 2 other projects) "Big changelog.gz file duplicates in libsnmp-base and libsnmp9 packages (affects: 1) (heat: 2)" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/127839
[16:01] <hggdh> xteejx: well, checking the affected packages?
[16:01] <xteejx> hggdh, I don't get what you mean
[16:02] <xelister> 10.10 ubutnu was realse, right?  its not in testing now?
[16:02] <xteejx> xelister: 10.10 is the latest Ubuntu release, yes
[16:02] <xelister> if I do  update-manager --devel-release   then it shows me new ubuntu 10.10
[16:03] <devildante> xelister: does it show without the option?
[16:03] <xelister> but there it says - = Welcome to the Ubuntu 'Maverick Meerkat' development release =
[16:03] <hggdh> xteejx: hum. Actually, it is fix-released on Ubuntu
[16:03] <xteejx> xelister: It would do, 11.04 hasn't been touched yet
[16:03] <xelister> and without that option, this is now shown. wtf
[16:03] <xelister> I use   deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-proposed restricted main multiverse universe
[16:03] <xelister> since I helped testing some stuff on lucid
[16:04] <xteejx> hggdh, I know it's fixed in Ubuntu, but that Debian task adds to our number doesn't it? How do I change it?
[16:04] <hggdh> xteejx: so it is only open on Debian. You could download the debian packages, and check if it is still true there
[16:04] <xteejx> hggdh, ahh I see whwere you're going :) I'llk get on it
[16:04] <yofel> xelister: does it even list maverick when you don't use --devel-release?
[16:04] <xelister> yofel:  list it where?
[16:04] <hggdh> xteejx: no, it does not add -- not really -- to our numbers. It will still be shown, but it is not an Ubuntu bug, it is upstream
[16:05] <xteejx> hggdh, ahh ok, just looked messy :)
[16:05] <yofel> xelister: well, update-manager should offer you the maverick upgrade without --devel-release if you set it to show normal releases and not just LTS ones
[16:08] <xelister> yofel: it doesnt.  why?
[16:09] <xelister> could it be because I set sources.list to lucid-proposed?
[16:10] <yofel> xelister: if you go to software sources -> updates, what does it say for "show new distribution releases: ..." ?
[16:12] <xelister> ah, that was the problem
[16:12] <xelister> it was only showing TLS
[17:28] <slinker> !bug 661774 wishlist
[17:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 661774 in meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) "CPU applets do not show text (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/661774
[17:29] <slinker> bug 661774 wishlist
[17:29] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 661774 in meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) "CPU applets do not show text (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/661774
[17:30] <slinker> whoops
[17:39] <slinker> !dupliate 661774
[17:39] <ubot2> Factoid 'dupliate 661774' not found
[17:39] <slinker> !duplicate 661774
[17:39] <ubot2> slinker: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)
[17:39] <slinker> figured maybe you'd list the ones listed as dupes
[17:47] <hggdh> slinker: why do you think it is a wishlist? Also, what package should be assigned to the bug? Finally, did you reproduce it?
[17:49] <hggdh> slinker: I am asking only because I see (1) wrong package assigned; (2) no real reference to *which* CPU applet was used; (3) no confirmation it does indeed happen
[17:49] <slinker> Sorry, I Jumped the gun a bit 'cause it was a patch
[17:49] <slinker> kinda bad :\
[17:49] <hggdh> :-)
[17:49] <slinker> you can't unlink, can you?
[17:49] <slinker> http://www.gaertner.de/~lindig/software/tony.html
[17:50] <slinker> erm, wrong link
[17:50] <hggdh> yes, you can
[17:50] <slinker> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash-completion/+bug/615042
[17:50] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 615042 in bash-completion (Ubuntu) "MPlayer completion rules complete only specific files (dup-of: 661775)" [Low,Fix released]
[17:50] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 661775 in bash-completion (Ubuntu) "completion for "mplayer -(cd|dvd)-device" should also complete directory names (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,New]
[17:50] <slinker> yeah
[17:50] <slinker> I was about to run the patch
[17:50] <slinker> then it kicked in my brain that I hadn't yet
[17:50] <slinker> no coffee I think
[17:54] <hggdh> slinker: I unlinked. Now, why did you mark bug 615042 as FixReleased?
