davidascher | hi y'all. anyone here been successful installing vmware tools on ubuntu 10.10? | 00:38 |
---|---|---|
* micahg uses Virtualbox | 00:39 | |
davidascher | micahg: will it let you access mac filesystems from the guest OS? | 00:43 |
micahg | davidascher: hmmm, idk | 00:43 |
=== debfx_ is now known as debfx | ||
fishor | hallo all, i have problem with current 4.0b8pre. Fi watch youtube video embeded to thirt party website, i'll get lot's of artifacts | 08:55 |
fishor | here is screencast http://videobin.org/+281/2il.html | 08:55 |
fishor | do this some thing known? | 08:55 |
fta2 | jdstrand, http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/7.0.517.41~r62167/ (bug 663523) as usual, I can't test armel | 13:19 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 663523 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "6.0.472.63~r59945 -> 7.0.517.41~r62167 upgrade (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/663523 | 13:19 |
jdstrand | fta2: thanks! | 13:19 |
fta2 | jdstrand, it's a major upgrade, so i took that opportunity to re-sync my branches (so lucid caught up and all l/m/n are at the same level packaging wise).. i think that was the idea, right? | 13:21 |
fta2 | there was not much difference anywhay. just apport and some translations | 13:22 |
fta2 | anyway | 13:22 |
jdstrand | fta2: well, the idea was to keep the changes in debian/ minimal regardless of the upstream version. I'll review it. from what you said it sounds like it shouldn't be a problem | 13:25 |
fta2 | jdstrand, ok, thanks. let me know if you have any question regarding the changes | 13:30 |
flo1 | hello, how can I change the font for writing a new not-html message? | 13:48 |
flo1 | bye. | 14:29 |
chrisccoulson_ | asac - i've narrowed down our problem with gcc-4.5 quite a bit now | 15:53 |
chrisccoulson_ | ......hardening-wrapper! | 15:53 |
chrisccoulson_ | does that mean i can blame jdstrand? ;) | 15:53 |
asac | chrisccoulson_: yeah | 16:01 |
asac | chrisccoulson_: actually kees | 16:01 |
chrisccoulson_ | asac - yeah, i just asked kees for help on #ubuntu-devel | 16:01 |
chrisccoulson_ | next step is to narrow it down to a specific build option | 16:01 |
chrisccoulson_ | i will try -fstack-protector first | 16:02 |
micahg | chrisccoulson_: then there should be no issue with thunderbird builds since it's not used | 16:02 |
chrisccoulson_ | micahg - yeah, that's ok then | 16:02 |
chrisccoulson_ | although they should use it ;) | 16:02 |
asac | chrisccoulson_: have you looked at ffox 4 + GL/GLES support for webgl? | 16:05 |
asac | do we need a session on that at UDS? | 16:05 |
asac | what we really want is that you can easily swap out GL/GLES backend for that | 16:05 |
asac | both on armel and i386 .... | 16:05 |
chrisccoulson_ | asac - not yet, although I think there was an e-mail on one of the mozilla mailing lists a couple of weeks back detailing the current state of all of this | 16:06 |
chrisccoulson_ | let me check, just to make sure i didn't dream it ;) | 16:06 |
asac | i think all this already landed | 16:07 |
asac | in trunk for 4.0 ... that was my impression at moz summit a few month back at least | 16:07 |
fta | hi | 16:11 |
fta | anyone running natty here? | 16:11 |
fta | need chromium/natty testers, for the gcc 4.5 stuff | 16:11 |
fta | asac, http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/chromium-translations.png | 16:14 |
asac | fta: awesome. is that the future or already implemented? | 16:15 |
asac | a full feedback loop is really good if you get this going | 16:15 |
fta | asac, it's 99% implemented | 16:16 |
jdstrand | chrisccoulson_: fyi, if I take a thunderbird profile (2.0.0.12, ~/.mozilla-thunderbird) created on hardy, then copy that to a maverick system and run thunderbird, I lose all my imap accounts. See lp:qa-regression-testing/notest_testing/thunderbird | 16:25 |
