| vadi21 | My upload to a PPA is getting stuck at 13k repeatedly. Anything I can do? | 01:23 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | vadi21: Are you using FTP or SFTP? | 01:26 |
| vadi21 | it says via ftp | 01:26 |
| wgrant | Try SFTP instead. See http://blog.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/sftp-uploads | 01:26 |
| vadi21 | Where can I find this dput.cf? | 01:27 |
| vadi21 | Unless I should make one in ~ | 01:28 |
| wgrant | vadi21: You can alter the one at /etc/dput.cf | 01:29 |
| wgrant | or add a new stanza in ~/.dput.cf | 01:29 |
| vadi21 | thanks | 01:29 |
| vadi21 | I adjusted the method to say sftp, and I don't have a ~/.dput.cf, but it still tries to use ftp | 01:31 |
| vadi21 | ie: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/276387/ | 01:31 |
| wgrant | vadi21: You need to change the ppa stanza, not the DEFAULT one. | 01:34 |
| wgrant | Since the ppa stanza overrides it. | 01:34 |
| vadi21 | right. stfp now. no progress at all on the .tar.gz unfortunately | 01:35 |
| vadi21 | oh, some progress. will be patient | 01:36 |
| wgrant | vadi21: Yeah, the SFTP mode unfortunately doesn't show progress. | 01:38 |
| vadi21 | i see | 01:39 |
| vadi21 | it said done on both files now for a while, but isn't returning the prompt yet | 02:00 |
| vadi21 | still at it. | 02:21 |
| lifeless | you may have a PMTUd blackhole | 02:22 |
| lifeless | if so try lowering your MTU by 40 bytes | 02:22 |
| micahg | lifeless: FYI, karma broke again (if you tell me where to file a bug for this I"ll stop poking you :)) | 02:23 |
| lifeless | micahg: launchpad | 02:24 |
| micahg | lifeless: right, but under the launchpad general project? | 02:25 |
| vadi21 | lifeless: eh? | 02:28 |
| lifeless | micahg: sure, its arguably either registry or foundations, but meh. | 02:33 |
| micahg | lifeless: k, also bugs for answers | 02:33 |
| micahg | *or | 02:33 |
| lifeless | micahg: potentially but less likely | 02:38 |
| micahg | lifeless: hmm, so I'll file it under answers then, thanks | 02:39 |
| lifeless | anyhow, I'm sure the query is fixed, question is whether we have reenabled the cronscript | 02:39 |
| lifeless | m | 02:39 |
| lifeless | micahg: why answes? | 02:39 |
| micahg | lifeless: oh, I thought that's what you were implying since it was most likely a cron or something | 02:40 |
| lifeless | micahg: oh, as an 'answers' | 02:40 |
| lifeless | micahg: that would be fine | 02:40 |
| lifeless | I thought you meant the bugs of the answers component. | 02:40 |
| micahg | https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/129830 | 02:41 |
| lifeless | thanks | 02:45 |
| mgunes | does Malone no longer present RSS feeds for bugs in a project / distribution? I haven't used feeds in a while and they seem to be unavailable now. | 04:20 |
| cody-somerville | mgunes, I see it just fine | 04:22 |
| mgunes | hmm, seems to be specific to Firefox 4; it doesn't display the RSS icon in the location bar on some pages that advertise feeds. I'll look into it and file a bug if needed; thanks. | 04:25 |
| darkmagez_ | anyone got access to the unfiltered version of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hal/+bug/66254/comments/33 ? kinda killed the important part | 05:03 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 66254 in HAL "empty CD not correctly recognized by hal (affected: 1, heat: 69)" [Medium,Fix released] | 05:03 |
| wgrant | darkmagez_: Is it filtered? | 05:06 |
| darkmagez_ | yes :( | 05:06 |
| wgrant | Ah, the match key was detected as an email address? | 05:06 |
| darkmagez_ | yup | 05:06 |
| wgrant | You can log in to see that. | 05:07 |
| wgrant | But: | 05:07 |
| wgrant | <match key="@info.parent:storage.cdrom.cdr" bool="true"> | 05:07 |
| darkmagez_ | cheers | 05:07 |
| === Lcawte|Asleep is now known as Lcawte | ||
| ari-tczew | what is wrong with Launchpad Janitor on bug 544284 | 09:33 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 544284 in xenomai (Ubuntu) "no matching kernel patch, please update to 2.5.x (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/544284 | 09:33 |
| ari-tczew | looks not good | 09:33 |
| wgrant | What's wrong with it? | 09:34 |
| wgrant | The wrapping? | 09:34 |
| ari-tczew | wgrant: yes | 09:36 |