[17:54] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 615042 in bash-completion (Ubuntu) "MPlayer completion rules complete only specific files (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/615042
[17:56] <neriukas> i bad speak english where i could paste printscreen's images of bugs ubuntu? to shaw bugs ...
[17:56] <slinker> I did that 'cause I saw auto-completion and hadn't woken up yet, I'll get my head right before I log into launchpad. Sorry.
[17:59] <slinker> thank you
[17:59] <hggdh> neriukas: you can use http://imagebin.ca/ or attch to a bug
[17:59] <hggdh> slinker: np
[18:00] <neriukas> thanks hggdh
[18:01] <neriukas> i have question ... Can i shaw bugs of xubuntu here?
[18:02] <yofel> evening, finally got around to read the meeting log - did anyone remember that the linux apport hook needs to be changed too as it uses the regression tags?
[18:04] <hggdh> afternoon yofel
[18:04] <yofel> and can someone please update the meeting date in the topic?
[18:05] <hggdh> I am not sure about the linux apport hook, but please feel free to update it (of course, the usual way... open a bug, add a patch, etc, etc)
[18:05] <hggdh> yofel: I do not have access to it
[18:06] <yofel> heh, np
[18:08] <njin> hello fellows, there's a kubuntu user to take a look at this ?https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/661313 Thanks
[18:08] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 661313 in ubuntu "kubuntu 10.10 issue with desktop effects and taskbar transparency (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[18:15] <yofel> that they're not enabled on boot probably comes from a bug in the complicated blacklisting code for intel cards (there was a report about that somewhere..) I don't know how the taskbar transparency works though
[18:18] <yofel> njin: you could ask in #kubuntu-devel what information is needed here, I would use kwin (source kdebase-workspace) as the package name for now
[18:19] <njin> yofel: thanks
[18:21] <ramanK> The System Monitor shows more than %100 for some processes. is this a reported bug?
[18:22] <Nafallo> is it a bug?
[18:22] <slinker> bug 661812 low
[18:22] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 661812 in pitivi (Ubuntu) "File Open and Save As menu items missing ellipse (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/661812
[18:22] <ramanK> I think it is  a bug .
[18:23] <Nafallo> ramanK: well, 100% is one processor core... if you have several and the application uses them it can be well beyond 100%
[18:23] <Nafallo> i.e. say it's using two cores fully... that's 200%
[18:24] <ramanK> Nafallo: hmm. do you think this is what people usually expect ?
[18:26] <yofel> well, I wouldn't expect a process that uses one full core on a quad-core to only use 25% either, so a process using >100% is fine IMHO
[18:26] <yofel> depends on the viewpoint I guess
[18:28] <ramanK> thanks for answer.
[18:29] <ramanK> good luck
[18:43] <slinker> bug 661806 medium
[18:43] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 661806 in pitivi (Ubuntu) "Audio not selectable after zooming in (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/661806
[18:47] <hggdh> slinker: for this one, what version of pitivi are you running? The was opened against 1ubuntu2, and current is 1ubuntu3
[18:48] <hggdh> slinker: also, if you find *another* issue, you should report it on a NEW bug -- one bug per issue, one issue per bug
[18:50] <devildante> could someone change the topic? It's still saying that the meeting is 12 Oct :p
[18:50] <xteejx> I asked for that 2 days ago lol
[18:52] <hggdh> slinker: use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Description to add the version info in, please
[18:53] <hggdh> OK. I now count three of you asking for it :-)
[18:54] <slinker> hggdh: alright, thank you :)
[18:54] <devildante> hggdh: who's allowed to change it?
[18:55] <hggdh> devildante: I think bdmurray, pedro, and the IRC sysops
[18:55] <xteejx> bug 144793 anyone know about this??
[18:55] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 144793 in partman-auto-loop (Ubuntu) "Use dd with bs=4k when creating disk images (heat: 2)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/144793
[18:55] <devildante> hggdh: thanks :)
[18:56]  * hggdh cannot do it, and is pretty happy *without* this capability ;-)
[18:56] <devildante> lol
[18:59] <hggdh> xteejx: no, I do not. But, perhaps it is coded in partman?
[18:59] <xteejx> hggdh, any way I'd find out?