jdstrand | s/notest/notes/ | 16:25 |
jdstrand | chrisccoulson_: so it seems 2.0 to 3.1 are not quite seemless | 16:26 |
micahg | jdstrand: I think someone reported that as well :( | 16:26 |
jdstrand | chrisccoulson_: this won't affect the pending update, since the some problem is with maverick-release | 16:26 |
jdstrand | micahg: k. more of an fyi for the 3.1 transition | 16:26 |
micahg | jdstrand: thanks, we'll need to address that in the next two months since Lucid will be moving to 3.1 | 16:27 |
jdstrand | micahg: well, lucid has 3.0, so it may be ok (haven't tested yet) | 16:27 |
micahg | jdstrand: right, be we'll be supporting upgrades from Hardy and Karmic still | 16:28 |
jdstrand | reight, yeah, I see what you mean now | 16:28 |
jdstrand | right | 16:28 |
chrisccoulson_ | jdstrand, oh, thanks. i'll remember that ;) | 16:28 |
jdstrand | so hardy (2.0) or karmic (2.0) -> lucid (3.1) | 16:29 |
micahg | chrisccoulson_: I was wondering, since we have no "beta" builds in teh daily PPA ATM, can I strip that out for the LUcid 3.1 upgrade? | 16:54 |
chrisccoulson_ | micahg - yeah, that can be taken out of the 3.1 upgrade, if there aren't any beta builds already | 17:29 |
micahg | chrisccoulson_: ok, I was going to try to push 3.1 to tb-stable, but in light of jdstrand's findings, I think I'll wait | 17:30 |
micahg | chrisccoulson_: also, I think at this point, I"m going to remove the mv .thunderbird .thunderbird.UPSTREAM as well since our dailies use .thunderbird | 17:30 |
micahg | chrisccoulson_: should I assign the gnome-web-photo glue issue to you? | 17:35 |
chrisccoulson_ | micahg - yeah, can do | 17:39 |
micahg | chrisccoulson_: k, done, and milestoned for alpha 3 | 17:40 |
chrisccoulson_ | thanks | 17:40 |
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
ubugeek | Hi, how can I install firefox 3.6.11 on Lucid - packet manager still say - no updates | 19:21 |
ubugeek | ok, no answer - bye | 19:28 |
gnomefreak | chrisccoulson: was the gcc bug fixed? | 21:18 |
chrisccoulson | gnomefreak, not yet | 21:20 |
gnomefreak | chrisccoulson: thanks | 21:20 |
gnomefreak | firefox wont open :( | 21:24 |
gnomefreak | does crome use xul? | 21:25 |
gnomefreak | chrome | 21:25 |
micahg | gnomefreak: no, it's webkit based | 21:34 |
micahg | gnomefreak: the problem with Firefox/xulrunner in Natty is the hardening-wrapper | 21:34 |
gnomefreak | micahg: thanks | 21:34 |
gnomefreak | >50 mailing lists post only 1 is not spam | 21:37 |
gnomefreak | i cant belive most of the addons have not been updated passed 4.0b6 we are on ~b8 | 21:50 |
micahg | gnomefreak: b6 is the last release ATM | 21:50 |
gnomefreak | not for us | 21:51 |
micahg | b7 is branched, but waiting for stuff to land/be fixed | 21:51 |
micahg | gnomefreak: no, I'm saying it's the last beta | 21:51 |
micahg | I mean teh last one that has been officially released as a beta | 21:51 |
gnomefreak | oh | 21:51 |
micahg | beta 7 is still pending | 21:51 |
gnomefreak | for some reason i have maverick build on natty PPA | 21:52 |
micahg | gnomefreak: are you sure the PPA source is set for Natty? | 21:52 |
gnomefreak | looking atm | 21:52 |
gnomefreak | deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa/ubuntu natty main | 21:52 |
gnomefreak | firefox-4.0: Installed: 4.0~b8~hg20101018r55986+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~maverick Candidate: 4.0~b8~hg20101018r55986+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~maverick | 21:53 |
micahg | apt-cache policy | grep ubuntu-mozilla-daily | 21:54 |
gnomefreak | gnomefreak@Development:~$ apt-cache policy | grep ubuntu-mozilla-daily | 21:54 |