| nigelb | thats because the wrapping of lp is at 72 chars I think | 09:36 |
| wgrant | It looks like it. | 09:36 |
| lifeless | there is a bug | 09:48 |
| lifeless | on maline | 09:48 |
| lifeless | bah | 09:48 |
| lifeless | malone | 09:48 |
| geser | wgrant: as you are a little familiar with the buildd code, can you take a look at my patch for bug #615286 if it should fix the DEPWAIT problem? | 09:52 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 615286 in Launchpad Auto Build System "DEPWAIT not recognized from build log (affected: 2, heat: 14)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/615286 | 09:52 |
| wgrant | geser: It looks reasonable. Do the other new messages not exist any more? | 09:56 |
| geser | wgrant: that's the current message in recent maverick and natty build logs | 09:58 |
| wgrant | geser: But what about the "no installation candidate" one? | 09:59 |
| wgrant | There are a couple of different errors. | 09:59 |
| geser | wgrant: I assumed that apt changed it once again to the current error message | 10:02 |
| geser | I'll check the apt source | 10:03 |
| geser | wgrant: you are right, I'll add the other regex too. I guess I should duplicate the regex and add the missing ' to not break support for older releases, right? | 10:08 |
| wgrant | geser: or add "'?" or similar to the existing regex. | 10:09 |
| wgrant | To work with or without the quotes. | 10:09 |
| geser | right | 10:12 |
| geser | wgrant: btw, do you know why the last missing dependency is used in DEPWAIT instead of the first one? | 10:13 |
| wgrant | geser: Not sure. | 10:14 |
| geser | patch updated to cover also the other cases | 10:16 |
| maks_ | could we *please* have those attachments on bugs properly sent out email notification.s | 13:05 |
| maks_ | it be really cool as currently this reduces considerably any desire to want to work on ubuntu bugs | 13:05 |
| maks_ | due to their heavy overhead compared to debian debugs. | 13:05 |
| maks_ | to be clear i'm speaking of https://launchpad.net/bugs/3926 | 13:06 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 3926 in Launchpad Bugs "Attachments should be included in the bug notification (affected: 0, heat: 3)" [Medium,Triaged] | 13:06 |
| maks_ | not that i have a particular love of any bts but debugs and even bugzilla get this right. | 13:07 |
| pulb | hi! I'm trying to build a package A via a recipe. the package depends on another package B available in the target ppa. A won't build because the dependency B can't be found. Any ideas how I make the recipe use the ppa as mirror for dependencies? | 13:50 |
| wgrant | pulb: Can you link to the build? | 13:52 |
| pulb | wgrant: I don't know where to do that | 13:53 |
| wgrant | pulb: What's the URL of the build? | 13:55 |
| pulb | wgrant: the ppa is here: https://launchpad.net/~pulb/+archive/basenji-daily | 13:57 |
| pulb | the recipe here: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~pulb/+recipe/volumedb-tools-daily-recipe/ | 13:57 |
| wgrant | pulb: It is picking up the dependency fine. | 14:03 |
| wgrant | But... | 14:03 |
| wgrant | While your basenji source is versioned 0.7.1+469-0~maverick1, the archive contains binaries versioned 0.7.1-0~maverick1 | 14:05 |
| wgrant | I'm not entirely sure what's wrong here. | 14:05 |
| * wgrant is digging deeper. | 14:05 | |
| wgrant | Oh. | 14:07 |
| wgrant | pulb: You built into the wrong PPA. | 14:08 |
| pulb | I did? :-) | 14:08 |
| wgrant | pulb: The builds are targetted at ppa:pulb/ppa, not ppa:pulb/basenji-daily. | 14:09 |
| pulb | hmm I'm pretty sure I clicked "daily ppa" | 14:09 |
| pulb | wgrant: your right, it has been build in the wrong ppa | 14:10 |
| pulb | but its specified correctly in the recipe | 14:10 |
| pulb | however, if I click on "request builds" the ppa is the wrong one.. | 14:12 |
| wgrant | pulb: What does it default to on the manual build request form? | 14:12 |
| pulb | wgrant: "basenji PPA" | 14:12 |
| wgrant | It is the automatic daily build archive, so it's not entirely clear that it should also change the manual default. | 14:12 |
| wgrant | But perhaps it should. | 14:12 |
| wgrant | Could you file a bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+filebug? | 14:12 |
| pulb | wgrant: many thanks! I'll do so | 14:13 |