[19:00] <xteejx> suppose i could google again
[19:00] <hggdh> xteejx: grab the source...
[19:02] <xteejx> hggdh: Duh why didn't I think of that :)
[19:02] <xteejx> Thanks hggdh :)
[19:02] <hggdh> xteejx: my pleasure. It is always my pleasure to get people to work ;-)
[19:02] <xteejx> hehe :P
[19:03] <xteejx> ermm stupid question...why can't I find partman? Only parted, partimage etc
[19:03] <xteejx> Oh it's partitionmanager isn't it?
[19:05] <devildante> I think so :)
[19:06] <xteejx> :)
[19:07] <hggdh> xteejx: one oway is to click on the Overview link at the top of the bug, and you will get to see all versions published for that package (which means binary and package sources
[19:08] <hggdh> then you can navigate from there
[19:08] <xteejx> hggdh, but I don't know if it was ever implemented or not
[19:08] <xteejx> I have the source anyway, going thru the changelog
[19:09] <hggdh> xteejx: if 'dd' is being used, then you should be able to find a call to it
[19:09] <xteejx> hggdh, ok I'll do a grep search
[19:14] <xteejx> Nothing matching dd that I can see, so gonna mark it Confirmed
[19:15] <hggdh> oops
[19:15] <xteejx> oops?
[19:15] <hggdh> xteejx: I just downloaded it, and ran a grep on it: http://pastebin.com/HannJwe5
[19:15] <geekosopher> am i correct in marking bug 659668 as confirmed?
[19:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 659668 in linux (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu does not suspend for Lenovo Thinkpad T500 (affects: 8) (dups: 1) (heat: 54)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/659668
[19:16] <xteejx> hggdh, strange it didn't come up :S
[19:17] <hggdh> xteejx: did you 'grep -R dd *'?
[19:17] <xteejx> yup I done a recursive search
[19:17] <hggdh> geekosopher: for Linux (kernel) bugs, ideally you have to have the *exact* same hardware to be able to confirm
[19:18] <hggdh> geekosopher: the OP states it has a T500, the additional commenter has a W500. What is the difference between both?
[19:18] <geekosopher> hggdh: ok, so should I let it be marked as new?
[19:19] <hggdh> xteejx: also, I used 'pull-lp-source' to get the source packages
[19:19] <xteejx> weird my system didn't see it (or my eyes)
[19:19] <xteejx> I assume that first line pretty much closes the wishlist bug then with the bs=xxx ?
[19:19] <geekosopher> hggdh: i don't know
[19:19] <hggdh> geekosopher: yes, I think so. Also, please add a comment to the second commenter to please open a new bug
[19:20] <geekosopher> ok
[19:20] <hggdh> xteejx: *seems* to. Now you have to really look at the sources, and find how they are used
[19:20] <xteejx> hggdh, :O
[19:20] <hggdh> xteejx: but I have a feeling this is not a bug...
[19:22] <geekosopher> hggdh: the original reporter has also done apport-collect for the bug. Is the information contained enough to be marked as triaged?
[19:22] <xteejx> hggdh, It's wishlist isn't it?
[19:23] <njin> hggdh: reporter reply https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slide-webdavclient/+bug/651004
[19:23] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 651004 in slide-webdavclient (Ubuntu) "webDAV corruption on Lucid: Lightning calendar not available (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New]
[19:23] <hggdh> geekosopher: now... it would, yes, usually. But this is a kernel bug...
[19:23] <xteejx> I think I'll just ask the guy if he's still having issues with this
[19:24] <geekosopher> :0
[19:24] <devildante> geekosopher: he needs to test the upstream mainline kernel first
[19:24] <hggdh> xteejx: you can state that Maverick (at least) already uses a bs="1000000", which is bigger than what is being proposed
[19:25] <hggdh> xteejx: also, there is no indication of *what* version the OP is running...
[19:25] <xteejx> hggdh, that's true, will put that in the reply :) thank you
[19:25] <hggdh> xteejx: "please use ubuntu-bug ..." to report new bugs, etc, etc
[19:25] <xteejx> hggdh, going by the report date I'd guess 7.04
[19:25] <xteejx> yeah I'll do that then :)
[19:26] <hggdh> xteejx: now that you have a good idea of dates, you can look at the changelog and try to find out when it was added in
[19:26] <xteejx> Will do...detective to the rescue......... hehe
[19:26] <geekosopher> devildante: and where should I ask him to get it from, if at all I should ask him to do so?