gnomefreak | 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages | 21:54 |
gnomefreak | release v=11.04,o=LP-PPA-ubuntu-mozilla-daily,a=natty,n=natty,l=PPA for Ubuntu Mozilla Daily Build Team,c=main | 21:54 |
chrisccoulson | there are no natty builds of firefox for x86 yet, they all fail because of the gcc issue | 21:55 |
micahg | right, was just about to say that :) | 21:55 |
gnomefreak | not exactly | 21:55 |
micahg | the build is 2 days old | 21:55 |
gnomefreak | Version table: | 21:56 |
gnomefreak | 3.6.12~hg20101019r34686+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 0 | 21:56 |
gnomefreak | 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa/ubuntu/ natty/main | 21:56 |
micahg | yep, weird | 21:56 |
gnomefreak | i have a firefox update waiting for me to get to it | 21:56 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: why does PIE work on 3.6 but not 4.0? | 21:56 |
gnomefreak | im sure it will fail to configure | 21:56 |
chrisccoulson | micahg - does it work on 3.6? remember that we don't run the test-suite there, so the builds all succeed | 21:57 |
chrisccoulson | but i bet they don't run ;) | 21:57 |
micahg | oh, right, heh | 21:57 |
gnomefreak | but what the hell ill let it update and have a smoke in the meantime | 21:57 |
gnomefreak | here 4.0 runs but 3.* doesnt again guessing due to gcc bug | 21:58 |
gnomefreak | be back in a few | 21:58 |
micahg | gnomefreak: right, but you have the maverick build for 4.0 | 21:58 |
gnomefreak | wait dont we use a general GCC in /rules, i did for SM and dont recall if i did for sunbird but i think i did | 21:59 |
micahg | gnomefreak: we're using the gcc in the toolchain across teh board I think | 21:59 |
gnomefreak | gerneal == without versions, or is that only for spac | 21:59 |
gnomefreak | sparc | 21:59 |
micahg | sparc is gone :) | 21:59 |
chrisccoulson | sparc? nobody cares about that ;) | 21:59 |
gnomefreak | it was a while ago :) | 22:00 |
chrisccoulson | yeah, the builds all use the default toolchain, although FF-4.0 has a hack to force gcc-4.5 if you turn on PGO | 22:00 |
chrisccoulson | so i can build it on maverick | 22:00 |
gnomefreak | oh we are building with PGO now? | 22:00 |
chrisccoulson | no | 22:00 |
chrisccoulson | but we will hopefully be this cycle | 22:00 |
gnomefreak | yeah lots of people want it but im not sure what it is but im betting end-user wont notice it | 22:01 |
micahg | gnomefreak: it improves start time | 22:01 |
gnomefreak | oh hell yes :) | 22:01 |
chrisccoulson | hopefully. i will try and do some benchmarks after UDS and see what real win there is for us | 22:01 |
chrisccoulson | i haven't really seen any hard figures about how big a win it is | 22:02 |
gnomefreak | ok ill be back while update is going (only 30 packages or so | 22:02 |
gnomefreak | 28 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. | 22:03 |
gnomefreak | 4 not fully installed or removed. | 22:03 |
gnomefreak | :) | 22:03 |
chrisccoulson | you're using natty already? | 22:03 |
chrisccoulson | i think i'll wait until at least after UDS before upgrading ;) | 22:04 |
* micahg will wait until at least alpha 3, maybe beta if any major changes planned after alpha 3 | 22:06 | |
BUGabundo | guud evening | 22:08 |
* gnomefreak much rather have tb32 but it will be a while | 22:10 | |
micahg | gnomefreak: after UDS, I hope to get 3.2 and 3.3 dailies going | 22:11 |
gnomefreak | there used to be a term that allowed me to fold it | 22:11 |
* gnomefreak looking for screenshot | 22:18 | |
BUGabundo | fta: LOL LP fail... it show indiviual mails | 22:32 |
fta | BUGabundo, ? | 23:04 |
BUGabundo | the mail I sent to gwibber team | 23:05 |
fta | oh, i see. | 23:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!