| pulb | wgrant: source format 3.0 (quilt) won't build. does 3.0 (native) work? | 14:19 |
| wgrant | pulb: 3.0 (native) will, yes. | 14:21 |
| pulb | ok, thanks again :-) | 14:21 |
| wgrant | 3.0 (quilt) requires an orig.tar.*, which the recipe build infrastructure doesn't support yet. | 14:21 |
| pulb | ok, I see, no problem | 14:21 |
| wgrant | It's a bit of a mess to get the files shuffled around properly. | 14:21 |
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| lelamal | hi all, I want to unsubscribe from bug #1 (ubuntu), but I can't. everytime I get an error: "The following errors were encountered: * Server error, please contact an administrator. OOPS ID:OOPS-1751K1229". can anyone please help? | 15:10 |
| ubot5 | Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: list.index(x): x not in list (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1) | 15:10 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1751K1229 | 15:10 |
| lelamal | I don't know what does ubot5's output mean, but I can't access its link | 15:16 |
| geser | lelamal: the bot posted a link with the traceback of the crash which helps the devs to see why and where it happened | 15:24 |
| lelamal | oh it wasn't meant for me, I see | 15:25 |
| === Ng_ is now known as Ng | ||
| LinuxGuy2009 | How do I completely delete my launchpad account. | 20:14 |
| LinuxGuy2009 | ? | 20:14 |
| lifeless | you can deactivate it | 20:16 |
| lifeless | https://help.launchpad.net/YourAccount/Closing | 20:17 |
| LinuxGuy2009 | thank you | 20:18 |
| LinuxGuy2009 | Is launchpad part of ubuntu or is it not distro specific? | 20:20 |
| lifeless | it is not distro specific | 20:20 |
| LinuxGuy2009 | Oh ok Ill keep it then. | 20:20 |
| lifeless | Launchpad hosts Ubuntu, and many upstream projects (like mysql and drizzle) | 20:20 |
| GaryvdM | Hi - I'm trying to branch from lp:gf.recipe.bzr, but I'm getting an error because it is stack on a branch of a different format. | 20:44 |
| GaryvdM | error here: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/515194/ | 20:44 |
| lifeless | the older format one needs upgrading | 20:45 |
| GaryvdM | lifeless: Would it be possible to get a lp admin to upgrade, or do I need to contact the author? | 20:46 |
| GaryvdM | (~ree) | 20:46 |
| lifeless | generally the author is preferred | 20:46 |
| GaryvdM | The branch it is stack on is ~ree/gf.recipe.bzr/trunk which is Packs 6 rich-root | 20:47 |
| GaryvdM | ok | 20:47 |
| GaryvdM | I'll send him a message. | 20:47 |
| === Guest16378 is now known as jelmer | ||
| === jelmer is now known as Guest5922 | ||
| xteejx | Hey guys anyone able to place a ban please? | 21:03 |
| lifeless | whats up? | 21:03 |
| xteejx | Alex Riesen LP id: raa-lkml - reason: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/243963/comments/10 | 21:04 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 243963 in firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) "*** glibc detected *** ...firefox-3.0/firefox: free(): invalid next size (affected: 0, heat: 8)" [Undecided,Invalid] | 21:04 |
| lifeless | ugh, thats rather unplesant | 21:04 |
| xteejx | unpleasant? So I used an auto response...meh the guy isn't getting any more help from me - I don't see why I should | 21:05 |
| lifeless | I can understand that | 21:05 |
| * xteejx is a bit annoyed at the moment so sorry if I seem a bit short, I'm normally not | 21:06 | |
| lifeless | I'm not a sysadmin, I can't do bans. | 21:06 |
| GaryvdM | xteejx: Totally justified... | 21:06 |
| GaryvdM | (your responce that is) | 21:06 |
| xteejx | Being sworn at? | 21:06 |
| xteejx | Oh lol | 21:06 |
| lifeless | For something like this we'd warn them for sure, I think. | 21:06 |
| lifeless | I'll point a sysadmin at it when they start work | 21:07 |
| xteejx | Well I thought "this hasnt been updated for over a year it can't be that bad a problem, I'll send a quick response to check"...and omg | 21:07 |
| xteejx | lifeless: Thanks :) Very much appreciated | 21:07 |
| lifeless | xteejx: that said, the dialog makes it clear that he wasn't going to test anymore. | 21:08 |
| lifeless | xteejx: did you read that first? | 21:08 |
| xteejx | I did yes | 21:08 |
| lifeless | one of the problems with Launchpad is that the bug filer can't escape | 21:08 |