[19:26] <hggdh> njin: looking at it
[19:27] <devildante> geekosopher: all is explained here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds
[19:28] <geekosopher> devildante: reading the page
[19:32] <hggdh> njin: frankly, I do not know (don't know the DAV client being used, and how it integrates). I can see on the access.log some GETs for what seems the calendar entries
[19:32] <hggdh> but I do not know enough to tell you how to proceed
[19:33] <hggdh> njin: I see no errors being reported, though, but it seems that Apache is not being run with extended error logging
[19:33] <hggdh> njin: I do not even know if this is Apache-related, or DAV client-related, right now...
[19:35] <njin> hddgh: no problem, thanks, i go to search at developer site.
[19:36] <geekosopher> devildante: read the wiki page, and iirc, it is related to lucid... no info about maverick. Should I really be asking the reporter to do this?
[19:36] <slinker> bug 661753 medium
[19:36] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 661753 in gnome-nettool (Ubuntu) "ping does not work not history is saved and tracerout columns information is wrong (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/661753
[19:40]  * neriukas rado buga :D didziausia ubuntu klaida "ubuntu software center" :D
[19:43] <hggdh> slinker: I agree with the importance, but...
[19:43] <geekosopher> devildante: thanks for updating the tags :)
[19:43] <hggdh> slinker: there are actually 3 (!) different issues there!
[19:44] <hggdh> slinker: may I suggest you to open two new bugs on gnome-nettool, and split the three issues so that we have one bug per issue, one issue per bug?
[19:46] <hggdh> slinker: and you could say something like: "thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. I took the liberty of opening the additional bug  xxxx and yyyy for the issues of yadda and blahblah"
[19:47] <hggdh> slinker: "we cannot track multiple issues per bug. I also subscribed you to those new bugs, and adjusted the title on this one to one single issue"
[19:48] <hggdh> slinker: then I will be happy to mark the Importance on each one :-)
[19:49] <hggdh> slinker: finally, if you want to, you can blame me ;-)
[19:50] <devildante> geekosopher: yes, please ask him to do that
[19:50] <devildante> geekosopher: and you're welcome :)
[19:50] <geekosopher> devildante: right away!
[20:10] <geekosopher> devildante: done. hope the responses are okay
[20:11] <devildante> geekosopher: great, now set to confirmed. and before you ask why, it's the kernel team policy :p
[20:12] <geekosopher> argh! what?
[20:12] <geekosopher> devildante: you serious?
[20:13] <devildante> geekosopher: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BugTriage/BugStates and scroll to Confirmed bugs
[20:13] <devildante> rather to Incomplete bugs
[20:19] <geekosopher> devildante: okay, my bad... missed reading these parts :) Thanks for helping me discover
[20:20] <devildante> geekosopher: np, I was shocked too :p
[20:22]  * geekosopher is wondering why the resources are distributed between /Kernel and /KernelTeam
[20:25] <geekosopher> time for me to get into sleep mode... see you hggdh, devildante :)
[20:25] <devildante> bye :)
[20:25] <hggdh> geekosopher: see you, and thank you for heloing
[20:25] <hggdh> ohhh too late...
[20:34] <xteejx> bug 71684 - this is fixed in brasero but gnomebaker and dvd+rw-tools aren't
[20:34] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 71684 in gnomebaker (Ubuntu) (and 3 other projects) "Unable to burn multisession disk (heat: 14)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/71684
[20:35] <xteejx> any ideas? (its really old)
[20:39] <penguin42> do they all use the same underlying library/tool ?
[20:40] <xteejx> Probably dvd+rw-tool (I'm guessing)
[21:04] <njin> hello, could someone set importance for this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/480903 thanks
[21:04] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 480903 in linux (Ubuntu) "canon iP4600 does not print; cnijfilter-common install failed (affects: 6) (heat: 30)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[21:06] <xteejx> njin: Done
[21:06] <njin> xteejx: thanks
[21:07] <xteejx> njin: no prob
[22:08] <jgr_> If I use 'ubuntu-bug' and if I choose 'Another problem', it simple exits
[22:08] <jgr_> If I go to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu the 'report a bug' is a link to documentation about reporting bugs
[22:09] <penguin42> jgr_: Oh, it shouldn't exit
[22:09] <jgr_> So, after reading so many documents how to report a bug, I actually can not do that :-(
[22:09] <penguin42> jgr_: Hmm, what's the problem?
