=== jibouman` is now known as jiboumans === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk [03:09] If someone can confirm, we're having a meeting tomorrow. Among the agenda, my application for membership. I am expected to be here when the meeting commences at 1700 PST (21 of Oct). === ecanto is now known as ecanto_ === ecanto_ is now known as ecanto === jarlen_ is now known as jarlen [13:00] Hey, thorwil. Do you know if we're meeting this week? [13:01] godbyk: theoretically it happens every week. practically i never know in advance ;) [13:01] thorwil: Yeah, that's how it goes here, too. [13:02] godbyk: since uds is at the door, i wonder if mpt said something ... he's not online [13:02] thorwil: I'm not sure. I was under the impression last week that we'd have a regular meeting today. [13:02] hi JanC [13:03] (Seeing as how I was assigned homework and all.) [13:03] vish [13:05] hi all... [13:06] Hey, aday [13:06] anything on the agenda? [13:08] so iva-not-highlighting-vanka said: "we are in Orlando. I think he thinks the meeting is at 9am our time which is in an hour", referring to mpt [13:08] aday: Good question. I just emailed the ayatana-ux list with the usability testing script introduction thing I was tasked with writing. [13:08] thorwil: aha. well, he's off by an hour. :-) [13:09] have you guys seen http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/design-center/ ? [13:09] godbyk: ah cool - i'll look at that. where is it going to live when it's done? [13:09] doctormo took matters in his hands [13:09] aday: Good question. [13:10] https://code.launchpad.net/~doctormo/erato/trunk [13:10] https://launchpad.net/erato [13:10] hi andreasn [13:11] godbyk: i'd like to be able to at least link to it from the gnome usability pages [13:11] thorwil: Do you distinguish between artwork and, say, UI mockups? [13:12] andreasn: i'd prioritize eating, as mpt is not there (perhaps off by 1 hour in orlando) [13:12] aday: There's a copy in my public dropbox you can link to if you like: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5067756/usability-testing-script.pdf [13:12] so meet back in one hour? [13:12] godbyk: yes and no. it's all design assets [13:13] andreasn: can do [13:13] cool [13:13] later! [13:14] andreasn: see ya [13:14] thorwil: I see. [13:14] thorwil: why not use/contribute to design hub? seems like they're trying to do the same thing, or am i missing something? [13:15] brb [13:15] godbyk: everyone else in the team seems to see the needs of ubuntu-artwork first, but there have been no objections to my proposal to make it neutral [13:17] yes, anyway, back in a bit [13:17] aday: yes to some degree. but mairin's mockups already include details i don't agree on. aside of that, i can't steer the project on that level, now doctormo started development of a minimalistic first implementation and got others in [13:18] arg [13:20] heh. don't ya hate that? :) [13:21] What aspects of Mairin's designs do you disagree with? [13:23] godbyk: mainly the simple up/down voting [13:23] Hey, wers-android. [13:23] lol [13:24] [13:25] thorwil: Do you have another voting scheme in mind? Would up/down voting that requires comments/constructive criticism/critiques be better? Or do you not want voting at all? [13:25] wers? [13:25] wassup? [13:25] godbyk, hello [13:25] hey, there you are. :) [13:25] hehe [13:25] so has the meeting started? [13:26] wers: yes and no. we think mpt may arrive in half an hour or so, but it's unclear. [13:26] ooh ok [13:26] a couple others were hear, but they're eating now. [13:26] godbyk: i've been thinking about a "how well does this asset meet the briefing?" [13:26] so thorwil and I are just shooting the breeze. [13:26] lemme have quick dinner :D [13:26] wers: lol. no problem. [13:26] I'm online on my mobile anyway :D [13:27] thorwil: I like that. Instead of a simple up/down vote, you could have a few parameters with Lickert scales or something. [13:27] i'd like to discuss the UX survey we (GNOME.Asia) are going to conduct. we could do persona research there and some other stuff [13:27] cool === rrittenhouse is now known as rrittenhouse_ === rrittenhouse_ is now known as rrittenhouse [14:21] hi all, anything happening? [14:23] aday, hi [14:23] what's up? [14:23] aday: No activity for quite a while. [14:27] aday: refering to earlier: yes to some degree. but mairin's mockups already include details i don't agree on. aside of that, i can't steer the project on that level, now doctormo started development of a minimalistic first implementation and got others in [14:27] that was to: "why not use/contribute to design hub? seems like they're trying to do the same thing, or am i missing something?" [14:29] thorwil: fair enough. seems like a shame (mainly cos i'd like to see design hub get moving again ;) ) [14:30] aday: it's also that we have 3 people all in favor of django, 2 of them not interested in any other option. designhub is ruby [14:30] on rails, of course [14:31] i figured it might be something like that *sigh* [14:31] aday: mizmo told me designhub is blocked on design/mockup issues. so a designer could step in , perhaps [14:32] thorwil: oh really? a designers tool blocked because of design issues... we're all doomed [14:33] aday: nah, missing design because of mizmo's lack of time [14:34] thorwil: sounds about right === plars_ is now known as plars-actual [15:12] aday ¦ they did try to do it the designhub way.. :) , but django was the main factor and none were familiar with ruby … [15:12] aday ¦ so its better to get it done so how right? ;) [15:12] s/so/some [15:16] vish: sure! there were some pretty clear requirements behind design hub which might not tally with what's being aimed for with this new site [15:16] i want my design site! [15:16] :) === bazhang_ is now known as bazhang