[17:58] <kees> jdstrand_, mdeslaur, sbeattie: meetin' time in 2 min?
[17:58] <mdeslaur> kees: sure
[18:10] <jdstrand_> o/
[18:10] <SergioMeneses> jdstrand, \o
[18:15] <sbeattie> kees: doh, I'm back now.
[18:16] <mdeslaur> cool
[18:16] <kees> okidoky
[18:16] <kees> uhm, let's see.
[18:16] <kees> I'm on triage this week.
[18:17] <kees> there will be a kernel publication tomorrow that I'll be shepharding a bit, then it's back to internal audits
[18:17] <kees> need to do some natty kernel rebases for all the kernel security features that aren't mainline.
[18:18] <kees> and some blueprint work, but we can talk about that after status updates.
[18:18] <kees> mdeslaur: all you
[18:18] <mdeslaur> I'm currently testing my poppler updates
[18:18] <mdeslaur> which I should be releasing tomorrow probably
[18:18] <mdeslaur> and I have an embargoed issue to look at
[18:19] <mdeslaur> and will be preparing my mini9 for UDS
[18:19] <mdeslaur> that's it from me
[18:19] <mdeslaur> jdstrand: your turn
[18:20] <jdstrand> I got sidetracked last week with apparmor 2.5.1 SRUs. 2.5.1 is in natty now, and waiting for approval into -proposed for maverick and lucid
[18:20] <jdstrand> I've got a bunch of mozilla updates to test/publish
[18:20] <kees> s/got sidetracked/kicked ass/
[18:20] <jdstrand> heh
[18:20] <sbeattie> yeah
[18:20] <jdstrand> well, thanks :)
[18:21] <jdstrand> libvirt is almost ready to publish-- I fixed virtinst and vm-builder and just want to go through my checklists again
[18:21] <jdstrand> so that should go out this week
[18:21] <jdstrand> if I have time, I'll start moodle
[18:22] <jdstrand> that's it from me
[18:22] <jdstrand> sbeattie: your turn
[18:23] <sbeattie> I spent last week in a maze of openjdk build issues; alas, apparently there's an upgrade issue and so doko will be sending me new packages, as well as something that will hopefully build on maverick/armel.
[18:23] <sbeattie> so there'll be more of that this week.
[18:23] <doko> sbeattie: they are there, see email
[18:23] <sbeattie> doko: cool thanks, I hadn't rechecked my email in the last two hours.
[18:24] <sbeattie> I got a bit behind on cve triage last week as well, so will help catch upon the backlog today.
[18:24] <kees> cool, no worries
[18:25] <sbeattie> I hope to get some testing in of jdstrand's apparmor SRUs this week.
[18:25] <sbeattie> and I think that's everything for me.
[18:25] <sbeattie> does anyone else have any issues to raise with the security team?
[18:25] <sbeattie> robbiew? jj-afk?
[18:26] <kees> what blueprints do we want to get into UDS?
[18:26] <jj-afk> hey
[18:26] <robbiew> I'm good
[18:26] <robbiew> and if you need UDS sessions....let me know?
[18:26] <sbeattie> kees: hrm, good question.
[18:26] <jjohansen> uhm, I think we should have an AA meeting on wednesday to discuss uds
[18:27] <kees> my short list is: better boottime debug/linearization, roundtable w/ kernel team on more hardening features, roundtable on what to do with our wide meaning of "medium" priority issues.
[18:27] <mdeslaur> kees: re: medium issues: hide them under the mattress?
[18:27] <kees> mdeslaur: done!
[18:27] <mdeslaur> \o/
[18:27] <sbeattie> which of the previous uncompleted blueprints do we wish to carry forward?
[18:28] <kees> sbeattie: yeah, that's the other question.
[18:28] <kees> I always claim I'm going to work on making dpkg fscap aware, but I never get anywhere with it.
[18:28] <jdstrand> I thought we could actually discuss that there-- since the already discussed ones have been, well, already discussed
[18:28] <sbeattie> jjohansen: AA meeting wednesday, +1 from me.
[18:28] <kees> yeah
[18:28] <kees> jdstrand: good point.
[18:29] <sbeattie> kees: fscaps> heh, me too.
[18:29] <jdstrand> so it is just a matter of identifying what to push forward
[18:29] <jdstrand> we should look at at least lucid and maverick imo
[18:29] <kees> and all our past stuff already has full work-item breakdowns...
[18:29]  * jdstrand nods
[18:30] <jdstrand> if there is something that needs more discussion, we could use a breakout room. or pre-allocate a time for miscellaneous things
[18:30] <sbeattie> that works for me.
[18:31] <kees> okay, I'll go build out the 5 days of roundtables for us, then.
[18:31]  * ScottK mentions (just for fun) that the phrase "AA meeting" has other meanings.
[18:31] <kees> heh
[18:31] <jjohansen> ScottK: intentionally so
[18:31] <jdstrand> one thing people could do to prepare is look at their postponed items from http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/lucid/canonical-security.html and http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/maverick/canonical-security.html
[18:32] <jjohansen> jdstrand: you mean so that we can prepare to postpone them for another cycle :)
[18:32] <kees> yeah, agreed
[18:32] <kees> hehe
[18:32] <jdstrand> jjohansen: yes. prepare to postpone :P
[18:33]  * sbeattie adds a work item "postpone other work items"
[18:34] <kees> heh
[18:34] <kees> okay, sounds like a wrap. :) thanks everyone!
[18:34] <mdeslaur> thanks!
[18:34] <jdstrand> thanks
[18:39] <Dens777> Ïðèâåò.ß èç óêðàèíû à âû ëîõè ãîíäîíû è ïèäîðàñû ÷ìî óåáàíîå âû åá¸òå âàøó êàìåçå è áàðàçå?Greetings. I from ua. Friends you correspond only in English?