[22:10] <penguin42> jgr_: What was your original bug?
[22:11] <jgr_> It is related with a very small issue when installing a aspell dictionary in a fresh 10.10
[22:11] <penguin42> jgr_: OK, so do    ubuntu-bug aspell
[22:12] <jgr_> yes, I'm doing that
[22:12] <jgr_> thanks
[22:12] <penguin42> or if it's a particular dictionary package do ubuntu-bug aspell-whatever
[22:12] <jgr_> ubuntu-bug aspell-pt-pt
[22:12] <jgr_> :-)
[22:12] <jgr_> thanks penguin42
[22:12] <penguin42> jgr_: But that 'other problem' behaviour in ubuntu-bug is rather broken
[22:13] <jgr_> yeh, the 'other problem' should continue to some where
[22:13]  * penguin42 looks to see if it's already reported
[22:13] <njin> hello could someone set importance for this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/654791 thanks
[22:13] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 654791 in linux (Ubuntu) "Kernel oops - Winfast USB DTV Dongle (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[22:15] <penguin42> jgr_: Bug 653928 is the other problem bug
[22:15] <ubot2> penguin42: Bug 653928 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/653928 is private
[22:16] <penguin42> hmm
[22:16] <penguin42> bug 654928
[22:16] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 654928 in apport (Ubuntu) "application does not allow to report bugs concerning ubuntu in general (asks for PID if you try to report "other problems") (affects: 1) (heat: 497)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/654928
[22:16] <penguin42> better
[22:21] <jgr_> I think it's not a bug in ubuntu-bug, but simple a feature that should be improved
[22:21] <penguin42> jgr_: I don't think so, the 'other problem' option must have been put in with the hope it would do something useful
[22:22] <jgr_> yeh, but probably not enough time to 'do something useful'
[22:23] <jgr_> I can be improved, definitely
[22:48] <penguin42> can someone suggest what to do with bug 656558 ? The original reporter is saying it's now working, however I doubt there was a bug fix that actually fixed it
[22:48] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 656558 in linux (Ubuntu) "Kernel panic on boot: cannot mount root fs (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/656558
[22:53] <hggdh> penguin42: since we do not have the kernel data, I guess the only thing we can do is close it
[22:53] <penguin42> hggdh: Yeh I'm torn between invalid and fix-released though
[22:54] <hggdh> penguin42: I would go fix released, unknown fix
[22:54] <penguin42> ok
[23:18] <penguin42> bu 627487 is curious, it suggests the package just needs a rebuild (or there is a bug with libwx that is causing that)
[23:19] <penguin42> bug 627487 even
[23:19] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 627487 in wxwidgets2.8 (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "KiCad won't start (affects: 14) (dups: 2) (heat: 88)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/627487
[23:27] <hggdh> yes, interesting. Perhaps one of the dependant packages has been updated?
[23:38] <penguin42> I guess for those users a rebuild of that package would be a nice fix, but it looks like maybe libwx something has changed and it needs fixing
[23:42] <hggdh> yes. If the version is the same, perhaps a changed compile option?
[23:44] <penguin42> it looks from that the symbol has been removed from the library
[23:45] <penguin42> actually, maybe symbol versioning stuff - now how does nm work with that...
[23:50] <penguin42> hmm annoying, can't see a way
[23:54] <hggdh> I wonder if rebuilding it on a builder (PPA, for example, or pbuilder) would show the same behaviour
[23:54] <hggdh> as opposed to a debuild within the user's environment
[23:56] <penguin42> I suspect it would, I think it's just the age of the wx library it was built against - but I don't understand what's happening to the symbol versioining to know why
[23:59] <penguin42> hggdh: The library is saying that symbol came in version 2.8.9 but for some reason KiCad is asking for it in 2.8 - that could be Kicad did something silly, the library used to declare it differently or the tools changed somewhere