| xteejx | but the user above my comment John *was* testing it | 21:08 |
| lifeless | even if the bug stops being relevant to them (like in this case), but still exists. | 21:08 |
| * micahg though one can usubscribe from ones own bugs | 21:08 | |
| micahg | *thought | 21:08 |
| xteejx | It was directed at anyone who could check it | 21:08 |
| xteejx | I thought you could too | 21:09 |
| TheUni | is it possible to do a dry-run ppa upload? i'd like to have my package built but not published | 21:12 |
| lifeless | TheUni: no | 21:13 |
| lifeless | you could use a different PPA though as a staging area | 21:14 |
| thumper | morning | 21:14 |
| TheUni | yea, was just hoping to avoid that | 21:14 |
| michaelh1 | Hi there. I have a few bugs that are also linked to GCC bugzilla but they always show up as Status Unknown / Importance Unknown | 21:26 |
| michaelh1 | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/gcc-bugzilla suggests some type of import is broken | 21:27 |
| lifeless | michaelh1: how so? | 21:27 |
| michaelh1 | The 'next check fields' are all in the past | 21:28 |
| lifeless | oh yay another earthquake | 21:28 |
| * michaelh1 rocks and rolls | 21:28 | |
| lifeless | bet its 4.2 or something | 21:28 |
| lifeless | so I think that simply means 'will get checked when a scan is done' | 21:29 |
| lifeless | also its possible that we don't check bugs in terminal state; I'm not sure. could you post something on https://answers.launchpad.net/malone/ | 21:29 |
| michaelh1 | Will do | 21:32 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === jenkins1 is now known as jenkins | ||
| === jenkins is now known as Guest14708 | ||
| maxb | bzr is python | 22:45 |
| maxb | erm, oops | 22:45 |
| maxb | bad ssh connection issues | 22:46 |
| maxb | I wish I knew how it could stop responding from my perspective but actually still act on my keypresses | 22:46 |
| exarkun | TCP flow control is bidirectional | 22:46 |
| exarkun | Intermittent network issues can cause the server->client flow control to decide it needs to back off from sending for a while | 22:47 |
| exarkun | Meanwhile the client->server flow control can happily continue passing bytes in a timely manner | 22:47 |
| maxb | meh. Sounds plausible | 22:47 |
| exarkun | I sometimes ponder adding a ~ command to ssh to let the client tell the server to reset all its timeout/backoff counters | 22:48 |
| exarkun | Since it's often quite easy for a human to know when some bad network issue has passed | 22:49 |
| exarkun | But it would be hard to implement because the TCP state machine is in the kernel and there are only a few knobs you can twist from userspace. | 22:49 |
| GaryvdM | I just logged a bug for bzr and saw this: "Thanks for submitting this bug report. We should be in touch soon. If you want to talk to somebody now, try #bzr on the freenode irc network." - cool launchpad :-) | 23:03 |
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === jelmer__ is now known as jelmer | ||
| fta | since Oct 16 6am (CEST), the lp API is at least 3 times slower and timeouts all the time, no longer usable for my ppa dashboards | 23:47 |
| fta | OOPS-1751ED2047 OOPS-1751ED1981 .. | 23:48 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1751ED2047 | 23:48 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1751ED1981 | 23:48 |
| natesm | hi, I'm trying to figure out debian packaging and PPAs. I made a lucid source package ("lucid" in the changelog file) and a maverick one, but the maverick one is being rejected by launchpad because it already exists (the lucid one of course). I'm clearly doing it wrong - any help? thanks! | 23:48 |
| GaryvdM | natesm: I think you will need different version numbers. e.g. 1.0-0~lucid 1.0-0~mavrick | 23:50 |
| maxb | natesm: Whilst this may seem counter-intuitive at first, it is mandatory that each upload, *even if for different distros* have a distinct version number | 23:51 |
| maxb | natesm: To understand why this is, consider: What if someone using your lucid package then upgrades their system to maverick? The package manager needs a way to track the upgrade to the newer version of your package too | 23:51 |
| natesm | ah, ok, makes sense | 23:52 |
| natesm | thanks a lot! | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!